Lexington, MA Historical Society Embraces Black Lives Matter-Rev. Steve Craft Interviewed on the subject

Recently, I visited Lexington Center (MA) and noticed a Black Lives Matter banner hanging in front of the Lexington  (MA) Historic Society.   I decided to contact the society and below is an E-mail exchange I had with its director:

“Dear Folks:

While I was on my morning walk. I noticed a “Black Lives Matter” banner over your entrance. While, of course, black lives matter, the organization Black Lives Matter, is a militant, violent anti-American organization whose founders proudly exclaim that they are Marxists and have a hatred for Western Civilization, the United States, and its history. They even defaced the 54th Regiment monument that stands across the Massachusetts State House and destroyed a Frederick Douglas statue in New York.

The Lexington Historic Society is a fine organization that does an excellent job promoting the contributions and sacrifices made by Black Americans. It has no need to virtue signal or support an organization whose members would gladly tear down the statues and monuments in Lexington.

Hal Shurtleff

Dear Mr. Shurtleff,

Thanks for reaching out to us and sharing your thoughts. Back in June, we made a statement that we would commit to being anti-racist.

“Due to recent events, we have come to realize how much more we need to do to be actively anti-racist within our organization. The Society pledges to redouble our efforts to be anti-racist, to work with our members and peers to dismantle white privilege, and to disavow white supremacist ideology.” Please read our full statement here. https://www.lexingtonhistory.org/uploads/6/5/2/1/6521332/lexington_historical_society_statement_on_racial_equity_6.8.2020.pdf

By displaying a Black Lives Matter banner, we are taking one small step towards the promise we made in June and proclaiming that we will no longer tolerate white supremacy and racism. We are not alone in this; we are in the company of thousands of people and organizations around the country, including many in Lexington, who support the Black Lives Matter movement. We are proud to display the banner, and will continue to do so.

Happy holidays. Erica”

Dear Erica:

Thank you for your response. I am surprised to learn that the Lexington Historic Society is full of racists and white supremacists. While I realize that many white progressives are racist, and living in Lexington with a Black population of 1.5 % is evidence of the racism of its residents, I don’t understand how hanging a banner of a racist, Black Supremacist organization whose members have committed acts of violence against those in the Black Community, will somehow solve your organization and the Town of Lexington’s racism. white privilege, and white supremacy.

I am sure that NPR and CNN didn’t report this story, but the leader of the Boston Chapter of Black Lives Matter, Monica Cannon-Grant, engaged in a racist attack against a Black woman who is married to a white man and has interracial children: https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/07/22/black-republican-whose-interracial-marriage-was-slammed-by-ayanna-pressley-supporter-says-she-seeks-apology-gets-none/ Rayla is a friend.

More recently, another Boston Black Lives Matter leader, honored by the Red Sox, was arrested for punching an 80 year-old woman: https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/black-lives-matter-hero-who-was-honored-by-the-red-sox-arrested-for-punching-80-year-old-woman/ You can find hundreds of such incidents of Black Lives Matter members engaging in violent activities all over the U.S. Will the Lexington Historic Society condemn the violence of Black Lives Matter?

While misguided white progressives may look upon your BLM banner with pride, many, especially those who live in the black community see it as a sign that your organization supports violence and mayhem. I will leave you with a short video of my friend Bebe Reid from Harlem who confronted a group of privileged white progressive women on Lexington Green: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGEzfHHz3GA&feature=youtu.be

It has been almost a week and no reply from Erica since then.

Hal Shurtleff

Here is a short video I did in front of the Lexington Historical Society with Rev. Steve Craft

 

 

What the Constitution REQUIRES Congress to do on January 6, 2021

by Publius Huldah
January 4, 2021
Re-blogged from renewamerica and News With Views.

  1. The Rule of Law is being erased in our Land
    Several years ago, I saw a movie on TV. The setting was Berlin, Germany just after WWII at the time the
    Soviets were laying roles of barbed wire on the ground to mark the border between East and West Berlin.The main characters were a young American woman and a young German man. He had gotten a law degree while Hitler was taking over Germany; but he never practiced law. She asked him why and he said, “The Law disappeared”.

    And that’s what’s going on in our Country: The Law – as the standard which those in government must obey – has disappeared and is being replaced by the age-old system where those with the power do what they want, and the cowards go along with it.

    Just as the cowards in Germany went along with Hitler; cowards in America are going along with the Left’s brazen theft of the recent election. Countries are destroyed by such cowards; and that may be the reason Revelation 21:8 lists cowards as the first to be thrown into the Lake of Fire: Tyrants couldn’t get to first base without the acquiescence of cowards.

    So this paper calls upon each Member of Congress to rise up and restore the Rule of Law to our Land.[1] Knowledge of Truth – and the Love of Truth – makes us strong. So learn the Truth, embrace it, and restore the Rule of Law.

  2. We must read each Part of the Constitution in the Light cast by the other Parts
    It is impossible to understand any Part of the Constitution without understanding how that Part fits into the
    Whole; and how each individual Part is affected by the other Parts addressing the same subject. Accordingly, it is an ancient rule of construction that constitutional provisions or statutes that are on the same subject (in pari materia) must be construed together [link].So it is a serious misconstruction of the 12th Amendment to assert that Congress’s role on January 6 is the
    passive one of merely counting numbers; or that the Presiding Officer has discretion to do whatever he
    wants.

    As shown below, specific provisions of the Constitution impose on Congress the Duty to determine whether the Electors were lawfully chosen; and whether the putative President elect and Vice-President elect are qualified for office.

  3. When it meets on January 6, Congress must enforce these Constitutional provisions respecting the Appointment of Electors: Article I, §4, clause 1; Article II, §1, clause 2; and Article II, §1, clause 4Art. I, §4, cl. 1 says that only state and federal legislatures have the power to make laws addressing the Times, Places and Manner of conducting federal elections. So Judges and State executive officials have no lawful authority to change the election laws made by the Legislatures!

    Art. II, §1, cl. 2 says that the Electors for President and Vice-President are to be appointed in such manner as the State Legislatures shall direct. So Judges and State executive officials have no lawful authority to change the election laws respecting how the Electors are to be chosen!

    So Electors who were appointed in violation of these two provisions were unlawfully appointed and hence are not legally competent to cast votes for President and Vice President.

    Art. II, §1, cl. 4 provides that Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors. At 3 USC §1, Congress set the time for chusing Electors for November 3. So Electors who were appointed after November 3 by means of late ballots (which was made possible by unconstitutional changes to state election laws which unlawfully extended the deadlines for receiving ballots past Nov. 3) were unlawfully appointed and hence are not legally competent to cast votes for President and Vice President.[2]

  4. Congress must also enforce these Constitutional provisions respecting the qualifications for the Offices of President and Vice-President Article II, §1, clause 5Art. II, §1, cl. 5 sets forth qualifications for the Office of President. After our first generation of Presidents [who were all born as subjects of the King of England] had passed away; the qualifications for President are that he must be a “natural born citizen”, at least 35 years of age, and have been for at least 14 Years a Resident within the United States.

    The last sentence of the 12th Amendment shows that no person who is ineligible to be President is eligible to be Vice-President.[3]

    The 22nd Amendment

    The 22nd Amendment imposes term limits on the office of President. So any person who has already served two terms is constitutionally ineligible to be President.

    The 20th Amendment, §3

    §3 of the 20th Amendment addresses what happens when the President elect and/or Vice-President elect “fail to qualify”. So §3 underlines Art. II, §1, cl. 5; the last sentence of the 12th Amendment; and the 22nd Amendment: If the President elect or the Vice-President elect “fail to qualify”, they are to be passed over.

    So! The Constitutional scheme is that the Electors’ choice is subject to Congress’ determinations of:

    • whether the requirements of Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl.2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4 were obeyed when the Electors were selected; and
    • whether the persons whom the Electors chose meet the requirements of Art. II, §1, cl. 5; the last sentence of the 12th Amendment, and the term limits provision of the 22nd Amendment.If not, Congress must disqualify the persons.
  5. Congress is also bound by these Constitutional provisions The Guaranty clause at Article IV, §4Art. IV, § 4 says:
    “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government…” [emphasis added]

    Since the essence of a “Republic” is that power is exercised by Representatives elected by The People;[4] the violations of Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; and Art. II, §1, cl.4 (which made massive election fraud possible) strike at the heart of our Constitutional Republic.

    When Electors are selected in violation of our Constitution by means of last minutes changes unlawfully made to state election laws; and/or an election is stolen by means of fraud, the Right of The People to choose their Representatives is taken away from them – and the Republic is destroyed.

    Art. IV, §4 imposes on Congress the Duty to guarantee lawful and honest federal elections. Congress can do this by enforcing Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl.2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4 by disqualifying the Electors chosen in contravention of those provisions.

    Congress may (and should) also disqualify Biden and Harris on the additional ground that their pretended election was procured by cheating. They must be stripped of their sham “win”.[5]

    The Supremacy clause at Article VI, cl. 2

    Art. VI, cl. 2 says:
    “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme Law of the Land…” [italics added]

    Only those Acts of Congress which are consistent with the Constitution are part of the supreme Law of the Land.[6]

    Accordingly, Sections 5 and 15 of the Electoral Count Act (3 USC §§1-21), are unconstitutional to the extent they purport to:

    • require Congress to accept slates of Electors who were appointed in violation of Art. I, §4, cl.1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; and Art. II, §1, cl. 4;
    • require Congress, in the case of dueling slates of Electors, to choose the slate signed by the Governor of the State and reject the slate approved by the State Legislature;[7]
    • and eliminate the 12th Amendment’s dispute resolution procedures under which the House of Representatives chooses the President; and the Senate chooses the Vice-President.[8]

But, contrary to what some have asserted, the 12th Amendment most manifestly does NOT vest exclusive authority and sole discretion in the President of the Senate (Vice-President Mike Pence) to determine which slates of Electors for a State are to be counted and which slates are to be rejected!

As President of the Senate, the Vice-President has certain Parliamentary powers at his disposal; but he has no “discretion” in deciding whether he will adhere to the Constitutional framework governing the Election. He – and every other Member of Congress – must adhere to and enforce each Constitutional provision.

The Oath of Office at Article VI, cl. 3

Every Member of Congress is bound by Oath or Affirmation to support our Constitution. On January 6, you
must lay aside all personal considerations. Do your DUTY as set forth in the Constitution. And remember:
This isn’t about Trump – this is about whether our Republic is to survive. If you permit violations of the
Constitution and the resulting fraud to prevail; you will destroy our Republic.

  1. Our Constitution sets up an elegant system of checks and balances
    One of the benefits of the “separation of powers” Principle is that it provides a mechanism for one power to
    correct violations made by another power. Within the federal and State governments, powers are divided into three Branches: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Each Branch has the duty to “check” the violations of the other Branches.Likewise, the power of the State governments is separated from the power of the federal government. When people within State governments violate the Constitution – as was done in the recent election – it is the Duty of the federal government to “check” the violation. Since Electors were chosen in violation of the Constitution; Congress has the Duty to check the violations and reject those Electors.

Endnotes:
[1] The term, “rule of law”, is defined here at Point 7.
[2] The same Principle applies to Electors who were chosen before Nov. 3 pursuant to [unconstitutional] state
election laws which permit early voting for selection of Electors.
[3] It appears that at the time Kamala Harris was born, her parents were not US Citizens. If so, she is constitutionally ineligible to be President or Vice-President [link]. Congress has the Duty to inquire into this
matter; and if they find that she is not a “natural born citizen” within the original intent of Art. II, §1, cl.5, it is
Congress’ Duty to disqualify her. Congress is the body which is charged with determining the eligibility
of the President and Vice-President
[link].
[4] Federalist No. 10 (J. Madison): “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of
representation takes place, … *** … The two great points of difference between a democracy and a republic
are: first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; …”
[5] If you win a medal at the Olympics; and it’s later discovered that you cheated by taking performance enhancing drugs, you will be stripped of “win” and medal – and both will be awarded to your runner-up. The same Principle applies to stolen elections.
[6] Federalist No. 78, 10th para (A. Hamilton): “…every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of
the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the
Constitution, can be valid.
To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that
the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves;
….” [emphasis mine]
[7] Art. II, §1, cl. 2 provides that the State Legislatures have the power to direct how the Electors are to be
appointed! The State Governor has no constitutional power whatsoever in the selection of Presidential
Electors!

[8] To the same effect, see the Complaint recently filed by US Representative Louie Gohmert [link].
© Publius Huldah

The Weekly Sam: Attention Deficit Disorder is Created in the Classroom

In this presentation, Sam Blumenfeld makes the case that Attention Deficit Disorder is created in the classroom and promoted by Big Pharma:  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2021-01-02T05_04_56-08_00

This audio presentation can also be found at the Blumenfeld Archives:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Help us spread the late Sam Blumenfeld’s message.  Consider making a donation to Camp Constitution.  Donations can be made via our PayPal account accessed from  website’s homepage  http://www.campconstitutiom.net

 

 

The Weekly Sam: Phonics and the History of Reading

In this lecture, Sam Blumenfeld discusses the history of reading, the need to use phonics to teach reading and how the “educators” are dumbing down America’s school children using the look-say method:

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2020-12-27T04_30_03-08_00

This audio is from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives-a free on-line resource:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Please consider a donation to help us reach more people with this important resource.  Donations may be made via PayPal account accessed from our website’s homepage https://www.campconstitution.net

 

Christmas Under Fire by Dr. Peter Hammond

 

Massachusetts Citizens Deserve Fair Elections By Kathy Lynch

Massachusetts Citizens Deserve Fair Elections

By Kathy Lynch

Republican State Committeewoman

Westford, Lowell, Tyngsboro, Pepperell, Groton, and Dunstable

 Some people claim that Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential election while others claim Trump won in a landslide. The truth of the matter is, until all legal votes are counted and certified, in all states, we will not be able to claim a legal winner. Battleground states of Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Georgia, are being contested and are not yet certified.

 One thing is certain, though. This election has brought election integrity to the forefront. Attorney Sydney Powell has compiled a long and growing list of evidence of voter fraud at https://hereistheevidence.com. In a television interview, she equated the amount of evidence coming forth like “drinking from a firehose.”

 Examples of voter fraud include fraudulent voter registrations, deceased voters, ballots cast in the name of others without consent, ballots mailed without request, counting ballots more than once, ballots magically appearing in new-found boxes, and so much more. 

 Now is the time to fix this appalling situation or never trust an election again!

How can we fix this? Here is a start:

  1. Reserve mail-in voting only in rare circumstances such as for overseas military who cannot vote in person. Offering mail-in voting to the masses will, as we have seen, increase voter fraud.
  2. Require voter ID. This should be a no-brainer. By doing so, you ensure one citizen, one vote. For those rare mail-in votes, signatures should be verified.
  3. Don’t make it easier for illegal immigrants to vote through slippery-slope legislation like drivers’ licenses for illegal immigrants.
  4. Increase the number of poll workers and watchers, with all political parties represented.
  5. Use paper ballots instead of electronic ballots. Voting systems like Dominion have been proven to be programmable or hackable to favor certain candidates.

 While we await the final election results for the 2020 Presidential Race, let us take this opportunity to investigate and ensure that all future elections will be conducted with fair election procedures, as listed above, that produce honest results we can trust. 

 Now is the time to connect with fellow citizens who want fair elections. Email ElectionIntegrityNow@protonmail.com. Visit and Like https://www.facebook.com/ElectionIntegrityNow for events, articles, photos and commentary.

 Our lives are greatly affected by laws made by our elected leaders. Let us make sure that those leaders are the ones we truly elect through fair and honest elections. 

Action Alert: Where Does the “Roe Act’ Stand by C.J Williams of Mass Citizens for Life

 

ACTION ALERT: Where does the “ROE ACT” stand?

Th House and Senate have rejected Governor Baker's  recommendations; the state budget will be returned to Baker's desk for approval or veto soon.

Governor Baker must veto the so-called “ROE” amendment, and we must encourage state representatives to vote to uphold his veto.

Please call Gov. Baker thanking him and reiterating that you fully support his veto of this bill until the “ROE” Act language is removed.

617-725-4005

If the governor vetoes the amendment, it will go back for an override vote only to the House of Representatives, where the amendment originated. While messages from constituents will make the largest impact, we need ALL Massachusetts citizens to continue to email and call the state representatives on the below list

 –Even if you are not in the district of these representatives, your voice matters–

  • Use cell phone numbers, if available.
  • If voice mail boxes are full, send a text message to the representative.
  • These representatives need to hear from you, because they are not radically pro-abortion and are most likely to hear your common sense opposition to this unconscionable anti-life piece of legislation.

Find the full list of state representatives below. Please thoughtfully review the details so that you can better make a personal connection with your lawmakers. 

Thank you, and keep on standing up, speaking out, and holding the breach for our most vulnerable!

C.J. Williams, Director of Community Engagement
http://www.masscitizensforlife.org/


Rep Marcos Devers – (617) 722-2020, marcos.devers@mahouse.gov

16th Essex: Lawrence: Ward A: Precincts 2, 4,Ward B, Ward C: Precinct 4, Ward E: Precincts 2, 3, 4, Ward F: Precinct 2, 3, 4

16 Woodland St, Lawrence MA 01841

Cell: (978)590-2594

  • Married since 1986 has four children
  • Endorsed by Democrats for life in 2014

Rep Edward Coppinger – (617) 722-2080, Edward.Coppinger@mahouse.gov

10th Suffolk: Boston: Ward 20: Precincts 1, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, Brookline: Precincts 14, 15, 16

227 Manthorne Rd, West Roxbury, MA 02132-1338

Cell: (617)519-1874

  • Went to Catholic Memorial High School
  • Married with three children
  • Endorsed by Democrats for life in 2014

Rep John Lawn – (617) 722-2460, John.Lawn@mahouse.gov

10th Middlesex: Newton: Ward 1: Precincts 1,4, Ward 4: Precinct 2, Ward 5: Precinct 1, Ward 6: Precinct 2, Ward 7: Precinct 2, Wards 8, 9, Watertown: Precincts 10, 11, 12

20 Pilgrim Rd, Watertown, MA 02472-2228

Cell: (617)515-7647

  • Married with five children
  • Went to St. Patrick’s High School in Watertown

Rep Steven Ultrino – (617) 722-2460, Steven.Ultrino@mahouse.gov

33rd Middlesex: Malden: Ward 2, Ward 3: Precinct 1, Ward 4, Ward 5: Precinct 1, Ward 6

39 Adams St, Malden, MA 02148-6412

Cell: (781)820-1056

  • Went to and taught at Malden Catholic
  • President of the St. Rocco Society of Malden
  • School Principal and Business Manager, St. Mary’s Parish in Winchester

Rep Frank Moran – (617) 722-2582, Frank.Moran@mahouse.gov

17th Essex – Andover: Precincts 2, 3, 4, Lawrence: Ward C, Precincts 1, 2, 3, Ward D, Ward E, Precinct 1, Methuen: Precinct 2

38 Dartmouth St, Lawrence, MA 01841-3250

Cell: (978)884-6375

  • Married with two children

Rep William Driscoll – (617) 722-2460, William.Driscoll@mahouse.gov

7th Norfolk – Milton: Precincts 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Randolph: Precincts 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10

625 Adams St, Milton, MA 02186-5602

Cell: (617)922-3344

  • Married with young children
  • Went to St. Agatha School, BC High, Boston College
  • Received BC High St. Ignatius Award
    • The St. Ignatius Award is the highest honor bestowed on a graduate of BC High, acknowledging those who have exemplified the ideals of our school through high moral character and selfless service to the community. Overall, BC High has recognized more than 80 distinguished alumni with this prestigious honor.

Rep Daniel Cullinane – (617) 722-2430, Daniel.Cullinane@mahouse.gov

12th Suffolk – Milton: Precincts 1 and 2, Boston: Ward 16: Precincts: 8 and 11, Ward 17: Precincts: 4, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, Ward 18: Precincts: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 21

6 Jo Anne Ter, Dorchester Center, MA 02124-5241

Cell: (617)872-5138

  • Married with two children
  • Attended Providence College
  • From his website: My parents, Bob and Elaine Cullinane of Dorchester – a union leader and a Boston public school secretary – are my foundation. They gave me a life of opportunities far too few children are given. At four-months old, they adopted me. I know how easily I could have been one of the thousands of children navigating foster care, dependent on social services, without a family or home to call my own. Yet, through their love, courage, and sacrifice, I went from being an orphan with an uncertain future to being a son with a loving home and every opportunity for a better life. I was given a chance.
  • From his website: The last three years have been very special for Emily and I. In 2017, we were blessed to welcome our first child, William, into the world. In 2019, we welcomed our precious daughter, Isabel, into our family. Together they have brought us more joy than we could have ever imagined and have changed our lives in so many special ways.

Rep Daniel Cahill – (617) 722-2460, Daniel.Cahill@mahouse.gov

10th Essex – Lynn Ward 1: Precincts 3,4, Ward 2, Ward 3: Precincts 1,2,3, Ward 4: Precincts 1,2, Ward 5: Precincts 1,2, Ward 5: Precincts 2, 3

20 Belleaire Ave, Lynn, MA 01904-2102

Cell: (617) 817-3294

  • Married with 2 children

Rep Dan Donahue  – (617) 722-2014, Daniel.Donahue@mahouse.gov

16th Worcester – Worcester: Ward 5: Precincts: 1, 2, 4 and 5, Ward 6, Ward 8: Precincts: 1, 4, and 5

9 Malmo St, Worcester, MA 01607-1318

Cell: N/A

  • Went to St. Mary’s Elementary School, St. John’s High School, and College of the Holy Cross

Rep Bruce Ayers  – (617) 722-2230, Bruce.Ayers@mahouse.gov

1st Norfolk – Quincy: Ward 3: Precincts 4, 5, Ward 3: Precincts 4, 5,Ward 5: Precinct 2, Ward 6, Randolph: Precincts 5, 6, 11, 12
45 Williams St, Quincy, MA 02171-1834

Cell: (617)699-8048

  • Endorsed by Democrats for life in 2020

Rep John Mahoney  – (617) 722-2130, John.Mahoney@mahouse.gov

13th Worcester – Worcester: Ward 1: Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, Ward 3: Precinct 2, Ward 9, Ward 10: Precinct

138 Newton Ave N, Worcester, MA 01609-1404

Cell: (508) 579-0054

  • Married with four children

Rep Jerald Parisella – (617) 722-2240, Jerald.Parisella@mahouse.gov

6th Essex – Beverly

14 Red Rock Ln, Beverly, MA 01915-1229

Cell: (978)807-2999

  • Married with two children

Rep James Kelcourse – (617) 722-2130, james.kelcourse@mahouse.gov

1st Essex – Amesbury, Newburyport, Salisbury

50 Monroe St, Amesbury, MA 01913-3215

Cell: (978)590-7673

  • Married with two children
  • Villanova Alumn

Rep Thomas Petrolati – (617) 722-2575, Thomas.Petrolati@mahouse.gov

7th Hampden – Chicopee: Ward 6: Precinct B, Ludlow, Springfield: Ward 8: Precincts E, F, G, Belchertown: Precincts B, C, D

106 Stevens St, Ludlow, MA 01056-3620

Cell: (413)537-8500

  • In April 1996 Petrolati helped Thomas Finneran build a coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats to defeat House Majority Leader Richard A. Voke for the speakership

Rep Thomas Golden – (617) 722-2263, Thomas.Golden@mahouse.gov

16th Middlesex – Chelmsford: Precincts 2, 3, 6, Lowell: Wards 5, 6, 9

24 Munroe St, Lowell, MA 01850-2205

Cell: (978)590-4941

  • Married with two children
  • Endorsed by Dems for Life

Rep James Arciero – (617) 722-2012, James.Arciero@mahouse.gov

2nd Middlesex – Chelmsford: Precincts 5, 7, 8, Littleton, Westford

29 E Prescott St, Westford, MA 01886-2355

Cell: (978)496-6266

  • Eagle Scout
  • Endorsed by Dems for Life

Rep Stephan Hay – (617) 722-2220, Stephan.Hay@mahouse.gov

3rd Worcester – Fitchburg, Lunenburg: Precinct B

30 Shawna St, Fitchburg, MA 01420-369

Cell: (978)235-1968

  • Married with two children
  • Director First Parish Housing Fitchburg INC

Rep Richard Haggerty – (617) 722-2090, richard.haggerty@mahouse.gov,

30th Middlesex – Reading: Precincts 2, 3, 4, 5, Woburn: Wards 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

160 Winn St, Woburn, MA 01801-2825

Cell: (781)264-1307

  • Married

Rep Jose Tosado – (617) 722-2060, Jose.Tosado@mahouse.gov

9th Hampden – Chicopee: Ward 5: Precinct A, Springfield: Ward 2: Precincts A, B, C, D, F, G, Ward 5: Precincts C, D, G, H, Ward 7: Precincts F, H, Ward 8: Precincts A, B, D, H

22 Birch Glen Rd, Springfield, MA 01119-2102

Cell: (413)478-6423

  • Married with three children
  • Veteran
  • 2014 news clip – “As a native of Puerto Rico, Tosado understands the special concerns of Latinos and will bring that voice to Beacon Hill.”

Rep Ronald Mariano – (617) 722-2300, Ronald.Mariano@mahouse.gov

3rd Norfolk – Holbrook: Precincts 2, 3, 4, Quincy: Ward 2, Ward 4: Precinct 5, Weymouth: Precincts 5, 6, 9, 12, 16

200 Falls Blvd, Unit F301,Quincy, MA 02169-8195

Cell: (857)526-6161

  • Married

Rep. Patrick Kearny – (617) 722-2014, patrick.kearney@mahouse.gov

4th Plymouth – Marshfield; Scituate: Precincts 1, 2, 4, 5, 6

18 Lighthouse Rd, Scituate, MA 02066-3515

Cell: (781)820-2031 (?)

  • Went to BC High
  • Comes from large Irish family
  • From his website: Patrick has a unique perspective on service, leadership, and engagement. He values the commitment of  family, hard work, and community which his parents and grandparents have always emphasized.

 

 


Massachusetts Citizens for Life · 529 Main St, Suite 205, Boston, MA 02129, United States
This email was sent to campconstitution1@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.


Contact us: 617-242-4199 | cj@masscitizensforlife.org

Bill of Rights Day by Pastor Garrett Lear

December 15th is Bill of Rights Day, the 229th anniversary of the most successful assertion of individual rights and liberties ever written. The date is as obscure as it should be celebrated. If you watched the news this morning, they were more likely highlighting National Cupcake Day. But it’s also one of the most important dates in American history, because without the Bill of Rights the fledgling United States may not have survived.

Barely a decade after 1776, shortcomings in the Articles of Confederation brought about a political crisis among the states, culminating in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The new Constitution was ratified the following year, but that was not the end of the crisis, as a number of states made ratification contingent on a Bill of Rights being swiftly added to it.

With the fate of the Republic at stake, the two dominant political forces of the time – the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists – waged a public contest of ideas. It ended with the drafting by consensus of the first ten amendments to the new Constitution, collectively known as the Bill of Rights, which sealed the deal when Virginia became the 11th state to ratify, on this day in 1791.

The history of the document since then has been a stunning success. In a testament to the power of its ideas, the visionary principles embodied in the Bill of Rights that were considered radical by most of the outside world at the time – freedom of expression and belief, the presumption of innocence, due process and equality under the law – are today lauded as universal human rights.

The expanding reach of these principles in our own country has been no less breathtaking. When the Bill of Rights was ratified its provisions only fully applied to 5% of the people living here. They didn’t apply to slaves, native Americans, women, or white men of less than a certain means or property.

But the amendments themselves do not contain a single exclusionary clause. So as our understanding of freedom grew from the experience of it, along with the wrenching tragedy of a civil war, the Bill of Rights remained a clear beacon illuminating the path forward. Today virtually all Americans expect that these rights and freedoms belong to all equally.

There have been setbacks and reversals along the way. President Roosevelt declared the first Bill of Rights Day in 1941. Two months later he issued the executive order interning all Japanese Americans, one of the darker episodes in our history. Today’s headlines remind us just how perpetually fragile the idea of a free, just, and civil society is. As President Reagan pointedly observed “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream.”

The Bill of Rights:

THE BILL OF RIGHTS – FULL TEXT

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.12391436_10156353994430154_6154612813614644086_n 12391248_10156353995805154_639477869495943373_n