The Weekly Sam: Statement on President Trump’s Executive Order to Return Power Over Education to States and Local Communities

While I am not sure if those in Heaven are aware of what is happening here on Earth, but if they are, I am certain that our late friend and mentor Sam Blumenfeld is rejoicing over President Trump’s recent executive order defunding, with the goal of abolishing, the U.S. Department of Education.  I used to joke with Sam suggesting that if he became Secretary of the Department of Education, his first duty would be to obtain an auctioneer’s mallet. He then would sell the property owned by the unconstitutional department to the highest bidder, fire all of the employees, and resign.  Here is the news released issued by, we hope, the soon defunct department:

Secretary of Education Linda McMahon released the following statement following President Trump’s Executive Order to return education to the states:

“Today’s Executive Order is a history-making action by President Trump to free future generations of American students and forge opportunities for their success. We are sending education back to the states where it so rightly belongs.

“Education is fundamentally a state responsibility. Instead of filtering resources through layers of federal red tape, we will empower states to take charge and advocate for and implement what is best for students, families, and educators in their communities.

“Closing the Department does not mean cutting off funds from those who depend on them—we will continue to support K-12 students, students with special needs, college student borrowers, and others who rely on essential programs. We’re going to follow the law and eliminate the bureaucracy responsibly by working through Congress to ensure a lawful and orderly transition.

“With today’s action, we take a significant step forward to give parents and states control over their children’s education. Teachers will be unshackled from burdensome regulations and paperwork, empowering them to get back to teaching basic subjects. Taxpayers will no longer be burdened with tens of billions of dollars of waste on progressive social experiments and obsolete programs. K-12 and college students will be relieved of the drudgery caused by administrative burdens—and positioned to achieve success in a future career they love.”

This is a long time coming.  Ronald Reagan campaigned on abolishing the department only to see it grow under his administration.  The Department of Education is an unconstitutional entity that should never have been created.  I think that our late friend and mentor helped to make

 

I Testify: My Years as an F.B.I. Undercover Agent

 

Julia Brown spent nine years as an undercover agent for the F.B.I reporting on communist activity in the Greater Cleveland area.    In 1966, her book I Testify: My Years as an F.B.I. Undercover Agent was published.  She wrote that the Communist Party U.S.A. gave its members an order to support Martin Luther King, and that the party does not support anyone that it does not control.  Her book is out-of-print and listed on Amazon for $2,847.12. While I doubt few if anyone would pay that much, the book is an important expose on the late slain civil rights leader.  We have a PDF version of the book that we offer free-donations accepted.  For a copy, E-mail me at campconstitution1@gmail.com   Donations may be made via our PayPal account accessed from our website’s homepage  https://www.campconstitution.net

In 1976, a federal judge ordered the F.B.I’s file (not to be confused with the F.B.I.’s assassination file) on King sealed for 50 years. King’s supporters wanted the file destroyed.   It is scheduled to be released next year.  If the file is still intact, it will prove King’s communist activities, and his moral depravity.

 

American Minute with Bill Federer Who are the Houthis?

 

LISTEN (text to speech)
Facebook  Twitter  Linkedin

Read American Minute

Houthis of Yemen have been in the news for attacking ships in the Red Sea.

A little history and geography is helpful  … continue reading …

Download as PDF …

A little geography is helpful.

 

The Tigris and Euphrates Rivers run across Iraq and empty into the Persian Gulf, where also oil pipelines end.

Oil is the number one commodity traded globally.

Oil from Iraq, Kuwait and Iran is put on tankers and shipped south past Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, and through the Strait of Hormuz, into the Gulf of Oman in the Indian Ocean.

 

Turning west, the oil tankers sail around the south side of the Arabian Peninsula along the coast of Oman into the Gulf of Aden, then along the coast of southern Yemen, an area controlled by anti-Houthi forces.

 

Then tankers turn the corner of the Horn of Africa, past Somalia and near Djibouti, passing through the dangerous, narrow 14-mile-wide Bab-el-Mandeb Strait continuing north into the Red Sea.

This is where the ships sail with the African coast on the west, passing Eritrea, Sudan and Egypt, but on the east passing the Houthi controlled coast of northern Yemen.

 

If the ships get past this point, they continue up the Red Sea till they get to Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula, where they go through the Suez Canal and into the Mediterranean, where they deliver their oil to Europe or continue their route to America.

 

Fifteen percent of the world’s maritime traffic travels this route, but as the Yemen Houthis attack oil tankers, the only alternative route is to sail around South Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, taking weeks longer and adding thousands of additional miles to the trip.

This consumes much more fuel and drastically increases the costs of products shipped.

 

According to Open Door’s World Watch List, the counties passed around the Arabian Peninsula are listed as some of the most dangerous places for Christians in the world:

Somalia ranks number two,

Eritrea number four,

Yemen number five,

Sudan number eight,

Iran number nine, and

Oman number 31.

In recent years, large numbers of immigrants from these anti-Christian countries have immigrated to the United States.

 

But this hostile environment in the Arabian Peninsula and the Horn of Africa was not always the case.

 

Yemen has a long history. It was originally called Sheba.

 

According to the Bible’s Table of Nations in Genesis, chapter 10, Noah’s son Shem had a great-grandson named Eber, an ancestor of both Israelites and Arabs.

Eber’s son Joktan migrated into Southern Arabia. The children of Joktan were called Joktanites or Qahtanites.

Joktan’s son Ya’rub is possibly the origin of the name “Arab.”

 

Additionally, everyone knows Abraham and Sarah had their son Isaac.

Abraham also had Ishmael by the Egyptian slave woman Hagar.

After Sarah died, Abraham had another wife named Keturah, whose name means incense.

 

Abraham and Keturah’s son were Midian, Medan, Ishbak, Shuah, Zimran, and Jokshan.

The sons of Jokshan were Dedan and Sheba.

Sheba migrated into the Arabian Peninsula, to the furthest west corner, to the area known today as Yemen.

Sheba is the oldest and most important of the South Arabian Kingdoms.

The people of Sheba were called “Sabaeans.” They considered themselves the original Arabs and viewed Ishmaelites as northern Arabs.

 

The Book of Job, 1:15, stated:

“And the Sabeans fell upon them, and took them away; yea, they have slain the servants with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.”

 

Job 6 mentioned: “The troops of Tema looked, the companies of Sheba waited for them.”

 

Around the year 1750 B.C., during era of Abraham, the Sabaeans began building near their capital city of Marib an enormous dam to collect rainwater from the periodic monsoons.

 

The dam, built with the same precision as the pyramids, was 50-feet high and nearly 2,000-feet long.

It was located where several mountain valleys joined together at Wadi Saba. A wadi is an area of dry creek beds that fill up with water during heavy rains.

 

The Marib Dam was considered one of the wonders of the ancient world.

Canals from it channeled water to irrigate 50 square miles, creating a garden oasis. It was repaired several times and functioned successfully for over a thousand years.

 

Sheba was renowned for aromatic resins, frankincense and myrrh which was their most profitable trade.

Sheba was on the caravan trade routes from Egypt south through Sudan to the Horn of Africa, across the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, to Sheba, then by ships over to India.

 

The histories of Sheba and Ethiopia are intertwined, being just a short 14-mile distance across the Red Sea from each other. For centuries, both Sheba and Ethiopia were ruled by the same kingdom.

 

Josephus wrote in Antiquities of the Jews that Moses gained fame as a prince in Egypt for conquering Saba, which was possibly Ethiopia on the African side of the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait from Sheba.

 

Some believe Moses and the Israelites wandered 40 years, not in the tiny Sinai Peninsula, which is the size of West Virginia, but instead in the Arabian Peninsula, which is nearly five times the size of Texas.

 

Archeologist Dr. Doug Petrovitch proposed that the Ten Commandments were given to Moses in the Paleo-Hebrew script, and that in their wanderings the Israelites may have influenced the Sabaic script of Ancient Southern Arabia, as both have phonetic consonants, no vowels and are read right to left.

 

The Sabaic script possibly influenced the development of the Ge’ez language used in Ethiopia and Eritrea.

 

Psalm 72:10, 15 “The kings of Sheba and Saba shall offer gifts … And to him shall be given of the gold of Sheba.”

 

Around 970 B.C., according to First Kings 10:

“And when the Queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the Lord, she came to prove him with hard questions.

And she came to Jerusalem with a very great train, with camels that bare spices, and very much gold, and precious stones …

There came no more such abundance of spices as these which the Queen of Sheba gave to Solomon.”

 

Isaiah 60:6 “The multitude of camels shall cover thee, the dromedaries of Midian and Ephor; all they from Sheba shall come: they shall bring gold and incense; and they shall shew forth the praises of the Lord.”

 

Isaiah 45:14 “Thus saith the LORD, The labour of Egypt, and merchandise of Ethiopia and of the Sabeans … shall come over unto thee, and they shall be thine … and they shall fall down unto thee, they shall make supplication unto thee, saying, Surely God is in thee.”

 

Jeremiah 6:22 “To what purpose cometh there to me incense from Sheba.”

 

Ezekiel 27:22 “The merchants of Sheba and Raamah, they were thy merchants: they occupied in thy fairs with chief of all spices, and with all precious stones and gold.”

 

Joel 3:8 “O Tyre and Zidon … and all the coast of Palestine … because ye have taken … the children also of Judah and … sold (them) unto the Grecians …

Behold … I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall send them to the Sabeans, to a people far off.”

 

Sheba was called Arabia Felix, or Arabia fertile, by the Greeks and Romans. It was considered like Paris – a prosperous, cultural center of the ancient world.

 

Beginning in 400 B.C., Ethiopia was ruled by the Askumite Kingdom.

 

According to the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, the New Testament account was that an Ethiopian Jew, the eunuch treasurer of Queen Candace, was baptized as a follower of Christ by the disciple Philip.

 

In the highlands of Sheba, later called Yemen, a Himyarite Kingdom began in 110 B.C., and invaded Sheba, also called Saba, in 25 B.C.

 

Then, around 200 A.D., the Ethiopia’s Askumite Kingdom crossed the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait and captured northern Yemen.

The Askumites were dirven out by a Sabaean-Himyarite alliance, but then the Himyarites proceeded to conquer the Sabaeans, taking full control of Sheba in 280 A.D.

 

A Himyarite king at this time was named Shammar Yahri’sh, from whose name Yemen is thought to have been derived.

 

A large group of Sabaeans, called Ghassanids, fled from the Himyarites conquest of Yemen and migrated to Syria in 220 A.D.

There, they converted to Christianity and had a significant kingdom between the Eastern Roman Empire and Persian Empire which lasted for over four centuries, until it was conquered by Muslims of the Rashidun Caliphate in 638 A.D.

 

In 354 A.D., the Christian Roman Emperor Constantius the Second sent missionary Theophilus the Indian to request permission of the Himyarite King to build a church.

 

On the African side of the Red Sea, Ethiopia’s Askumite Empire grew to control the Horn of Africa, Sudan, Somalia, and Eritrea.

Eritrea is the Greek name for Red Sea.

 

In 316 A.D., Askumite King Ezana had a Christian slave named Frumentius, who share the Gospel with him.

Ezana converted to Christianity. Frumentius was appointed the first Bishop of Axum, and called the Apostle to Ethiopia, translating the New Testament into the Ge’ez language.

 

Gold coins with King Ezana’s inscription have been discovered, some before his conversion with a pagan motif and some after his conversion with a Christian motif.

Askumite coins were found as far away as Israel and India.

 

In the third century, the Persian prophet Mani considered the Askumite Empire as one of the four world powers, next to Persia, Rome, and China.

 

In Yemen, around the year 380 A.D., the King of Saba and Himyar was named Abu Karib. He was a polytheist.

 

Abu Karib led a military expedition a thousand miles north where he took control of Yatrib, also called Medina.

He left his son as governor and continued further north, but when he received word that the inhabitants of Yatrib had killed his son, Abu Karib returned and wreaked havoc on the city.

 

During the siege, Abu Karib fell ill. Jewish scholars used their knowledge of medicine to heal him and then begged him to stop his siege.

 

Abu Karib agreed and soon after converted to religion of Moses.

He proceeded to Mecca where he almost destroyed the Kaaba but hesitated. His nephew converted to Judaism and was left in charge of both Mecca and Yatrib – Medina.

 

His Himyarite Kingdom adopted Judaism as its state religion in 384 A.D., thereby eliminating Byzantine influence.

It is hard for people to think that for nearly a century and a half Yemen was a Jewish Kingdom.

 

In 514 A.D, the Jewish Himyarite Kingdom was persecuting the Christian minority.

When news reached Byzantine Emperor Justin the First, he asked the Christian Askumite King Kaleb to invade the Himyarite Kingdom of Yemen to rescue them.

 

Askumite King Kaleb proceeded to conquer Yemen around 525 A.D.

It is hard for people to think that for half a century Yemen was a Christian Kingdom.

 

In 570 A.D., the Persian Sasanian Empire sent an army which invaded Yemen and drove the Askumites out.

Then Yemen was a ruled by a Persian Kingdom which had the Zoroastrian religion, mixed with Manichaeism, a belief which included elements of other religions.

 

That same year, 570 A.D., possibly due to neglect during the wars, Yemen’s Marib Dam broke, releasing a torrential flood that devastated the country.

This crippled Yemen’s economy to the point it never recovered. An estimated 50,000 people migrated away to other countries.

 

Persia’s presence in the Red Sea also caused the Askumite Empire to decline.

 

In 615 A.D., the Askumite Empire allowed Muslim refugees to shelter there, but then in 630 A.D., Mohamed sent a naval expedition, led by Umar, to attack it.

 

Following Mohammed’s death, the Rashidun Caliphate conquered Yemen. The Askumite Kingdom in Africa continued to rule Ethiopia till 960 A.D.

 

In the 16th century, the Ottoman Empire exerted control over the Red Sea coastline.

 

European powers attempted colonies.

 

In 1837, the British landed in southern Yemen and made it into the British Aden Colony, which was an important port to stop piracy between British controlled India, and the Suez Canal.

 

The French built the Suez Canal in 1869, and the British took control of it in 1882.

 

From 1884 to 1967, the French controlled an area near Ethiopia called Somaliland.

 

In 1889, the Russian Nikolav Ivanovitch Achinov attempted to establish a settlement near Somaliland but was thwarted by the French.

 

From 1885 to 1918, Germany had an East African colony near Tanzania.

 

In 1892, Italy control Somali, which included Mogadishu, till after World War Two.

 

Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1895, resulting in 10,000 killed. Italians invaded Ethiopia again in 1935 and ruled it till 1941, when after World War Two they were forced to relinquish control.

 

Eritrea was administered by the British from World War Two till 1952 when the United Nations designated it as part of Ethiopia.

Islamists, with help from Egypt, formed the Eritrean Liberation Front which won Eritrean independence in 1991.

 

Northern Yemen was controlled by Zaydi Shites from the 9th century on.

They fought nearly everyone, including the Umayyad Muslims, the Wahhabis and the Ottoman Turks.

 

With the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1918, the Zaydis formed the Mutawakkilite Kingdom in northern Yemen, ruled by a monarchy.

 

Yemen borders Saudi Arabia. In the 1930s, there was a border war and Yemen lost territory to the Saudis.

 

When President Harry Truman sent the first American diplomat to the Mutawakkilite Kingdom of northern Yemen, he reported that there were no roads, no legal system, and no medical facilities.

 

The Zaydis monarch let no foreigners into the country unless they were doctors to treat him.

 

Truman arranged for Yemen to be admitted into the United Nations in 1947.

 

In 1962, Egypt, backed by the Soviet Union, overthrew the Zaydis, who were backed by Saudi Arabia and Israel.

 

In 1967, after Egypt lost the Six Day War against with Israel, Egypt and Saudi Arabia reconciled and were no longer interested in Yemen’s civil war.

 

In 1978, Zaydi general Saleh came to power in northern Yemen and ruled for 33 years.

 

Britain relinquished control of its Southern Yemen Aden Colony in 1968, resulting in a communist government coming to power in Southern Yemen, the “People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen.”

 

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter abandoned the pro-U.S. Shah of Iran, allowing the Islamist Ayatollah to take over Iran, who formed the Islamist Hezbollah organization in Lebanon.

 

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, so did southern Yemen’s communist government. Northern Yemen’s Zaydi leader, Saleh, quickly united northern and southern Yemen.

 

In 1992, when the U.S. led Kuwait-Iraq War began, Saleh favored Sadam Hussien.

 

In retaliation, President George H.W. Bush supported Saudi Arabia in its expelling of over a million Yemen workers and cut off aid to Yemen.

 

In 1994, Saleh survived a Saudi-backed civil war.

 

In 2000, when al-Qaeda attacked the U.S.S. Cole, Saleh suddenly switched sides to align with Saudi Arabia and the U.S. against al-Qaeda.

 

Hussein al Houthi criticized Saleh for now siding with the U.S. and Saudi Arabia and organized Houthi opposition.

 

In 2001, President George W. Bush met with Saleh.

 

When Bush invaded Iraq in 2003, the Houthis radicalized in their anti-American hatred, calling themselves “Ansar Allah” – Supporters of Allah – with the slogan “Allah is great, death to the U.S., death to Israel, curse the Jews, and victory for Islam.”

 

Though the Houthi in Yemen were a different version of Shiite than the Shite Hezbollah in Lebanon, backed by Iran, nevertheless, Hezbollah began helping the Houthis as the both hated Saudi Arabia, the U.S., and Israel.

 

International investigations revealed the Houthis raped, tortured and prostituted women.

 

In 2004, Saleh, with the help of the Saudis launched a military campaign which killed Hussein al Houthi.

 

The Houthis, with the help of Hezbollah and Iran, suddenly won some battles against Saleh and the Saudi Arabian army.

 

In 2011, the Arab Spring resulted in an uprising against Saleh.

 

Saudi Arabia decided the answer was to pressure Saleh to resign and replace him with his vice president Hadi, a Sunni Muslim from southern Yemen who had been trained in Russia.

 

In a strange twist, in 2014, the ousted Saleh switched sides and colluded with the Houthi to oppose Hadi. They took control of northern Yemen in 2015, the same year that Salman became the new king of Saudi Arabia.

 

Houthis opened direct air travel between northern Yemen and Iran, in exchange for Iranian oil.

 

Houthis captured the main Yemen port at Hodeidah, then marched toward the southern Yemen capital of Aden, the largest port on the Indian Ocean.

 

The Saudis and the U.S., under both Obama and Trump, backed Hadi against Saleh and the Houthis, implementing an air and naval blockade.

 

Joining in attacks against the Houthis were Saudi allies Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Sudan. Over one hundred bridges and a third of the Yemen’s roads were destroyed.

 

This created a humanitarian crisis. All sides were accused of war crimes.

 

When Saleh signaled that he would consider switching sides again to Saudi Arabia, he was assassinated in 2017.

 

The Houthis claim to have 100,000 followers and started working closer with Hezbollah and Iran against what they consider to be a Saudi-U.S.-Israeli conspiracy.

 

In 2021, the U.S. designated the Houthis a terrorist organization, but President Joe Biden reversed this.

 

In 2022, Iran-back Houthis fired missiles at Saudi allies, including Abu Dhabi and the United Arab Emirates.

 

Southern Yemen’s leader Hadi relinquished power to Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council led by Rashad al-Alimi.

 

In 2023, following the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel, the Houthis began firing missiles into Israel and attack ships traveling up the Red Sea off the coast of northern Yemen.

 

In January of 2024, the Houthis were again designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. The U.S. and the U.K. conducted a few airstrikes against Houthi targets with little results.

 

Yemen, or Sheba, is included the Book of Ezekiel, chapter 38, in what many Bible scholars consider an end times prophesy, where Russia, Iran, Turkey, together with other nations, including those around the Red Sea, will invade Israel.

 

“In future years you will invade a land that has recovered from war, whose people were gathered from many nations to the mountains of Israel, which had long been desolate.

They had been brought out from the nations, and now all of them live in safety. You and all your troops and the many nations with you will go up, advancing like a storm; you will be like a cloud covering the land …

 

Sheba and Dedan and the merchants of Tarshish and all her villages will say to you, ‘Have you come to plunder? Have you gathered your hordes to loot, to carry off silver and gold?’”

 

Though the political situation in Yemen is confusing, the conflict there holds the ominous possibility of sparking an international crisis.

 

Before being assassinated, Saleh, the Yemen leader for 33 years, described ruling Yemen akin to dancing on the heads of snakes.

 

Download as PDF …

Read as American Minute post …

Who are the Houthis?

AmericanFaith.com

Camp Constitution in now taking donations of Teslas from owners who now hate Elon Musk

 

Camp Constitution, a New Hampshire based charitable trust, is now accepting donations of Tesla vehicles from owners who now hate Elon Musk.   A free pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution will be given to all donors so they can see for themselves that budget and department cuts are constitution.   “Instead of taking a sledgehammer to the vehicles” said Camp Director Hal Shurtleff “Musk haters can get rid of their vehicles and support a worthy cause.”
 To donate, please E-mail Hal at campconstitution1@gmail.com or visit their website https://www.campconstitution.net
  

Saint Patrick Missionary to Ireland

Enslaved
The year was AD 405. Patrick’s name in Latin was Patricius, meaning “Noble”. He was the son of a Civil Magistrate, but now he had become a slave in Ireland. Patrick was sold to a cruel warrior chief whose stockade in Northern Ireland was surrounded by sharp poles with the heads of his opponents impaled on them. Patrick was put to work as shepherd to care for his master’s pigs and sheep. He lived a lonely existence in the nearby hills, enduring long bouts of hunger and thirst, isolated from human company for months at a time. Patrick witnessed the superstitions of the druid priests who sacrificed prisoners of war to their war gods and newborns to the harvest gods. Skulls were used as drinking bowls; heads of decapitated enemies were used as footballs.

Conversion
In this strange place at “the ends of the earth” amongst these fierce people, Patrick remembered the faith of his father and grandfather, and the prayers of his mother and turned to Christ. Kneeling on the slopes of the Slemish Mountain, near what is now the town of Ballymena, Patrick prayed, sometimes a hundred times a day.

Escape
After six years of slavery, Patrick was led of the Lord to escape and run nearly 200 miles to a coastal port where he was able to persuade a captain to take him along with a shipment of Irish wolfhounds. A storm blew them off course to land on the coast of Gaul (France). Attacks by vandals had devastated the area and there was no food to be found in the, once fertile, area. Here Patrick was able to repay the kindness of the ship captain by praying for the Lord’s provision and seeing a herd of pigs appear.

Called
Patrick received a Macedonian call. In a vision, an Irishman named Victoricius presented him letters entitled “The Voice of the Irish”“We appeal to you, holy servant boy, to come and walk among us again.” Patrick was “pierced to my very heart” and he returned to the land where he had suffered as a slave many years before.

Opposition
Patrick was over 40 years old when he arrived as a missionary to Ireland in AD 432. He faced fierce opposition from the Druids. Patrick survived numerous attempts on his life and confronted the idolatry, immorality, slavery and human sacrifices of the savage tribes.

“Daily I expect murder, fraud or captivity, but I fear none of these things because of the promises of Heaven. I have cast myself into the hands of God Almighty who rules everywhere.”

Patrick delighted in taking risks for the Gospel. “I must take this decision disregarding risks involved and make known the gifts of God and His everlasting consolation. Neither must I fear any such risk in faithfully preaching God’s Name boldly in every place, so that even after my death, a spiritual legacy may be left for my brethren and my children.”

Confrontation
At Tara, Patrick challenged the Druids to a contest. The Druids invoked demons and brought a dark fog over the land. Patrick prayed and suddenly the fog cleared and the sun shone brightly. The king ordered 27 chariots to go and seize Patrick. He prayed aloud: “May God come up to scatter His enemies and may those who hate Him flee from His face.” The charioteers fell dead.
Patrick rebuked the king: “If you do not believe now, you will die on the spot for the wrath of God descends on your head.” The king fell on his knees before the missionary and pledged his realm to Christ. Many turned to Christ on that day.

One of Patrick’s writings was a letter excommunicating a tyrant Coroticus who had carried off some of Patrick’s converts into slavery. Within his lifetime Patrick ended the slave trade in Ireland. The legend that Patrick drove all the snakes out of Ireland has to do with his spiritual warfare in driving the demons from the land.

The famous Lorica “Patrick’s Breastplate” prayer of protection expresses Patrick’s confidence in God to protect him from “every fierce, merciless force that may come upon my body and soul, incantations of false prophets, black laws of paganism, deceit of idolatry, spells of druids…”

Mission Strategy
Patrick was one of the first great missionaries who brought the Gospel beyond the boundaries of the old Roman Civilisation. Patrick’s missionary strategy was to concentrate on converting the tribal kings. As the kings converted, they gave their sons to Patrick to be trained to be missionaries. From kingdom to kingdom, Patrick converted pagans, built churches, trained disciples, ordained deacons and ministers and built mission stations. Patrick provided pastors with written doctrinal standards with which to teach their people.

Faithful and Fruitful
For 30 years Patrick evangelised Ireland, converting many chiefs and kings, establishing over 300 congregations and baptising 120,000 people.

Inspiring Example
Patrick became an inspiring example for Celtic Christians. His life of continuous prayer, his love for the Scriptures, his love of God’s Creation and missionary vision inspired many hundreds of Celts to take the Gospel to Scotland, England and throughout the continent of Europe.

Saint
Although Patrick is commonly called Saint, he described himself as a sinner. Although Patrick is the Patron Saint of the Irish, he was not actually born in Ireland, but in England. It may also surprise people to know that Patrick was never canonized by the Roman Catholic church, but has been considered the Patron Saint of Ireland as a result of popular devotion and long-standing tradition.

On the last Sunday of every July, up to 30,000 pilgrims pass Saint Patrick’s statue and climb to the top of Croagh Patrick, commemorating Patrick’s 40 day fast on that 2,710 foot summit.

The greatest legacy of Patrick was the tremendous spiritual movement he launched in Ireland and his followers who sent out missionaries to evangelise not only the rest of the British Isles, but much of the continent of Europe.

This article is adapted from a chapter in Victorious Christians who Changed the World https://www.christianlibertybooks.co.za/item/victorious_christians by Dr. Peter Hammond, a missionary, author and conference speaker. Tel: 021-689-4480; mission@frontline.org.za.

The Weekly Sam: Conspiratology and Paranoia by Sam Blumenfeld

The other day a friend of mine called to ask if I’d read Wayne Johnson’s October 13
column in WND about my taking Rush Limbaugh to task for being so harsh on us
conspiratologists.  Somehow I had missed it, and so I dug it out of the Archives and read
it.

Indeed, it’s a very interesting article, but I fear that Johnson missed the whole point of
why people like me and my friend even bother to research the conspiracy.
We do it for one very simple reason. The more you know about what goes on behind the
scenes, the better you are able to understand what goes on in front of the scene. For
example, when Bill Clinton paid homage to Prof. Carroll Quigley in his acceptance
speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1992, the few of us in America who
knew the significance of that reference, knew exactly who Clinton was going to serve as
President. For, Quigley was not only Clinton’s professor at Georgetown University, but
also the author of “Tragedy and Hope,” the book that exposed in great detail the Rhodes
conspiracy for world government.

(A link to an interview of Carroll Quigley:  https://youtu.be/OV0zavSKHR4?si=xBks4ELdmrvjGodK

Also, the fact that Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar was significant, just as significant as the
fact that Bill Bradley is also a Rhodes Scholar. The other night, when Bradley was asked
who he personally admired most among world leaders, his answer was President Carter,
Woodrow Wilson, and Gorbachev. Wilson gave us the Federal Reserve System, the
income tax, and entry into World War 1. Carter gave us inflation and social malaise.
And Gorbachev is a lifelong Communist.

It was Cecil Rhodes who founded a secret society about a hundred years ago that would
work toward the creation of a world government, and he created the Rhodes Scholarships
to recruit future young leaders into that society. Rhodes said that for a secret society of
that kind to succeed, it must gain control of the wealth of the world. Setting up a central
bank in America was an essential part of the plan, plus the creation of huge tax-exempt
foundations that could further the goals of the globalists.
By now there are several thousand Rhodes Scholars in positions of influence and power
subverting our national sovereignty. Of course, you don’t have to be a Rhodes Scholar to
believe in world government. The idea is now so prevalent among the academic elite that
it’s now downright respectable, if not mainstream, to believe that our constitution is
obsolete. Most Americans would probably like to get rid of the Second Amendment if
they could. No other unalienable right–the right to bear anns–has been under such
heavy and relentless assault from the mass media, which is controlled by the CFR
establishment.

Am I beginning to sound paranoid? There are probably even a few renegade Rhodes
Scholars who do not favor world government. But at least those of us who know why the
Rhodes Scholarships were created can look at all of those Rhodies in our government and
ask why there are so many of them making policy for the American people – such as
going to war against Yugoslavia and making strategic partnerships with all the countries
surrounding Russia.

Knowledge does not make one paranoid. Lack of knowledge does. Any Jew in Germany
who read Mein Kampf in 1932 would have known that Germany was going to be a very
dangerous place to be if Hitler came to power. He would not have been paranoid if he
acted on that knowledge. Were Russian anti-communists paranoid in 1916? Was David
Koresh paranoid about the U.S. government coming after him with guns and tanks?
Wayne Johnson wrote: “The issue is not so much whether history is being subverted to
serve evil, but rather whether such subversion can ultimately be successful.” My view is
that evil can indeed be defeated, but at what price in human suffering? The Russians
finally got rid of communism after 75 years of totalitarian rule and the slaughter of
millions. Nazism was finally defeated after bringing ruin to Europe and destroying
millions of lives.

Would it not have been better had Hitler been stopped in 1933 rather than in 1945? And
wouldn’t it have been better had the plans of Lenin been thwarted in 1916 than in 1989?
If knowledge of what the conspirators are planning can be exposed to millions of people,
we may yet be able to save this country by electing people to office who understand what
is at stake. Studying the conspiracy does not make one paranoid. But it does tend to make one
cynical about politics, government, bureaucracy, and the establishment. Johnson says he
once subscribed to Foreign Affairs, the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations, and
was bored by it. Well, in order to know what is going on in our education establishment,
I have to read journals of education, and there is no more boring body of writing in the
world than journals of education, mainly because they are so full of nonsense in
convoluted language meant to fill space in order to justify the payment of a salary.

Colleges of education produce thousands of doctors of education who must find
employment somewhere in the mammoth education establishment. And so journals and
educational research projects proliferate just to keep all of these people busy.
Meanwhile, the education system is deliberately dumbing down the American people so
that they can be easily led into the new world order with little or no resistance.
Parents who understand what the conspiracy wants to do to their children are in a better
position to protect them than those parents who willingly put their children in the hands
of the enemy to be lobotomized. That’s why it’s important to know who is doing what to
whom and for what reason.

Most people, sadly to say, do not have the stomach to do this kind of research. But like
any hobby or pursuit, it can become quite challenging. There is also a kind of satisfaction
one gets in gaining knowledge that is withheld from the public at large. It’s nice to be
able to look at a fool like Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar and assistant to Mad Madeleine
Halfbright, and know that he’s not fooling this writer. He may have the backing of the
Council on Foreign Relations, the President, and several multi-billion dollar foundations,
but he has the mind of a programmed robot.

Meanwhile, the conspiracy has highjacked our military services to do the dirty work for
NATO, the military arm of the Council on Foreign Relations. Kosovo was merely a
rehearsal for what is to come. I said as much in the columns I wrote during the war
against Yugoslavia. I wrote that the real target is Russia, and that NATO was preparing
for this conflict by forming strategic partnerships with all of the countries surrounding
Russia. In fact, dissident Alexandre Zinoviev, who recently returned to Russia, said in an
interview with Le Figaro in Paris (7/24/99):

“The Russian catastrophe was wanted and programmed by the West. I say this, because I
was, at a certain time, an initiate. I read the documents, participated in the studies which,
under the pretext of combatting an ideology, were preparing for the death of Russia.”

So the question is: Will American men and women be required to fight in this next war
over oil in the Caspian region? What do you think? Then there is the World Trade
Organization, which will now supercede our constitution with its rulings. Our
sovereignty is slowly being whittled away by the CFR establishment, and most
Americans haven’t a clue.

Whether you want to call these people conspirators, or insiders, or global planners
depends on your view of history. But whatever you call them, you should know who
they are, what they believe in, and where they want to lead us. For starters, I would
advise Wayne Johnson to read “Shadows of Power” by James Perloff. It’s a lot shorter
than Quigley’s book, but just as devastating.

(This article was written by San in 2000-2001.  It is in his archives which can be accessed here:  http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm

The Blumenfeld Archives

WND EXCLUSIVE WATCH: The stunning truth about China and the Panama Canal

 

As Trump boldly takes back control of vital U.S.-built waterway, media decry president’s ‘expansionist agenda,’ ‘land grab’ obsession and ‘new U.S. imperialism’

The guided-missile destroyer Pre-Commissioning Unit Michael Monsoor transits the Panama Canal on Nov. 28, 2018. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class John Philip Wagner Jr.)
The guided-missile destroyer Pre-Commissioning Unit Michael Monsoor transits the Panama Canal on Nov. 28, 2018. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class John Philip Wagner Jr.)

Democrats in Congress hate it.

“It’s bananas. It’s insane,” U.S. Rep. Jim Himes, D.-Conn., told CNN. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D.-Fla., agrees: “It is utterly preposterous to suggest that we are going to send our military into Panama to, quote, ‘take back the Panama Canal.'” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., speaks for virtually all his congressional peers when he insists, “House Democrats believe that we are not sent to Washington to invade Greenland, rename the Gulf of Mexico or seize the Panama Canal by force!”

But as President Donald Trump stated explicitly during his March 4 speech to Congress, the nation and the world: “My administration will be reclaiming the Panama Canal – and we’ve already started doing it. Just today, a large American company announced they are buying both ports around the Panama Canal and lots of other things having to do with the Panama Canal and a couple of other canals.”

The Panama Canal, Trump pointed out, “was built at tremendous cost of American blood and treasure. 38,000 workers died building the Panama Canal. They died of malaria, they died of snakebites and mosquitoes. Not a nice place to work. They paid them very highly to go there, knowing there was a 25% chance that they would die – the most expensive project also that was ever built in our country’s history.”

Trump’s inaugural address: ‘China is operating the Panama Canal, and we didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.’

Concluded the 47th president: “It was given away by the Carter administration for $1. But that agreement has been violated very severely. We didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.”

‘Going to a battlefield’

The astonishingly gruesome process of constructing the Panama Canal – commenced by America in 1904 and completed a decade later – was undertaken to fulfill the centuries-old dream of connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, thereby saving ships from 21-23 extra days at sea by being able to cross through what would become a 51-mile-long waterway.

Cryptologic Technician 1st Class David Lane, from Las Vegas, Nevada, stands watch as the guided-missile destroyer Pre-Commissioning Unit Michael Monsoor proceeds through the Miraflores Locks while transiting the Panama Canal on Nov. 28, 2018. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class John Philip Wagner Jr.)
Cryptologic Technician 1st Class David Lane, from Las Vegas, Nevada, stands watch as the guided-missile destroyer Pre-Commissioning Unit Michael Monsoor proceeds through the Miraflores Locks while transiting the Panama Canal on Nov. 28, 2018. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class John Philip Wagner Jr.)

However, “the Panamanian isthmus proved to be one of the most difficult – and deadly – spots in the world in which to construct a channel,” explains History.com:

Death could strike in the form of an 18-ton boulder or miniscule, malaria-carrying mosquitoes that bred by the millions in festering swamps and puddles. … “The working condition in those days were so horrible it would stagger your imagination,” recalled laborer Alfred Dottin. “Death was our constant companion. I shall never forget the train loads of dead men being carted away daily, as if they were just so much lumber.”

The most dangerous work took place as laborers carved a ditch 45 feet deep and at least 300 feet wide through an eight-mile mountainous stretch known as the Culebra Cut.”

Nicknamed “Hell’s Gorge,” the Culebra Cut was a cauldron of noise with roaring locomotives and belching steam shovels where risks of death ranged from drowning to electrocution. Workers blasted away at the mountains with upwards of 60 million pounds of dynamite, which could ignite prematurely in the tropical Panamanian climate. …

Flooding regularly submerged equipment, and the unstable ground could give way at any instant. “The work of months or even years might be blotted out by an avalanche of earth,” lamented a senior U.S. administrator.

Particularly for workers partially deafened as a side effect of drinking quinine to ward off malaria, the inability to hear made deadly railroad accidents a regular occurrence. In an oral history, George Hodges remembered a fellow worker who fell trying to hop on a train and the wheel of another train “cut his body right in two…as if he had been chopped with a machete.”

As one laborer, Antonio Sanchez, explained, working in “the cut” was just like “going to a battlefield.”

Fast-forward six decades. In 1976, Democratic presidential candidate Jimmy Carter, campaigning against Gerald Ford, publicly promised – as did Ford – that he would not support transferring the canal from U.S. ownership to Panama, an idea that was then popular with the elites, but not the American people. Yet when he won the presidency, Carter changed his mind and, in 1977, signed the Carter-Torrijos Treaties, transferring total control of the canal to Panama, to take effect on Dec. 31, 1999.

 

The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Detroit (LCS 7) sails through the Pedro Miguel Locks while transiting the Panama Canal on Sept. 15, 2020. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan T. Beard)
The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Detroit (LCS 7) sails through the Pedro Miguel Locks while transiting the Panama Canal on Sept. 15, 2020. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Nathan T. Beard)

Interestingly, during the 1980 presidential election, Ronald Reagan expressed his firm opposition to turning the canal over to Panama … and then defeated Carter in a historic landslide, with a staggering 489 Electoral College votes to Carter’s 49.

“When it comes to the [Panama] Canal,” Reagan said, “we built it, we paid for it, it’s ours, and … we are going to keep it!”

China’s plans for world domination

.

 

Today, the big issue cited by Trump and other administration officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, is what has long amounted to the de facto control of the Panama Canal by the nation widely regarded as America’s most dangerous geopolitical adversary.

How can that be, many wonder? What happened to the Monroe Doctrine, that revered 200-year-old foreign policy stance established by the fifth U.S. president, James Monroe, holding that any major intervention in the Western Hemisphere – i.e., North, Central or South America – by a foreign power constitutes a potentially hostile act against the U.S.?

U.S.-based China expert Gordon Chang – author of several books about China’s barely disguised plans to dominate the world, including his 2024 bestseller, “Plan Red: China’s Project to Destroy America” – says the Panama Canal has long been a “chokepoint” that Beijing wants to control.

And as Secretary of State Marco Rubio told SiriusXM’s Megyn Kelly on Jan. 30: “If the government in China in a conflict tells them to shut down the Panama Canal, they will have to. And in fact, I have zero doubt that they have contingency planning to do so. That is a direct threat.”

Indeed, as WorldNetDaily reported in February, shortly after Rubio expressed to Panama’s leadership President Trump’s concerns over Chinese influence over the canal, Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulina stated that he would not renew a 2017 “memorandum of understanding” by which Panama joined China’s “Belt and Road Initiative.”

Sailors aboard the U.S. Navy's guided-missile destroyer, the USS Daniel Inouye, work with members of the Panama Canal Authority to safely pass through the first lock of the Panama Canal on Nov. 1, 2021. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeremy Lemmon Jr.)
Sailors aboard the U.S. Navy’s guided-missile destroyer, the USS Daniel Inouye, work with members of the Panama Canal Authority to safely pass through the first lock of the Panama Canal on Nov. 1, 2021. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jeremy Lemmon Jr.)

“Under that program, China funds the construction and development of infrastructure, such as ports, and then takes control of them for its own profit and empire building,” WND reported, adding: “In the case of the canal, [China] has worked on ports at both ends, creating the possibility that it could shut down the canal if it seemed in the best interests of the Chinese Communist Party. It also has been building bridges over the canal, which would offer the same option.”

Rubio explained to Panamanian officials that “the United States cannot, and will not, allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue with its effective and growing control over the Panama Canal area.” And in Congress, a bill has been introduced directing the U.S. to negotiate the repurchase of the canal from Panama.

Meanwhile, Trump’s March 4 prime-time announcement that “a large American company announced they are buying both ports around the Panama Canal” referred to BlackRock, the huge U.S.-based investment and asset-management firm. BlackRock purchased the critical ports from CK Hutchison Holdings Limited, officially described as a “Hong Kong-based and Cayman Islands-registered multinational conglomerate corporation” formed in 2015 by a merger of Cheung Kong Holdings and its main associate company Hutchison Whampoa.

However, just as with most things concerning Communist China, massive subterfuge and deception are involved. For Hutchinson Whampoa – as a few reality-based media organizations have noted, including this RealClearHistory analysis from January – has been identified as “a front Chinese company that was owned by Chinese military intelligence.” In the report, author Miguel A. Faria succinctly demystifies China’s longtime control of the Panama Canal:

The United States built the Panama Canal early in the 20th century with American sweat, toil and money, only to give it away to a leftwing Panamanian dictator via a dubious treaty. The Panamanians, in turn, ceded the Canal to Hutchison Whampoa, a front Chinese company that was owned by Chinese military intelligence. At about the same time, another Chinese front organization, the Hong Kong-based Hutchinson Port Holdings, obtained a 50-year lease to operate the two strategic ports at either end of the Panama Canal. Thus, in case of hostilities, U.S. shipping routes would be cut off and bottled up in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, encircled by the Chinese and their allies Cuba, Venezuela and Panama. To this day, the Chinese deny that they control the Panama Canal, and the American media seem to believe them. President-elect Donald Trump does not.

Indeed, the American media have rarely if ever sounded the alarm over this serious threat to U.S. security located right in “America’s backyard” (as Central and South America are commonly referred to in the U.S. global security context). Legacy media stories today instead obsess over Trump’s supposed “expansionist agenda,” his “land grab” obsession and his dangerous vision of “a new U.S. imperialism.”

There are a few exceptions, however, including WorldNetDaily, one of the only American media organizations that has sounded the alarm not just recently – but for decades. More than 25 years ago – before the canal was even turned over to the left-wing Panamanian government – WND founder Joseph Farah was passionately making virtually the same arguments Trump has been making during his second term as president.

The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) passes through Gatun lock while transiting the Panama Canal, March 10, 2022. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Danielle Baker)
The Freedom-variant littoral combat ship USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) passes through Gatun lock while transiting the Panama Canal, March 10, 2022. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Danielle Baker)

In “Clinton’s Panama Canal admission,” published Dec. 1, 1999, just weeks before Carter’s “gift” of the canal to Panama would take effect (one of many articles Farah wrote during the late ’90s warning about Chinese control of the vital waterway), he focused on then-President Bill Clinton’s public admission that, indeed, China was running the Panama Canal!

Was it a Freudian slip? Was it a gaffe? Or was it President Clinton finally being honest about something for the first time in his life?

I refer to the statement he made yesterday with regard to the Panama Canal transfer to a group of reporters in the Oval Office before leaving for the West Coast. …

Here it is, folks. Hold on to your hats – especially all of you people who scoffed when I began telling you three years ago that the Communist Chinese were taking over the Panama Canal.

“I think the Chinese will in fact be bending over backwards to make sure that they run it in a competent and able and fair manner,” Clinton said. That’s verbatim. Those are his words, not mine. Clinton, who has until now denied that the Chinese were to take control of the strategic canal, admitted it publicly.

And, as if to underline his admission and seemingly to ensure there could be no misunderstanding of his words, Clinton elaborated. … He compared the operation of the canal to China’s campaign to win admission to the World Trade Organization, which sets the rules for global trade.

“They’ll want to demonstrate to a distant part of the world that they can be a responsible partner,” the president said. “And I would be very surprised if any adverse consequences flowed from the Chinese running the canal.”

Oh, absolutely. Responsible. Partner. Competent. Fair. Those are all words I readily associate in my mind with the totalitarian government in Beijing. Don’t you?

Well, there you have it, folks. Goodbye Panama Canal. The Bamboo Curtain just moved into the Western Hemisphere – officially, that is.

After all, I gave you this history long ago. I told you about the fact that a Chinese government company – a front for the military – Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., was to begin operation of the ports on both ends of the strategic waterway Jan. 1. It has been the Clinton administration and its many apologists in Congress and the press who have laughed, ridiculed the idea. Chinese military shill Alexander Haig suggested I should be jailed for making such accusations.

And now the truth has finally come out through an unusually candid admission by Clinton. He is telling us now what has been obvious to anyone familiar with the transfer of the canal. He is admitting what former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Thomas Moorer stated in our pages some time back.

Clinton says we can rely on the good intentions of the Chinese to maintain access to the canal. Doesn’t that reassure you? The Chinese, who, as we speak, are rounding up tens of thousands of religious dissidents and interning them, threatening to attack Taiwan and working overtime on developing military technology that could only be used to attack the United States, should be trusted on this Panama Canal deal because it’s a chance for them to show how responsible they really are.

This is nuts!

When are the American people going to wake up? Clinton is so embarrassed by this deal on the canal that he is not even going to attend the transfer ceremonies. Why? If he doesn’t have any second thoughts and believes giving away the Panama Canal to a hostile foreign power is still a good idea, why not go wave the flag next month at the ceremony?

… If ever there was a time – an opportunity – to pressure the politicians to reverse what will someday be judged a historic blunder, it is now. If you really have the guts to stop this thing, America, wake up and take action now. You won’t have to risk your life to write a letter to your senators and representatives in Washington or fill out a simple online petition today.

Your kids, however, may someday pay for our mistakes with their blood if you sit silent through this official treachery.

The same day, Dec. 1, 1999, this writer published a detailed news article on WND, headlined “In 2000, it’s China Canal,” which included exclusive comments from former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer, who assured WorldNetDaily that China’s takeover of the canal “would be catastrophic for the U.S.”

Editor’s note: In these historic times, stay informed with fearless, hard-hitting, truthful journalism 24/7. And please support our work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Christian nonprofit WND News Center. Every contribution helps enormously!

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Purchasing through our affiliate links helps support WorldNetDaily with commissions at no extra cost to you.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

David Kupelian

David Kupelian is an award-winning journalist, Editor-in-Chief of the WND News Center and the bestselling author of “The Marketing of Evil,” “How Evil Works” and “The Snapping of the American Mind.” Read more of David Kupelian’s articles here.

(The above article was reposted with permission.)

The Weekly Sam: Libertarians for Life

This is a link to a pamphlet from Libertarians for Life that Sam had in his library:

http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/Other/Libertarians%20For%20Life.pdf

The Libertarian Party has long endorsed abortion as long as it isn’t taxpayer supported, but it always had a minority of members with strong moral convictions essential to a free society.   The party has also been a longtime supporter of so-called “same sex” marriage making the claim that governments should have no say in the institution.  This was a moral copout since the party had no campaign to get government out of marriage.  Party leaders thought that homosexuals would flock to the Libertarian Party’s ranks, but it never happened.  Instead, governments at all levels have been spending millions of dollars pushing the agenda of the totalitarian Alphabet Mafia, which uses the power of government to fire, fine, jail and generally make life miserable for those who don’t go along with its perverse agenda.

 

The Blumenfeld Archives

 

 

Debating a Liberal is as futile as putting talcum powder on a hog-But I sometimes still do it.

   While I agree with the late Tom Anderson who said with a distinct Southern drawl:  “Debating a liberal is as futile as putting talcum powder on a hog,” I occasionally do so.  Not that I think that my reason and logic will change the mind of a liberal, but to others who  may be reading or listening.  I recently had such a debate on a Facebook friend’s page:
John’s original post:
 If Maine is not the worst state in the United States, it is damn close to it!
Stephen (The “Liberal”)
 You want cheaper taxes? You old fart? Go live in a republican state! You will have a couple extra dollars in your pocket! But don’t ask for healthcare, education! Free rides to and from medical appointments! or meals on wheels! You will have to call trump for that kind of emotional support!!
Hal Shurtleff
Stephen:
 Free people don’t need “free rides” supplied by the government or inferior government healthcare or government schools that have become nothing more than far-left indoctrination centers.
 Stephen 
Hal Shurtleff:  the irony is!! it appears to me? that you’re the one that has been indoctrinated by the right!!!! and I hope you have plenty of money because when you hit 70 something years old, you can barely walk. Maybe you’re using a cane or a walker your kids are grown. Don’t call you!! because you’re right Wingnut job. You’re really going to appreciate things like Meals on Wheels! Because that’ll be the only contact you have with people!! if you have no money and nobody that cares about you.
Hal Shurtleff
 Stephen Thank you for your profound reply. Name calling always helps your case. You leftists are so brilliant.
Stephen 
 Hal Shurtleff:  if your idea of indoctrination is schools teaching things like? racial diversity, inclusion protect the environment! those kinds of things? Those issues seem pretty important to me and we should start young with our children so that their world is a better place to live when they’re older.
Hal Shurtleff
 Stephen:  Racial Diversity:  Hate whitey.  Inclusion:  All but conservative people of faith. Environment:  We are all going to burn up unless we give total power to the government.
Stephen
Hal Shurtleff do people who have no vehicle? need rides?
Hal Shurtleff
Stephen: Do you expect me to pay for your rides?
Stephen: 
Hal Shurtleff:  if you make enough money? Yes!!
Hal Shurtleff
Stephen:
 It works like this: Unscrupulous people promise to provide you free rides to the liquor store if you vote for them. They get elected and pass laws to buy an electric vehicle to take you and people like you to the liquor store. But in order to pay for the electric vehicle, maintain it, and hire people that will drive you and people like you, they need money. So, they pass laws forcing me and people like me whom you not only hate, but have been encouraging others to hate, to pay for all of this. The law is proposed and people who sell, build, and drive eclectic vehicles as well as those in the liquor industry lobby to pass the bill.
 The bill has a clause that reads “failure to pay the tax that takes Stephen and others like him to the liquor store is not only a felony but a hate crime.” When the elected officials discover that I refuse to pay the tax, they send out people with guns to arrest me or shoot me. You and people like you, get your free rides, and the unscrupulous people you voted for not only get reelected but pass other onerous laws. In a free market, a ride to the liquor store could have been provided to you for a small amount of money but now costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. You call it social justice. I call it communism.
Hal Shurtleff
 Stephen: Why is it right for people you hate to be forced to pay for your rides to the liquor store? And who determines if I make enough money? And how to you take this money from me?
Stephen:
 Hal Shurtleff:  who said the liquor store? I said doctors appointments. I never said liquor stores! And I never brought up Electric cars? You ok Hal? Little dementia kicking in?
Hal Shurtleff
Stephen:  Lefties have no sense of humor unless it is put down humor.
Hal Shurtleff
Stephen:  Good for you. More insults. That will show me. You can always ask Bernie Sanders for a ride. He is a multimillionaire. Or you can ask some local Maine socialists elected officials for a free ride. They know that they will be reelected. So, they don’t care about you, but you will still vote for them. They will be happy to voice solidarity with you, denounce the greedy doctors who must be MAGA, and Uber drivers and happily pass more restrictive laws to make practicing medicine and driving people more expensive. Or maybe you can ask some folks at the local church that have a ministry that takes people in need to their appointments. But don’t go to the churches with the Rainbow, Transgender and Black Lives Matter flags flying in front of them. Their members are far too busy lobbying governments to raise taxes, restrict free speech and do what their churches used to do before they went “woke.”
 Another option is taking the free market approach. There is a need, and the free market can meet that need. Your doctor could reach out to other physicians and maybe start a service to get patients who don’t drive to their appointments.  Or maybe organize a volunteer group to do it. But because you are a socialist at heart and hate people who don’t agree with your worldview, you choose to make nasty posts on Facebook.
Note:  I did not make any corrections to Stephen’s typos.

Russian Puppetry From Wilson to Obama-Biden

In the wake of President Zelensky’s disastrous visit to the White House, fake news outlets, Democrats and their Republican Neo-Con allies have regurgitated their ridiculous claim that Trump and his supporters are Putin’s Puppets” This false narrative began before Trump was elected and was proven to be a complete and total lie stemming from the fake Steele Dossier that Hillary Clinton purchased.  Obama used this discredited dossier to justify spying on the Trump campaign.

 

It was Hillary, and her boss Obama, which enabled Putin.  Hillary, as Secretary of State, facilitated the transfer of a percentage of our uranium to Putin. During a visit with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, Obama was caught on a hot microphone saying that after the election he will have “more flexibility.”  Medvedev. said that he will relay the message to Putin.  Mitt Romney, who hates Trump more than most, said that Obama’s comments were “alarming and troubling.”  It was the harshest thing he said against Obama during his weak presidential campaign.    But he never called him “Putin’s Puppet.”

 

Long before Trump entered the political scene,100 years actually, forces in the United States including Wall Street financiers and both Republicans and Democrats have been involved in aiding and abetting the communists in Russia.  Leon Trotsky was living in exile in New York City prior to the Bolshevik Revolution.   In March of 1917, holding an American passport given to him by the Wilson Administration, and a large amount of money, Trotsky boarded a ship in New York Harbor to eventually join with Lenin.  The Canadians detained Trosky and seized the ship after learning that Trotsky was going to get Rusia out of the war. This would have freed up thousands of German soldiers to fight on the Western Front where many Canadians were serving.    When Wilson learned of Trotsky’s detainment, he demanded that the Canadians free Trotsky. The Canadians relented.  After the Bolsheviks seized power, Wall St. bankers, using the Red Cross as a cover, went to Russia with large sums of money to help finance the revolution.  The reign of terror under Lenin began.

After Lenin’s death, Stalin seized power and picked up where Lenin left off with a vengeance.   The U.S. under Franklin Roosevelt established diplomatic relations with Stalin’s Russia.  Roosevelt, despite overwhelming evidence of Stalin’s atrocities, had a political love affair with “Uncle Joe.”  Pro-Communists reporters like Walter Duranty of “The New York Times” send stories to their papers praising Stalin to the hilt while overlooking the forced famine in Ukraine which resulted in the deaths of millions of men, women, and children, as well as other atrocities.

During World War II, we not only sent Stalin millions of dollars’ worth of weapons, and supplies, we gave them materials that made it possible for Russia to be a nuclear power.  This treachery was made known to us by Major Racey Jordan who was in charge of this project.   His book From Major Jordan’s Diary tried to warn the American people but it was smothered.

A link to a speech by Major Jordan:   https://youtu.be/Z9eYS0mxtpQ?si=1iJdDiQekrkZWpwg

At the Yalta Agreement Roosevelt not only handed Stalin the nations of Eastern Europe but agreed to forcefully hand over millions of people who had fled from the advancing Red Army.  This dark chapter in our history “Operation Keelhaul” is a little known event even to many World War II historians.  I made reference to “Operation Keelhaul’ in a letter to the “Brockton Enterprise” in 1988, and a survivor of this event reached out to me and gave me a firsthand narrative of this tragedy.

During the Cold War. President Johnson approved of sending supplies to satellites of the Soviet Union some of which made its way to the North Vietnam and used to kill American soldiers.  During the Nixon Administration, the U.S. sent technology to the Soviets making it possible for them to upgrade their nuclear missile system.  The technology included miniature ball bearing from the Bryant Company in Springfield, VT.  The company-the only one in the world at the time that made this ball bearing-initially refused to let the Soviets have them, but they relented due to the heavy hand of Henry Kissinger- who some believed was a Soviet Agent.  This is from a Wikipedia article:

“ Bryant’s Soviet contracts continued to be controversial that same year. Bryant’s sale of 45 precision grinders enabled the USSR to improve missile accuracy and MIRV their ICBMs. Objections to the sale were quashed by Henry Kissinger.

                   We also send the material to build the world’s largest truck engine factory in the world at the time in Russia:  The Kama River factory.  Engines from these trucks came in handy when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.  This comes right from the CIA’s website:

This treachery was documented by the late Professor Anthony Sutton in a series of books which include Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, National Suicide:  Military Aid To The Soviet Union, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, and the three-volume book Western Aid to the Soviet Union 1917-1965.

A link to a speech by Professor Sutton:  https://youtu.be/9RNbM4tmKEY?si=jpz251XvRGGhUcsb

It always helps to make your case by finding  those involved corroborating your research.    Back in the early 2000s, I took a homeschool field trip to the New England Air Museum in Windsor Locks, CT with two of my children. In the museum’ lobby was a newsletter from United Technologies-the parent company of Sikorsky Aviation.  It contained an article by Igor Sikorski Jr, the son of the aviation pioneer, and patriot.  In the article,  Igor bragged abut selling equipment to the Soviet bloc nations in the 1960s.  I wrote to him and asked if he knew how many Americans died in Vietnam as a result of his equipment being send from Eastern Europe to North Vietnam.  For some strange reason, he neve responded to my letter.

While doing research for the article, I pulled out a file of newspaper articles from the 1980s and early 1990s and found this this:

That’s right.  Soviet generals being lectured by General Colin Powell, an anti-Trumper who supported Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Biden.

 

When Russia invaded Ukraine, Biden, or more likely his handlers, banned the sale of Russian fossil fuels to the U.S. but he did not break off diplomatic relations which we have had since the Franklin Roosevelt Administration.   Practically every U.S. President from Wilson to Obama has done their utmost to cater to the Russian communists.  The Democrats and their Republican Neo-Con allies like Liz Cheney, and Adam Kissinger have labeled Trump as a “Putin’s Puppet” for wanting an end to the war in Ukraine.  While most have rejected their false and ugly accusation, there are a large number of people who want to believe it.

I realize that simply exposing the misguided people who have bought into the “Putin’s Puppet” narrative to the above will not likely change their positions.  However, it will help give folks who oppose the war in Ukraine some needed historical background. Readers who would like PDF versions of Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, please E-mail me at campconstitution1@gmail.com