The Weekly Sam: The Dumbing Down of America’s Children

Sam Blumenfeld conducted this lecture in 1994:  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2021-01-16T15_48_45-08_00 but he was aware of the deliberately dumbing down of our nation’s children since the early 1960s.

Please visit the Sam Blumenfeld Archives, and share this excellent resource far and wide  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

 

 

Camp Constitution’s 13th Annual Family Camp July 18-23. Applications Being Accepted

We are pleased to announce that we are  taking applications for our 13th annual family camp which runs from Sunday July 18 to Friday July 23.  This year’s camp returns to the Singing Hills Christian Camp and Conference Center in Plainfield, NH  https://www.singinghills.net/.    Instructors include author and journalist Alex Newman; Attorney Jonathan Alexandre of Liberty Council; Debbie Bacigalupi, an expert on Agenda 21; atmospheric scientist, Professor Willie Soon; Constitutional expert, Mrs.  Catherine; Rev. Steve Craft, and Pastor David Whitney of the Institute on the Constitution https://theamericanview.com/.   Returning to run the Junior Patriot program is Mrs. Edith Craft.  In addition to the classes, attendees have recreation opportunities which include swimming, marksmanship, basketball, volleyball, chess tournaments, martial arts, campfire, hiking and a field trip to the Calvin Coolidge Homestead in nearby Plymouth, VT, and plenty of good, wholesome fun.

Our family camp is open to entire families, unaccompanied minors from 12 to 17, and adults- staff and non-staff.  The cost for campers 13 and older and non-staff adults is $300.  Camper 4-12- $200.  Children three and under- free-must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. Staffers $250.   A $50.  “Early Bird” discount is available for each tuition for those who register by June 1.   The tuition includes lodging, meals, and materials. We encourage early registrations to insure availability.   Over the past few years, we used an on-line registration application that many people had trouble using.  This year,  we are using a simple two page downloadable form:    https://campconstitution.net/camp-registration/  Fill it out, make a copy  with a check payable  out to Camp Constitution  and send   it to Mr. Charlie Everett by E-mail  halleckeverett@gmail.com or by mail:   5945 Quail Hollow Road, Unit D Charlotte, NC 28210-5028.   Payments may also be made via our PayPal account accessed from our website’s home page https://campconstitution.net/.  Not able to attend camp but would love to help send a worthy young person or family to camp?  Please consider donating.   For questions or more information, please feel free to contact me by phone:  857-498-1309 or E-mail campconstitution1@gmail.com.    A link to our classes and activities from our 2020 camp:  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7jnzBzBiNYDOAZbrVE4kD1jNlhxScPmH

 

Hal Shurtleff, Director  Camp Constitution

 

The Weekly Sam: Why the Federal Government Should Get Out of Education

Why the Federal Government Should Get Out of Education

By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

The real issue is Limited Government versus Unlimited Government

Most Americans want less government, smaller government and lower taxes. The only way to accomplish this is by abolishing federal departments and bureaucracies. As far back as the Reagan administration, Republicans promised to abolish the Department ofEducation. They couldn’t do it then because they lacked a majority in Congress. But whatever happened to the plan to abolish the Department of Education when Republicans became the majority? Not only did they forget their promise, but in September 1996 they passed the single largest increase in federal education funding: $3.5 billion. Who were the Republicans trying to impress? The National Education Association?

The basic question is: Can good education be provided in the U.S. without the help or intrusion of the federal government? The answer is clearly yes. In fact, there is ample evidence indicating that the present decline in educational quality is a direct result offederal funding which has been used by the educators to fund more and more expensive educational malpractice.

A little historical background will help us understand why the federal role in education in America is more of an aberration than a natural development. There is no mention of education in the U.S. Constitution. However, in 1785 and 1787, while the United States were still under the Articles of Confederation, the Continental Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance Acts which provided for the orderly settlement of the Northwest Territory and encouraged the establishment of schools in the territory by stating: “Religion, morality and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall be encouraged.” The new states were required to set aside the 16th section of each township to be used for educational purposes. But there was no requirement that the schools be government owned and operated.

Seventy-five years later, in 1862, Congress passed and President Lincoln signed the Morrill Land Grant Act providing each loyal state with 30,000 acres of land for each Senator and Representative, the land to be used for agricultural and mechanical schools under a measure proposed by Senator Justin S. Morrill of Vermont. Five years later, in

1867, a federal Office of Education was established. Its purpose was:

“To collect such statistics and facts as shall show the condition and progress of education in the several States and Territories, and to diffuse such information respecting the organization and management of schools and school systems, and methods of teaching as shall aid the People of

the United States in the establishment and maintenance of efficient school systems, and otherwise promote the cause of education throughout the country.”

It should be noted that the National Education Association had been founded ten years earlier in 1857 and that its members called for the establishment of a federal department of education at the founding convention. And it is obvious that in that statement of purpose was an expansionist view of the government’s future role in education.

After World War I, the NEA began a long range campaign to get federal aid for public education. From 1867 to 1940–a period of 73 years–the Congress passed about 11 minor pieces of legislation related to education. The fear of federal control of schools kept most legislators from voting for federal aid to public education. But resistance was gradually broken down by such acts as the National School Lunch Act of 1946, the School Milk Program Act of 1954.

But it was the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 passed during the Johnson administration which opened the floodgates of the U.S. Treasury for the benefit of the education establishment. From 1965 to 1983–18 years–there were 43 education acts passed by the Congress, including the establishment in 1979 of a U.S. Department of Education with cabinet status. In the year 1994 alone, there were about 180 educational restructuring bills before Congress! The three most important bills enacted were the Goals 2000 Act, the School-to-Work Opportunities Act, and the Improving America’s Schools Act, a reauthorization of the ESEA of 1965. All of this legislation was passed with much Republican help. In short, the Congress launched an avalanche ofbills which virtually amounted to a cultural revolution.

It seemed as if all restraints had been removed on government expansion and intrusion into education, and the Republican Congress did nothing to reverse the trend. That is why the federal government has become a government of unlimited power.

We must return to the principle of limited government if we wish to reduce the cost of government and its unwarranted intrusion in the education of our children. A limited federal government does only those things that cannot be done by the states or the private sector. The purpose of taxes is to pay for government not change society.

There is no doubt that the federal intrusion in education has harmed education and produced the dumbing down effect. Test scores attest to this bizarre phenomenon. Since 1962, SAT verbal scores have declined despite billions offederal dollars pumped into public education. In September 1993, the U.S. Department of Education revealed that some 90 million adult Americans have grossly inadequate reading and writing skills, despite compulsory school attendance. The more federal money Congress pumps into education the worse it gets. Why? Because educational malpractice is very expensive, and without federal funding we’d have much less of it.

The simple truth is that federal education programs cost the taxpayers billions of dollars and not one of these programs has actually improved education. Claims have been made that Headstart is a successful program. But research indicates that whatever gains children make in Headstart are lost by the third grade.

Federal education grants subsidize a liberal academic elite with its secular humanist, socialist agenda, thus violating the Constitutional prohibition against establishing a state religion: Humanism.

The Data Collection System of the National Center for Education Statistics threatens family privacy and freedom. Children are not a “national resource” to be monitored and controlled for use by the state or industry. They are individuals whose lives belong to themselves, not to “the economy.”

The federal government has institutionalized educational malpractice by supporting unsound educational theories and practices which have found their way into the public schools via the federally funded National Diffusion Network. Federal aid to public education simply reinforces a socialist, government owned and operated education system which distorts market values and encourages monopoly union practices.

Meanwhile, the education establishment continues to grow and prosper. In 1982, the average public school teacher’s salary was $19,274. In 1995 it was up to $37,643., and in 2008 it us up to $47,602. In 1982, per pupil expenditure was $2,726. In 1995-96 the national average was up to $6,213, and in 2009 it was up to $9,963. In 1984, total expenditure for public education was $134.5 billion. In 2002 it had risen to $420 billion.

In short, never has public education been more generously supported by the taxpayer and never have our schools seen more violence, academic disarray, and parental dissatisfaction than the present. What is even more shocking is that over four million students must be drugged daily with Ritalin in order to be able to attend class.

Today, well-connected change agents like Mark Tucker are busy imposing on America the new Human Resources Development System, exuberantly described by Tucker in an 18-page letter to Hillary Clinton when her husband was elected President. Tucker described his system as “a seamless web of opportunities to develop one’s skills that literally extends from cradle to grave and is the same system for everyone–young and old, poor and rich, worker and full-time student.”

And so, in place of academic excellence, we have Outcome Based Education, Whole Language, Multiculturalism, Skinnerian Mastery Learning, National Teaching Standards and Certification, School-Based Clinics, Attitude Assessments, Global Citizenship, and Socialized Medicine for every student.

What is actually taking place is a cultural revolution engineered by behavioral psychologists, humanist educators, and socialist change agents using a whole galaxy of education programs to implement their agenda, financed by the federal government.

(This article written in 2003 is from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives.  Please visit and sign up for the archives  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Lexington, MA Historical Society Embraces Black Lives Matter-Rev. Steve Craft Interviewed on the subject

Recently, I visited Lexington Center (MA) and noticed a Black Lives Matter banner hanging in front of the Lexington  (MA) Historic Society.   I decided to contact the society and below is an E-mail exchange I had with its director:

“Dear Folks:

While I was on my morning walk. I noticed a “Black Lives Matter” banner over your entrance. While, of course, black lives matter, the organization Black Lives Matter, is a militant, violent anti-American organization whose founders proudly exclaim that they are Marxists and have a hatred for Western Civilization, the United States, and its history. They even defaced the 54th Regiment monument that stands across the Massachusetts State House and destroyed a Frederick Douglas statue in New York.

The Lexington Historic Society is a fine organization that does an excellent job promoting the contributions and sacrifices made by Black Americans. It has no need to virtue signal or support an organization whose members would gladly tear down the statues and monuments in Lexington.

Hal Shurtleff

Dear Mr. Shurtleff,

Thanks for reaching out to us and sharing your thoughts. Back in June, we made a statement that we would commit to being anti-racist.

“Due to recent events, we have come to realize how much more we need to do to be actively anti-racist within our organization. The Society pledges to redouble our efforts to be anti-racist, to work with our members and peers to dismantle white privilege, and to disavow white supremacist ideology.” Please read our full statement here. https://www.lexingtonhistory.org/uploads/6/5/2/1/6521332/lexington_historical_society_statement_on_racial_equity_6.8.2020.pdf

By displaying a Black Lives Matter banner, we are taking one small step towards the promise we made in June and proclaiming that we will no longer tolerate white supremacy and racism. We are not alone in this; we are in the company of thousands of people and organizations around the country, including many in Lexington, who support the Black Lives Matter movement. We are proud to display the banner, and will continue to do so.

Happy holidays. Erica”

Dear Erica:

Thank you for your response. I am surprised to learn that the Lexington Historic Society is full of racists and white supremacists. While I realize that many white progressives are racist, and living in Lexington with a Black population of 1.5 % is evidence of the racism of its residents, I don’t understand how hanging a banner of a racist, Black Supremacist organization whose members have committed acts of violence against those in the Black Community, will somehow solve your organization and the Town of Lexington’s racism. white privilege, and white supremacy.

I am sure that NPR and CNN didn’t report this story, but the leader of the Boston Chapter of Black Lives Matter, Monica Cannon-Grant, engaged in a racist attack against a Black woman who is married to a white man and has interracial children: https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/07/22/black-republican-whose-interracial-marriage-was-slammed-by-ayanna-pressley-supporter-says-she-seeks-apology-gets-none/ Rayla is a friend.

More recently, another Boston Black Lives Matter leader, honored by the Red Sox, was arrested for punching an 80 year-old woman: https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/black-lives-matter-hero-who-was-honored-by-the-red-sox-arrested-for-punching-80-year-old-woman/ You can find hundreds of such incidents of Black Lives Matter members engaging in violent activities all over the U.S. Will the Lexington Historic Society condemn the violence of Black Lives Matter?

While misguided white progressives may look upon your BLM banner with pride, many, especially those who live in the black community see it as a sign that your organization supports violence and mayhem. I will leave you with a short video of my friend Bebe Reid from Harlem who confronted a group of privileged white progressive women on Lexington Green: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGEzfHHz3GA&feature=youtu.be

It has been almost a week and no reply from Erica since then.

Hal Shurtleff

Here is a short video I did in front of the Lexington Historical Society with Rev. Steve Craft

 

 

What the Constitution REQUIRES Congress to do on January 6, 2021

by Publius Huldah
January 4, 2021
Re-blogged from renewamerica and News With Views.

  1. The Rule of Law is being erased in our Land
    Several years ago, I saw a movie on TV. The setting was Berlin, Germany just after WWII at the time the
    Soviets were laying roles of barbed wire on the ground to mark the border between East and West Berlin.The main characters were a young American woman and a young German man. He had gotten a law degree while Hitler was taking over Germany; but he never practiced law. She asked him why and he said, “The Law disappeared”.

    And that’s what’s going on in our Country: The Law – as the standard which those in government must obey – has disappeared and is being replaced by the age-old system where those with the power do what they want, and the cowards go along with it.

    Just as the cowards in Germany went along with Hitler; cowards in America are going along with the Left’s brazen theft of the recent election. Countries are destroyed by such cowards; and that may be the reason Revelation 21:8 lists cowards as the first to be thrown into the Lake of Fire: Tyrants couldn’t get to first base without the acquiescence of cowards.

    So this paper calls upon each Member of Congress to rise up and restore the Rule of Law to our Land.[1] Knowledge of Truth – and the Love of Truth – makes us strong. So learn the Truth, embrace it, and restore the Rule of Law.

  2. We must read each Part of the Constitution in the Light cast by the other Parts
    It is impossible to understand any Part of the Constitution without understanding how that Part fits into the
    Whole; and how each individual Part is affected by the other Parts addressing the same subject. Accordingly, it is an ancient rule of construction that constitutional provisions or statutes that are on the same subject (in pari materia) must be construed together [link].So it is a serious misconstruction of the 12th Amendment to assert that Congress’s role on January 6 is the
    passive one of merely counting numbers; or that the Presiding Officer has discretion to do whatever he
    wants.

    As shown below, specific provisions of the Constitution impose on Congress the Duty to determine whether the Electors were lawfully chosen; and whether the putative President elect and Vice-President elect are qualified for office.

  3. When it meets on January 6, Congress must enforce these Constitutional provisions respecting the Appointment of Electors: Article I, §4, clause 1; Article II, §1, clause 2; and Article II, §1, clause 4Art. I, §4, cl. 1 says that only state and federal legislatures have the power to make laws addressing the Times, Places and Manner of conducting federal elections. So Judges and State executive officials have no lawful authority to change the election laws made by the Legislatures!

    Art. II, §1, cl. 2 says that the Electors for President and Vice-President are to be appointed in such manner as the State Legislatures shall direct. So Judges and State executive officials have no lawful authority to change the election laws respecting how the Electors are to be chosen!

    So Electors who were appointed in violation of these two provisions were unlawfully appointed and hence are not legally competent to cast votes for President and Vice President.

    Art. II, §1, cl. 4 provides that Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors. At 3 USC §1, Congress set the time for chusing Electors for November 3. So Electors who were appointed after November 3 by means of late ballots (which was made possible by unconstitutional changes to state election laws which unlawfully extended the deadlines for receiving ballots past Nov. 3) were unlawfully appointed and hence are not legally competent to cast votes for President and Vice President.[2]

  4. Congress must also enforce these Constitutional provisions respecting the qualifications for the Offices of President and Vice-President Article II, §1, clause 5Art. II, §1, cl. 5 sets forth qualifications for the Office of President. After our first generation of Presidents [who were all born as subjects of the King of England] had passed away; the qualifications for President are that he must be a “natural born citizen”, at least 35 years of age, and have been for at least 14 Years a Resident within the United States.

    The last sentence of the 12th Amendment shows that no person who is ineligible to be President is eligible to be Vice-President.[3]

    The 22nd Amendment

    The 22nd Amendment imposes term limits on the office of President. So any person who has already served two terms is constitutionally ineligible to be President.

    The 20th Amendment, §3

    §3 of the 20th Amendment addresses what happens when the President elect and/or Vice-President elect “fail to qualify”. So §3 underlines Art. II, §1, cl. 5; the last sentence of the 12th Amendment; and the 22nd Amendment: If the President elect or the Vice-President elect “fail to qualify”, they are to be passed over.

    So! The Constitutional scheme is that the Electors’ choice is subject to Congress’ determinations of:

    • whether the requirements of Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl.2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4 were obeyed when the Electors were selected; and
    • whether the persons whom the Electors chose meet the requirements of Art. II, §1, cl. 5; the last sentence of the 12th Amendment, and the term limits provision of the 22nd Amendment.If not, Congress must disqualify the persons.
  5. Congress is also bound by these Constitutional provisions The Guaranty clause at Article IV, §4Art. IV, § 4 says:
    “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…” [emphasis added]

    Since the essence of a “Republic” is that power is exercised by Representatives elected by The People;[4] the violations of Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; and Art. II, §1, cl.4 (which made massive election fraud possible) strike at the heart of our Constitutional Republic.

    When Electors are selected in violation of our Constitution by means of last minutes changes unlawfully made to state election laws; and/or an election is stolen by means of fraud, the Right of The People to choose their Representatives is taken away from them – and the Republic is destroyed.

    Art. IV, §4 imposes on Congress the Duty to guarantee lawful and honest federal elections. Congress can do this by enforcing Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl.2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4 by disqualifying the Electors chosen in contravention of those provisions.

    Congress may (and should) also disqualify Biden and Harris on the additional ground that their pretended election was procured by cheating. They must be stripped of their sham “win”.[5]

    The Supremacy clause at Article VI, cl. 2

    Art. VI, cl. 2 says:
    “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme Law of the Land…” [italics added]

    Only those Acts of Congress which are consistent with the Constitution are part of the supreme Law of the Land.[6]

    Accordingly, Sections 5 and 15 of the Electoral Count Act (3 USC §§1-21), are unconstitutional to the extent they purport to:

    • require Congress to accept slates of Electors who were appointed in violation of Art. I, §4, cl.1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4;
    • require Congress, in the case of dueling slates of Electors, to choose the slate signed by the Governor of the State and reject the slate approved by the State Legislature;[7]
    • and eliminate the 12th Amendment’s dispute resolution procedures under which the House of Representatives chooses the President; and the Senate chooses the Vice-President.[8]

But, contrary to what some have asserted, the 12th Amendment most manifestly does NOT vest exclusive authority and sole discretion in the President of the Senate (Vice-President Mike Pence) to determine which slates of Electors for a State are to be counted and which slates are to be rejected!

As President of the Senate, the Vice-President has certain Parliamentary powers at his disposal; but he has no “discretion” in deciding whether he will adhere to the Constitutional framework governing the Election. He – and every other Member of Congress – must adhere to and enforce each Constitutional provision.

The Oath of Office at Article VI, cl. 3

Every Member of Congress is bound by Oath or Affirmation to support our Constitution. On January 6, you
must lay aside all personal considerations. Do your DUTY as set forth in the Constitution. And remember:
This isn’t about Trump – this is about whether our Republic is to survive. If you permit violations of the
Constitution and the resulting fraud to prevail; you will destroy our Republic.

  1. Our Constitution sets up an elegant system of checks and balances
    One of the benefits of the “separation of powers” Principle is that it provides a mechanism for one power to
    correct violations made by another power. Within the federal and State governments, powers are divided into three Branches: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Each Branch has the duty to “check” the violations of the other Branches.Likewise, the power of the State governments is separated from the power of the federal government. When people within State governments violate the Constitution – as was done in the recent election – it is the Duty of the federal government to “check” the violation. Since Electors were chosen in violation of the Constitution; Congress has the Duty to check the violations and reject those Electors.

Endnotes:
[1] The term, “rule of law”, is defined here at Point 7.
[2] The same Principle applies to Electors who were chosen before Nov. 3 pursuant to [unconstitutional] state
election laws which permit early voting for selection of Electors.
[3] It appears that at the time Kamala Harris was born, her parents were not US Citizens. If so, she is constitutionally ineligible to be President or Vice-President [link]. Congress has the Duty to inquire into this
matter; and if they find that she is not a “natural born citizen” within the original intent of Art. II, §1, cl.5, it is
Congress’ Duty to disqualify her. Congress is the body which is charged with determining the eligibility
of the President and Vice-President
[link].
[4] Federalist No. 10 (J. Madison): “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of
representation takes place, … *** … The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic
are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; …”
[5] If you win a medal at the Olympics; and it’s later discovered that you cheated by taking performance enhancing drugs, you will be stripped of “win” and medal – and both will be awarded to your runner-up. The same Principle applies to stolen elections.
[6] Federalist No. 78, 10th para (A. Hamilton): “…every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of
the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the
Constitution, can be valid.
To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that
the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves;
….” [emphasis mine]
[7] Art. II, §1, cl. 2 provides that the State Legislatures have the power to direct how the Electors are to be
appointed! The State Governor has no constitutional power whatsoever in the selection of Presidential
Electors!

[8] To the same effect, see the Complaint recently filed by US Representative Louie Gohmert [link].
© Publius Huldah

The Weekly Sam: Attention Deficit Disorder is Created in the Classroom

In this presentation, Sam Blumenfeld makes the case that Attention Deficit Disorder is created in the classroom and promoted by Big Pharma:  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2021-01-02T05_04_56-08_00

This audio presentation can also be found at the Blumenfeld Archives:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Help us spread the late Sam Blumenfeld’s message.  Consider making a donation to Camp Constitution.  Donations can be made via our PayPal account accessed from  website’s homepage  http://www.campconstitutiom.net

 

 

The Weekly Sam: Phonics and the History of Reading

In this lecture, Sam Blumenfeld discusses the history of reading, the need to use phonics to teach reading and how the “educators” are dumbing down America’s school children using the look-say method:

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2020-12-27T04_30_03-08_00

This audio is from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives-a free on-line resource:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Please consider a donation to help us reach more people with this important resource.  Donations may be made via PayPal account accessed from our website’s homepage https://www.campconstitution.net

 

Christmas Under Fire by Dr. Peter Hammond

 

Massachusetts Citizens Deserve Fair Elections By Kathy Lynch

Massachusetts Citizens Deserve Fair Elections

By Kathy Lynch

Republican State Committeewoman

Westford, Lowell, Tyngsboro, Pepperell, Groton, and Dunstable

 Some people claim that Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential election while others claim Trump won in a landslide. The truth of the matter is, until all legal votes are counted and certified, in all states, we will not be able to claim a legal winner. Battleground states of Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Georgia, are being contested and are not yet certified.

 One thing is certain, though. This election has brought election integrity to the forefront. Attorney Sydney Powell has compiled a long and growing list of evidence of voter fraud at https://hereistheevidence.com. In a television interview, she equated the amount of evidence coming forth like “drinking from a firehose.”

 Examples of voter fraud include fraudulent voter registrations, deceased voters, ballots cast in the name of others without consent, ballots mailed without request, counting ballots more than once, ballots magically appearing in new-found boxes, and so much more. 

 Now is the time to fix this appalling situation or never trust an election again!

How can we fix this? Here is a start:

  1. Reserve mail-in voting only in rare circumstances such as for overseas military who cannot vote in person. Offering mail-in voting to the masses will, as we have seen, increase voter fraud.
  2. Require voter ID. This should be a no-brainer. By doing so, you ensure one citizen, one vote. For those rare mail-in votes, signatures should be verified.
  3. Don’t make it easier for illegal immigrants to vote through slippery-slope legislation like drivers’ licenses for illegal immigrants.
  4. Increase the number of poll workers and watchers, with all political parties represented.
  5. Use paper ballots instead of electronic ballots. Voting systems like Dominion have been proven to be programmable or hackable to favor certain candidates.

 While we await the final election results for the 2020 Presidential Race, let us take this opportunity to investigate and ensure that all future elections will be conducted with fair election procedures, as listed above, that produce honest results we can trust. 

 Now is the time to connect with fellow citizens who want fair elections. Email ElectionIntegrityNow@protonmail.com. Visit and Like https://www.facebook.com/ElectionIntegrityNow for events, articles, photos and commentary.

 Our lives are greatly affected by laws made by our elected leaders. Let us make sure that those leaders are the ones we truly elect through fair and honest elections.