Camp Constitution Mails Liberty to Socialist Congressman Jamaal Bowman After He Sends Marxist Books to Governor DeSantis

 

Recently, Congressman Jamaal Bowman, a member of the Democrat Socialists of America who wants to defund the police, sent Governor Desantis some Marxist, and racists books including White Fragility.  Bowman made a video placing the books and mailing the box in a post office.  In the video, he made some outrageous accusations against Desantis who signed a bill banning Critical Race Theory in the state’s high schools and is working to ban it in public colleges.

(Congressman Jamaal Bowman D-NY

After watching the video, I thought that we would make our own video and send Mr. Bowman a few liberty books which include The Law, Cliches of Socialism by Frederic Bastiat, Color, Communism and Common Sense by Manning Johnson, and a copy of Sam Blumenfeld’s Alpha-Phonics.

 

Are You Familiar with the Shurtleff Case? Senator Josh Hawley to Colleen Shogan, Nominated to be National Archivist

Last week, the US. Senate Judiciary Committee held a confirmation hearing for Colleen Shogan nominated by Joe Biden to be National Archivist.  Senator Hawley exposed her as a far-left anti-Christian bigot which is the norm for a Biden nominee for any position in his administration.  She refused to acknowledge her ranting on social media.  In this short clip of the hearing, Hawley asks Shogun if she has heard of the “Shurtleff case?”  Hawley takes her to task for offering legal advice to a friend who complained of religious flags on federal property.

 

Since the 9-0 U.S. Supreme Court decision “Shurtleff v Boston”, Camp Constitution’s lawsuit against the City of Boston, dozens of towns and cities across the United States have banned third party flags which include the Rainbow flag.  USA Today recently ran a story on the subject:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/02/24/pride-flag-ban-lgbtq-symbol-vanishes-more-cities-schools/11325450002/

 

The Weekly Sam: John Dewey’s Plan to Dumb Down America by Sam Blumenfeld

in 2013, Camp Constitution Press, at the recommendation of Sam Blumenfeld, reprinted John Dewey’s article from May of 1898 titled “The Primary-Education Fetich” (sic) in which the life-long socialist and enemy of Christianity how he and his fellow socialists would dumb-down America.  Sam wrote the preface and we include a link to the a PDF version of the entire reprint:

 

Preface to John Dewey’s Plan
to Dumb-Down America
By Samuel Blumenfeld
The dumbing-down of America is no accident. It is not the result
of uncontrollable natural forces floating in the air we breathe or the
water we drink. It is the result of a planned scheme launched in 1898
by Progressive-in-Chief John Dewey outlined in an article titled “The
Primary-Education Fetich” (sic). Dewey was a diehard socialist with
a deep hatred of capitalism, individualism, and orthodox Christianity.
He, and his small army of academic followers, were determined to
turn America into a humanist collectivist society and he figured out
that the best way to separate Americans from their constitutional
freedoms and individualism was to dumb them down.

And the easiest way to do this was to change the way children were
taught to read in their primary schools. Get rid of intensive phonics,
the foundation oflanguage mastery and independent intelligence, and
put in its place a “sight” or “look-say” method that teaches children
to read English as if it were Chinese. Have them memorize a sight
vocabulary so that they develop a whole-word reflex and cannot see
the phonetic structure of our alphabetic words. Thus, they will become
reading disabled, dyslexic, or simply low-level readers.

Need proof? Look no further than what happened to the four
Rockefeller boys back in the 1920s when John D. Rockefeller Jr.
put his four sons-Nelson, Laurence, Winthrop, and David-in the
Progressive Lincoln School in New York. As a misguided admirer of
John Dewey, Rockefeller donated three million dollars to the school
which then turned his four sons into dyslexics. Mr. Rockefeller’s
ignorance condemned his sons to lives ofliterary frustration. Yes, they
had plenty of money, but their life-long reading handicap deprived
them of the great pleasures of reading.

Dewey’s vision of an egalitarian, socialist America was based on
a novel written by Unitarian journalist Edward Bellamy, Looking
Backward. The novel is a fantasy of America becoming a socialist
paradise in the year 2000. Economic planning replaced free-market
competition, and Americans became members of a regimented
industrial army, all paid by the government.

Of course, Dewey knew that Americans would not voluntarily give
up their economic and individual freedoms, so he told his colleagues:
“Change must come gradually. To force it unduly would compromise
its final success by favoring a violent reaction:’ And so, wholesale
deception became the modus operandi of the progressive movement.

We are reprinting Dewey’s article because it is important for
Americans to understand how they’ve been deceived by their so-called educators. The plan to deliberately dumb down the nation
has been hidden from the public for almost 100 years. Reading it
today is to become finally aware of the deceit and treachery behind
this treasonous conspiracy to destroy the intellect of millions of
Americans behind the benign fa<;:ade of Progressive education.
When you consider the misery, frustration, despair and humiliation
these teaching methods have caused in millions ofAmerican children,
it becomes clear that the professional educators behind all ofthis were
diabolically inspired.
Can we repair the damage done by Dewey’s plan? Only if the will
is there and Americans are willing to face the fact that they have been
betrayed by their educators.
Dewey, of course, is long dead, but his disciples control American
public education, and whether they know it or not they are continuing
to implement Dewey’s plan. And we see the results every day. In
2007, the National Endowment for the Arts released its report on the
decline of American literacy. Its chairman, Dana Gioia stated:
“This is a massive social problem. We are losing the majority of
the new generation. They will not achieve anything close to their
potential because of poor reading:’

The only way to reverse this situation is to make sure that every child
in every American school is taught to read with intensive, systematic
phonics. We know how to restore high literacy to America. But is
there the will to do it? Many parents are doing it by homeschooling
their own children. But will it be done in the schools? It will be
done only if there is enough of an outcry from concerned parents and
citizens. That is why we urge readers ofthis article to distribute copies
of it to as many people as possible. If this article is read by millions of
Americans, it will have an impact that the educators and politicians
will not be able to ignore.

A link to a PDF version of our 2013 reprint:  https://campconstitution.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/The-John-Dewey-Plan-to-Dumb-Down-America.pdf

Global Warming Mostly Human Caused or Mostly Natural:Camp Constitution Instructor Dr. Willie Soon’s February 2023 presentation at ICCC15, Florida (USA)

On February 24th, 2023, CERES co-team leader, Dr. Willie Soon presented a talk at the Heartland Institute’s 15th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC15). His talk was entitled, “Global warming: Mostly human-caused or mostly natural?”

In this talk, he summarized some of the key findings of two of CERES’ recent scientific publications:

  1. P. O’Neill, R. Connolly, M. Connolly, W. Soon, B. Chimani, M. Crok, R. de Vos, H. Harde, P. Kajaba, P. Nojarov, R. Przybylak, D. Rasol, Oleg Skrynyk, Olesya Skrynyk, P. Štěpánek, A. Wypych and P. Zahradníček (2022). Evaluation of the homogenization adjustments applied to European temperature records in the Global Historical Climatology Network dataset. Atmosphere 13(2), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020285. (🗄️)

  2. R. Connolly, W. Soon, M. Connolly, S. Baliunas, J. Berglund, C. J. Butler, R. G. Cionco, A. G. Elias, V. M. Fedorov, H. Harde, G. W. Henry, D. V. Hoyt, O. Humlum, D. R. Legates, S. Lüning, N. Scafetta, J.-E. Solheim, L. Szarka, H. van Loon, V. M. Velasco Herrera, R. C. Willson, H. Yan and W. Zhang (2021). How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/6/131. (🗄️) Supplementary Materials available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7088728.

He also discussed the implications these studies have for the findings of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s recent 6th Assessment Report (AR6, 2021).

The slides for his presentation can be downloaded here in either Powerpoint or PDF format:

Soon23-Feb24-Heartland ICCC15 Talk
.pptx
Download PPTX • 25.29MB
Soon23-Feb24-Heartland ICCC15 Talk
.pdf
Download PDF • 9.95MB

For details on the latest ICCC conference, see https://climateconference.heartland.org/. For access to an archive of all the ICCC conferences since 2008, see https://climateconferences.heartland.org/.

Dr. Soon’s talk can be viewed at the following YouTube link:

(The above article originated on the CERES Science blog https://www.ceres-science.com/post/iccc15
Professor Soon will be  an at Camp Constitution’s 15th Annual Family Camp July 16-21:  https://campconstitution.net/camp-registration/
 

Childish beliefs drive lethal energy and agricultural agendas

Biden and environmentalist policies would destroy agriculture, habitats, products and nutrition

Paul Driessen

Many eco-activists (and too many legislators, regulators, judges and journalists) have trouble thinking beyond slogans. They apparently believe declaring ecological emergencies, repeating clever mantras, and issuing proclamations and mandates will create a fossil-fuel-free, organic farming utopia. In their dreams.

Since 1950, American farmers increased per-acre corn yields by an incredible 500% – and other crop yields by smaller but still amazing amounts, while using less land, water, fuel, fertilizers and pesticides. Their exports helped slash global hunger and malnutrition. Farmers in BrazilIndia and other countries worldwide have likewise enjoyed record harvests in recent years. Their success has many “roots.”

Hybrid seeds combine valuable traits from different plants. Biotech seeds protect crops against insects and viruses and reduce water and pesticide demand. Nitrogen fertilizers (synthesized from natural gas) join phosphorus and potassium in supercharging soils. School and online programs offer libraries of agricultural success tools. Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) further spurs plant growth.

Long-lasting herbicides control weeds that would otherwise steal moisture and nutrients from crops, while enabling farmers to utilize no-till farming that avoids breaking up soils, reduces erosion, further retains soil moisture and preserves vital soil organisms. Israeli-developed drip irrigation delivers water without the evaporation characteristic of other irrigation methods.

Modern high-tech tractors use GPS systems, sensors, cameras and other equipment to steer precise courses across fields, while constantly measuring soil composition, and injecting just the right kinds and amounts of fertilizers, herbicides and insecticides, along with seeds, to ensure optimal harvests.

Imagine the bounteous crops for humanity if all these technologies could spread across the globe.

Instead, this planet-saving, life-saving progress is under assault – by well-meaning or ideologically driven, ill-advised or ill-intended … but all well-funded … organizations that demand natural gas bans, “more Earth friendly” agriculture and a return to “traditional farming lifestyles.”

Their hatred of biotech crops is intense and well-documented, but they also despise hybrid seeds. They want modern herbicides and insecticides banned, in favor of “natural” alternatives that are often toxic to bees, animals and people; may actually be synthetic (eg, neurotoxic pyrethrins); and are rarely tested for residues on produce or long-term toxicity to humans. They demand “natural” fertilizers, which often provide a tiny fraction of nutrients that modern synthetic fertilizers do.

They want to teach only “traditional” (ie, subsistence) farming, especially in Africa. They prefer to call it “food sovereignty” – which they claim is the “right” to “culturally appropriate” food produced through “ecologically sound and sustainable methods,” in accord with AgroEcology policies. In other words, millions more people (ruling elites and their kids?) doing back-breaking stoop labor, dawn to dusk.

Tractors? Why not horses, oxen or human labor, they ask? At least get rid of gasoline and diesel tractors and trucks, in favor of electric models. Never mind that EV tractors and combines would require several tons of battery modules, and still wouldn’t be able to do a full day’s work without hours-long recharges.

They want oil and gas locked in the ground. “We don’t need petrochemical products, especially synthetic fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.” Or tractor tires, paint, windows, GPS/computer housings, and more.

Have these illiterati looked at their own clothing, food, homes, offices or world? Synthetic fabrics, cosmetics, cell phone and computer housings, pharmaceuticals, tapes and adhesives, protective gear, eyeglasses, car bodies, detergents, wind turbine nacelle covers and blades, medical devices, car bodies – practically everything around them and in their lives exists because of oil, gas and petrochemicals.

But we can just use biofuels to replace feed stocks for products we really need, they proclaim. Right.

Banishing oil, gas, petrochemicals and internal-combustion engines would certainly mean no more ethanol as a gasoline additive. That would eliminate the need to grow corn on 36,000,000 acres (equivalent to Iowa), and that land could be used for food crops or wildlife habitat. Except it won’t be.

Organic farms have significantly lower crop yields per acre and require far more land than conventional agriculture. Worse, ending oil and gas production means tens of millions of acres would have to be planted with biofuel crops, to provide feed stocks for thousands of now-petrochemical products.

That means vastly more tractors or human labor – and more water, fertilizers and pesticides – to cultivate and harvest sugar and oilseed crops (and algae). And then all those simple biofuel molecules would have to be transformed into much more complex hydrocarbons to provide the necessary feed stocks. That would require even more energy, from even more wind turbines and solar panels – on top of doubling or tripling our existing electricity needs, to transform the U.S. and global economies to all-electric systems, and repeatedly recharge the grid-balancing and power backup batteries those systems would require.

Or perhaps Team Biden plans to simply import all those petrochemicals and/or products – as it seems to be planning with regard to wind turbines, solar panels, battery modules, transformers and other “green” energy equipment. America will not be able to produce any of it, because Team Biden and its allies oppose mining and drilling in the USA (even for raw materials essential for their utopian “renewable” energy transformation – and we won’t even have affordable, reliable electricity to operate factories.

How can these “best and brightest” decision-makers and advisors be so ignorant, inept and clueless – so unable to connect even two or three dots? They’re destroying our planet, habitats and wildlife, to “Save the Earth” from a computer-modeled “climate crisis” that President Biden absurdly insists is “a greater threat than nuclear war.”

They base critical policies that deeply affect lives and livelihoods everywhere on childish beliefs in Santa Claus and Harry Potter. They think we can banish today’s energy and agricultural resources and technologies – and amazing replacements will just be there … via some mystical, mythical process called Materials Acquisition for Government-mandated Infrastructure Change (MAGIC).

Some of them know this cannot possibly happen, but promote the policies anyway. They seem to believe they can mandate that “common folks” will just have to live austerely, under nineteenth or early twentieth century living standards, in 700-square-foot apartments, using electricity when it’s available (not when they need it), and subsisting on bug burgers and larvae milk.

They think Africa would be “the perfect laboratory” for testing new foods, like “crackers, muffins, meat loaves and sausages” made from lake flies. If all that fails, they’ll just impose forced rationing.

Others would go even further. Obama science advisor John Holdren advocated “de-development of the [United States and other over-developed countries] and semi-development of the under-developed countries, to approach a decent and ecologically sustainable standard of living for all in between.”

Oceanographer Jacques Cousteau once said, “in order to stabilize world populations, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.” Environmental Defense scientist Charles Wurster said “People are the cause of all the problems…. We need to get rid of some of them, and [banning DDT] is as good a way as any.”

Environmental and racial justice? Campaigns, policies government actions to eradicate fossil fuels and modern agricultural practices and technologies go well beyond callous and imperious. They go well beyond eco-imperialism, eco-colonialism and eco-Apartheid. They drive eco-manslaughter on a global scale via energy, farming and climate policy. They impose systemic, systematic racism.

These ideas, and these policy proponents, are what should be banished from government, media and academic institutions. Not the wondrous technologies that make modern life possible.

Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books and articles on energy, climate change, environmental policy and human rights.

Contact me: pkdriessen@gmail.com

The Constitutional Minute #17: Does the federal government need a budget?

Not if we elected folks who would abide by the Constitution! The federal government does not provide for a budget because the enumerated powers are the budget! It’s all so simple. Only the government can muck up such simplicity.

Congress is to appropriate funds to carry out the handful of delegated powers, and then it is to pay the bills with receipts from taxes.

Our Constitution doesn’t permit the federal government to spend money on whatever they want. If Congress obeyed our Constitution, they would limit spending to the enumerated powers listed in the Constitution.

Since the Constitution delegates to Congress only limited and narrowly defined authority to spend money, excessive federal spending (and regulation) is not the result of a defective Constitution, but of our federal government disregarding the existing constitutional limitations on federal spending.

Various factions are now telling us that the only way to stop out of control federal spending is with an amendment, specifically a BBA (Balanced Budget Amendment), but we must look at the interactions of one part of the Constitution with the other parts to get a complete picture and to prevent unintended consequences! How many of those have we had in the past?

An amendment is not a stand-alone document. Its parts are wonderfully interwoven with other parts of the Constitution. Once an amendment is ratified, it now becomes part of the Constitution. Now, look at Art. III, Sec. 2 where it says the judicial power shall extend to all cases “arising under this Constitution”.

If a Balance Budget Amendment creates a budget (and it does) and defense spending is part of the budget (and it is), defense spending now “arises” under the Constitution, yes?  Is defense spending now possibly subject to judicial determination? How would you like to see defense spending differences end up in federal courts? What could possibly go wrong?

Still think amendments are a good idea?  We must not let desperation sideline our critical thinking skills!

wethepeoplehandbook@gmail.com

www.buildingblocksforliberty.org

Evolution’s Racism defended by Clarence Darrow: The Monkey Trial & William Jennings Bryan – American Minute with Bill Federer

The Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925 pitted EVOLUTION against CREATION.

Clarence Darrow was the attorney who defended EVOLUTION.
Darrow had previously defended Leopold and Loeb, the teenage homosexual thrill killers who murdered 14-year-old Robert “Bobby” Franks in 1924 just for the excitement.
Darrow obtained a pardon for antifa-type anarchists in 1886 who blew up a pipe bomb in Chicago’s Haymarket, Square, killing 7 policemen and injured 60 others.
A Haymarket Statue was dedicated to the fallen policemen.
The policemen’s Haymarket Statue was blown up by the socialist anarchist group Weather Underground on October 6, 1969, prior to the “Days of Rage” protests.
The statue was rebuilt, but the Weather Underground blew it up again on October 6, 1970.
The Weather Underground’s leaders had a lasting effect, as two of them, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, hosted a meeting in 1995 to launch Barack Obama’s Illinois State Senate Campaign; and another, Eric Mann, trained Patrisse Cullors, a founder of Black Lives Matter.
Clarence Darrow defended the “mentally deranged drifter” Patrick Eugene Prendergast in 1894 who confessed to murdering Chicago mayor Carter H. Harrison, Sr.
Darrow defended socialist organizer Eugene V. Debs, who was prosecuted for instigating the Pullman Railroad Strike which caused 30 deaths, 57 wounded, and $80 million in property damages in 27 states.
Debs founded the Socialist Party of America, which branched off the Communist Party USA in 1919.
Clarence Darrow represented the Western Federation of Miners leaders charged with the 1905 murder of former Idaho Gov. Frank Steunenberg.
In 1911, the American Federation of Labor arranged for Darrow to defend the McNamara brothers.
The McNamara brothers were charged with dynamiting the Los Angeles Times building which killed 21 employees.
Implicated in bribing jurors, Darrow was banned from practicing law in California.
In 1925, Darrow unsuccessfully defended John Scopes, a Tennessee high school biology teacher who taught the theory of origins called “evolution.”
The attorney defending CREATION was the Democrat Party’s three time candidate for President, William Jennings Bryan.
Bryan objected to a tooth being presented as proof of humans evolving from apes.
Later the tooth was found to be that of an extinct peccary (pig).
William Jennings Bryan won the Scopes case on JULY 21, 1925.
Though Darrow lost the trial, a pro-evolution propaganda film was produced in 1960 titled Inherit the Wind.
Professor Alan M. Dershowitz wrote on “The Scopes Trial” in his book America on Trial: Inside the Legal Battles that Transformed Our Nation (eBook Edition: May 2004):
“The popular perception of what transpired in the courtroom comes not from the transcript of the court proceeding itself, but rather from the motion picture … Inherit the Wind.
The William Jennings Bryan character, Scopes’s prosecutor, was a burlesque of know-nothing religious literalism …
… The actual William Jennings Bryan was no simple-minded literalist, and he certainly was no bigot.
He was a great populist who cared deeply about equality and about the downtrodden.
Indeed, one of his reasons for becoming so deeply involved in the campaign against evolution was that Darwin’s theories were being used – misused, it turns out – by racists, militarists, and nationalists to further some pretty horrible programs …”
Dershowitz continued:
“The eugenics movement, which advocated sterilization of ‘unfit’ and ‘inferior’ stock, was at its zenith, and it took its impetus from Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
German militarism, which had just led to the disastrous world war, drew inspiration from Darwin’s ideas on survival of the fittest.
The anti-immigration movement, which had succeeded in closing American ports of entry to ‘inferior racial stock,’ was grounded in a mistaken belief that certain ethnic groups had evolved more fully than others …
… The Jim Crow laws, which maintained racial segregation, were rationalized on grounds of the racial inferiority of blacks.
… Indeed, the very book – Hunter’s Civic Biology – from which John T. Scopes taught Darwin’s theory of evolution to high school students in Dayton, Tennessee, contained dangerous misapplications of that theory …”
Dershowitz added:
“Indeed, its very title, Civic Biology, made it clear that biology had direct political implications for civic society.
In discussing the ‘five races’ of man, the text assured the all-white, legally segregated high school students taught by Scopes that ‘the highest type of all, the Caucasians, (are) represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America.’
The book, the avowed goal of which was the improvement of the future human race, then proposed certain eugenic remedies.”
Eugenic laws, based on evolution, were passed in many states.
Virginia’s eugenic law, in 1924, allowed for the state to sterilize its first victim, Carrie Buck, who was a patient in the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-minded.
A case was brought which went to the Supreme Court.
There, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., gave his infamous Buck v. Bell decision (1927), which continued to allow the sterilization of people without their knowledge or consent, stating: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Because of Holmes’ decision, Virginia continued to sterilize more than 8,000 people until the practice was stopped in 1974.
Holmes also applied evolution to his decision-making philosophy, calling it “legal realism,” letting judges alter laws to adapt to changing social and economic conditions.

Professor Alan Dershowitz continued his critique of the high school textbook used by John Scopes, Hunter’s Civic Biology:
After a discussion of the inheritability of crime and immorality, the author proposed an analogy: …
‘Just as certain animals or plants become parasitic on other plants or animals, these families have become parasitic on society.
They not only do harm to others by corrupting, stealing, or spreading disease, but they are actually protected and cared for by the state out of public money …
They take from society, but they give nothing in return. They are true parasites …'”
Dershowitz added:
“From the analogy flowed ‘the remedy’:
‘If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading.
Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.
Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully in Europe and are now meeting with success in this country.’
… These ‘remedies’ included involuntary sterilizations, and eventually laid the foundation for involuntary ‘euthanasia’ of the kind practiced in Nazi Germany …”
Dershowitz continued:
“Nor were these misapplications of Darwinian theory limited to high school textbooks. Eugenic views held sway at institutions of higher learning such as Harvard University, under racist president Abbot Lawrence Lowell.
Even so distinguished a Supreme Curt justice as Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld a mandatory sterilization law on the basis of a pseudo-scientific assumption about heritability and genetics.
His widely quoted rationale – that ‘three generations of imbeciles are enough’ – was later cited by Nazi apologists for mass sterilization …
… It should not be surprising, therefore, that William Jennings Bryan … would be outraged – both morally and religiously …
The textbook Scopes wanted to teach was … a bad science text, filled with misapplied Darwinism and racist rubbish.”
After the trial, William Jennings Bryan wrote in his summary of the Scopes trial of how science tells us what we can do, religion tells us what we should do:
“Science is a magnificent force, but it is not a teacher of morals. It can perfect machinery, but it adds no moral restraints to protect society from the misuse of the machine.
It can also build gigantic intellectual ships, but it constructs no moral rudders for the control of storm-tossed human vessel.
It not only fails to supply the spiritual element needed but some of its unproven hypotheses rob the ship of its compass and thus endanger its cargo …”
Bryan continued:
“In war, science has proven itself an evil genius; it has made war more terrible than it ever was before.
Man used to be content to slaughter his fellowmen on a single plane, the earth’s surface.
Science has taught him to go down into the water and shoot up from below and to go up into the clouds and shoot down from above, thus making the battlefield three times as bloody as it was before;
but science does not teach brotherly love.
… Science has made war so hellish that civilization was about to commit suicide;
and now we are told that newly discovered instruments of destruction will make the cruelties of the late war seem trivial in comparison with the cruelties of wars that may come in the future …”
Bryan concluded:
“If civilization is to be saved from the wreckage threatened by intelligence not consecrated by love, it must be saved by the moral code of the meek and lowly Nazarene.
His teachings, and His teachings alone, can solve the problems that vex the heart and perplex the world.”
Bryan’s 1925 statement was echoed by Winston Churchill, who stated in 1941:
“But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States … will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.”

William Jennings Bryan had been a Colonel in the Spanish-American War, a U.S. Representative from Nebraska and U.S. Secretary of State under Democrat President Woodrow Wilson.
Bryan edited the Omaha World Herald and founded The Commoner Newspaper.
Dying five days after the Scopes Trial, William Jennings Bryan was so popular that his statue was placed in the U.S. Capitol’s Statuary Hall by the State of Nebraska and the Post Office issued a $2.00 stamp in his honor.
Bryan gave over 600 public speeches during his Presidential campaigns, with his most famous being “The Prince of Peace,” printed in the New York Times, September 7, 1913, in which he stated:
“I am interested in the science of government but I am more interested in religion …
I enjoy making a political speech … but I would rather speak on religion than on politics.
I commenced speaking on the stump when I was only twenty, but I commenced speaking in the church six years earlier-and I shall be in the church even after I am out of politics …”
Bryan reasoned:
“Tolstoy … declares that the religious sentiment rests not upon a superstitious fear … but upon man’s consciousness of his finiteness amid an infinite universe …
Man feels the weight of his sins and looks for One who is sinless.
Religion has been defined by Tolstoy as the relation which man fixes between himself and his God …
Religion is the foundation of morality in the individual and in the group of individuals …”
Bryan added:
“A religion which teaches personal responsibility to God gives strength to morality.
There is a powerful restraining influence in the belief that an all-seeing eye scrutinizes every thought and word and act of the individual …
One needs the inner strength which comes with the conscious presence of a personal God …”
Bryan stated further:
“I passed through a period of skepticism when I was in college …
The college days cover the dangerous period in the young man’s life; he is just coming into possession of his powers, and feels stronger than he ever feels afterward-and he thinks he knows more than he ever does know.
It was at this period that I became confused by the different theories of creation.
… But I examined these theories and found that they all assumed something to begin with …
A Designer back of the design – a Creator back of the creation;
and no matter how long you draw out the process of creation, so long as God stands back of it you cannot shake my faith in Jehovah …
We must begin with something – we must start somewhere – and the Christian begins with God …”
Bryan continued:
“While you may trace your ancestry back to the monkey … you shall not connect me with your family tree …
The ape, according to this theory, is older than man and yet the ape is still an ape while man is the author of the marvelous civilization which we see about us …
This theory … does not explain the origin of life.
When the follower of Darwin has traced the germ of life back to the lowest form … to follow him one must exercise more faith than religion calls for …”
Bryan explained:
“Those who reject the idea of creation are divided into two schools, some believing that the first germ of life came from another planet and others holding that it was the result of spontaneous generation …
Go back as far as we may, we cannot escape from the creative act, and it is just as easy for me to believe that God created man as he is as to believe that, millions of years ago, He created a germ of life and endowed it with power to develop …”
He added:
“But there is another objection.
The Darwinian theory represents man as reaching his present perfection by the operation of the law of hate – the merciless law by which the strong crowd out and kill off the weak …
I prefer to believe that love rather than hatred is the law of development …”
William Jennings Bryan concluded:
“Science has disclosed some of the machinery of the universe, but science has not yet revealed to us the great secret — the secret of life.
It is to be found in every blade of grass, in every insect, in every bird and in every animal, as well as in man.
Six thousand years of recorded history and yet we know no more about the secret of life than they knew in the beginning …
If the Father deigns to touch with divine power the cold and pulseless heart of the buried acorn and to make it burst forth from its prison walls, will he leave neglected in the earth the soul of man, made in the image of his Creator? …
The Gospel of the Prince of Peace gives us the only hope that the world has.”

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated in an address at the Memorial to William Jennings Bryan, May 3, 1934:
“No selfish motive touched his public life; he held important office only as a sacred trust of honor from his country …
To Secretary Bryan political courage was not a virtue to be sought or attained, for it was an inherent part of the man.
He chose his path not to win acclaim but rather because that path appeared clear to him from his inmost beliefs.
He did not have to dare to do what to him seemed right; he could not do otherwise …”
Franklin Roosevelt continued:
“It was my privilege to know William Jennings Bryan when I was a very young man.
Years later both of us came to the Nation’s capital to serve under the leadership of Woodrow Wilson …
It was Mr. Bryan who said: ‘I respect the aristocracy of learning, I deplore the plutocracy of wealth but I thank God for the democracy of the heart.’
Many years ago he also said: ‘You may dispute over whether I have fought a good fight; you may dispute over whether I have finished my course; but you cannot deny that I have kept the faith.’
We who are assembled here today to accept this memorial in the capital of the Republic can well agree that he fought a good fight; that he finished his course; and that he kept the faith.”

American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate.
(Camp Constitution reposted this with permission from American Minute)

The Weekly Sam: The Miracle of Alpha-Phonics A Teacher’s Testimonial by Paul Lukawski

(Mr. Lukawski wrote this testimonial of Sam Blumenfeld’s Alpha-Phonics in May of 2008)

 

I have been a high school English teacher for 14 years. I remember in college wanting to know how to teach children to read. I went to a teacher college established in 1910. The school had one of the oldest teachers colleges in the country. Its College of Education enjoyed an excellent reputation. I asked three different professors how do you teach reading I received three different vague responses. After I completed my second year of teaching. I realized that my students could not read. I taught grades nine through twelve. The second year, I had three classes of ninth graders. I assigned the novel To Kill a Mockingbird for them to read. I rea1ized that most of my students could not read the novel’s literate narrative.

It was during this time that I heard Samuel Blumenfeld interviewed on shortwave radio. At this time the Rodney King verdict had come in and there was rioting in the streets of LA. He said that the reason the people were rioting was that they did not have jobs. They did not have jobs because they were illiterate. He said you could tell they were illiterate by listening to lyrics of the songs they listened to and by the way they talked. I was intrigued by what he said because it verified my experience as a high school teacher. He then said the schools were at fault because of the way they taught reading. I was again intrigued because of my experience in college trying to determine how to teach children to read. I was never taught it in college. Mr. Blumenfeld had made two provocative statements on the radio, but I knew them to be true because of my personal experience. I then decided to buy a couple of his books, including Alpha-Phonics.

My third year of teaching, I had a class of ninth graders that consisted of the worst performing students in the school These students were in the dropout prevention program.  They were waiting until they turned sixteen to drop out of school.  I teach in our state’s poorest county and our district at that time had a high dropout rate. Also in the class were several students from Mexico and one from Haiti. These students were speakers of other languages (ESOL). Their only problem was that they had a limited understanding of English. Every day in the class was a struggle with disruptive behavior; and if I could finish class without one being sent to the office for discipline problems, I considered it a success. The students had chronic discipline problems; they had trouble with the law, and every problem you could imagine.

After two months of getting absolutely nowhere with the students, I decided that I would try an experiment. I was going to use Alpha-Phonics beginning with lesson one to teach those that wanted to learn how to read.  I told the class that those that wanted to learn would sit on this side of the and those that did not were to sit on the opposite side of the room. The only rule was a student could not interfere with the Alpha-Phonics lessons.  Until this time, everyone sat scattered around the back of the room, as I did not have a seating chart.

Any student, when given the option, would not sit in the front of the room with the teacher. The stage being set, I began the first day by reading the directions from the “Teachers Manual” to Alpha-Phonics and beginning with lesson one. I wondered what response I would get. I was shocked by the response of the students. Nothing could have prepared me for what happened. If someone had told me what would happen, I would not have believed them. With the exception of a few students who sat on the other side of the room because they did not want to participate, all of the students followed along as I wrote the lessons on the board. I would write the lesson on the board,   read it out loud, and then have them read. The students leaned forward in their desks and followed along. The next day the students all sat in the front of the room. Everyone would raise their band and want to read. Indeed, after the first few days, the students would fuss among themselves to read out aloud. They fought over who could write the lessons on the board. Everyone wanted to read aloud. Everyone sat in front of the room. There were no discipline problems. The entire class had been transformed. I had discovered a disturbing truth.

We worked through the book; and about halfway through the book, we began reading Sounder and The Old Man and the Sea.  One youth in the class who could not read, and who had been a behavior problem told me that every night he would sit with his dad as his dad read the sports section of the papers.  He said he always wanted to read the paper with his dad, but he could not because he did not know how to read. A few weeks after starting Alpha-Phonics, he entered the class one day and told me that as he was driving down the road be began to sound out the words on the signs. He was excited because he was never able to do that before.

We had started Alpha-Phonics in October and the semester ended in December. I would not be seeing the students anymore. We had completed about three-fourths of the book and read the two novels. I would begin each class by doing about 15 minutes of Alpha Phonics and then read from the novels. The students were eager and well behaved.  The youth who began reading the signs told me that in evening he could now sit with his dad and read the sports section along with him. They would talk. about what they had read. Three Spanish-speaking students learned English this way.

The following year, I tried another experiment. I had one student who was identified as having ADD/ADHD. He was notorious. He was a ninth grader. This was his first year at our school. I had another student who was in trouble with the dean’s office constantly. I gave both of them Sam’s Blumenfeld Oral Reading Test (BORAT), and they scored between the Ist and second grade levels. I made an arrangement with other teachers to have both students come to my class fifteen minutes while I did an Alpha-Phonics lesson with them. Because I began in August, I was able to finish the whole book with them by Christmas.

I gave both students the BORAT test. One boy had doubled his reading score, and the other was close behind him. The boy with ADO/ ADHD was never antsy or hyperactive when he was working on the lesson.  He was a completely different child when he was with me. Indeed, his teacher would often allow him to stay the whole hour with me because he had many behavior problems in her class. He never bad a behavior problem when working on Alpha-Phonics, neither did the other child who was constantly getting into fights and being When these two youngsters worked on Alpha-Phonics with me they were different children.

The following year, I worked with some other children. I had developed a system where I would set aside ten minutes each class period and do a few lessons while the rest of the class would work: quietly on their own at their desks. I would use the BORAT to Identify the illiterates in my class. I would then ask them if they bad ever had an A in English. Invariably they would say, “‘No.” I would ask them if they would want one. They would say, “Yes.” I then would say that all they had to do was work with me for ten minutes a day on Alpha-Phonics until we were done with the book. When we were done with the book, I would choose several pages at random for them to read from. If they could read the pages to me., they would receive an A.  I told them that that was all they had to worry about in the class as I was not interested in what they did regarding the usual course work.

That was the incentive I offered them. It was up to them. One youth had failed the ninth grade and was taking his ninth-grade English class over again with me. He was also taking his tenth-grade English class. His tenth-grade class met next door to mine first period. He would then come to my class second period. His tenth-grade teacher was the same one he took the year before, the class, which he had failed. He was working ten minutes a day on Alpha-Phonics for several weeks, when one day the door that communicated between my room and the neighboring room opened. It was his tenth-grade teacher. She called me over to her and asked what it was I was doing with him. I told her Alpha-Phonics. She said, “Look!” The whole class was watching Channel One and chatting. It was during homeroom. The whole class, except this youth, who was busy reading a book I had given him. The teacher was flabbergasted. She knew he was illiterate and could not believe that he was able to read.

One day I was working with this boy at my desk when we had a new student enter the class. He had just been released from a juvenile detention. He knew the youth I was working with and sat by him as we worked together. He was curious about what we were doing,  and I explained it to him. He said that he could not read either. He explained that he started having trouble reading in the third grade. He said that when the time came to read aloud be would intentionally get into trouble so he would be sent to the office so that he would not have to read. He could not take the embarrassment. He did not want anyone to know that he could not read.  The boy I was working with chimed in and said that he was the same way. They both recounted events when they would get into trouble on purpose so they could avoid reading. They would even start fistfights. The boy who had been in juvenile detention was sent there because be had set fire to the junior high school.

The following year, I had finally established my regular ten-minute routine in my class, and every year after that I would have students who would participate. One year, I was in a staffing meeting for a boy who was labeled as a special education student with learning disabilities. The special education staffer, whom I had never met before asked me what I was doing with the boy. The reason she asked is that she was with the boy’s science teacher when the science teacher had reported that the boy began volunteering to read aloud. The science teacher was astonished. We Iive in a small community and the teacher had known the boy ever since kindergarten, and had known that he could not read, thus the placement in the special education program: Here he was volunteering to read aloud in her class.  I told them what it was I was doing.

There is one case that haunts me. I had a big strapping youth who was seventeen years old. He had failed ninth and tenth grade English because he could not read.  He was in my ninth-grade English class. I had given him the BORAT test, and he was at about the 1-2 grade level: A typical case. We began working ten minutes a day. After a month I gave him the book Sounder, and he told me he was reading it at home. We were about halfway through the book when he no longer showed up in my class. I learned that he had moved away. I do not know if he ever completely learned how to read. He was a decent well-mannered youth who would show up ever day, was polite and carried a big stack of books with him. He was waiting for someone to teach him to read.

My daughter was born in 1996. I remember seeing the little girl read in the Hooked-on Phonics commercials and wished my daughter could read like her. When she was two, I began to teach her how to read during my summer vacation. She would take naps then, and I followed the advice in the teacher’s manual. I set up a routine. Every day, before she took be- nap, we would sit together. Following Sam’s advice, I appealed to be- intellect. I said, “”It is time for our lessons.” I began by following the alphabet pre-reading exercise in the back of the book. Again, following Mr. Blumenfeld’s advice, I did not pressure her or scold her, regardless of her behavior. Some days, she would kick at the book and giggle. I would say, “You did a good job today!” And I put the book away. We would continue tomorrow. It went on like this for several months. When school started again, she would do the lessons with me before we went to bed. She enjoyed the routine and the lessons.

One evening, while my wife was in the room, she took out the book on her own and began reading from lesson two: “”Am, Sam, Hear the S sound,” she said Then, – “Sam Sal” – etc. My wife could not believe it. “Did she memorize those words?” She asked. “No,” l replied, and then explained the method. When she was three, we were driving down the road when she said, “Look Momma,” pointing to a sign, “‘Marshal’s, there is your store.’ My wife could not believe it. When she was three, there was one occasion when our daughter was at Sunday school. Her teachers were arguing over whether or not she was reading the colors on the crayons. ‘”She’s memorized them,” said one. “‘No, she is reading them,” said the other. The colors she was reading were purple~ fuchsia and magenta; Magenta was her favorite. The spring before my daughter began kindergarten, she could read fluently any word in front of her.

We were at a spring festival when my daughter and her friend bought soft drinks. My daughter” read the inside of the cap, which told whether or not you had won a prize advertised on the side of the can. My daughter read the label effortlessly, which included the words vacation and discovery. “‘She is a genius!” exclaimed the father. My daughter’s friend asked her dad to read the soft drink label to her. I told the girl’s father that his daughter could read if he used Alpha-Phonics with her. I said, “‘Follow the lesson manual and be patient, do not pressure your child, as Mr. Blumenfeld says, and in a year or so she will be like my daughter.” That fall I saw the girl’s parents and asked how she was doing. He said his daughter had not really taken to the book yet. (His daughter” had just started kindergarten, as mine had.). “Be patient and keep going. ”

Meanwhile, my daughter” was reading at 2nd grade level; and during kindergarten reading time, she would go to a second-grade class for reading instruction. The following year I saw the girl’s dad again and asked him how she was doing in first grade. He said that his daughter was reading at a second-grade level and was being tested for gifted and talented. Meanwhile my daughter entered the first grade and soon afterwards was referred to the gifted and talented program. She won the spelling bee and Math bash just as she did in kindergarten. I used Samuel Blumenfeld’s “How-to-Tutor” to instruct her in math. In second grade, she read at the seventh-grade level~ won all of the reading, spelling and math prizes and was elected to the school’s hall of fame.  She has had straight A’s in every class. She learned to read with Alpha-phonics and learned math with How-to-Tutor.

While my daughter was in first grade, I was asked to sit on a parent teacher committee. While on the committee, the mayor of our town complained to the principal that be bad been on the committee for three years and that the committee was always talking about doing something outside of the box when it came to improving the school’s reading scores. Regardless of what the committee did to improve reading scores., they were always the same. The principal said that he was open for suggestions outside of the box. No one had any suggestions, so I said that I was familiar with the method of reading instruction in the public schools and that was what was at fault.  I said that I had a method that worked better. Indeed, I said that I drop my daughter- off at school at 7:30, I could walk into any class, give a ten-minute lesson and still arrive at the high school where I teach in time to sign in a 8:00 am. I said that if anyone doubted me, I get a paycheck every two weeks with a comma in it.  Let us put it on the table and keep the tourists out. I wanted to let them know my intentions were serious.

They took me up on the offer, and a first-year teacher volunteered her class. I began the first Monday after spring break. I only had six weeks to work with the children. I made transparencies of the Alpha-Phonics lessons and followed the teacher’s manual I only did a ten-minute lesson. The teacher combined her bottom ~ students with the reading teacher’s bottom students. After two weeks, the mother of one of the children approached me. She said, “‘I am glad you are working with my daughter. A while bad the school called me up to their office and told me there was something wrong with my daughter. She had a learning disability.”  I cried for two days,” she said I told her not to listen to anything the schools told her, to be patient and to watch what happens. A week after school was over, I saw the mother again and I asked her how her daughter was doing. She said that the school had called her up again and told her that they had given her daughter an end of the year reading test showing that she had a 40% improvement in her reading: they and were going to put her into an advanced class.

The following year, I was asked to do the project again with a first-grade class. I worked ten minutes each morning. I was only able to complete three-fourths of the book. The school’s diagnostic test revealed that of the children who were able to complete the project successfully, not one had a reading disability. The makers of the diagnostic test said that you could expect 20% of the children to have reading disabilities.

I once was explaining to a student why children have reading problems. When I finished, a girl from the other side of the class, who I thought was not listening, said, “This is what happened to my brother. He is in the fourth grade, hates to read and gets stomach aches and headaches.” I told her that his troubles were over and gave her a copy of Alpha Phonics.  Four months later, I asked how her brother was doing. She said be completed the book and reads just fine. I had the same success with students in special education, who were labeled as learning disabled or educatable mentally retarded. I have 100% per cent success with every student.

The only variable is the speed at which students progress. You must follow Dr. Blumenfeld’s advice and be patient. Do not pressure the child. I have many other- heartbreaking stories about children who have quit school because they did not know how to read, and no one will teach them. I have had children take a copy of Alpha-Phonics and keep it to teach friends they know, how to read. I encourage everyone to try Alpha-Phonics. The results you see in the child are truly miraculous. It must be seen to be believed.

(Copies of Sam’s Alpha-Phonics are available from our on-line shop:  http://mpconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-by-sam-blumenfeld/   And, afree-donations accepted-PDF version is available here: https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-workbook/

To sign up for Sam’s archive:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Camp Constitution Announces New Instructors for its 15th Annual Family Camp

Camp Constitution Announces New Guest Instructors Valery McDonnell, the Nation’s Youngest Elected Official, and Vince Ellison, author, and documentary producer for its 15th Annual Family Camp

Camp Constitution is pleased to announce that Miss Valery McDonnell of Salem, NH, the youngest elected official in the nation, and Mr. Vince Ellison, author of several books including 25 Lies.

Vince Everett Ellison was born on a cotton plantation in Haywood County, Tennessee. His parents at that time were sharecroppers. Through hard work and a belief in Jesus Christ, his parents pulled him and his seven siblings out of poverty. His family started the Ellison Family Gospel singing group, where Vince sang and played multiple instruments as a child and young adult. Vince worked for five years as a Correctional Officer at the Medium/Maximum Kirkland Correctional Institution in Columbia, SC. Afterward, Vince worked in the nonprofit arena.

In 2000, Vince received the Republican Party nomination for the South Carolina 6th Congressional District. In 2019, Vince wrote The Iron Triangle: Inside the Liberal Democrat Plan to Use Race to Divide Christians and America in their Quest for Power and How We Can Defeat Them, which became an Amazon #1 bestseller. He has appeared numerous times on Hannity, The Laura Ingraham Show, Newsmax, OAN, The Joe Pags Show, The Brian Kilmeade Show, The Howie Carr Show, and many other radio and television programs.

Vince is a member of Project 21 and has written numerous articles for American Greatness magazine, Bizpacreview.com, and other publications.  He is the producer of the soon to be released documentary Will You Go to Hell For Me   https://willyougotohellforme.com/

 

Valerie McDonnell was born to parents Brian McDonnell and Pauline McDonnell in 200 She is a native of Salem, New Hampshire[2]

McDonnell graduated from Salem High School  in 2022 She is a . sophomore at Southern New Hampshire Universi, where she is majoring in political science with a minor in professional writing.  In 2021 and 2022, McDonnell was the New Hampshire state champion and a National Finalist of the American Legion Oratorical Contest.  Her website:  https://mcdonnellforsalem.com/

 

  Camp Constitution’s15th Annual Family Camp runs from Sunday July 16 tp Friday July 21 the Singing Hills Christian Camp.

Returning instructors include Pastor David Whitney of the Institute on the Constitution; Professor Willie Soon, world renowned astrophysicist and climate realist; Catherine White of The Constitution Decoded; Alex Newman, author and host of the Sentinel Report, and Rev. Steve Craft, Camp Constitution’s chaplain.  Mrs. Edith Craft returns to direct the program for the Junior Campers. In addition to the classes, the camp will offer marksmanship courses, martial arts, hiking, basketball, volleyball, wiffleball, and optional field trip and swimming, chess, gaga and corn hole tournaments.  Campers and staff end the day with an evening campfire.

 

Camp Constitution’s annual camp is a family camp open to entire families, unaccompanied minors, and adults. The cost for the week which includes lodging, meals and class handouts is $300 for those 13 and over. $200. For campers 12 and under, and three and under with parents are free.  The camp offers an “Early Bird” discount of $50, per person by registering by May 1.   A link to the camp registration:  https://campconstitution.net/camp-registration/

Don’t plan on attending but would like to help send a young person or a family attend?  Please consider a donation which may be made vis our PayPal account accessed from our website’s homepage https://www.campconstitution.net

Star-Spangled Banner author helped free slaves; Some Early Black American Leaders; & John Randolph who gave land to freed slaves – American Minute with Bill Federer

 

On SEPTEMBER 13, 1814, just weeks after they burned the U.S. Capitol, British forces attacked Baltimore, Maryland — the third largest city in America.

Britain had the largest global empire in world history, controlling 13 million square miles — almost a quarter of the Earth’s land — and nearly half billion people — one-fifth of the world’s population at that time.
Out of nearly 200 countries in the world, only 22 were never controlled or invaded by Britain.

As the War of 1812 progressed, British soldiers marched toward Baltimore.
On their way, they captured an elderly physician of Upper Marlboro, Dr. William Beanes.
The town feared Dr. Beanes would be hanged so they asked attorney Francis Scott Key to sail with Colonel John Skinner under a flag of truce to the British flagship Tonnant in order to arrange a prisoner exchange.
Concerned their plans of attacking Baltimore would be discovered, the British placed Francis Scott Key and Colonel Skinner under armed guard aboard the H.M.S. Surprise.
They were transferred to a sloop where they watched 19 British ships fire continuously for 25 hours over 1,800 cannon balls, rockets and mortar shells at the earthen Fort McHenry.
An American soldier who helped defend Baltimore was John McHenry, whose father was Secretary of War James McHenry, the signer of the Declaration of Independence for whom Fort McHenry was named.
President James Madison, known as the “Chief Architect of the Constitution,” had declared a National Day of Prayer, July 9, 1812, stating:
“I do therefore recommend … rendering the Sovereign of the Universe … public homage … acknowledging the transgressions which might justly provoke His divine displeasure … seeking His merciful forgiveness …
and with a reverence for the unerring precept of our holy religion, to do to others as they would require that others should do to them.”
On July 23, 1813, Madison issued another Day of Prayer, referring to: “religion, that gift of Heaven for the good of man.”
During the Battle of Fort McHenry, the citizens of Baltimore extinguished every light in every window so that the British would not be able to use them to get their aim.
A thunderstorm providentially blew in and rained so hard the ground was softened, allowing most of the cannon balls to sink in the mud.
With the stormy darkness broken by slashes of lightning and the exploding cannon balls, Francis Scott Key saw the dramatic scene of “bombs bursting in air.”
On the morning of September 14, 1814, “through the dawn’s early light,” Key saw the flag still flying.
The first verse is well-known, but the fourth verse had an even more enduring affect, as it contained a phrase which became the United States’ National Motto:
O thus be it ever when free men shall stand,
Between their loved home and the war’s desolation;
Blest with victory and peace, may the Heaven-rescued land,
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just;
And this be our motto ‘IN GOD IS OUR TRUST’!
And the Star Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave,
Over the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Americans honor the flag, as it is the symbol of the “republic for which it stands.”
A “republic” is where THE PEOPLE are KING, ruling through their representatives — their public servants.
Instead of a king dictating to us, pledging allegiance to the flag is basically pledging allegiance to us being in charge of ourselves.
When someone dishonors the flag, what they are saying is they no longer want to be king, they are protesting this system where people rule themselves.
Francis Scott Key’s song, “The Defense of Ft. McHenry,” was printed shortly after the Battle of Fort McHenry in the Analectic Magazine (Vol. 4, 1814).
The song’s name was later changed to “The Star-Spangled Banner” and it became the United States National Anthem.
Francis Scott Key had actually written a similar song to the same tune nine years earlier in 1805, titled “When the Warrior Returns from Battle Afar,” to celebrate America’s victory over Muslim Barbary pirates:
In the conflict resistless, each toil they endured,
Till their foes shrunk dismay’d from the war’s desolation,
And pale beam’d the Crescent, its splendour obscured
By the light of the Star-Spangled flag of our nation.
Where, each radiant star gleam’d a meteor of war,
And the turban’d heads bow’d to the terrible glare;
Then mix’d with the olive the laurel did wave,
And form’d a bright wreath for the brows of the brave.
 Sharia Muslim pirates had enslaved an estimated 180 million Africans and over a million Europeans.
Many African slaves brought to America had been purchased from Islamic slave markets.
In a twist of irony, those intent on removing symbols and reminders of past groups which participated in enslaving Africans should, to be consistent, remove Islamic symbols as their slaves markets sold Africans.
After the Battle of Fort McHenry, President James Madison proclaimed, November 16, 1814:
“The National Legislature having by a Joint Resolution expressed their desire that in the present time of public calamity and war
a day may be recommended to be observed by the people of the United States as a day of public humiliation and fasting and of prayer to Almighty God for the safety and welfare of these States, His blessing on their arms, and a speedy restoration of peace …
I … recommend … offering … humble adoration to the Great Sovereign of the Universe, of confessing their sins and transgressions, and of strengthening their vows of repentance …
that He would be graciously pleased to pardon all their offenses against Him … that He would in a special manner preside over the nation … giving success to its arms.”
Remembering American history is necessary to counteract the socialist/communist tactic of deconstruction, or “cancel culture,” which is:
  • say negative things about a country’s founders so students emotionally detach from them;
  • then move students into a neutral position where they no longer remember where they came from;

then brainwashed them into a socialist/communist future.

Francis Scott Key fought legal battles to end slavery!
In 1820, a U.S. revenue cutter captured the slave ship Antelope off the coast of Florida with nearly 300 African slaves.
Francis Scott Key was defense attorney trying to free the Africans, many of whom were just young teenagers.
Spending his own money, Key fought to free them in an expensive legal battle which dragged on for seven years.
Arguing the before the Supreme Court in 1825, Henry S. Foote recorded that Key:
“… greatly surpassed the expectations of his most admiring friends … Key closed with … an electrifying picture of the horrors connected with the African slave trade.”
Jonathan M. Bryant wrote in Dark Places of the Earth: The Voyage of the Slave Ship Antelope (2015):
“Most startling of all, Key argued … that all men were created equal …
If the United States had captured a ship full of white captives, Key asked, would not our courts assume them to be free? How could it be any different simply because the captives were black? …
Slavery was a dangerously hot subject, but Francis Scott Key stepped deliberately into the fire.”
Bryant continued:
“Key had unleashed all of his rhetorical weapons … This was a case he believed in and had worked personally to bring before the Supreme Court.
The Antelope was a Spanish slave ship that had been captured by privateers and then seized by a United States Revenue Marine cutter off the coast of Florida …”
Bryant added:
“Using clear precedent, poetic language, and appeals to morality, Francis Scott Key argued that the hundreds of African captives found aboard the Antelope should be returned to Africa and freedom.
United States law demanded it, he said. The law of nations demanded it, he said. Even the law of nature demanded it.
Key looked into the eyes of the six justices sitting for the case, four of whom were slave owners, and announced that ‘by the law of nature, all men are free.'”
The Supreme Court, in one of its many shameful decisions, chose to define slaves as property.
Only a portion of the slaves were returned to their homes in Africa, where they founded the colony of New Georgia in Liberia.
Key raised $11,000 to help them.
The movement to help freed slaves return to Africa was pioneered by a successful black ship owner, Paul Cuffee (1759–1817).
He was a Quaker Christian and activist in Boston.
His father was of the Ashanti tribe of Ghana, Africa, and his mother was of the Wampanoag Indian tribe of Massachusetts.
Cuffee advocated freeing American slaves and helping them return to their homeland.
The plan to settle them in the British colony of Sierra Leone initially gained support of free black leaders as well as the British government and members of Congress.
In 1815, Cuffee financed a trip himself. The following year, he took 38 American blacks to Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Before he died in 1817, he laid the groundwork for the American Colonization Society.
Lott Cary, who was born a slave in 1780 near Richmond, Virginia.
He heard the Gospel and gave his life to Christ at the age of 27.
Joining the First Baptist Church of Richmond, he listened to sermons from the church balcony and was stirred to preach to his own people.
He taught himself to read and study the Bible, then was licensed to preach.
Working as a craftsman, he saved up enough money to purchase his families’ freedom in 1813.
Two years later, at a time of “growing interest in world missions,” Cary, with the help of William Crane, founded the Richmond African Missionary Society, working together with the American Baptist Union.
Lott Cary was joined by Colin Teague, also a slave who had purchased his freedom.
Teague had become an assistant minister at Richmond’s First African Baptist Church.
On January 16, 1821, Lott Cary and Colin Teague set sail on the ship Nautilus from Norfolk, Virginia, to Liberia, West Africa.
They are considered the first black missionaries from the United States to Africa.
Lott Cary established the first Baptist church in Liberia – Providence Baptist Church of Monrovia.
He set up schools and founded the Monrovia Baptist Missionary Society to evangelize local tribes, and served as Liberia’s governor in 1828.
Another notable black leader was George Liele, born in Virginia, 1750, and taken to Georgia in 1752.
When he was 23, he heard Baptist preacher Rev. Matthew Moore and converted.
Liele later wrote that he “… saw my condemnation in my own heart, and I found no way wherein I could escape the damnation of hell, only through the merits of my dying Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”
George Liele attended the Buckhead Creek Baptist Church, with his master, Henry Sharp, who was a deacon.
Sharp encouraged George’s preaching and freed him.
Liele gained a following and organized them into the congregation of Silver Bluff Baptist Church in Beach Island, South Carolina, 1773, which is considered one of the first black congregations in America.
When the Revolutionary War threatened, George Liele and members of his congregation moved to Savannah, Georgia, where they met in Jonathan Bryan’s barn.
One of Jonathan Bryan’s slaves, Andrew Bryan, converted, was freed, and became the pastor of the congregation –– First Bryan Baptist Church –– one of the first black Baptist churches in North America.
In 1782, George Liele and his family went as missionaries to Jamaica, being considered the first foreign missionaries sent out from America.
Through Liele’s efforts, by 1832, there were 20,000 believers in Jamaica, which contributed to the country eradicating slavery by July 31, 1838.
One of George Liele’s converts in South Carolina was David George.
In 1778, when the British captured the city of Savannah during the Revolution, David George went with the British to Nova Scotia, where he founded a black Baptist church.
In 1792, David George went with the British to Freetown, Sierra Leon, and started another black Baptist church.
 Francis Scott Key became a board member of the American Sunday School Union and the American Bible Society.
He told the Washington Society of Alexandria, March 22, 1814:
“The patriot who feels himself in the service of God, who acknowledges Him in all his ways, has the promise of Almighty direction, and will find His Word in his greatest darkness, ‘a lantern to his feet and a lamp unto his paths’ …
He will therefore seek to establish for his country in the eyes of the world, such a character as shall make her not unworthy of the name of a Christian nation.”
 Key, in 1841, two years before his death, helped former President John Quincy Adams to win the Amistad case which freed 53 African slaves.
 Key wrote a detailed account of the Battle of Fort McHenry to Thomas Jefferson’s cousin, John Randolph, October 5, 1814.
 John Randolph was a U.S. Congressman from Virginia who went on to become a U.S. Senator, 1825-1828.
 President Andrew Jackson appointed John Randolph as U.S. Minister to Russia, 1830.
 Key wrote to John Randolph:
“May I always hear that you are following the guidance of that blessed Spirit that will ‘lead you into all truth,’ leaning on that Almighty arm that has been extended to deliver you, trusting only in the only Savior, and ‘going on’ in your way to Him ‘rejoicing.'”
 Rep. John Randolph wrote to Francis Scott Key, September 7, 1818 (Hugh A. Garland, The Life of John Randolph of Roanoke, New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1853, Vol. II, p. 99):
“I am at last reconciled to my God and have assurance of His pardon through faith in Christ, against which the very gates of hell cannot prevail. Fear hath been driven out by perfect love.”
In 1817, John Randolph was one of the founders of the “The Society for the Colonization of Free People of Color of America” which helped found the country of Liberia, West Africa, in 1821-1822.
John Randolph wrote to Francis Scott Key, May 3, 1819, (Hugh A. Garland, The Life of John Randolph of Roanoke, New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1853, Vol. II, p. 106):
“I still cling to the cross of my Redeemer, and with God’s aid firmly resolve to lead a life less unworthy of one who calls himself the humble follower of Jesus Christ.”
 Rep. John Randolph made Francis Scott Key the executor of his Will.
In his Will of 1819, John Randolph arranged for all his slaves to be freed after his death, writing:
“I give and bequeath to all my slaves their freedom, heartily regretting that I have ever been the owner of one.”
James Forten (1766–1842) grew up attending the African School run by Quaker Anthony Benezet.
Benezet founded the first ant-slavery society in America, of which Ben Franklin served as its president.
During the Revolution, at age 15, James Forten joined the Continental navy, sailing with Stephen Decatur, Sr., father of the War of 1812 hero.
Forten was a crewman on the ship Royal Lewis, which was captured by the British.
 He was imprisoned on a British starving ship. After the war, Forten apprenticeship as a sailmaker in Philadelphia.
He began his own company, invented a sail-making device and made a fortune. Employing both black and white workers, his worth was estimated at over $100,000 by the 1830s, equivalent to over $2.5 million today.
Forten helped enlist 2,500 black volunteers to defend Philadelphia during the War of 1812.
He refused to do business with any vessels involved with the slave trade.
He became a prominent advocate for abolishing of slavery, serving as vice-president of the American Anti-Slavery Society.
Forten at first supported Paul Cuffee’s vision to colonize Africa, but after meeting with Rev. Richard Allen, he supported freed blacks staying in America.
Rev. Allen stated:
“This land, which we have watered with our tears and our blood, is now our mother country, and we are well satisfied to stay where wisdom abounds and Gospel is free.”
As the movement to colonize Africa waned, John Randolph supported giving land to help freed slaves stay in America.
In his Will of 1822, Randolph also provided money for the purchase of land for his freed slaves to settle in the free State of Ohio, as well as funds for supplies and transportation.
Each slave above the age of 40 was to receive 10 acres of land.
Randolph’s Will was challenged in court but after a lengthy battle it was upheld.
The 383 former “Randolph Slaves” arrived in Cincinnati in 1846.
They overcame many difficulties and local prejudices, and eventually settled Rossville, Ohio, near the town of Piqua.
 In Rossville and Piqua, they established Cyrene African Methodist Episcopal Church in 1853, Second Baptist Church in 1857, an African Baptist Church in 1869, and a Jackson African Cemetery in 1866.
In their Jackson African Cemetery, founded in 1866, one of the gravestones has engraved on it:
“Born A Slave — Died Free.”
 From this settlement came some of the first African Americans to serve in the U.S. military during the Civil War.
During this time lived Free Frank McWorter (1777–1854).
He bought his freedom and started a saltpeter production operation – necessary for making gunpowder – which helped during the War of 1812.
His financial success enabled him to buy freedom for 16 family members, and after his death, his inheritance was used to free more.
Free Frank McWorter was the first black American to found a town – New Philadelphia, Illinois, in 1836.
 Rep. John Randolph wrote to John Brockenbrough, August 25, 1818 (Collected Letters of John Randolph of Roanoke to Dr. John Brockenbrough, Kenneth Shorey, editor, New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1988, p. 17):
“I have thrown myself, reeking with sin, on the mercy of God, through Jesus Christ His blessed Son and our (yes, my friend, our) precious Redeemer; and I have assurances as strong as that I now owe nothing to your rank that the debt is paid and now I love God – and with reason.
I once hated him – and with reason, too, for I knew not Christ. The only cause why I should love God is His goodness and mercy to me through Christ.”
(The above article was reposted with permission from American Minute    https://americanminute.com/