While members of the Left are celebrating another assault on morality and freedom in the United States, it may very well lead to the overturn the Obergefell decision. This is a press release from our friend at Liberty Counsel:
In his dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “Today, however, the Court takes the extraordinary step of ordering every State to license and recognize same-sex marriage. Many people will rejoice at this decision, and I begrudge none their celebration. But for those who believe in a government of laws, not of men, the majority’s approach is deeply disheartening…. Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law.”
“The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent. The majority expressly disclaims judicial ‘caution’ and omits even a pretense of humility, openly relying on its desire to remake society according to its own ‘new insight’ into the ‘nature of injustice.’ As a result, the Court invalidates the marriage laws of more than half the States and orders the transformation of a social institution that has formed the basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs. Just who do we think we are?”
The RFMA cannot define marriage for the states. In 2013, the Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor, struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined marriage for ALL the states as the union of one man and one woman. The Court noted that domestic relations and the definition of marriage is “an area that has long been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States.” In other words, the states, not the federal government, have the right to regulate marriage.
The second part of DOMA said that one state did not have to recognize same-sex marriage of another state. This is the provision that the Respect for Marriage Act repealed, and now it requires one state to recognize the same-sex marriage of another state.

Until now, the biggest obstacle to overturning Obergefell was based on those who relied on the flawed decision to obtain a marriage license. What happens to these licenses? The consequence of overturning Obergefell is now off the table and is no longer a policy reason for upholding the opinion. In other words, it is easy to attack Obergefell on the merits but the consequence of overturning it could, until now, result in chaos. The merits argument of why Obergefell should be overturned is easy. The policy argument that doing so would cause a huge disruption has always been the most difficult to overcome – until now.
As a result of RFMA, when Obergefell is overturned, those who obtained licenses will be “grandfathered” in and the licenses will remain valid. However, like abortion, the Supreme Court will overturn Obergefell and states will then be free to return to their laws prior to 2015 where they defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Liberty Counsel’s case involving Kim Davis may be the vehicle to help overturn Obergefell. This case is working its way back to the Supreme Court where one of the arguments will be that Obergefell was wrongly decided. Justices Thomas and Alito have already invited future challenges to the 2015 Obergefell marriage case since the decision was never constitutional.
Justice Thomas previously wrote, “Davis found herself with a choice between her religious beliefs and her job.” He continued, “Davis may have been one of the first victims of this Court’s cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last.” Justice Thomas said “the Court has created a problem that only it can fix. Until then, Obergefell will continue to have ‘ruinous consequences for religious liberty.’”
The drafters and supporters of RFMA did not intend for the consequence that is forthcoming. But it will come. Like Roe, the days of Obergefell are numbered.
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “While I am disappointed that the ‘Respect for Marriage Act’ passed both houses of Congress, the bill will be the undoing of the Supreme Court’s 2015 same-sex marriage opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges. The advocates of RFMA may celebrate today, but that celebration will not last. Lawmakers have unwittingly created the perfect scenario to overturn the unconstitutional Obergefell decision.”
Liberty Counsel provides broadcast quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost.
If the Supreme Court decides a case, is it to be considered the “Law of the Land”? We hear this all the time.
Nope! Read on.
Article VI, clause 2 of our Constitution (below) addresses this.
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
So!! Only those laws and treaties that are in accordance with – in pursuance of – our Constitution are to be considered “supreme”!!.
The second clause (above) defines the “supreme Law of the Land” as the (1) Constitution, (2) acts of Congress authorized by the Constitution, and (3) Treaties which are authorized by the Constitution.
Supreme Court opinions aren’t included! The Supreme Court is not superior to the Constitution, contrary to what we are told.
So! When the Supreme Court decides cases contrary (NOT pursuant) to the Constitution, they are guilty of usurpation of power, and thus vulnerable to impeachment!
Does Roe versus Wade come to mind?
For more study, go here: https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2018/11/25/why-supreme-court-opinions-are-not-the-law-of-the-land-and-how-to-put-federal-judges-in-their-place/
Bob Hilliard
wethepeoplehandbook@gmail.com
www.buildingblocksforliberty.org

In Part 1, we saw that ever since 1907, 2/3 or more of the States have had at least one active application on record asking Congress to call a convention under Art. V. And if Congress is hoodwinked into validating all non-rescinded applications by passing H.R.8419 or its 2023 counterpart,[1] Congress will likely trigger the first constitutional convention since 1787.
So why wasn’t Congress deceived into calling a convention 50 or 100 years ago? Perhaps it’s because the PR industry hadn’t come of age yet! To justify a “call,” Congress, whose priority is getting re-elected, would require considerable constituent pressure—or the appearance of such—before casting a vote that would risk our Constitution.
Enter Mark Meckler, President of the Convention of States (COS), who has been waging a PR war with millions of dollars in dark money for almost a decade. COS is creating the impression that Americans are demanding a “convention of states” under Article V, while most Americans have no clue what an Article V Convention (A5C) is.
“Grassroots”—From the Top Down?!
In 2011—while Meckler was still with the Tea Party and just getting involved in the convention deception, he joined Eric O’Keefe’s John Hancock Committee of the States (JHCOS) as a Director and President. O’Keefe is known as the front man for the Koch brothers’ money. He is also Chairman of the Board and co-founder of Meckler’s Citizens for Self-Governance (CSG)—parent to COS.
In its 2011 IRS filing signed by Meckler, JHCOS reported over $1.8 million in anonymous contributions (pg. 1), and almost one million dollars in expenses to public relations & lobbying firms (pg. 8).[2] At least 38% of the contributions can be traced to Donors Trust, the “dark money ATM” of the Right.
Hmmm—right out of the gate, almost $2 Million in seed money; pricey PR and lobbying firms; and $180,000 per year for Meckler by 2013, which appears to have started in mid-2012—well before Meckler introduced his first A5C application. Moreover, two members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)[3]—Robert P. George and C. Boyden Gray—have been on Meckler’s Legal Board of Reference since its inception in 2014. That isn’t exactly how a grassroots organization gets started!
An “Army of 5 Million”
Petitions. A sophisticated computer has been spinning numbers representing alleged signers of COS petitions for years. But when Meckler was confronted with fake signatures in Idaho a few years back, he admitted (@ 1:28:00) that he can’t guarantee who signed, whether they remember that they signed, or whether they changed their mind since they “signed.” Indeed, it’s a mystery why half of Meckler’s “army” hasn’t bothered to sign at all![4]
Nevertheless, Meckler gets away with claiming he has “an army of 5 million” supporters nationwide and boasting about tens of thousands of supporters at each Legislature he visits. That’s twice the size of China’s army! And Meckler doesn’t bother to prove his numbers; nor is he usually questioned about them publicly.
Polls. COS commissions polls which proponents claim show bipartisan support for a “convention of states”—a complicated, little-understood issue—from data collected in a one- to three-minute robo-call, text, or phone survey. But COS polls don’t measure public opinion. COS commissions “push polls” to sway public opinion. PR firms and private pollsters design polls to get the response their clients pay for. The result is often published as News. Outcomes are manipulated by the questions asked.
For years, COS has routinely released official-looking poll results showing close to 2/3 support or more from voters responding to trick questions. Yet contrary to being a popular issue, A5C legislation is a hot potato, drawing bipartisan opposition nationwide from grassroots constituents defending the Constitution. To pass these controversial applications, it often takes years of false narratives, wining & dining, pressure from leadership, backroom deals, empty promises, threats, stifling the opposition, dirty tricks,[5] smear tactics, contributions, wearing down legislators, and more.[6]
Meckler simulates pressure from below by touting his “army” and convincing Republican legislators that they’re putting their jobs on the line, should they oppose his “grassroots” legislation. In addition, pressure from above, exerted by lobbyists and leadership, can be intense—including threats of running primary opponents against incumbent holdouts. This leaves too many Republicans shaking in their boots with visions of Meckler’s army knocking on doors to defeat them at the next election.
Name-dropping. For lack of a sound argument, Meckler resorts to reckless name-dropping when he’s among Republicans:[7]
“And this is an irrefutable fact. In the United States of America today, every single nationally-known conservative, law professor, talker, politician, who has taken a position–nationally known–on the convention of states is in favor. There are no exceptions. Rush Limbaugh, God rest his soul, Levin, Hannity, Beck [since reversed], Shapiro, all the professors I’ve named on our legal advisory board; there are NO exceptions…” —Meckler, Roundtable discussion, Harrisburg, PA Nov. 8, 2021
COS has courted big name endorsements since 2014, and Meckler has admitted he’s willing to pay for them. In this 30-second clip from 2019, Meckler tells his fans that he tried unsuccessfully to get Rush’s endorsement, knowing it would have cost $2.25 million just to start negotiations!
Apparently, Meckler has managed to convince—or buy—a few dozen well-known politicians, pundits, and public figures. And we don’t know if COS endorsements are a result of direct payments, payroll, paid advertising, or something else, because COS expenses are lumped together on financials in broad reporting categories like “advertising and promotion” and “fees for services,” with most recipients anonymous.[8]
Still, from the little COS must disclose, we know that COS Action (COSA) bankrolled former US Senator Tom Coburn (turned COS lobbyist) to the tune of $240,000 annually for a combined total of almost one million dollars in 2016, 2017, 2018, & 2019. The 2017 link also shows former US Senator and COS endorser Jim DeMint as a paid COS lobbyist, raking in $140,000. Former US Senator Rick Santorum, who replaced Coburn, admits he was formerly opposed to an A5C. Not surprisingly, Santorum’s appearance as an endorser on the COS website coincided with his being added to Meckler’s 2021 payroll.
Posthumous Endorsements. Meckler apparently conjured up Justice Antonin Scalia’s support after Scalia’s death. Scalia’s opposition to a constitutional convention was a matter of public record from a 2014 interview. But Justice Scalia’s body had scarcely gone cold when Meckler broadcast that Scalia supported an Article V Convention, based on law professor Scalia’s published comments from 1979. That was seven years before Justice Scalia’s 30-year tenure on the bench, during which he changed his mind. Neither Rush’s nor Scalia’s support for an A5C appeared on COS’s endorsement page while they were around to speak for themselves.
Smoke and Mirrors
As it turns out, the “grassroots momentum” behind COS is smoke and mirrors. The total number of States with non-rescinded applications on record today, is the same as the 2012 total (39). So, if we were to judge by the validation scheme built into H.R.8419, COS has made no progress in the past decade! That’s because as many states rescinded their applications as passed new applications since 2012.
Nevertheless, the deceptive PR campaign and misleading validation schemes[9] complement each other. Without the PR campaign, the validation schemes lack the appearance of public support. And without the validation schemes, the PR campaign would have no quick path to victory. The con-con lobby, backed by both the globalist Right and Left, is hoping to turn their bluff into a self-fulfilling prophecy. And they need only one convention to impose their preferred Form of Government.
But bluffing works only by deceiving the uninformed. Please share this article and PART 1 with your State Legislators and members of Congress.
[1] The 2023 bill# will change, but the content will probably remain the same.
[2] Later Forms 990 show JHCOS DBA (doing business as) CSG with the same tax ID#.
[3] CFR sponsored “Building a North American Community,” which promotes integrating Canada, the US, & Mexico politically and militarily. To move the US into the North American Union, they need a new constitution.
[4] At this writing, Meckler claims an “army” of 5 million while his computer shows 2.4 million “signatures.”
[5] See e.g., “How the ‘COS’ Cheated Utah.”
[6] E.g., after 7 years of trying, NE passed the COS application in 2022 by suspending a Senate rule and trading votes: “I’ll vote for your bad legislation, if you’ll vote for mine.”
[7] Among Democrats, he’s bipartisan!
[8] Form 990 requires that only the 5 highest-paid independent contractors receiving over $100,000 be reported.
Bio: Judi Caler is a citizen activist working to defend our Constitution from those who would risk it at an Article V constitutional convention. She serves as Article V Issues Director for Eagle Forum of California.
In 2012, Bill McNally, a long-time friend and supporter of Camp Constitution, brought Sam Blumenfeld into Windham, New Hampshire’s public access station and videotaped the all 128 lessons of Sam’s Alpha-Phonics. It was done in three videos which we have in a YouTube playlist:
The videos as well as an audio version has been available on our Sam Blumenfeld Archives: https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/
A link to a free (donations accepted) PDF download of Alpha-Phonics: https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-workbook/
And, a link to purchase a copy of the workbook $20. shipping included: https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-by-sam-blumenfeld/


|
||||||||||||
This is a link to a PDF of a rare 28-page booklet by the late Professor Anthony Kubek:
https://campconstitution.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Communism-At-Pearl-Harbor.pdf

His bio from revisionists.com: Dr. Kubek was a nationally prominent authority on American foreign policy, especially US policy in Asia.
Anthony Kubek was born in 1920. After a year as a scholarship student at Geneva College, he served during World War II in the US Navy in the Pacific theater and the Far East.
He earned three degrees from Georgetown University: B.A. in Foreign Service (1948), M.A. (1950), and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History (1956). During his academic career, he served as the Academic Dean of Frisco College, in Frisco, Texas, and as a professor at the University of Dallas, where he was chairman of the Department of History and Political Science.
He was widely known as a lecturer and a consultant on American foreign policy. He was active in the national honor society Phil Alpha Theta, the Political Science Association, and the American Historical Association.
His published writings included The Amerasian Papers, a two-volume study issued by the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary, How the Far East was Lost: American Policy and the Creation of Communist China, 1941- 1949 (published in 1963 and 1972), The Red China Papers (1975), Ronald Reagan and Free China (2002), as well as a monograph, Communism at Pearl Harbor: How the Communists Helped to Bring on Pearl Harbor and Open Up Asia to Communization (http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/docs/Communism_at_Pearl_Harbor.html).

Throughout his life he was a devout Roman Catholic and staunchly anti-Communist. He and his wife Naomi Dugan Kubek were parents of four children. He died on June 10, 2003, at his home in Irving, Texas.
Today marks the anniversary of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The attacked by the Japanese resulted in the deaths of 2,403 Americans and the destruction of 19 naval ships including 8 battleships and it led to the last time Congress declared. The American people were led to believe that this attack was a total surprise, but was it? James Perloff, author of the Shadows of Power conducted a presentation at Camp Constitution’s 2012 annual family camp explains how the Japanese code was cracked, and the 1944 court martial of Admiral Husband Kimmel and General Walter Short which they demanded totally exonerated them, but Franklin Roosevelt would not allow the American people to knew by making the verdict top secret.
On May 25, 1999, the U.S. Senate passed a resolution to exonerate Kimmel and Short and asked that they be restore both men to full rank.

In 1972, the late Gary Allen published his magnum opus None Dare Call It Conspiracy. Over six million copies were distributed. It was a primer on what is now called the Deep State. Gary authored a number of other books which include The Rockefeller File, Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State, and Nixon: The Man Behind the Mask-a book that changed my life. He also wrote a monthly article for the now defunct American Opinion. He was a generation ahead of his time. Camp Constitution is selling copies of the 1st edition paperback that were still in their original case for $15. shipping included: https://campconstitution.net/product/none-dare-call-it-conspiracy-paperback-1st-edition/ If interested in larger quantities, please E-mail me campconstitution1@gmail.com
Camp Constitution has an audio of a speech on None Dare Call It Conspiracy which we posted to our Podomatic page. We also converted it to MP4 and posted it on both our YouTube and Rumble channels. A link to the video on our Rumble page:
https://rumble.com/v1yv4y0-none-dare-call-it-conspiracy-a-lecture-by-gary-allen.html
And on Podomatic: https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2017-10-01T18_26_18-07_00
A link to his monthly articles: https://s3.amazonaws.com/camppictures/CampArchive/index.html
Sam Blumenfeld gave this presentation in December of 2014, shortly prior to the publication of his last book which he co-authored with Alex Newman entitled Crimes of the Educators
A link to a prepublication manuscript of Crimes of the Educators: http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/Books/Crimes%20of%20the%20Educators.pdf

Since September of 2017 when Liberty Counsel http://lc.org sent a demand letter to the City of Boston, we have received our share of vile comments via E-mail, Facebook, on-line posts, and even a few phone calls. Of course, the positive comments greatly outweighed the negative.
As I was deleting some of my old messages from my cell phone, I discovered the one linked below. It was received on September 30, 2021, the day that the U.S. Supreme Court decided to hear our case. The story has made national and international news. I thought that I would upload the triggered Leftist’s comment on our Podomatic page and convert to a video.to demonstrate the mindset of those opposed to us and our worldview. If this tirade was anything other than anti-Christian, it would be considered a hate crime which would draw national media attention. Warning: It contains vile language. At the end of the message, the man gives out his phone number and encourages me to call him. I did not return the call and I explain why in the short recording. I do not urge anyone listening to this message to call him. I do, however, encourage that you pray for him.
Audio version:
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2022-12-02T13_45_46-08_