Defend our Constitution From All Enemies, both Foreign and Domestic
“You will never know how much it has cost my generation
to preserve your freedom.
I hope you will make good use of it.”
— John Adams, 220 years ago
The world still believes in the American experiment in self-governance. The Davos oligarchs [World Economic Forum] have demonstrated their gross incompetence to all the world over the last 2 years. They have neither right nor ability to govern America and Americans. We are a free people. And we have governed ourselves for almost 250 years now based on a Constitution developed by self-reliant farmers, tradesmen, shop owners, and landholders. These forefathers rejected a foreign monarchy and oligarchy and instead created and fought for a political structure which remains an inspiration for the world… a shining city on the hill…This is OUR country. We own this amazing gift. But we must defend it if we wish to keep it.– Dr. Robert Malone speech at the DC Rally on Jan 23, 2022, 10 days ago
Our Founding Fathers gave their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to ensure the blessings of liberty for countless generations.
The Elite oligarchs are sacrificing other people’s lives in medical genocide, obliterating other people’s fortunes while amassing unimaginable wealth for themselves. They have no integrity, no honor, and do conspire to enslave humanity under the chains of tyranny for countless generations.
Standing between We the People and tyranny is the United States Constitution that protects us.
If we protect her.
Prov 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
This article is about that very battle. PLEASE make the time to read this and watch the video for the sake of our Constitution. I’m not going to lie to you, this will take less than 2 hrs of your time to read and watch everything. Where do you rate a mere 2 hrs with the sacrifices of our Founding Fathers? Please prioritize this. Time is of the essence. We are possibly only two states away.
Constitutional Conventions movements are raging in their dangerous deception and passage all across America (there are several types of convention movements: Article V, COS, BBA, USTL, SCOTUS 9, etc). One of those Convention applications, COS, passed last Tuesday in WI by only ONE vote and will be sent to Congress. Friday it passed in Nebraska as well (on the bright side, these particular states already have other convention applications into Congress, so they aren’t a new win. Rescind them all together).
The convention movement takes advantage of good people who are rightly frustrated with federal overreach to make them feel they are doing something to save our Country. As for the legislators, there are some who just vote along party lines and don’t read the Constitution (for shame), but there are others who are really drunk with promised power/positions/control at Convention, compliments of the lobbyists. The snake oil salesman (aka lobbyists) use flagrant flattery and outright lies to do that, and they also hoodwink the voters (because they have to have a “grassroots” constituent base to convince some legislators to vote in favor of convention). Here are only 3 of the many lies (COS is one of the Convention movements to use as an example) you may have heard presented as truth:
Lobbyist Lie #1
“When we get to a Convention of States, Congress will be forced to obey our amendments and we will limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.”
TRUTH:
I find this one SHOULD be a hard sell. If we think about it for 2 seconds we say “Yeah, right. They aren’t obeying the Constitution that ALREADY limits the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.”
Our 11 yr old child once asked the legislature in a public hearing if the convention was going to sprinkle magic dust to make Congress obey their new amendments? They didn’t answer.
Seriously, there should be no convention movement on that point alone, because even if it wasn’t dangerous, it won’t work.
Lobbyist Lie #2
“Convention of States”
TRUTH:
Terminology is very important, it deceptively implies the States have power in Convention. How far would the COS movement have gotten if they called it what it really is, “Convention of Congress”? (keep reading and all will be explained)
Lobbyist Lie #3
“The Founders placed STATE POWER in Article 5 to use the Constitution to save the Constitution”.
TRUTH:
The Founders placed state power in Article 6 and the 10th Amendment (nullification, where states ignore or resist unconstitutional federal dictates, which automatically and quickly reins in the power and jurisdiction of the federal government). We’ve recently seen some great states nullifying against unconstitutional federal mandates.
The Founders most certainly DID NOT place state power in Article 5 with a Convention of Congress. That’s where states will lose their power — and our Constitution.
Why would the convention lobbyists intentionally LIE to their followers about where the Founders placed state power?
Why did Hitler lie that the Jews were a health hazard to the rest of the country? Why does Fauci lie?
Because they have something sinister to gain by deception.
Let’s keep reading…
—————————————
The lobbyists shysters also use something called “The Power of First Impressions”.
In general, people will be either wary or susceptible to a false leader’s sales pitch. Depending on a person’s prior knowledge of the source document — whether it is the Bible for a religious group, or the Constitution for a political group (both of which are rarely – if ever – taught in government schools and this is one of the consequences) — that person will either recognize the lie as a lie – or accept it as their truth. If a follower embraces the lie as truth, it is difficult, even when showing him the truth in black and white (like Article V in the Constitution) – for him to accept the truth and reject the lie that he already believes, because of the power of first impression (and spiritual warfare).
New research reveals that first impressions are hard to dislodge. And wow, would we agree. From our experience, even when we read the Constitution to the legislature, some still walk away droning the lobbyist’s narrative. Proof that adults can believe the fairytales spun by the Big Bad Wolf will end in “happily ever after.”
I’m sorry to be so blunt, but I’ve seen these committees vote in favor of 3 separate convention resolutions; so, they are legislating on Article 5 and some of them don’t even know what Article 5 says! But they sure CAN QUOTE the fraudulent, empty promises of the out-of-state paid lobbyists. And THAT is what they risk our Constitution for.
PART 1: WATCH THE VIDEO “Defending our Constitution” public hearing on AJR 77 (SCOTUS 9 Convention)
I’ve posted the whole video this time,
- Because it’s only an hour and 17 min long (instead of hours and hours, thankfully the snake oil salesmen were not there to flatter & bolster the legislature). Also missing were the lobbyist’s followers. I can only go from what I have personally seen at these many public hearings. Lobbyist followers often fill their speeches with their life histories, what they had for breakfast, or the problems in our country (which we already know) and then at the end of their speech, add “the solution is a convention”. The really dedicated followers repeat the talking points of the lobbyists, some verbatim. To be perfectly honest, I haven’t heard one convention supporter’s speech have substance on the Constitution, and I feel they are truly deceived. Sincere, but deceived. And it furthermore makes me wonder, how many followers would the convention movement have if it was an honest movement?
- Unlike the lobbyists, those testifying in this video are not out-of-state, nor paid – and are actual individual Americans who live in WI and have investigated the situation, read the Constitution, and are concerned that their elected employees will not protect our Constitution. Thus this hearing took less time and it is quite powerful.
- It’s so very eye opening. Most intriguing of all, for the first time, we got some questions that seemed to indicate some of our points were penetrating. Perhaps it is because of the faith of a child expressed in prayer…
TIPS to consider as you watch:
- Although it is stated that they adjourn part way through, stay with us and it will continue immediately after only a few seconds, and it’s worth watching, believe me.
- Let’s remember representatives are not royalty, they are actually our elected employees.
- Months ago, both the Assembly & Senate committees emphatically assured members of our family in the public hearings that there was NO WAY they would be in favor of a Constitutional Convention, but that an Article V convention was completely different from a con-con (because the lobbyists told them that). For all of you who saw our 15 yr old grilled for 10 min by the senate committee months ago on this topic, to which our child held her ground and read the Constitution to the committee (Sen Bradley included), proving that there is only one type of convention, we DO seem to be making progress. Because now in this hearing, several Reps, including this Senator Bradley (the author of this SCOTUS 9 bill), and legis counsel refer to this convention bill AJR 77 as calling for a “Constitutional Convention”. Unfortunately, these same Reps (apparently) have no more aversions to a con-con and are supporting it openly. At least they are calling it what it really is in this bill.
- Thank the Lord for Rep Dave Murphy (R) who consistently defends the Constitution and votes each time against convention bills in committee and on the floor.
- For clarity as you watch, the unmasked people are Republicans, the masked people are Democrats, but we must remember this is not about party, it’s really about who is a Constitutionalist that will defend and preserve the Constitution (and thus our individual freedoms) from all enemies, both foreigh and domestic – and who is not. I think the answer may surprise you as you watch the legislative dialogue that occurs before your very eyes.
- I did disagree with anyone who said that the state legislatures were for sure going to ratify it. Even if the delegates do NOT rewrite the ratification rules as they with the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution gives 2 methods of ratification. One is state legislatures, but the other is conventions in states, and the choice is up to CONGRESS. The ratifying delegates may be the same delegates that Congress selected from each state when they called the Convention in the first place. The state legislatures may be completely shut out of the ratification process. He who chooses the delegates, chooses the outcome of the convention.
- Of course, you can cherry pick if you like and only watch certain sections of the video, but I highly HIGHLY recommend watching this in its entirety, not only because each live testimony from a homegrown WI constituent contributed to the whole, but because of the very constitutional message they portrayed. And in the different facets of that knowledge expressed in each of their speeches, it is especially intriguing to see the questions that this legislative committee started to ask about Article V (and mind you, this is after their voting in favor of numerous other Article V Convention resolutions). It is also dumbfounding and mind blowing some of the conclusions the Chair came to.
As my husband says, some of them are willingly ignorant of Article V, VI, and the 10th amendment and choose to remain so. You have to see it to believe it:
“Defending our Constitution” 1 hr 17 min video (AJR 77 SCOTUS 9 Convention)
PART 2: READ THE REST OF MY ANSWER IN A FOLLOW UP LETTER TO EACH MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE:
This is a continuation of what happened in the room that day, captured in the video, so PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO FIRST before reading the rest of the answer:
——————–
Dear Representative,Representative Theisfeldt asked me at the public hearing on AJR 77,“How is it a violation of our Oath of Office to use a legitimate provision within the Constitution?”
Here is the rest of my answer:While technically, your application to Congress is a Constitutional procedure, you are misinterpreting – and misusing it. You believe that YOU, the State Legislature, will rein in the federal government through the Convention process and YOU will be in charge of every aspect of Convention AND the ratification process.That. Is. Not. Article V.You’ve constructed something in your mind that is not true, doubtless placed there by the lies and flattery of the lobbyists. It seems you have erected, so to speak, an Article V in your own image, your own likeness, to suit your own ideas of the states being in charge, under the pretense of invoking the Founding Fathers’ Constitutional provision.Let me tell you what the REAL Article V state application says it is – the trigger to put Congress. In. Charge.——————Again, an Article V state application is the trigger to put Congress in charge of calling a Convention, who will doubtless form a new Constitution and a new government. That IS what it’s there for, the Founders recognized it is our right to alter or abolish and establish new government. None of us want THIS Congress or their handlers doing that.If you go ahead and STILL vote in favor of AJR 77 or other Convention applications, which is the trigger to put Congress in charge, I’m not sure what your motives could possibly be, but by process of elimination, it can’t be to protect the Constitution, can it? Also interesting to note, every Wisconsinite from across our state registered AGAINST and spoke AGAINST AJR 77, you had not one in favor of AJR 77.So yes, you are putting our Constitution in great peril. That is NOT protecting our Constitution, and I firmly believe that IS violating your oath of office, and that is why I CANNOT withdraw my statement.My brother put it well when he talked about those of you voting in favor of convention resolutions,“They are directly ignoring the indirect destruction of the Constitution.”– Brian Bakash, WI
I continue,
Chair Wichgers brought up another point that I think needs to be addressed. Establishing “Intent”.The State legislature is forever assuring us the Convention will be safe, limited, controlled, accountable because they are establishing INTENT with attorneys.So what?What good is establishing INTENT for the states to be in charge, when the rock of the Constitution clearly states Congress IS in charge?At the Assembly hearing, legislative counsel admitted:“There is legal uncertainty about whether those expressionsof the legislature’s intent from the statewould carry the day over, you know,competing with a call by Congress stating something else.”There’s nothing uncertain about it. Congress will carry the day.Article 1, Section 1All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.Article 1, Section 8The Congress shall have power…To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the forgoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.Article 5,“The CONGRESS… shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which…shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by…legislatures of three-fourths of the several states OR by conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the CONGRESS”And Congress has been writing & holding hearings about how they would run a Constitutional Convention for 60 years in the Congressional Research Report. 1378 pages.They know they will be in charge. Make no mistake.Please work to rescind the Convention applications Congress already has from WI and kill any future convention applications in committee.”My name and address
PART 3: “PRAISE THE LORD…”
GREAT results on the 1 hr 17 min hearing “Defending our Constitution” video on AJR 77, SCOTUS 9 Convention:
- Rep. Scott Allen (the one who asked if the instructions for how conventions for ratification are called was in Article V or a different Article), who has always voted in favor of Art V Convention bills, wrote back to me that he will not vote in favor of this one.
- Rep. Timothy Ramthun (the one who asked for a copy of my speech, and who may be familiar to you because of his leadership on Election integrity in WI to the point that Robin Vos pulled Ramthun’s aid) also has always voted in favor of Convention bills. Thank you to all of you who prayed, as a miracle happened. The Lord moved through various people, and as was reported to me, on Jan 5th, 2022, the very morning of the executive session to vote on AJR 77, Rep Ramthun miraculously pulled his sponsorship of this bill in both the Assembly and Senate, as well as pulled his sponsorship of Convention of States in both the Assembly and Senate!!
- Which led to them not having enough support to pass AJR 77 out of committee, and apparently, they do NOT want a convention bill to be voted down. Chair Wichgers declared during the executive voting session on Jan 5th that they would not vote on AJR 77. And if it doesn’t get out of committee, it doesn’t get on the floor.
- This is the first time the tide changed, thank the Lord for the encouragement!!! Thank you everyone who prayed, fasted, testified, wrote, called, educated others, etc!
PART 4: “…AND PASS THE AMMUNITION!”
We CAN still save our Constitution!!!
As an encouragement, through Constitutional education of the Representatives, New Hampshire recently voted 19-1 AGAINST Convention of States!! And New Jersey rescinded ALL their convention applications to Congress and so did Colorado!!! Woo-hoo!!
We MUST rescind ALL applications to Congress.
I know that this wholesale departure from logic and clear reading of the Constitution – to instead follow the piper of the lobbyist’s flattery and lies – is occurring in state after state after state. In fact, according to convention strategists who are asking Congress to count all these various conventions together, including 5 from long ago – ones to get us a Bill of Rights [1789], to avert the Civil War [1861], etc they claim 33 STATES have a Convention application sent to Congress!!!(Since NJ just rescinded at Christmas, they technically have32, not 33 by their count. See this excellent link by Judi Caler for more info, “Not the Limited Convention You Were Promised!”.)
2/3rds, or 34 state applications are required for Congress to call the convention, right? They possibly just need two more states. Then Congress can combine the convention requests at any time and can call the Convention. (remember “limited to one topic” is a lie the lobbyists tell the state legislatures in their “convention-can’t-runaway-spiel”)
TO SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION,
18 STATES MINIMUM MUST BE CONVENTION-FREE ZONES.
Not one bill in the works, not one application to Congress, whether it was from last year or 200 years ago. We need to rescind ALL applications in our individual states. Why a minimum of 18 and not 17 states? Then even if Washington DC becomes a state (51 states – 18 rescissions = 33 states left), and even if 33 states submit thousands of various Convention applications and Congress combines them together, they will not have 34 states to meet the 2/3 requirement to call a Convention!! Do not assume someone else will take the initiative in your state, please check with your state and see if you have convention applications in the works, or continuing applications on the books from hundreds of years ago, we are in a crucially DANGEROUS time.
Honestly, even though we’re trying, we may not be able to rescind them in WI in time, but maybe you can rescind in YOUR state and save our Constitution for all of us!!
—————————
This is also one of the MOST important issues to ascertain where you will place your vote this year. Find out where a would-be candidate or your current rep stands concerning protecting our Constitution from an Art 5 Conv. We need to primary out the traitors who voted yes to convention bills, selling our beloved Birthright for a pot of lentils that the lobbyists offer. We need Constitutionalists to run incognito as Republicans and get the RINO’s OUT.
We need Constitutionalists who not only protect the whole of the Constitution (like Democrats who vote against con-con), but in part as well (like Republicans who vote to nullify mandates that violate our Bill of Rights, and vote to restore election integrity, etc).
I think it’s downright creepy how these Covid vaccines are being shoved down our throats – but it is also downright creepy how ANY and EVERY angle is being tried to get this Convention called.” Theresa Henderson, WI
PLEASE call your reps in your state and educate them on defending the Constitution from the dangers of Convention (see video in Part 1). Then tell them if they support any convention bills, and don’t work to rescind them they should consider a new line of work. Freedom is on the line, and if they don’t get that, they have failed in their most basic job description.
They cannot be molly-coddled, they need to be fired.
We need Founding Fathers, not Benedict Arnolds.
As one of my fellow defenders of the Constitution says,“Storm the gates of Heaven with your prayers that the out-of-state bad actors don’t recruit all 34 States!”
We don’t just need states rescinding their applications to Congress, we need individual citizens to rescind their support and remove their names from the lists of the con artist convention lobbyists. For example in one of the convention groups, there are COS supporters listed who’ve actually been dead for years, there are duplicate people on the list, gracious, WE are even in one of their COS support videos and we’ve never supported them – in the picture, there were 8 of us AGAINST COS and 6 of them FOR COS, but they used the picture of all 14 in their video to make it look as though everyone in the room was a supporter. 14 surely looked better than 6 for their purposes.
Although we don’t have time to get into this, please be aware the convention strategists/lobbyists are not who they present themselves to be. Nor does their REAL funding come from the $25 donations of their followers.
If the convention followers only knew the truth, that this is primarily funded with dark money, darker connections, and the darkest agenda to destroy the Constitution, most of them would recoil in horror and do an about-face and work AGAINST the convention movement. Like Holly in her passionate speech below. Holly was the final testimony at the Senate public hearing SJR 58 (companion bill to AJR 77) where some of us testified again only 5 days after AJR 77. Her testimony is too powerful not to include in this email for several reasons, PLEASE watch:
“I want to retract my support right here.” 4 min video
Listeners of Worldview Radio & Crosstalk may recognize her voice as one of our favorite callers.
Conclusion
I can tell you from personal experience of all that I have seen, all that we have experienced in testifying with new speeches in public hearings for 6 con-con bills in only 7 months, communicating personally with these legislators, writing these Convention updates/sending out the videos, that the oppression and variety of trials we and others have undergone is spiritual warfare.
There is no doubt in my mind that the powers of darkness
are tenaciously raging to get access to our Constitution.
Historian James MacGregor Burns said of the Framers of our Constitution:
Let us face reality.The Framers have simply been too shrewd for us.They have outwitted us.They designed separate institutions thatcannot be unified by mechanical linkages and frail bridge tinkering.If we are to turn the Founders upside down
we must directly confront
the Constitutional structure they erected.“
Some of the Founders warned that those who would want to replace our Constitution in the future would do it under the guise of “amendments”. And sure enough…
[Council on Foreign Relations] Robert P. George, a Member of [Mark Meckler’s] Convention of States Legal Advisory Board, has co-authored a new “conservative” Constitutionwhich grants massive powers to a new federal government and imposes gun control!” – Publius Huldah https://www.thestandardsc.org/joanna-r-martin/cos-board-member-drafted-new-constitution-that-imposes-gun-control/
Not to mention all the other drafted constitutions that all sides are writing, 3 of them:
- Constitution for the Newstates of America,
- Constitution for The New Socialist Republic in North America,
- George Soros’s Progressive Constitution, etc.
“And since any new Constitution will have its own new mode of ratification (such as a national referendum), it’s sure to be approved.” – Publius Huldah
Article V convention (which has NEVER been activated, because it’s the nuclear option) is the opportunity of a lifetime for the Elite Globalists (and some have waited that long). A5C, or con-con, is the access door to replace our Constitution. The time is ripe: the people are worked into a panic, and the globalists are deceptively funneling them down into their planned “solution”: convention. Masquerading as a “conservative” movement (2 Cor 11:14) serves the globalist’s purposes — for now. You watch how quickly this becomes a liberal movement once the conservatives wake up. The globalists don’t care HOW they get access to our Constitution, so long as they get access. The ONLY thing the Globalist Elite need the states to do – Republican or Democrat, makes no difference – is to be one of a number that reaches 34. That’s it. Just a number. And freedom dies.
Prov 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
Defend our Constitution in your state “from all enemies, both foreign and domestic, so help me God.”
Join us.
Camp Constitution’s Recommendations for Supreme Court Justice
Camp Constitution firmly opposes identity politics, but since Joe Biden announced that a black woman and only a black woman will be his choice to replace Justice Stephen Breyer, we have a few recommendations:
Dr. Felecia Nace is a New Jersey Native. A former language arts teacher at the Montclair Public School District New Jersey, Dr. worked as an education specialist for the New Jersey Department of Education, five years as an adjunct professor for Mercer County Community College’s English department, and his currently the executive director of Partners 4 Change, and education consulting firm. Nace is an international consultant, speaker/presenter, and has many published articles on the topic of systemic change. She is the author of several books including Top-Down Confusion: Is Grey the New Pink in Education
Mrs. Edith Craft: Born and raised in New Orleans, Mrs. Craft is a retired schoolteacher who serves as Camp Constitution’s program director for its junior camp. She is married to Camp Constitution’s chaplain Rev. Steve Craft. She is a mother and grandmother
Kalasia Richer is the New England Faith Representative for Turning Point USA. She works full time serving and supporting pastors/members of the faith community in MA, NH, VT, ME, and upstate New York in the restoration of their God-given liberties. Kalasia is originally from Woonsocket, RI and currently lives in Boston, MA. She graduated in 2020 from Roger Williams University in Bristol, RI with a BA in Political Science and Communications. While in college she served as the President of the RWU College Republicans and Vice President of Christian Student Fellowship. She also worked as a staffer for an RI gubernatorial campaign and interned at the Rhode Island State House. In addition to working full time for Turning Point USA, she currently serves as an ambassador for Future Female Leaders.
And Barbara From Harlem:
“Barbara From Harlem” is a community and political activist in New York City. Born in the Bronx and raised in Harlem, she raised five children as a single mother. She has also been a small business owner and has run several nonprofits helping inner-city youth.
Barbara earned her nickname in the mid-90s from then-WABC talk radio host Jay Diamond. She was a frequent caller about the O.J. Simpson murder trial, which she thought was wrongly decided.
She has since become a well-known voice of black conservatism in New York City and across the country. She has been called the “godmother of black conservatives” by fellow podcaster Darius Mayfield.
She is the author of the book “Escaping the Racism of Low Expectations” (Simon & Schuster, 2018). In it, she explained:
I was a liberal by default. I asked no questions. I had no answers… But my eyes were opened to reject victimhood and lack of accountability. My journey has proven to me that when you have clarity of conscience, love of God and a deep-seated belief in America’s goodness, your life will be enriched and your focus will change to one of accountability.
With her daughter Bebe, Barbara has co-hosted the “Our Urban Story” podcast since 2014; it streams live on Saturday afternoons.
The Power to Declare War by Dr. Lee Button
Dr. Lee Button explains the power to declare war under the U.S. Constitution. This is from a weekly show that aired in New Hampshire and hosted by the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2022-01-28T15_15_03-08_00
For information on the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies, please visit their website http://www.nhccs.org
Dance of Deceit: WE CANNOT STAY SILENT
TRUTH
I’ve cried for those I don’t know, but especially for the people I love who were intentionally deceived into taking the shots. Finding out you’ve been lied to is so HARD. And even more infuriating when those lies were pivotal to your innocently accepting a genetic injection that could harm or kill you. It’s surreal to process that institutions/leaders/science journals not only failed you, but intentionally did so for their own agenda.
However, not looking at the truth because it’s unsettling & getting your boosters based on these lies only perpetuates the problem. And binds the hands that would help you.
You see, when we RISE as one and the truth is proclaimed from the rooftops – that instigates a halt to these shots – we not only stop feeding the Big Pharma/Mandate/Passport beast, but more importantly, we gain access to the exact ingredients per lot (they vary) that were injected into the exact person where GOOD scientists, chemists, doctors, analysts are desperate to get their hands on the data to find cures to hopefully reverse the eugenicists & globalists’ crimes against humanity.
Show me the data! Show me what’s in the shot, the lot numbers, I don’t care what you SAY, SHOW ME THE DATA – If we can get some data, we can start to heal these people – as long as there’s breath, there’s life.” BRILLIANT scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits
WE CANNOT STAY SILENT
Virologist, and Immunologist Dr. Robert Malone, the Developer of the mRNA technology that was used in the Pfizer/Moderna shots warns:
I’ve been through outbreak after outbreak – I’ve never seen anything like this: integration, harmonization, and enforcement. It is overtly authoritarian and it’s coming down from above, and its coordinated, and they’ve developed a bunch of different vehicles to reinforce this dominant narrative and make it so no other information is available to people so that people behave the way that the Health and Human Services and World Health Organization want them to behave. This is behavior control. It’s really psyops, is what’s happening, it’s applied psychological operations to control people and their behavior so they will accept these products, which are still experimental, based on technology that has never been deployed at this level, and as the data are coming out, it becomes more and more clear that these products are NOT completely safe…“The entire HHS system has been corrupted. The system is deeply corrupted and can no longer be counted on to perform its intended function. Then we go to a higher level, the media is corrupted and coordinated, the government is corrupted and coordinated…with the pharmaceutical industry basically buying access to the Hill and the regulatory capture we’ve seen across multiple agencies.“With the decisions that the pharmaceutical industry advocated for… that the FDA would be funded largely, directly, by fees from the Pharmaceutical industry – has created a situation in which they’re dependent on that Pharmaceutical money.In the case of CDC, it has a dual function, it’s there to promote the industry and to regulate the industry. It promotes vaccines, it’s a specific part of its mandate, and yet it also has the mission to regulate and oversee the safety of vaccines. Those two are in conflict. (And the mission that is more highly funded at the CDC is ‘promoting vaccination’).”
Please help me spread truth to others, don’t let these “Dance of Deceit” articles or others like them. We must share person to person since the media is pumping the propaganda and outright lies big time. Please don’t assume your friends and family have seen these. Share with those you love!
God has placed us each here to fulfill His specific purpose for this generation.
Who knows whether we are come into the kingdom for such a time as this?
Through no choice of our own, we’ve been thrown onto the pages of the history books
with the personal choice to be part of saving or losing freedom.
Furthermore, we are literally racing against the clock
trying to solve the largest binary-poison murder mystery ever (where part A is given, then much later part B is subtly introduced, and the combination of A/B kills the person with no apparent connection to the murderer).
AND we are also on the precipice of rescuing the perishing, saving lives,
both physically & spiritually as they plunge into eternity.
If we “don’t have time for this”, we need to ask ourselves, “Why?”
Instead of agreeing and complying with the unfruitful works of darkness, we are going to reprove them by manifesting the light of truth upon the situation. We need to move quickly because the days are evil.
If you are someone who loves the truth and hates a lying tongue as does our God, then this email series is for you. Throughout this series we will reveal how to stay out of the hospital and why they’re being dubbed “killing fields”; and if you must go to the hospital, how to survive it; what is really happening with these employer mandates; the truths the mainstream media twist to their own advantage to fulfill the agenda of their handlers; what some of the things doctors/scientists are finding in the vaccine vials and the blood of the vaccinated; what the patents utilizing these vaccines reveal about the plan; the priority to save the children; how to learn from history instead of repeat it. We will even discuss the next pandemic Bill Gates has “kindly” told us is coming so we can stop it before it becomes another psyop, and so much more.
LIE
TRUTH
EVIDENCE
It isn’t all-inclusive, that would be several books, it’s only some of the lies, and some of the evidence. But enough.
95% of the links will be new ones I’ve never sent out before, some of them will feature courageous whistleblowers, like Attorney Tom Renz says, .
I got a lot of whistleblowers…these are heros. This is the only hope that we have because the government is so corrupt and lying so badly, we would never have it [proof].” Attorney Tom Renz
Do not be afraid of the truth. Face it head on with power, love, and a sound mind. Too much is at stake to ignore the evidence presented in this series of the lies, lies, dances of deceit.
These lies are literally killing people.
Save a life. It could be your own. Save hundreds, thousands of lives by spreading the truth. Courage is contagious.
Maybe the Lord will empower us and miraculously intervene as He did nearly 250 years ago, to win our FREEDOM. Maybe our Country revealing how much evil is within and hitting rock bottom will lead to revival, a return to the Lord. Or maybe it is setting the stage for what God said will happen in Revelation in the end times.
Remember we PRAY, we step forward in courage, not hide in fear. We resist evil.
We never despair, we never give up, we always HOPE.
We walk by FAITH in the power of the TRUTH.
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation,
continuing instant in prayer”“God hath not given us the spirit of fear,
but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.”“The truth shall make you free.”“Jesus Christ is the same
yesterday, today, and forever.”“Jesus saith unto him,I am the way, the truth, and the life.
No man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
Dominique Uhl is a wife and mother who is passionate her children not only grow up free, but that her future grandbabies are born free. She is dedicated to preserving our Constitution & rights as the Founders intended. In a culture teeming with lies and danger, she writes to share truth, preserve freedom, and save lives.
The Weekly Sam: The Great Education Struggle
Author and homeschool pioneer Sam Blumenfeld appears as a guest on “The Great Education Struggle” hosted by Isaac Moffett:
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2022-01-28T12_53_30-08_00
You can find this audio among most of Sam’s writings on the Sam Blumenfeld Archive: https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/
PLASTIC IS NOT A THREAT by Tom DeWeese
PLASTIC IS NOT A THREAT
I am fed up to my burning ears with the carte blanche castigation of plastic. Plastic is one of the greatest inventions ever, not only for modern society, but also for the environment. If plastic seems to now pose an environmental threat, it’s not plastic’s fault – but the fault of the environmental movement itself.
The use of plastic reduces the need for other natural resources. Plastic bags, cups, and plates save the need for more paper. It saves the tress the greens are so concerned about. Plastic tables and chairs and lamps also save the demand for wood. Plastic bumpers on cars eliminate the need for chrome, a natural mineral the greens worried about a couple of decades ago – plastic provided the saving solution. And the use of plastic in cars makes them lighter and therefore more fuel efficient. Plastic makes heart transplants possible. Plastic is used in a wide variety of medical devises, without which people would either die or be denied happy, useful lives. There is no natural wood, paper, or glass substitute.
It’s interesting to note that the decade-old American obsession with bottled water resulted from environmentalist scares over possible chemicals in municipal tap water. Green radicals like the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) spewed horror stories of tap water full of rocket fuel, arsenic, germs, feces, lead, and pesticides. Plastic bottles provided the solution. Now the pendulum has swung and we’re all supposed to forget the earlier scaremongering over tap water and obey the new scare over water bottles. Crisis to crisis – whatever keeps up the green fundraising and power-building. It’s also interesting to note that one of the biggest promoters of the return to tap water is the National Conference of Mayors. Many cities are now taxing each bottle used. A classic move – right out of the government handbook. Vilify it and then tax it.
So, the mantra goes, plastic bottles and products are filling the landfills. Says one ad (by a water filter company with an ulterior motive to compete with plastic water bottles), America uses enough plastic water bottles to ring the earth several times in a year. Plastic bottles don’t degrade, they say, so they will be in the ground forever. The collectively acceptable answer, of course, is that we simply must ban them and any other use of plastic, if possible.
One corporation using the anti-plastic propaganda is the Whole Foods supermarket chain which forces its suppliers to provide “sustainable” and recyclable packaging for their products or they will be banned from the store’s shelves. The chain also does not use plastic carrier bags. Instead, it uses either paper bags or encourages customers to bring in their own reusable cloth bags. Whole Foods is a large enough force in the grocery market that such policies force other chains to follow suit. That, of course, is its political strategy.
Whole Foods CEO, John Mackey, is a full-fledged promoter of Sustainable Development as a political policy. He talks of corporations “doing good,” through a policy of “Conscious Capitalism.” I love the use of those words, “responsible;” “good,” “conscious.” Says who? Rather than a businessman, Mackey is ultimately promoting his own political agenda on the buying public. That isn’t free enterprise; it’s a form of activism designed to covertly enforce behavior modification techniques on the buying public.
In addition, Mackey’s drive to “do good” has a lot of unintended consequences. First, he has helped to perpetrate lies and prejudices to encourage lawmakers to ban valuable products. That causes job loss in that industry. Second, he is taking away the right of choice from those who don’t accept his position. Third, all so-called sustainable policies lead to one specific conclusion – higher prices for consumers. Fourth, his actions may well lead to endangering the health of many consumers. For example, removing plastic bottles for shampoos and conditioners and replacing them with glass bottles will be a hazard in the bathroom when they inevitably fall on the floor.
Finally, there is a growing hypocrisy from the do-good faction. Some governments, such as in Fairfax County, Virginia are now charging 5 cents tax for every plastic bag, with the intention of returning us to the paper bags that were banned in the name of environmental protection for trees. The difference now is that the government will get to fill its coffers from the unnecessary regulations it imposed.
Of course, when political power is at stake, consumers are simply pawns to be manipulated. In San Francisco, where the city government banned the use of plastic bags, one resident wrote, “I remember when it began to rain last year while I was carrying my groceries home in a paper bag. As I chased my cans down the street, I cursed our idiot mayor and whoever among his stooges had decided to ban rainproof plastic bags in San Francisco. Paper is certainly biodegradable, for the process started even as I was carrying the bag home.” Where was her freedom of choice?
When one is driven by political correctness or globally acceptable truth, one has a hard time looking past the “allowable” thought patterns to ask obvious questions. Are plastic bottles really a threat to landfills? Is there another way to dispose of plastic other than throwing it in landfills? Is there any other reason landfills are filling up, and is there a solution? There are answers to these questions, but they will surely make the greens choke on their tofu as they read them.
The fact is, according to a 2010 report by Angela Logomasini of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, plastic bottles are not filling up landfills. They represent less than one percent of landfill waste. She goes on to agree that they don’t degrade, “but nothing does.”
In addition, we have an artificial shortage of landfills because environmental regulations prevent new ones. We have no lack of land in America and could open numerous new landfills to meet growing needs. Angela Logomasini agrees that we have plenty of landfill space and adds, “one large landfill 44 miles by 44 miles could manage 1,000 years of our waste. Simple enough, but completely politically in-correct in today’s attack on logic. It’s much more acceptable to regulate and ban valuable products. That has become the American way.
Those old landfills, once full, could be used for other uses. By researching the subject, I found a list of 10 former landfills around the nation that were converted to parks, golf courses, playgrounds, soccer fields, and shopping centers. One in Virginia Beach, VA, was converted into a full-blown city park called Mount Trashmore. We’re supposed to envision landfills as a no man’s land of devastation and waste forevermore (hence the need to block the creation of new ones). But, again, it’s not true.
Finally, there are at least two possible scientific solutions to the disposal of plastic — first, heat. Plastic products are produced and shaped through the use of heat. It melts at a very low temperature. Instead of throwing massive amounts of money into propaganda to destroy the plastics industry, those concerned over the disposing of plastic could develop and purchase heat-generating machines (without smokestacks) and place them at every landfill. Then, melt the plastic into reusable liquid. Well, perhaps that’s not as much fun as bullying us with anti-plastic police forces.
In 2020, scientists working at the University of Portsmouth developed and even better solution. According to their findings, Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) is the most common thermoplastic, used to make single-use drink bottles, clothing, and carpets. Usually, PET takes hundreds of years to break down in the environment, the leading attack against plastic. However, scientists have re-engineered a plastic-eating enzyme called PETase into an enzyme cocktail. Incredibly, this new PETase process can shorten those hundreds of years of plastic breakdown into a matter of days. That will revolutionize plastic recycling and eliminate the environmental danger.
However, as many now understand, little in these attacks against industrial revolution products have anything to do with science or truth. The roots of the environmental movement’s agenda lay in the determination to destroy free markets. The use of fear of ecological Armageddon creates political power and massive funding for them. So, actually solving the problem means losing the power and the money. That’s why no headlines have promoted solutions beyond banning the products.
Instead, there is now a steady march by the stores, which have always provided the bags (whether paper or plastic) for free, to embrace government regulations that will ban the bags. Providing those bags for free to every customer is a considerable cost for the store. Now, however, with the government’s new tax, in the name of environmental protection, they are succeeding in getting consumers to purchase their own “reusable” bags which the store now sells to you for a profit. It’s a new profit center built on environmental guilt. “Conscious Capitalism,” indeed. Partnerships between government and private corporations, for the sake of political power, is more accurately called fascism, and truth and liberty always lose in that game.
Refuting Left-Wing “Virtue Signaling” Lawn Signs by Darrell Pack
I am disturbed by the evil and dishonesty of these signs. Since they have never in my own knowledge been responded to, I will in the hope that people will not be deceived. Worse, is when you find this in front of a Christian household, a pastor’s household, or even a Church.
In this house, we believe: As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. Joshua 24:15
Love is Love: Sex is not Love.
No, Love is not Love. The Bible distinguishes types of love. They are communicated through four Greek words (Eros, Storge, Philia, and Agape) and are characterized by romantic love, family love, brotherly love, and God’s divine love. Many Languages have multiple words for Love. In Arabic there are 11. But in the context of this yard sign, it is referring to sex. In particular, it refers to what people do because it feels good. Sex is not love. In fact, not only is it about self-gratification, but it is also often used as violence against others as in the case of Rape. In the last several years, within the midst of this same group of people, there has been a concerted effort to normalize sexual relations between adults and children. This is one of the worst-case examples of false moral equivalency perpetuated by the morally bankrupt people who would display this disgusting sign in their yard.
Black Lives Matter: All Lives Matter in the eyes of the Lord.
Black Lives Matter has become a rallying cry for the Marxist Left. In the words of the founders of BLM, they are trained Marxists., This slogan was created to divide us based on race. This is a group that calls for reparations based on the evils of Slavery, yet most people in America, even at a time when it was prevalent, did not own slaves. Additionally, these same people say and do nothing about the slave trade which is still in existence to this day. While it is impossible to know, according to the Thomas Reuters Foundation, in 2018 there were more than 40 million people in the world in Slavery. These organizations do nothing but undermine a country that outlawed slavery more than 156 years ago.
No Human is Illegal: But their actions often are.
So why is the left so intent on bringing people illegally into the country? Because that is how they support politicians with a socialist agenda. People who believe in Liberty understand that this is a way to break down traditional American values and worse, traditional family values because with people illegally coming across our border are rapists, drug cartels, terrorists, and criminals. They are not here to assimilate. While many people are in search of a better life, this creates a dangerous environment for those innocent people as well. If America is so bad, why are those people taking such great risks to get here? Why is the Left (Socialists and Marxists) trying to change it?
Science is Real :But they do not follow Science.
This is to perpetuate the idea of manmade climate change and false pandemic protections on our nation. It is not science to say that science is settled or prevent proper research and challenges to scientific theory. Yet they silence opposing voices, including some of the top scientists in the world if they disagree with the leftist political organizations. Science is ever-changing and never settled; however, some people will ignore science when it comes to gender. They ask everyone to be accepting of gender dysphoria as if it is a legitimate and sensible point of view. Science says it is a dangerous mental disorder that often leads to suicide even after gender reassignment surgeries and therapies. They attempt to make it illegal to challenge this view, yet they claim science is real. One thing is for sure. Hypocrisy is real. They ignore the science that contradicts the Leftist narrative. Real science is not created by consensus. Consensus is not created by the limited samples of leftist political organizations.
Woman’s Rights are Human Rights Well, Human Rights are Women’s Rights.
Following this logic, a baby in the womb is not human with rights. This is even more hypocritical if the baby aborted is a female. Let’s face it, if we were talking about human trafficking (like what happens at our open borders) conservatives would be in agreement, but considering their position that no person is illegal, this is not what they are talking about. The truth is that this is about abortion. Abortion is inconsistent with Christianity. Psalm 139: 13-16 13 For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. 14 I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful; I know that full well. 15 My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. 16 Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be. Perhaps this would be more honest if the sign read abortion is a Human Right. This is actually listed in the UN Charter of human rights. In actuality, that is what this means. Anyone who is properly educated in the origin of rights knows that this cannot be a right because it is exercised at the cost of another individual’s rights. If those on the left were to say exactly what they mean, their ideas would be rejected by most, at least by intellectually honest and thinking people.
Kindness is everything Kindness without truth is not kindness. It is deception.
If you are in Unity but not in Truth, you are united against Christ.
Darrell Pack is the hosts Restore the Intent Constitution Study Group in Alton, NH and is the owner of Lakes Region Cabinet Company.
Don’t Ignore This Warning by Mike Rothfield of Foundation of Applied Conservative Leadership
H. L. Mencken once said, “For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”
Mencken’s words aptly apply to a “Convention of States,” also known as an “Article V Convention,” “Constitutional Convention,” — or as I have known it for 30 years, the “Con Con” — the cure-all hoax to “fix the federal government” that takes root among some grassroots activists every time a Democrat occupies the White House.
It offers the quick fix and masks a danger worse than any Socialist proposal to the Biden or Pelosi agenda.
Promoters of this terrible idea would have you believe the answer to all that ails us is clear — all we have to do is pass new amendments at a Constitutional Convention to limit what the federal government can do.
They’ll tell you this solution is simple, and contrary to the belief of some “fearful” nay-sayers, nothing bad will happen.
First of all, the Constitution already does this… which politicians and courts too often ignore.
How will new “rules” change that? They won’t. If you cannot force change now, (and you CAN… that is what FACL teaches you, but it takes time, effort, and organization) you will not force change then.
Worse, the Con-Con itself will be manned by career politicians (from Red and Blue states) and Leftists (at least from Blue states). Once assembled, they will do as THEY please, not as you or I please. No “rule” will prevent it. History shows again and again that conventions write and rewrite their own rules.
The arguments are so absurd for a Con-Con, I struggle to try to be fair to the sincere but misguided folks who promote the agenda.
If you’re receiving this email, chances are you’ve been actively fighting FOR liberty legislation and AGAINST threats to liberty at the state level for a while now.
So it should be obvious to you that state legislators are at least as big a threat to your liberty as their federal cohorts… if not more so.
One only need examine what the states have done in response to COVID-19 to get a sense of how little they can be trusted with your liberty.
After all, it was Governors — Democrat AND Republican — who forced businesses to close, robbed children of over one year of their lives, and authorized jailing mothers, fathers, grandmothers, and grandfathers for trying to open their businesses so they could pay rent and put food on the table.
And most state legislatures — Democrat AND Republican — refused to do a single thing about it.
Despite that, the “Convention of States Project” would have you believe these very same turncoat state politicians can, and should, be trusted to open up the U.S. Constitution for alterations at a convention.
To be sure, there are some limited-government champions in states across the country.
But they are not in the majority. If they were, you wouldn’t have to work so hard to kill bad bills and pass good ones!
What’s more, these few champions of liberty will likely not even be invited to a convention.
In fact, some states have already made clear their intention to send the very same State House and Senate leadership that you struggle against every legislative session.
Can a convention really be limited?
In recent years, Con-Con promoters have spent millions of dollars from wealthy donors to enlist a team of so-called “experts” to reassure conservatives that a convention will be safe because it will be “limited,” and delegates will be “forced to follow rules” their own state legislators will set.
They go on to insist the rules of the convention itself will bind them down further and will likely follow Mason’s Manual, which is currently used in most states.
This includes Nebraska, where Con-Con operatives recently succeeded in bringing their resolution back from the dead by “suspending the rules” and vote trading.
You see, the resolution was nearly dead in committee, so an attempt was made to usurp the normal process. When that attempt failed to garner the required votes, it was fully dead under the rules.
So the bill sponsor, Republican Senator Steve Halloran, traded some votes and agreed to support some Big Government legislation if opponents of the convention would agree to vote to break the rules and bring his Convention of States resolution back to life.
Yes, the bill sponsor voted to GROW the government so he could maybe one day LIMIT the government — and he broke the rules to do it!
And they were able to do that under Mason’s Manual, the legislative procedure most argue would be used at a convention.
In Kansas, a state which also uses Mason’s Manual, Con-Con politicos have been frustrated by the State Constitution, which requires a voter-ratified two-thirds majority to pass this type of legislation, a threshold they have never been able to achieve.
So Convention of States insiders conspired with the Kansas Senate President, Ty Masterson (also a Republican) — in direct violation of the State Constitution and the will of the people of Kansas — to “deem” the resolution passed if a simple majority was achieved (it wasn’t). This is the same trick-play Nancy Pelosi uses in Washington.
If Convention of States Project political operators and their own hand-picked bill sponsors can’t be trusted to follow the rules, just how can you expect anyone to follow so-called “rules” convened to rewrite the Constitution?
It defies all logic!
What they did in just those two states is a perfect example of the vote trading and rule breaking that will happen if a convention is called and your fundamental rights are on the line.
And it will not be conservatives trading and cheating then… it will be the hard-Left, bankrolled by George Soros and others. In fact, they also fund groups calling for a Con-Con (for Left-wing purposes).
(Mark Meckler founder of Convention of States with Joanne Blades of the Soros funded MoveOn.Org)
Let’s take a look at the Red Fox Four Score on this issue.
*** More money/people: -1
Both sides will raise some money on this issue, but it can (and does) divide liberty activists into opposing camps, leaving support for vital projects that can actually advance liberty or thwart Big Government in the lurch.
The fact is, Convention of States is overwhelmingly funded by a handful of wealthy donors, not grassroots donations. Consistent conservative leaders who oppose the Con-Con risk alienating some of our own donors who, in honest frustration and fear, have been taken in by the Con-Con hype and happy-talk.
*** Help friends: -3
This is where it gets painful. Good legislators who support great causes get wrapped up in these fights, become a danger to liberty, and then can’t be trusted as a bill champion on vital legislation.
And good legislators who do not support the Con-Con are branded as enemies by convention supporters. This further waters-down what was already a very small “champion” universe.
*** Hurt enemies: -5
No liberal has ever lost his or her seat over this issue — this is almost exclusively a fight within the conservative movement. If the Left ever sees the very real opportunity to seize power at a convention, this might change.
And tax-and-spend Republicans love this issue because they can cover up the truth of their liberal voting records by focusing on their support of “limiting” government, and then they don’t have to worry as much about primary election problems.
*** Policy Ratio: -10/0
If it passes: -10. This is speculative, but Congress already tries to openly ignore the Bill of Rights. This gives Big Government lackeys the opening to repeal what they don’t like, edit what suits them, and pass things like packing the courts, ending the electoral college, and installing a Universal Basic Income.
There is no upside to a convention. The dangers of a runaway convention are very real, especially since the media and billionaire Leftists like George Soros WILL be involved.
(Does anyone really believe hard-core Leftists will simply walk away dejected and consider themselves down for the count if a Con-Con is called?)
If it fails, then nothing happens. There is NO upside to this battle for conservatives, except to stop it in order to protect our liberties from frustrated “friends.”
*** SCORE: -19 to -9 — one of the worst scores I have ever seen for a serious proposal.
Whenever Democrats take control of the federal government, going all the way back to President Jimmy Carter, their cries for a convention reach a fever-pitch.
They’ll tell you they don’t support either side in D.C., but then celebrate when Big (federal) Government RINOs like Senators Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio proclaim their support!
There is no doubt that D.C. is broken.
Federal government power has far exceeded its constitutional authority.
But it can’t be fixed by sending a bunch of modern-day politicians to a convention so they can modify (or do away with) our founding document.
The states have allowed the federal government to become the behemoth it is today.
They have done so by accepting Big Government federal “mandates” just so they can get their hands on more federal taxpayer dollars.
States need to get their own houses in order and start fulfilling their own constitutional duties.
They can shrink the federal government — right now — by refusing to accept and spend federal taxpayer dollars on unconstitutional Big Government programs.
To sum up, there is no way to predict what constitutional amendments the delegates to a convention might adopt.
The only Constitutional Convention in U.S. history — in 1787 — went far beyond its mandate. Charged with amending the Articles of Confederation to promote trade among the states, the convention instead wrote an entirely new governing document. A convention held today could set its own agenda too.
Now, if America’s leaders looked like Washington, Madison or Henry, maybe, maybe it might be OK (though even Patrick Henry opposed the final product, even AFTER the Bill of Rights was added).
But as the late Supreme Court Justice Warren E. Burger said, “[T]here is no way to effectively limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda.”
It is past time for this harebrained scheme to die and for all limited-government advocates to band together and clean up their own local and state governments.
JUST A REMINDER: The Foundation for Applied Conservative Leadership increased the number of schools last year and are hoping to do more in 2022.
Don’t see a school in your neck of the woods?
Did you know about FACL’s Secret Vault?
We have been sending out weekly emails since June, 2010. There are some good articles you might have missed and they are stored in our archives.
But don’t share this information with just anyone. Remember, tactics are philosophically neutral and can be used against you by those fighting for the other side. For that reason, I’ve password protected this content.
After clicking here, you will be prompted to login.
Please use the unique login that you created, and let us know if you have any questions.
We have been sending out weekly emails since June, 2010. There are some good articles you might have missed and they are stored in our archives.
But don’t share this information with just anyone. Remember, tactics are philosophically neutral and can be used against you by those fighting for the other side. For that reason, I’ve password protected this content.
After clicking here, you will be prompted to login.
Please use the unique login that you created, and let us know if you have any questions.
© 2022 All Rights Reserved
Donate securely online to the Foundation by clicking here.
Would you like to mail in a tax-deductible gift to our Foundation? Make checks payable to “FACL” and mail to:
Foundation for Applied Conservative Leadership
101 Washington Street
Falmouth, Virginia 22405
Please, don’t even think about reproducing, forwarding or posting this document or its contents on the Internet without written permission from the Foundation for Applied Conservative Leadership.
For reprint permission, please contact us at:
kirk@kirkshelley.com or dp@facltraining.org
Please click here to opt out of future emailings.
|
The Foundation for Applied Conservative Leadership is an IRS recognized 501(c)(3) Foundation and contributions are tax-deductible for income tax purposes. Contact us at www.facltraining.org. Our mailing address is 101 Washington Street, Falmouth, Virginia 22405. |
The Weekly Sam: Teaching Penmanship and Reading
Author and homeschool pioneer, Sam Blumenfeld conducts a presentation on teaching penmanship where he stresses cursive first.
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2022-01-22T15_14_09-08_00
Please visit Sam’s archive where you can find this and hundreds of other works or late friend:
https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/
Camp Constitution at the U.S. Supreme Court
Liberty Counsel hosted several events prior to and after oral argument of Shurtleff v Boston https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shurtleff-v-boston/
On Monday night January 17, we participated in a prayer vigil and on Tuesday morning, a rally was held prior to the oral argument. Speakers included Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler, Tim Goeglein (Focus on the Family), Dean Nelson (Frederick Douglass Foundation), Kalisia Richer (Turning Point USA), Barbara from Harlem, Patrick Mahoney (Christian Defense Coalition), Mario Diaz (Concerned Women for America), Jeremy Dys (First Liberty), Larry Cirignano (Choose Life), Pastor David Whitney (Institute on the Constitution), Andrew Beckwith (Massachusetts Family Institute), Adrian Jones (Mordecai Mission), Hal Shurtleff, Rev Steve Craft and Earl Wallace (Camp Constitution), and Liberty Counsel attorneys Harry Mihet, Roger Gannam and Jonathan Alexandre.
9A link to an audio of the oral argument: https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2022-01-20T12_52_59-08_00
This is a news release from Liberty Counsel:
Supreme Court Heard Religious Viewpoint Case Today
Jan 18, 2022
There are three flagpoles outside City Hall that fly the U.S., Massachusetts and Boston flags, plus a fourth flag on Congress Street, which runs parallel to City Hall. For 12 years from 2005-2017, Boston approved 284 flag-raisings by private organizations with no denials on the flagpoles that it designated as a “public forum.” Had the flag been referred to as anything but Christian, the city would have approved it. The flag itself was not the problem; it was the word “Christian” describing it in the application that was the issue. The year before Camp Constitution’s application (2016-2017), Boston approved 39 private flag-raising events, which averaged three per month. In 2018, Boston approved 50 private flag raising events, averaging nearly one per week. One included a flag of a private credit union.
Boston now argues that despite the policy and longstanding practice, the private flag raisings are actually government speech.
Liberty Counsel Legal Team and Client Hal Shurtleff
Today, the Supreme Court seemed united in favor of Liberty Counsel’s argument that this censorship is unconstitutional, and that Boston was wrong to deny the Christian flag, a white banner with a red cross on a blue background in the upper left corner.
During today’s argument, Boston’s attorney, Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, admitted that if the High Court finds that if the city created a public forum, then Boston has no defense.
When the city’s attorney attempted to justify the policy to fit their agenda, Justice Alito said, “You did some after-the-fact gerrymandering of your policy and reverse engineered it.”
Hallward-Driemeier also stated that the city’s “goal is to foster diversity of communities” and “commemorate events or occasions.”
In response, Justice Clarence Thomas stated that if Christians are not a part of that diversity the city purports to support, “that’s limited diversity.”
Justice Amy Coney Barrett also asked the city attorney, “Isn’t celebrating Constitution Day considered an event?”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh also acknowledged that it seems the Establishment Clause is not the issue in this case since there has not been equal treatment of religious groups or religious speech.
Justice Neil Gorsuch also noted that the city cast religion into the same category as speech deemed offensive by censoring the religious viewpoint.
Liberty Counsel’s Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “Today is a historic day and I was honored to present this religious viewpoint case before the U.S. Supreme Court. This case is so much more significant than a flag. Boston cheated when it opened the flagpoles to all applicants and then excluded Christian viewpoints. The city then claimed that the flagpoles never were a public forum despite its history and express policy. The city’s censorship is clearly unconstitutional, and government cannot censor religious viewpoints.”
For more information on the case, visit www.LC.org/flag.
Liberty Counsel provides broadcast quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost.