campconstitution

Appeals Court Allows Louisiana To Post Ten Commandments

NEW ORLEANS, LA – The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order Friday allowing Louisiana to post the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms in accordance with the state’s new law, except in the five school districts where parents have challenged the law. The Appeals Court’s order limits the scope of a lower court ruling that initially blocked Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law statewide as unconstitutional. The state is now free to post the Ten Commandments in its remaining 67 school districts beginning January 1, 2025 as litigation continues.
Louisiana state attorneys had filed an emergency motion with the Fifth Circuit arguing that lower court Judge John deGravelles had overstepped his authority when he ordered all 72 school districts in the state be notified that he had struck down the law instead of just the five districts involved in the lawsuit. The Appeals Court decided 2-1 in a one-sentence order to grant the state’s motion for an “administrative stay” which pauses the judge’s notification requirement and only allows his judgment to affect the five school districts with parents officially challenging the law. The Louisiana school districts currently blocked from posting the Ten Commandments are East Baton Rouge Parish, Livingston Parish, St. Tammany Parish, Orleans Parish, and Vernon Parish. The state is appealing to overturn Judge deGravelles full judgment arguing the law is constitutional.

In June 2024, Louisiana enacted House Bill 71 which requires all K-12 public schools and state-funded universities to display at least an 11-inch by 14-inch poster of the Ten Commandments. The displays must have a four-paragraph “context statement” describing the history of the Ten Commandments and how they “were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries.”

However, a multifaith group of nine families, consisting of Jewish, Christian, Unitarian Universalist, and nonreligious parents represented by the ACLU, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, have challenged the law alleging the state is endorsing a specific religion.

Louisiana officials defended the Ten Commandments law as constitutionally valid by arguing that it has a historical and educational purpose. They cite the Decalogue’s “historical role” in developing American law and education, which displayed alongside other historical documents, would be permissible under the First Amendment. Since HB 71 also required public school classrooms to display the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance, the state’s legal team argued that the law’s intent is not to endorse a religion but to teach where America’s longstanding moral values in civic life originate.

Louisiana has considerable grounds for its appeal. Recent Supreme Court precedents show that displaying the Ten Commandments is not necessarily a religious endorsement.  In American Legion v. American Humanists Association, the High Court wrote that the Ten Commandments “have historical significance as one of the foundations of our legal system” and represents a “common cultural heritage.” Then, in 2022, the cases of Shurtleff v. City of Boston and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District rejected and overruled the 1971 case of Lemon v. Kurtzman. The High Court replaced the “Lemon Test” by returning to a traditional First Amendment standard where courts must interpret the Establishment Clause by “reference to historical practices and understandings.”

Liberty Counsel’s Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “The Ten Commandments is a universally recognized symbol of law and has indelibly shaped the Western Legal Tradition and American government. There are more than 50 displays of the Ten Commandments inside and outside the United States Supreme Court. The Ten Commandments are ubiquitous and their central role in law and government pre-date the U.S. Constitution. With this injunction narrowed to only five school districts, the Ten Commandments will be displayed in nearly all Louisiana public schools.”

Liberty Counsel provides broadcast quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost.

(The above is a news release from Liberty Counsel  http://www.lc.org

 

TAKE ACTION

Democrats lost by overly orchestrating anti-Trump efforts

Democrats lost by overly orchestrating anti-Trump efforts

Nancy Pelosi got blamed for top-down “orchestration,” but the Cabal was broader than that

Ken Reid

The primary reasons voters elected Donald Trump over Kamala Harris and chose a Republican Congress were Joe Biden and the Democrats’ miserable handling of the economy, immigration and foreign policy – and their embrace of far-left “woke” polices, like sex-change operations for prisoners and other “transgender rights.”

However, the Democrat “strategy” of hitting Trump with multiple indictments, tagging him and his supporters as “existential threats to democracy,” and scaring women over abortion rights after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision may also have backfired, because these efforts were really designed to deflect attention from the harmful impacts of Biden’s bad policies and actions.

Topping it off, when he was pushed off the ticket for Vice President Kamala Harris in July, many voters may have smelled a rat. In essence, all of this was masterminded by a few political chieftains, notably former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and probably the Obamas, Clintons and their “strategists.”

Indeed, on MSNBC November 9, former Harris spokesperson and one-time Bernie Sanders operative Symone Sanders-Townsend (no relation to the senator), mouthed off against Pelosi, saying she    “orchestrated the very public demise of the president. And thank God for Joe Biden, that he came out and, yes, endorsed his VP. Pelosi is known for being “calculated,” she went on to say, but “where is her calculator now?”

The key words here are “orchestration” and “calculating.” One could say “None dare call it conspiracy,” or resurrect then-First Lady Hillary Clinton’s 1998 phrase “vast right-wing conspiracy” that “has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”

Ms. Clinton was denounced for calling it a “conspiracy.” In reality, a group of conservative activists and publications did continue an “opposition research” campaign against President Bill Clinton from the day he was elected in 1992, to persuade Congress and courts to investigate him, impeach him and undermine his presidency.

It didn’t really work. Like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton was impeached, but he resurrected himself, while Hillary went on to become a US Senator from New York and Secretary of State – and came close to defeating Trump for president in 2016.

The vast-left wing orchestration against Trump, however, was much more intricate, extensive and orchestrated than what conservatives used to tarnish Clinton. For example:

* Advancing the phony “Russiagate” scandal, at the highest levels of government

* Supporting and glorifying the “mostly peaceful” “Resistance” against the Trump presidency

* Instigating the 2019 House impeachment

* Demanding school and business lockdowns during the Covid pandemic, to hurt the economy and President Trump

* Supporting and capitalizing on the George Floyd riots

* Perpetuating “January 6” investigations, hearings, indictments and media coverage

* Promoting fear and hysteria following the Dobbs decision and various state limitations on abortion

* Pushing challengers out of the 2020 primaries to anoint Joe Biden (South Carolina Congressman James Clyburn’s “masterstroke”)

* Preventing a competitive 2024 primary against Biden

* Holding a Biden-Trump debate after primaries had ended, to see how President Biden would perform – and then forcing him off the ticket because he bombed

* Coronating Kamala Harris after Biden was ousted

Many are convinced that all these schemes were orchestrated by the Cabal of Pelosi, Schumer, the Obamas, the Clintons, and their strategists. Perhaps they wanted Biden to be the 2020 nominee, instead of independent-minded people like Senators Amy Klobuchar or Elizabeth Warren, or outsiders like Pete Buttigieg or Michael Bloomberg, because they knew they could manipulate Biden more easily.

However, Joe Biden was never a leader in the US Senate; he was a follower. He does little thinking for himself, but makes decisions based on the advice of bureaucrats, political aides and special interests. He largely approved all the big-spending legislation and regulatory initiatives the Democrats and his Obama-holdover aides wanted when they regained control of Congress after 2020. And he opened the nation’s borders to salve the bleeding hearts of his policy wonks.

“Joe Biden is nothing more than a Trojan horse for the radical socialists,” former Vice President Mike Pence warned in 2020. In the end, that radicalism doomed the Democrats in 2024.

In anointing Biden “The Nominee” during the 2020 primaries, octogenarians Clyburn and Pelosi looked over Biden’s eroding cognitive abilities. When he inevitably became a liability to the Democratic cause, they orchestrated his departure from the ticket for the younger Harris. They also engaged in incessant “lawfare,” Trump indictments and January-6 investigations.

Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested the Democrats should have focused “on one or two” charges against Trump, not four, and the indictments “will backfire on the Left.”  But The Cabal apparently wanted to extend the Trump-tarnishing so that there would be no trial before the GOP nominating process, thereby giving Republicans little opportunity to nominate someone else.

Prolonging the 1/6 congressional investigation into the 2022 elections was an effort to tarnish not just Trump, but his supporters. Biden’s unforgivable September 2022 speech in Philadelphia, when he attacked “MAGA Republicans” for being disloyal to America, was part and parcel of this effort

The media covered up the Cabal’s intrigues. Anyone who watches CNN or MSNBC has seen how Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Pelosi, Clyburn and other leading Democrats are treated with kid gloves. The media hated Trump for calling them “fake news” and colluded with the Democrats nearly every step of the way.

It’s unlikely that Symone Sanders-Townsend will come clean on all of this, though our nation would benefit greatly from the disinfecting sunshine she could provide. Regardless, it seems highly unlikely that the Democrats can change their stripes, because their base and big donors have gone Loony-Left.

The Cabal probably thought throwing all those indictments and civil penalties at Trump would make him crack and cop a plea with the prosecutors. But Trump had the money and backbone to slug it out. He also had excellent lawyers, who mucked up the lawfare wheels. Essentially, he ran the clock out on the Democrats.

There’s a lesson here about being “overzealous” in politics. Jerome Lawrence coauthored the 1955 play (and 1960 film) “Inherit the Wind,” which examined extremism in “the Scopes monkey trial,” as a metaphor for the McCarthy investigations. Lawrence wrote: “Is it possible to be overzealous, to destroy that which you hope to save – so that nothing is left but emptiness?”

With Trump wining a near landslide despite the criminal cases – and taking the Congress – it seems all the Democrat orchestrations left them nothing but emptiness.

Ken Reid has been a journalist covering Congress and the federal health agencies since 1986. He served in local elected office in Loudoun County, VA (2006 to 2017), has been involved in Trump campaigns in Virginia since 2016, and has written for the Federalist and American Thinker.

The Weekly Sam: HOME SCHOOLING AND THE EDUCATIONAL CRISIS by Samuel L. Blumenfeld

(This article was originally published in the late 1980s.  Today, the homeschool movement is flourishing-Ed)

 

Home schooling is now the fastest growing educational phenomenon in the United States. For example, in April of this year, Massachusetts had its first home-school convention and more than 600 registries showed up, many with babes in arms preparing for the future. These are young Christian families who have decided that their children will never see the inside of a public school. No one knows exactly how many children are being educated at home. Estimates vary from 200,000 to a million. What we do know is that there are now home-school associations in every state and more home-school conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops and book fairs than anyone family can attend. Why is the home-education movement attracting so many new young families? Much of it has to do with the renewal of the Christian family and the desire to adhere to Biblical principles in child rearing.

The growing knowledge among Christians that the public schools are aggressively proselytizing Christian children into humanism via such programs as values clarification, sensitivity training, globalism, multiculturalism, evolution, sex education and death education is perhaps the most compelling reason why parents are turning to home schooling as the preferred alternative ~. Also, many families are disappointed in the lukewarm religious content of many Christian schools that seem to adopt too much from  the public schools in curriculum and general ‘practice. What the parents want is a strong, radical shift in orientation toward the Bible. They seek its moral and spiritual security in a world inundated by pornography, drugs, violence, abortion. political corruption and pagan depravity. The home school is being recognized as perhaps the only sure safe haven for children growing up in an increasingly dangerous society.

Meanwhile, the education establishment has become quite concerned with the growth of the home-education movement, which is contributing to the exodus from the public school. In fact, at its 1988 convention, the National Education Association virtually declared war on home education with its Resolution C-34:

“The National Education Association believes that home-school programs cannot provide the child with a comprehensive education experience. The Association believes that, if parental preference home-school study occurs, students enrolled must meet all state requirements. Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used. The Association further believes that such home-school programs should be limited to the children of the immediate family, with all expenses being borne by the parents.”

While the NEA deprecates the home school as an educational institution, the home schoolers are proving that their children are indeed getting a “comprehensive education experience” far  superior to the academic junk-food that public schoolers are fed for twelve years and result in declining test scores and increased functional illiteracy.

All of this has led to an education reform movement which is costing the taxpayers additional billions without any visible improvement to date. In addition, wherever home schoolers have been tested,  they’ve done better than their public-school counterparts. For example, in Tennessee, where about 900 home schoolers were registered with the state in 1989 — even though it is estimated that about 4,000 Tennessee children are being taught at home — home schoolers did quite \well. The Chattanooga News-Free Press of Dec. 11, 1989, reported:

“State tests show that second graders are about equal to their classroom-educated counterparts. But by the fifth grade, home schoolers have passed their classroom peers in reading, and by the seventh grade home schoolers excel in both math and language, scores show.”

In 1987, the performance of homeschoolers in Tennessee was equally impressive. Of the 561 homeschoolers tested, 213 outscored 245,000 of their public-school counterparts. Fifty-nine homeschool second graders were among the nation’s top 16 percent in reading ability and in the top 10 percentile in math. In the eighth grade, 30 home-schoolers scored 89 percent in reading and 79 percent in math. The 61,518 public school students scored 82 percent in reading and 72 percent in math. (Chattanooga Times, 8/13/87)

The reason why home schoolers do so well is because one-on-one tutoring is far superior to the classroom situation where children who need help get lost in the crowd. In tutoring you get immediate feedback, immediate correction, and thus the child is less likely to develop bad academic habits. Also, home-schooling parents are more apt to teach their children to read by intensive phonics than by the discredited, inefficient look-say or whole-word method. This makes an enormous difference when the goal is academic excellence. Another reason why home schoolers excel is because home educators are highly motivated, dedicated parents, committed to providing their children with the best education possible.

They want their children to become the best that America has to offer. The home-educated youngster represents the finest expression of the American Christian character; moral in behavior, peer independent, self-confident, respectful of elders, self-disciplined, inventive, freedom loving, patriotic, enterprising, God fearing. These are the youngsters who will become the leaders of tomorrow. It is symptomatic of our corrupt, paganized society that it is the finest Christian families, who have accepted their responsibility to educate and rear their children in a Godly manner, who are being , harassed and prosecuted by educational bureaucrats and state attorneys in Iowa, Michigan and elsewhere, determined to impose an atheistic sovereignty over God’s children. There will be many trials and tribulations in the days ahead, but in Christ, victory is ultimately assured.

The Weekly Sam: Educational Freedom in Early America By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

Many Americans falsely believe that there have always been government schools in our
country. Some believe that compulsory public education was written into our
Constitution. But nothing could be less true. The American colonies had total educational
freedom. Dames’ Schools provided primary education, and private academies provided
moral, literary, and commercial education. There were also, in New England,
town-supported Common Schools. These schools were run by local authorities, paid for
by local citizens, and provided the kind of basic education that parents approved of.
Church elders made sure that these schools provided a good moral education.

The idea of a centralized education system, owned and operated by the state and paid for
by all taxpayers, came from Prussia. In 1843 the “Father of Public-School Education”
Horace Mann visited Prussia, a state within what is now Germany run according to
militarist and centralist principles. Mann was impressed by the Prussians’ central control
of curriculum and teacher training. He was also impressed with the idea of compulsory
school attendance and the role of the truant officer.

Americans were quite satisfied with educational freedom and did not agitate for a
government system supported by taxes. They did not clamor for compulsory education
run by centralized government. But, as usual, the liberals and progressives were able to
use persuasive propaganda in favor of public schools and rally educators to their cause.
In the 1820s, the free market in education was clearly phasing out the community-run
common schools. The private academies were more efficiently organized, provided better
instruction, pupil supervision, and social atmosphere. They were less crowded and
offered a more practical curriculum. But by the 1850s, thanks to political propaganda,
liberal pressure on state legislators, tax-supported public schools were beginning to
phase out the private academies.

Let’s take a look at one of these academies. In 1846 a school entrepreneur by the name of
James Arlington Bennet was able to create the Arlington Academy for boys at New
Utrecht on Long Island, seven miles from New York City. It was housed in an elegant
and spacious building on 100 acres of land. According to the academy’s circular, its
English curriculum included “All the usual elementary branches, with Rhetoric,
Elocution, and English Composition. To this Department are added a splendid pair of
Globes, with Compasses, and Maps of the world, designed for the illustration of
Geographical, Historical, and Astronomical subjects.”
The Academy also taught Latin, Greek, French, Spanish, and Italian. Its Mathematical
Department taught Geometry, Algebra, Trigonometry, Differential Calculus, Land
Surveying, Navigation, and Lunar Observations. It had a Commercial Department, a
Civil Architecture Department, a Chemical and Philosophical Department, a Military
Department, and courses in Ethics and Moral Philosophy, Oratory, Agriculture and
Horticulture. The academy also provided instruction in Morals and Religion.

(Dummer Academy)

Many small towns had their own private academies. Dummer Academy was founded at
Byfield, Massachusetts, in 1763. Phillips, at Andover, Massachusetts, in 1778. Phillips at
Exeter, New Hampshire, in 1781. Leicester, at Leicester, Massachusetts, in 1783. Derby,
at Hingham, Massachusetts, in 1784. Each of these schools was founded by the
generosity of some wealthy person.

However, even in poorer towns, the local citizens were able to create excellent private
academies. Such was the case in Atkinson, New Hampshire, where in 1787 Atkinson
Academy was founded by prominent citizens of the town. It educated both boys and girls.
Students from other towns were boarded among local families. A history of the academy
describes what a typical day at school was like:

As the pupils entered the schoolroom each morning, the boys bowed and the girls
curtsied to the master. Awkward country youths found this an ordeal; some of the boys
and girls lost their balance and fell to the floor, greatly to the amusement of their
schoolmates… There followed Bible reading and prayer… Then came the classes. Slates
were probably in use for most of the written work and the problems in arithmetic…
Classes in English grammar parsed, perhaps from the complicated sentences in “Paradise
Lost.”

Virtually every academy had a debating society. At Atkinson Academy, the subjects
debated were of the abstract character so loved by schools of early days: honor versus
shame, courage versus fortitude, genius versus application, city life versus country life. In
1815 the question of the justice of Negro slavery was debated for the first time.
Obviously, the private academies suited the American temperament and desire for
freedom far more than the government schools, which went on to subvert that love of
freedom. Hopefully, the homeschool movement will revive that love of educational
freedom in more and more Americans.

Armenian Genocide History – American Minute with Bill Federer

 

Armenia’s last Arsacid king was deposed in 428 AD, ending an independent Armenia until the rise of Bagratid Armenia in the 9th century.

 

Armenia’s thousands of years of history included independence, interspersed with occupations by:

 

Assyrians, Medes, Achaemenid Persians, Greeks, Parthians, Romans, Sasanian Persians, Byzantines, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, Mongols, Ottoman Turks, Russians, Safavid Persians, Afsharid Persians, Qajar Persians, and again Russians.

 

Armenia’s medieval capitol of Ani was called “the city of a 1,001 churches,” with a population of 200,000, rivaling the populations of the cities of the largest cities of the era, such as: Constantinople, Baghdad, Damascus, Florence, Rome, Paris, London, and Milan.

Islam emerged in the 7th century and quickly conquered throughout north Africa, Egypt and the Middle East.

 

In 704 A.D., Caliph Walid tricked Armenian nobles to meet in St. Gregory’s Church in Naxcawan and Church of Xram on the Araxis River.

 

Once they were all inside, he broke his promise, a practice called “taqiya.” He had his soldiers surround the church, set it on fire, and burn everyone inside to death.

 

In 1064, Muslim Sultan Alp Arslan and his Seljuk Turkish army invaded Armenia and after a 25 day siege, destroyed the city of Ani.

 

Arab historian Sibt ibn al-Jawzi recorded:

 

“The city became filled from one end to the other with bodies of the slain … The army entered the city, massacred its inhabitants, pillaged and burned it, leaving it in ruins … Dead bodies were so many that they blocked the streets; one could not go anywhere without stepping over them. And the number of prisoners was not less than 50,000 souls … I was determined to enter city and see the destruction with my own eyes. I tried to find a street in which I would not have to walk over the corpses; but that was impossible.”

 

Ottoman Turks reduced conquered Christians, Jewish, and non-Muslim populations to a second-class status called “dhimmi,” and required them to annually ransom their lives by paying an exorbitant tax called “jizyah.”

 

Sultan Murat I, 1359-1389, began the practice of “devshirme” — taking away boys from the conquered Armenian and Greek families.

 

These innocent boys were systematically traumatized and indoctrinated into becoming ferocious Muslim warriors called “Janissaries,” similar to Egypt’s “Mamluk” slave soldiers.

 

Janissaries were required to call the Sultan their “father” and were forbidden to marry, giving rise to depraved practices and abhorrent pederasty — “the sodomy of the Turks.”

 

For centuries Ottoman Turks conquered throughout the Mediterranean, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Spain and North Africa, carrying tens of thousands into slavery.

 

Beginning in the early 1800s, the Ottoman Empire began to decline. Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania won their independence.

 

When Armenia’s sentiments leaned toward independence, Sultan Abdul Hamid II put an end to it by massacring 100,000 from 1894-1896.

 

President Grover Cleveland reported to Congress, December 2, 1895:

 

“Occurrences in Turkey have continued to excite concern … Massacres of Christians in Armenia and the development … of a spirit of fanatic hostility to Christian influences … have lately shocked civilization.”

 

The next year, President Cleveland addressed Congress, December 7, 1896:

 

“Disturbed condition in Asiatic Turkey … rage of mad bigotry and cruel fanaticism … wanton destruction of homes and the bloody butchery of men, women, and children, made martyrs to their profession of Christian faith …

 

Outbreaks of blind fury which lead to murder and pillage in Turkey occur suddenly and without notice … It seems hardly possible that the earnest demand of good people throughout the Christian world for its corrective treatment will remain unanswered.”

 

President William McKinley told Congress, December 5, 1898:

 

“The … envoy of the United States to … Turkey … is … charged to press for a just settlement of our claims … of the destruction of the property of American missionaries’ resident in that country during the Armenian troubles of 1895.”

 

On December 6, 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt reported to Congress of:

 

“… systematic and long-extended cruelty and oppression … of which the Armenians have been the victims, and which have won for them the indignant pity of the civilized world.”

 

Sultan Abdul Hamid the Second made a league with Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, trading guns for access to oil.

 

When Sultan Hamid was deposed in 1908, there was a brief euphoria among the citizens of Turkey, as they naively hoped the country would adopt a constitutional government guaranteeing individual rights and freedoms.

 

Instead, the government was taken over by the “Young Turks” — three leaders or “pashas”: Mehmed Talaat Pasha, Ismail Enver Pasha, and Ahmed Djemal Pasha.

 

They acted as if they were planning democratic reforms while they clandestinely planned a genocidal scheme called “Ottomanization,” ridding the country of all who were not Muslims Turks.

 

The first step involved recruiting unsuspecting Armenian young men into the military.

 

Next they made them “non-combatant” soldiers and took away their weapons.

 

Finally, they marched them into the woods and deserts where they were ambushed and massacred.

 

With the Armenian young men gone, Armenian cities and villages were defenseless.

 

Nearly 2 million old men, women and children were marched into the desert, thrown off cliffs or burned alive. Armenian cities of Kharpert, Van, and Ani were leveled.

 

Entire Armenian populations were deported to the deserts of Syria and Mesopotamia where hundreds of thousands were killed or starved to death.

 

During World War One, Armenia briefly received aid from Russia until that country’s military was decimated by German artillery, followed by Tsar Nicholas the Second being killed during Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik revolution.

 

Theodore Roosevelt recorded the fate of Armenians in his 1916 book Fear God and Take Your Own Part:

 

“Armenians, who for some centuries have sedulously avoided militarism and war … are so suffering precisely and exactly because they have been pacifists whereas their neighbors, the Turks, have … been … militarists …

 

During the last year and a half … Armenians have been subjected to wrongs far greater than any that have been committed since the close of the Napoleonic Wars …

 

Fearful atrocities … Serbia is at this moment passing under the harrow of torture and mortal anguish …”

 

Roosevelt continued:

 

“Armenians have been butchered under circumstances of murder and torture and rape that would have appealed to an old-time Apache Indian …

 

The wholesale slaughter of the Armenians … must be shared by the neutral powers headed by the United States for their failure to protest when this initial wrong was committed …

 

The crowning outrage has been committed by the Turks on the Armenians. They have suffered atrocities so hideous that it is difficult to name them, atrocities such as those inflicted upon conquered nations by the followers of Attila and of Genghis Khan …

 

It is dreadful to think that these things can be done and that this nation nevertheless remarks ‘neutral not only in deed but in thought,’ between right and the most hideous wrong, neutral between despairing and hunted people — people whose little children are murdered and their women raped — and the victorious and evil wrong-doers …

 

I trust that all Americans worthy of the name feel their deepest indignation and keenest sympathy aroused by the dreadful Armenian atrocities. I trust that they feel … that a peace obtained without … righting the wrongs of the Armenians would be worse than any war.”

 

Historian Arnold Toynbee wrote:

 

“The Turks draft the criminals from their prisons into the Gendarmeri – military police – to exterminate the Armenian race …

 

In 1913 the Turkish Army was engaged in exterminating the Albanians … Greeks and Slavs left in the territory … The same campaign of extermination has been waged against the Nestorian Christians on the Persian frontier … In Syria there is a reign of terror …”

 

Toynbee continued:

 

“Turkish rule … is … slaughtering or driving from their homes, the Christian population … Only a third of the two million Armenians in Turkey have survived, and that at the price of apostatizing to Islam or else of leaving all they had and fleeing across the frontier.”

 

Armenia’s pleas at the Paris Peace Conference led Democrat President Wilson in a failed effort to make Armenia a U.S. protectorate.

 

The Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi, issued a decree in 1918 that the Syrian lands should:

 

“Protect and to take good care of everyone from the Jacobite Armenian community living in your territories and … defend them as you would defend yourselves … they are the Protected People of the Muslims.” (Ahl Dimmat al-Muslimin).

 

Woodrow Wilson, who was born December 28, 1856, addressed Congress, May 24, 1920:

 

“The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has established the truth of the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the Armenian people have suffered … deplorable conditions of insecurity, starvation, and misery now prevalent in Armenia …

 

Sympathy for Armenia among our people has sprung from untainted consciences, pure Christian faith and an earnest desire to see Christian people everywhere succored – helped – in their time of suffering.”

 

In 2006, Director Andrew Goldberg produced a documentary film The Armenian Genocide.

 

In 2016, actors Christian Bale, Oscar Isaac and Charlotte Le Bon starred in the film The Promise, depicting the Armenian genocide in the last days of the Ottoman Empire. In some areas, entire Armenian populations were decimated.

 

Some heroic and caring Turks refused to carry out orders kill Armenians and were themselves punished, as represented in a scene in The Promise, where the character Emre Ogan, played by Marwan Kenzari, risked his life to rescue American journalist Chris Myers, played by Christian Bale.

 

On August 29, 2014, the California Senate unanimously passed the Armenian Genocide Education Act mandating that among the human rights subjects covered in public schools, instruction shall be made of the genocide committed in Armenia at the beginning of the 20th century:

 

“The Legislature encourages the incorporation of survivor, rescuer, liberator, and witness oral testimony into the teaching of … the Armenian, Cambodian, Darfur, and Rwandan genocides … teaching about civil rights, human rights violations, genocide, slavery … the Holocaust … and … the Great Irish Famine of 1845–50 …

 

For purposes of this article, ‘Armenian Genocide’ means the torture, starvation, and murder of 1,500,000 Armenians, which included death marches into the Syrian desert, by the rulers of the Ottoman Turkish Empire and the exile of more than 500,000 innocent people during the period from 1915 to 1923, inclusive.”

 

Hitler allegedly gave orders August 22, 1939, to brutally invade Poland, adding: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

 

Secular leaders, such as Turkey’s Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Egypt’s Gemal Nasser, Iran’s Reza Pahlavi, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, Syria’s Hafez al-Asad, had ushered in an era of moderation and tolerance in the Middle East, but their legacy has been rejected by fundamentalists.

 

Attaturk was the founding father of the Republic of Turkey and served as President from 1924 to 1938, ushering in era of moderation.

 

He abolished sharia courts, and made Friday a workday, instituting the “weekend” of Saturday and Sunday. He outlawed polygamy and elevated the status of women, appointing the first female judges, and insisting on education of girls.
 

He abolished women wearing of scarves, veils, chadors or burqas – the full-length body dress worn by Muslim women, and requiring women to wear skirts.
 

Ataturk stated:
“If henceforward the women do not share in the social life of the nation, we shall never attain to our full development. We shall remain irremediably backward, incapable of treating on equal terms with the civilizations of the West.”
 

Ataturk wrote in his book on citizenship (quoted in Ataturk, Yurttaslik Bilgileri, Yenigun Haber Ajansi, June 1997, p. 18):
 

“Mohammedanism was based on Arab nationalism above all nationalities … The purpose of the religion founded by Muhammad, over all nations, was to drag them into Arab national politics … It might have suited tribes in the desert. It is no good for a modern, progressive state …
 

Even before accepting the religion of the Arabs, the Turks were a great nation … He is a weak ruler who needs religion to uphold his government.”
 

Ataturk abolished the position of the Sultan and set up a secular government He ended the religious Caliphate, thus preventing Muslim religious leaders from controlling government affairs.
 

In an effort to cut ties with the fundamentalist past, he introduced the western use of last names, replaced Arabic Islamic names with Turkish names, and encouraged the next generation not take Arabic names but instead ethnic Turkish names. He abolished the use of Arabic and Persian script, and replaced it with the Latin alphabet.

 

Attaturk abolished turbans and fezes – the red cap with a black tassel, and required men to wear western pants and suits. He even required Muslim prayer leaders be beardless, and replaced Arabic muezzin’s call to prayer and made praying a private affair.

 

In some Islamist countries, minorities in have continued to suffer persecution and even genocide:

 

Iraqi Chaldean Christians, Assyrian Christians, Syriac Christians, Lebanese Maronite Christians, Egyptian Coptic Christians, Aramaic Christians, Melkite Christians, and Kurds.

 

Judge Learned Hand reportedly wrote:

 

“The use of history is to tell us … past themes, else we should have to repeat, each in his own experience, the successes and the failures of our forebears.”

 

Will and Ariel Durant wrote in The Lessons of History, 1968, New York: Simon & Schuster:

 

“Civilization is not inherited; it has to be learned and earned by each generation anew, if the transmission should be interrupted … civilization would die, and we should be savages again.”

 

Harvard Professor George Santayana wrote in Reason in Common Sense, 1905, Volume One of The Life of Reason:

 

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

 

American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate.
Image Credits: Public Domain; Description: The coat of arms of Armenia (the escutcheon only); Date: June 17, 2012; Source: Coat of arms of Armenia.svg http://yeraguyn.com/2010/04/zinanshan/ ; Licensing: Creative Commons CC-Zero, This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arms_of_Armenia.svg
(Reposted with permission from American Minute.)

The Weekly Sam: On the Delights of Reading Old Magazines By Samuel Blumenfeld

I recently had the pleasure of perusing a number of old magazines from the
mid-nineteenth century to about 1918. They included such great monthly periodicals as
Scribner’s, Harper’s, McClure’s, and others. All of them had well-written articles on a
wide variety of subjects, reflecting the eclectic tastes of their readers. American readers
wanted more than just entertainment. There was a voracious hunger for knowledge, and
these magazines provided it, along with wonderful illustrations.

In these old magazines you’ll find articles and stories by Mark Twain, Edith Wharton,
Henry James, Jules Verne, A. Conan Doyle, Bret Harte, Frederic Remington, Stephen
Crane, and many others whose names today don’t ring a bell. It’s amazing how few of
the writers of those days have survived the ravages of time. In those days, Americans
were readers, and of course there was no television, or movies, or radio to provide other
diversions. So the literary world was where all the entertainment and enlightenment was.
But what I have found of particular fascination in these old magazines are the ads. Some
of these magazines had over one hundred pages of ads, selling everything that American
capitalism could provide.

You can easily follow the development of America’s great
free-market economy by simply looking at the ads for automobiles. The earliest ads for
cars can be seen in magazines published as early as 1898. And if you follow the ads that
appear in the succeeding years, you get a fascinating picture of the development of the
great American automobile industry. In these magazines you’ll find ads for Locomobile,
Pierce-Arrow, King, Peerless, Marmon, Franklin, Mora, Columbia, Northern, Knox and
other car companies that no longer exist. Most of them went belly-up during the Great
Depression. The Fed made it impossible for them to get financing.
Some of the products advertised in those days are still being sold today: National Biscuit,
now Nabisco, Ivory Soap, Pabst Beer, Kodak cameras, Whitman’s Chocolates, Prudential
Insurance, Mennen’s Talcum Powder, Quaker Oats. Cream of Wheat, Campbell Soup,
and many more. These companies continued to grow and prosper probably because of
great management and great products that Americans enjoyed. And they relied on
advertising to keep them in the public’s mind.

But many other companies now rest in the graveyard of extinguished businesses, such as
The Buckeye Camera, Larkin Soaps, Olympia Self-Playing Music Box, Fairy Soap, Blue
Label Ketchup, Waltham Watches, and many more enterprises that no longer exist.
What we see in the ads is the dynamism of our capitalist system which keeps producing
new and improved products for the fussy American consumer. Competition gives good
management and good products the edge needed for survival.

Indeed, advertising is such an important part of our economy that today it can drive one
crazy by the sheer number of ads we see on television, or hear on the radio, or are
accosted by on the Internet. But magazines are still with us, and with a vengeance. Just
look at the magazine rack at Barnes & Noble, and like Vogue and Glamour, they are
glossy, with more pictures than text. In the old magazines, illustrations were used to
supplement the text. Today, pictures are what you look at page after page with great ads
selling luxury products to a materialistic public.

Of course, there are a few magazines that are still literate, such as The New Yorker, The
Atlantic, Commentary, Vanity Fair, and our own The New American. But most of the
new magazines, like People and US, are geared to the illiterate tastes of the young and are
simply picture books with lots of ads trying to sell their young readers on how to be sexy
and popular.

Great magazines like Life, Colliers, and the old Saturday Evening Post are gone. But the
women’s magazines like the Ladies Home Journal, Good Housekeeping, Cosmopolitan,
and Redbook have survived by adapting themselves to women’s new interests. People
still read Time and Newsweek, but their readership is declining.. Most magazines now
cater to every nuanced interest of the public, such as cooking (Italian, Southern, Chinese,
Vegetarian, Dietetic), decorating, running, skiing, body building, football, golf, travel,
finance, antiques, cars, computers, parenting, etc. The great renaissance mind no longer
exists in America. You must fit into a niche. Otherwise you won’t be recognized.
It is only by reading these old magazines that you can begin to understand how our
civilization has changed in a short hundred years. But human nature has not changed.
There are still people who want to “kill the Jews.” You can find some of them on
YouTube. So, as the French say, plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose, the more
things change, the more they remain the same.

(The above article came from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives:  http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm

The Blumenfeld Archives

How has the Sun’s energy changed over the last 45 years?

This article is from our friend and Camp Constitution instructor Professor Willie Soon:
For centuries, it has been known that the Sun goes through subtle and not-so-subtle changes over time. For instance, when Galileo Galilei pointed his telescope at the Sun, he discovered that the Sun is imperfect and often blotched by dark areas known as sunspots. We now know that sunspots are very large features – often many times larger than the Earth. However, it was only in 1978, when the first satellite missions to continuously monitor the Sun were launched, that it became possible to directly measure the changes in the Sun’s energy, without the Earth’s atmosphere getting in the way.
Sun-monitoring instruments on satellites describe the energy reaching the Earth from the Sun in terms of the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI). These satellite measurements show that the average TSI reaching the Earth is around 1360-1365 Watts per meter squared (W/m2). They also show the TSI rises and falls slightly over the course of a sunspot cycle (roughly 8-13 years). However, most of the satellite missions only last for around 1 to 2 sunspot cycles. Therefore, in order to study the changes in TSI for longer than 10-15 years, scientists need to composite, or “stitch together”, the TSI measurements from multiple satellite missions.
For more than 20 years, there has been ongoing scientific controversy between rival scientific teams on how to best composite the TSI missions into a continuous record for the entire satellite era, i.e., from 1978 to the present.
For example, the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitoring (ACRIM) team in charge of the NASA ACRIM satellite project took the approach of using the data as provided by the satellite mission science teams. In contrast, the Physical Meteorological Observatory in Davos (PMOD) team applied various data adjustments to each of the satellite missions before constructing their composite.
The ACRIM composite suggested that as well as the changes in TSI over the course of a sunspot cycle, there are also long-term changes in TSI between sunspot cycles. It suggested the possibility that these long-term changes in TSI could be contributing to global warming.
However, the PMOD composite suggested that TSI does not change much between sunspot cycles. It ruled out the possibility of TSI changes being a major factor in global warming.
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s latest reports explicitly favored composites like PMOD’s over ACRIM’s.
A major study, led by the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (www.CERES-Science.com), has just been published that revisits this long-standing scientific controversy and provides important new insights that could change our understanding of the long-term changes in TSI over timescales longer than 10-15 years.
This new peer-reviewed paper was published in the prestigious journal, The Astrophysical Journal, founded in 1895, it remains one of the top journals in astronomy and astrophysics.
The scientists in the team reanalyzed all the available satellite data from the first Nimbus 7 mission to the currently active missions on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft and Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor 1 (TSIS-1) on the International Space Station (ISS). They updated several of the older composites, as well as developing a wide range of new composites. In total, they found 21 different composites for the satellite era – including the 4 existing composites currently used by the scientific community.
Using common statistical techniques, these 21 composites were sorted into 6 main composite groups – labelled “A” to “F”, as seen in the chart below:
One group (“A”) matches very well to the PMOD composite and to the various solar activity datasets used in the IPCC’s most recent report. This group implies that there has been little or no contribution of the Sun to any of the global warming during the satellite era, i.e., since 1978.
Two groups (“B” and “C”) agree with the original ACRIM composite that had implied that solar activity might have contributed to global warming in the 1980s and 1990s, but that solar activity had since declined.
However, two other groups (“D” and “E”) suggest a new history of TSI variability in the satellite era. They agree with ACRIM that solar activity might have contributed to global warming in the 1980s and 1990s and that solar activity slightly decreased since the early 2000s. But, unlike ACRIM, they suggest that solar activity is still higher than in the 1980s and therefore might still be contributing to global warming.
The sixth group (“F”) – that is the only group that does not include any of the satellite data associated with the original PMOD team – suggests that solar activity has continued to increase throughout all four of the solar minima during the satellite era so far. It also confirms that the current ongoing solar maximum is already higher than the last cycle. If this composite group is correct, it would completely change our current understanding of how solar activity has changed over the last 45 years.
The team behind this new paper were shocked at how many completely different plausible composites could be generated from the available satellite data as provided by the satellite mission science teams.
The lead author of the study, Dr. Ronan Connolly, said, “As we explain in the paper, Group A – the one closest to that used by IPCC and many of the current climate modelling groups – is probably the most unreliable of the six. This is because of the heavy data adjustments and subjective data truncations that were applied to the original satellite mission team’s data.”
However, they have not yet established conclusively which of the six composite groups are most accurate. For this reason, the team have provided all these new, updated and existing composites to the scientific community so that other researchers can work on resolving these new challenges.
The new dataset is freely available through the Supporting Data at the journal website, as well as at the CERES-Science website and the Zenodo dataset repository website.
Citation details for the study:
  • Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, Michael Connolly, Rodolfo Gustavo Cionco, Ana G. Elias, Gregory W. Henry, Nicola Scafetta, and Víctor M. Velasco Herrera (2024). “Multiple new or updated satellite Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) composites (1978-2023)”. The Astrophysical Journal, 975 (1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7794

SPOOKED! Witches complain they cannot cast harmful spells on Trump

(Reposted with permission from World Net Daily)

‘He seems to have some kind of protection around him’

There’s no doubt that a morality foreign to America’s Judeo-Christian foundation and longtime adherence is afoot on its shores today.

The Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration has made transgenderism, including the bodily mutilation of minors, and abortion, the lucrative industry of killing the unborn, among its top priorities.

Further, the administration routinely has orchestrated attacks on followers of the faith, sending grandmothers to prison because of their actions in pursuit of protecting the unborn, and trying to force Christian ministries to fund abortion.

ADVERTISEMENT

So it’s not a surprise that President Donald Trump, who has promised to reverse many of the Biden-Harris agenda points, would be considered by some to be the choice closer to God’s desires for America than the Democrat nominee, Harris.

But now some speculation by witches, who have made their presence known on social media sites, is spurring that conversation.

They, in fact, are complaining about “some kind of protection” around Trump, making it so they cannot cast spells on him.

Does President Trump have divine protection from God Almighty?

Trump himself has acknowledged that circumstance, especially concerning his escape from an assassin’s bullet weeks ago. The bullet nicked his ear, causing it to bleed. But he explains that had he not turned his head at that very instant to look at a poster on stage at his rally, he likely would have died.

 

Online, “WitchesVsPatriarchy” complained, “Some other witches have mentioned that doing spells directly against tRump (sic) are not as effective as we might hope as he seems to have some kind of protection around him.”

ADVERTISEMENT

So the recommendation is to do spells “to help Kamala & the Democrats.”

report at Modernity News said, “A post on the far-left website appeared in a subreddit called ‘WitchesVsPatriarchy’ and features one of the witches bemoaning the fact that their spells aren’t working on the Donald.”

 

The report suggests Trump already “lives in their deranged heads rent free” because they want no more attention given to him, while giving him more attention.

WND reported Trump publicly thanked God for allowing him to escape that assassin’s bullet, at the recent Al Smith Charity Dinner in Manhattan.

He said, “You don’t hear about the American Dream anymore. We’re going to make it possible for them to have that dream again. This is a very religious evening to me. It really is. It represents so much. My sister was someone who loved the (Catholic) Church and gave to the Church. The cardinal knew that.

“Having recently, myself, survived two assassination attempts—yes, I survived. I have a chart that went down to the right. Fortunately, I looked at it. It’s my all-time favorite piece of paper. It went down, and I looked to the right, and I said, ‘Was that luck? Was that God?’ I think it was God that did that. I really do.”

Further, columnist Wayne Allyn Root bluntly said Trump has been chosen by God.

“He’s not perfect. He’s not a god. He’s a human, although I believe super-human. But Trump is clearly chosen by God for this role, at this time and place – to save America and make America great again,” he explained in a commentary.

“Like the heroes of the Bible, Trump is a courageous warrior, with a killer instinct, perhaps you might call him a Barbarian, chosen by God to FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT! And to protect our country, our values, and our childrens’ future.”

Root is author of multiple books and has a television show, “The ROOT Reaction” on Real America’s Voice TV, as well as a weekend program.

His comments, he explains, are being repeated from 2016. But they are never more true than now, he said.

On social media, Trump said, “There’s something going on. I mean, perhaps it’s God wanting me to be president, to save this country. Nobody knows.”

 

 

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh’s articles here.

ADVERTISEMENT

What do you think of this article?

   10 reactions

+1
upvote
8
like
+1
downvote
0
downvote
+1
love
1
love
+1
funny
1
funny
+1
angry
0
angry
+1
sad
0
sad
+1
curious
0
curious
+1
thoughtful
0
thoughtful

The Weekly Sam The Great American Math Disaster By Samuel Blumenfeld

 

One of the reasons why Americans are so confused about the large numbers being tossed
around by our leaders in Washington these days, is because of how poorly they’ve been
taught mathematics in the public schools they attended. Numbers in the millions,
billions, and trillions are almost impossible to visualize as anything more than just strings
of numbers. Most Americans can barely deal with thousands, let alone trillions.
The basic problem is that American children are no longer being taught arithmetic. They
are taught math, which includes more than our simple counting system. Arithmetic deals
with quantity. Math deals with relationships and uses complex symbols. When you
submerge arithmetic in mathematics, without making sure that the children have mastered
their counting skills, you get math failure. And this is nothing new. Back in 1991
Newsweek magazine reported (6/17/91):

How bad are eighth graders’ math skills? So bad that half are scoring just above
the proficiency level expected of fifth-grade students. Even the best students did
miserably; at the top-scoring schools, the average was well below grade level.
Hardly any students have the background to go beyond simple computation, most
of those kids can add but they have serious trouble thinking through simple
problems….

What’s really frightening about these results is that the alarm has been ringing
since the 1983 publication of “A Nation at Risk,” the federally sponsored study
that highlighted vast problems in the public schools. Yet despite years of talk
about reform–and genuine efforts of change in a few places–American students
are still not making the grade and remain behind their counterparts in other
industrialized nations.

All of those kids who did miserably in math in 1983 and 1991 are today’s voting adults in
their thirties and forties. And let us not forget the disaster called the “New Math” which
swept through America’s elementary schools like a hurricane during the 1960s and ’70s,
creating today’s math illiterates among Boomers in their fifties and sixties.
The educators blame the problem on traditional arithmetic, which hasn’t been taught in
years, but is a perfect scapegoat. They complain that too much time is wasted practicing
adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. The solution? More calculators and
computers.

The real problem is that our educators really don’t know the difference between
arithmetic and mathematics, and if you don’t know the difference, you will not know how
to teach either. Our arithmetic system is an ingenious method of counting, keeping track of quantity. It
uses 10 symbols and place value for all of its notations and operations. As such it is one
of the greatest achievements of the human intellect, an invention that permits human
beings to perform any counting feat with mere pencil and paper.
But the key to its proficient use is memorization of the basic arithmetic facts. If you
don’t memorize the facts, then you are stuck with unit counting and you might as well
learn to use an abacus. Memorization requires rote drill, which is forbidden in today’s
schools, even though it is the easiest way for a child to learn anything. When educators
think that children can learn to compute without memorizing the arithmetic facts, they are
deluding themselves and cheating the children.

Why is it important for children to memorize the arithmetic facts? Because
memorization will give them mastery of the system. And once the arithmetic facts are
memorized through drill and practice with pencil and paper, they will later be able to use
calculators and computers with accuracy, spotting errors when they make them, always
able to do the calculations on paper if necessary.
Why did eighth graders do so poorly even in wealthy suburban schools? Because of bad
teaching. Obviously, when even the richest and brightest fail, one cannot blame it on
rote memorization when we are told that memorization is what makes the Japanese
student so much better than the American. If teachers do not even know how to teach
simple arithmetic effectively, how can we assume that they know how to teach algebra,
geometry, trigonometry, or calculus effectively?

Besides, very few of us will need to use algebra, geometry, trigonometry or calculus, but
all of us will need to use arithmetic–in doing tax returns, figuring out mortgages,
balancing our checking accounts, using credit cards, making change, planning our
retirement. So if everyone must use arithmetic in order to survive economically, why
don’t the educators emphasize the need to develop good arithmetic skills?
Back in 1983, John Saxon, the celebrated author of superb mathematics textbooks used
by home-schoolers and private schools, wrote:

“For the last twenty years, these [mathematics] experts have worked unwittingly to bring
matters to a point where only the brilliant can learn mathematics. They have tried to
teach advanced concepts and a general overview before the student has learned the
basics….In an important sense, these authors are experts neither in mathematics nor in
education. They do not know which mathematics topics must be mastered at which level
and have no understanding of the capabilities of the average student. Their books are
visible proof that they do not know how children learn and assimilate abstractions.”
(National Review, 8/19/83)

Until rote learning is restored in our primary schools in the teaching of arithmetic, we can
expect math failure to plague American public education for the foreseeable future.

The Blumenfeld Archives

Please sign up for the Blumenfeld Archives:

http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm