
Ms. Dietsch is certainly no moderate. She supports open borders, opposed to fossil fuels, and thinks the Koch Brothers control New Hampshire. In June of 2020, her elitism and anti-Democratic worldview was on display when she was quoted at a House Education Committe meeting: “this idea of parental choice, that’s great if the parent is well-educated. There are some families that’s perfect for. But to make it available to everyone? No. I think you’re asking for a huge amount of trouble.”
Meet Cenk Uygur host of the Young Turks which was named after a group of Muslims who committed genocide against the Christian Armenians from 1915-1923 where 600,000 to 1.5 million souls including women and children were murdered. Uygur has denied that the Armenian Holocaust happened. He was born in Istanbul, Turkey in 1970, and at the age of eight moved to the United States. As a young man, he was conservative but since then has become a hard leftist. He was raised in a secular Muslim home but now considers himself an agnostic. He harbors a particular contempt for conservative Evangelical Christians.

This Progressive paragon of virtue supports the legalization of bestiality “where the animal is being pleasured” which even surprised his self-loathing, foul-mouthed side-kick Ana Kasparian. In 2019-2020, he ran twice-for California’s 25th Congressional district. The first election was a special election to fill the vacant seat, and the second was the general election. All the left-wing PAC money couldn’t get him a seat in Congress. He initially was endorsed by Bernie Sanders, but ‘The Bern” withdrew his endorsement after learning of Uygur’s racist, sexist, and anti-Semitic comments he has made over the years. He is a 2024 candidate for President of the United States knowing full well that he is Constitutionally unqualified.

(Uygur and Lessig at Harvard 2011)
In September of 2011, I encounter him at an event at Harvard University’s School of Law called A Conference on the Constitutional Convention that was co-hosted by Mark Meckler and leftist Harvard law professor Larry Lessig. Cenk was interviewing Lessig, and they both hoped for a “runaway” Article V convention. I videotaped the conversation. Readers can find that video on Camp Constitution’s YouTube channel. In the wake of the Harvard event, Uygur formed Wolf PAC-a group that is lobbying for an Article V Convention. Mark Meckler followed by forming Convention of States (COS), and Lessig founded the May Day PAC.
The goal of Wolf PAC ostensibly is to hold an Article V Convention to pass an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would end “corporate personhood” and give the federal government more power over elections. They were able to get five states pass Article V applications, but two of the states have wisely rescinded leaving only RI, VT, and CA with extant Wolf PAC resolutions. In the 2016, and 2018, election cycles, Wolf PAC used 80% of its funds for salaries and expenses.
What is an Article V Convention?
Our founders gave us two ways to amend the U.S. Constitution found in Article V of the U.S. Constitution:
“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress…”
While the first method has been used a number of times, the second method where states apply for a convention has never happened and for good reason.
Since its inception, Wolf PAC lobbyists have tried unsuccessfully to get their Article V Resolutions passed in New Hampshire. Convention of States and now Term Limits USA have been collaborating closely with Wolf PAC. COS, which enjoys the support of many well-meaning conservatives, have vociferously denied working with Wolf PAC, but such an alliance was on full display on January 19 at the New Hampshire State House where the House Committee on State and Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs held hearing on HCR 8 and HCR 9.
HCR 8 is a vaguely written resolution, sponsored by Wolf PAC that calls for New Hampshire to pass an application for an Article V Convention to introduce amendments that would end corporate personhood and have free and fair elections-a euphemistic term that, in reality, would give more power to the federal government over elections. The electoral college would also be on the chopping block. HCR 9 is a resolution to rescind New Hampshire’s only application for an Article V–a resolution which I fully support. While an accurate number of extant applications depends on how they are counted, it appears that Congress is looking at those that are similarly worded. We may be just a few states away from the 34 needed.
Despite the wording, a resolution applying for an Article V Convention cannot limit a convention. Supporting amendments that would give the federal government more power over anything should be strongly rejected by conservatives, and any self-respecting person or organization on any side of the political spectrum should have nothing to do with Cenk Uygur. But not in the Granite State where we witnessed the New Hampshire director of COS along with some of its supporters, as well as Mr. Ken Quinn, the out-of-state lobbyist for Term , testifying for the Wolf Pac resolution, and against the resolution to rescind.
Mr. Quinn, who spends a good portion of his time trashing conservatives who oppose his well-funded agenda, harbors a particular hatred of The John Birch Society (JBS), an organization that has done much to thwart his desire for an Article V Convention. He engages in childish antics like superimposing tin foil hats on pictures of JBS leaders. (As an aside, the late New Hampshire Governor Mel Thomson was not only a member of the JBS but served on its national council.) Back in 2016 while Quinn was a lobbyist for COS, its New Hampshire group sent out an E-mail accusing the JBS of bribing State Senator Kevin Avard. This was a bold-faced lie which was exposed by a friend who was receiving unsolicited E-mails from COS. COS has been involved in other dirty tactics around the nation. In South Dakota, State Senator Mark Willardsen returned a $1,000 donation to COS when he learned that COS was running attack ads against his opponent that were “full of half-truths, innuendos and outright lies.” This may explain why COS leadership have a cozy alliance with Cenk Uygur.

Quinn, ostensibly advocating for a limited convention, defended the idea of the need for structural change in the U.S. Constitution. John Adams once quipped that “facts are stubborn things.” If he were around today, he may have added “And so are screen shots:

It is important to point out that the vast majority of the supporters of COS and Term Limits USA are decent and honorable people that would have no part in COS tactics nor ally themselves with Cenk Uygur.
An Article V Convention, which we have never held, cannot be limited to a single amendment or topic. There are no laws guiding a convention, and rules and laws cannot be passed by state legislator. It is the job of Congress under the necessary and proper clause of Article 1, Section 8 to make laws or rules that would guide a convention. While I share many of the concerns that supporters of an Article V Convention, holding a convention and adding amendments to a constitution that is regularly ignored by Congress is not the solution. Readers are asked to contact their state reps urging them to oppose HCR 8 and vote for HCR 9. For those who would like more information on this critical issue, feel free to contact me. My E-mail is campconstitution1@gmail.com
A special thank you to Alex Destino of Gloucester, MA who motivated me to write this article and make the short video embedded below:

About ten years ago, I stopped in a library in Medfield, Massachusetts, a town about 40 miles West and South of Boston. At its book sale, I found “Formation of the Union Under the Constitution” in 1943 which was published to celebrate the Sesquicentenial-150 years of the U.S. Constitution. It was published by the U.S Government Printing Office which was totally controlled by the New Deal Democrats. It is an excellent book that contains the History of the United States detailed information on how the U.S. Constitution was formed, copies, a circular letter from Governor John Hancock expressing his opposition to an Article V Convention, and a chapter of Liberty Documents from the Magna Carta to the Monroe Doctrine. Starting on page 121 of the book, we find a series of questions and answers. One of the most interesting questions in the book is found on page 128: “Where, in the Constitution is there mention of education? And the answer in this New Deal publication: “There is none; education is a matter reserved for the states.”
Since there hasn’t been any amendment added to the Constitution to make federal funding constitutional, the Department of Education, and all funds going to school and colleges are unconstitutional. The Department of Education should be abolished, and all federal government funding of schools must end. Sadly, there isn’t much political will to make this happen. But that can change. Let’s begin by letting elected officials at all levels know that we have a federal document published under a New Deal Democrat Administration that those who vote for and accept federal funds for education are violating their oaths of office.
While the book is out-of-print and there are a limited number of hard back copies available, Camp Constitution makes the book available as a free PDF: https://campconstitution.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/History-of-the-Formation-of-the-Union-Under-the-Constitution.pdf
Here is a short video I made on the subject:
Dear Congressman Steube:

Introduction: One of the most important decisions parents must make is choosing a
school for their child. For most parents, the choice is pretty limited to the public school a child is
assigned to. In some communities, parents do have a choice among schools. But how are parents
to know which school is the best one? What should they look for? What kind of questions should
they ask? This book will help parents evaluate a school so that they can make a decision based on
personal observation and objective information.
Chapter One: Where do we start? First you must find out if the school has a well-articulated philosophy of education that determines what is taught and how it is taught. You must
find out if the school operates within the framework of a mandated reform program assisted by the
federal government, requiring a specific form of curriculum. If this is the case, then the purpose of
the school is to serve the needs of the government rather than the needs of your child. If the
schools in your town are so conducted, then you may want to consider a private school or
homeschooling. Government directed school reforms will be discussed in a later chapter.
Chapter Two: The physical environment. Whether parents know it or not, the
physical environment of a building and classroom can have a positive or negative effect on the
child. The parent must ask: Would I enjoy being in this building or classroom six hours a day, five
days a week, for a whole school year? Is tbe atmosphere in this classroom conducive to learning
or is there too much noise and distraction? Ask for permission to actually sit in a classroom for an
hour or two to see what goes on among the students and how the teacher handles the kids.
The seating arrangement is also important. If the children are seated in rows and the teacher
is the focus of attention in front of the class, then the class will probably be conducted in a
traditional manner. If the children are seated behind little tables grouped together so that they can
openly socialize and do group work then the class will be conducted along “progressive” lines.
Because there is significant difference between the traditional and the progressive models, a
parent should know which model the school has adopted. Some schools try to combine both
models. The school you’re looking at may be one of those.
Chapter Three: The Traditional Model. What is its philosophical basis? The emphasis
is usually on teaching academic skills, maintaining classroom discipline, sometimes having a dress
code, using textbooks, teaching subject matter as separate disci plines. In the kindergarten and
primary grades reading is usually taught with phonics, and arithmetic is learned primarily by rote
memorization. Few public schools today adhere to the traditional model. To find that model,
parents may have to consider private alternatives. The advantage of the traditional model is that
children learn their basics pretty well and student behavior is well controlled.
Chapter Four: The Progressive Model. Most schools today have adopted the
progressive model of education. You will know it the moment you enter a first-grade classroom.
The children will be seated around tables, chatting or working in groups. The walls will be
decorated with all sorts of posters, pictures of animals, etc. The teacher will not be the focus of
attention. She is now a facilitator. Occasionally she will read to a group of kids seated on the floor
and will have a dicussion with them. Her teaching program usually includes whole-language,
invented spelling, the new math, etc. Subject matter will be interdisciplinary. The atmosphere may
seem chaotic, but it is believed that each child is learning on his or her own. The advantage of this
model is its informality and general permissiveness.
Chapter Five: Teachers. When you put a child in a school you are entrusting that child
to a complete stranger. Most parents assume that their child’s teacher is qualified and certified. But
experience, sometimes painful, has taught us that some of today’s teachers may not only be
incompetent, but also immoral. How can parents know what kind of individual is their child’s
teacher? If possible, get background information on the faculty: colleges attended, degrees earned.
If the school does not have such information, you might talk with the teacher and elicit the
information you want in a chatty, friendly, non-threatening way.
Chapter Six: Teaching Reading. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
That certainly applies to the field of reading instruction. Faulty teaching methods can cause reading
problems, and it behooves parents to find out how reading is being taught in the school. This
chapter will explain the various ways reading is being taught, how to evaluate different programs
and what questions to ask. Although educators have declared that the reading war between
phonics and whole language is over, it is doubtful that it really is. Thus, it is most important to
know what to look for in a school’s reading program.
Chapter Seven: Writing and Spelling. You would think that such subjects would be
taught in a way that would virtually satisfy all parents. Unfortunately, that is not the case. One of
the questions most often asked by parents is how to improve an older child’s spelling. More often
than not that child was taught writing by the invented spelling method, which, unfortunately,
creates spelling problems. Again, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If you teach
spelling in a logical, rational way, you can avoid developing bad spelling habits. Also, find out
how your child will be taught to write: cursive first or print first? The proper sequence makes all
the difference.
Chapter Eight: Math. Millions of children emerge from our schools with poor
mathematical skills. Usually the problem can be traced back to the first and second grades and
how the child was taught arithmetic. Again, prevention can guard your child against mathematical
dysfunction. There are good ways and bad ways to teach arithmetic. This chapter will help
parents recognize the good and the bad ways.
Chapter Nine: The new federally mandated curriculum. Most parents are not aware of
the sweeping reforms that are being implemented in schools across the nation. These radical
changes may persuade you to seek alternatives for your children. The new curriculum is the result
of three important pieces of legislation passed by Congress in 1994: Goals 2000; School-to-Work
Opportunities Act; and the Improving America’s Schools Act. It is important for parents to
understand the ramifications of these acts. They are changing the goals of schooling and what
children are to be taught. They also include gathering extensi ve personal data about your child
which will become a permanent record in a federal computer in Washington.
Chapter Ten: Music, Art, and Foreign Language. Most parents want their children to
be exposed to the arts and some study of music. Does the school teach art? Does the school teach
children to play musical instruments? If not, does it at least teach music appreciation? Does the
school have a band or a chorus? Foreign language is another way of expanding a child’s cultural
horizons. Find out what languages the school offers. For some parents, cultural education is an
important way to instill love and appreciation of the arts and reading. It provides nourishment for
the soul. If a school is deficient in this area, you may not want to put your child there.
Chapter Eleven: Computers in the classroom. Is the school technologically up to date?
About the Author
Samuel L. Blumenfeld has written ten books on education, including:
The New Illiterates
How to Tutor
Alpha-Phonics: A Primer for Beginning Readers
Homeschooling: A Parents Guide to Teaching Children
He is considered one of the world’s top authorities on reading.
He has lectured in all fifty states as well as in Canada, Australia,
and New Zealand.
He is very well known among homeschoolers and has spoken at many
homeschool conventions over the last fifteen years.
Dr. Blumenfeld also edited The Blumenfeld Education Letter for ten
years, keeping a close watch on the growing illiteracy problem.
He presently is a columnist for World Net Daily and several other
internet websites and writes regularly for Practical Homeschooling.
Prior to becoming a full-time writer, Dr. Blumenfeld was an editor
in the book publishing industry in New York.
He worked at Rinehart & Company, The Viking Press, The World
Publishing Company, and Grosset & Dunlap.
He decided to write this book after reading an article about Tom
Cruise’s struggle to learn to read. Tom says:
“When I was about 7 years old, I had been labeled dyslexic. I’d try to
concentrate on what I was reading, then I’d get to the end of the page
and have very little memory of anything I’d read. I would go blank,
feel anxious, nervous, bored, frustrated, dUlTlb. I would get angry. My
legs would actually hurt when I was studying. My head ached. All
through school and well into my career, I felt like I had a secret.”
Tom was a victim of the faulty teaching methods in his school. Had
his parents known how he was being taught at school, his years of
agony and failure could have been avoided.

The Blumenfeld Archives
Our good friend and Camp Constitution instructor Professor Willie Soon was interviewed by Tucker Carlson. A link to the interview on X: https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1744777758507504061
At about 46:58, Professor Soon promotes Camp Constitution. We have been blessed by having Professor Soon and his family attend and teach at our week-long family camp since 2017. Here is a link to a YouTube playlist of Professor Soon’s classes at our camp:
https://studio.youtube.com/playlist/PL7jnzBzBiNYDpYp8KORgRjO5tIsDsjyh-/videos

Camp Constitution has an on-line shop where we offer books, yard signs, pins, and bumper stickers. Here is a sample of some of the items in the shop:
We just added a Ten Commandments Yard Sign:
https://campconstitution.net/product/ten-commandments-yard-sign/

Teach your children how to read using phonics or encourage members of your church, friends, neighbors and extended family members to use phonics by getting a copy of Sam Blumenfeld’s “Alpha-Phonics:
https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-by-sam-blumenfeld/

A Camp Constitution Press reprint of a 1958 book written by a former black communist with a foreword by Rev. Steve Craft, Camp Constitution’s chaplain. If you want to understand what is happening today it is important to understand what happened a generation ago. The names change but the plan is the same:
https://campconstitution.net/product/color-communism-and-common-sense-by-manning-johnson/

A first edition paperback on the classic None Dare Call It Conspiracy: https://campconstitution.net/product/none-dare-call-it-conspiracy-paperback-1st-edition/
This came out in a time when it was “unfashionable to acknowledge that there was a Deep State.

While Communist China may own many American politicians, there were many in the Unted States that helped the communists take over China. This book tells the story: https://campconstitution.net/product/again-may-god-forgive-us-2/

These are just a sampling of the many items available from our on-line shop. All proceeds from the sale of the books and other items goes to support Camp Constitution.
|
A link to an audio presentation: https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2024-01-01T10_03_25-08_00
Camp Constitution’s most popular video for 2023 is Dan Smoot’s “A Republic Not A Democracy” a film clip just under eleven minutes long We received close to 33,000 views and gained over 500 new subscribers. Dan Smoot, authored several books including The Invisible Government-one of the first books exposing the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, and The Business End of Government and his autobiography People Along The Way- copies of the later are available from our on-line shop: https://campconstitution.net/shop/?product-page=1 He also hosted “The Dan Smoot Report” which aired on a number of T. V. stations. This video is from one of his “Dan Smoot Report” programs.
Please view, share this video and others from our channel, and become a subscriber.
I have a YouTube channel- Hal Shurtleff- which I seldom use. It only has45 subscribers. Yesterday, I got word that my video of Ezola Foster on that channel received 500 views in less than a day. And, today, December 29, 2024, our friend and instructor Professor Willie Soon sent me a link to another video of Ezola Foster. So, I reposted her October 1997 speech which we hosted at the Endicott Estate in Dedham, MA on Camp Constitution’s YouTube channel. Dr. Mildred Jefferson introduced her, but her comments weren’t recorded. Ezola was Pat Buchanan’s running mate in the2000 Presidental election. She authored What’s Right for All Americans. The book She passed way in 2018.
Ezola was the featured instructor at a camp I managed in Rindge, NH Summer of 1997.