campconstitution

Towns and Cities Across Canada Declare December Christian Heritage Month

 

Thanks to Google Alert, we recently discovered about story of dozens of towns, and cities in Canada that have declared December Christian Heritage Month.  Hal Shurtleff, director of Camp Constitution, host of The Camp Constitution Report and the plaintiff in the precedent setting 9-0 Supreme Court decision Shurtleff v Boston http://www.lc.org  interviews the Toronto couple Jay and Molly Banerjei that have been the force behind the movement:  https://christianheritagemonth.ca/ 

Jay and Molly, originally from India, tell Hal about their concern that Christianity will be a persecuted religion in their adopted country, and how they were led by the Holy Spirit to take a stand for Christ.  They share with Hal how they founded the widely successful Toronto Christian Music Festival and the difficulties they had in obtaining permits for this well attended annual event https://christianmusicfestival.org/about-us/

(A link to an audio version of the interview:  https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2024-12-08T05_06_10-08_00 )

A

The Christian Heritage Month Proclamation:

Whereas Canada was founded on the words of Psalm 72:8, “He shall have dominion also from sea to sea,” acknowledging our nation’s spiritual foundation; and
Whereas the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms recognizes the supremacy of God, affirming the importance of faith in shaping our values; and
Whereas Christianity, the largest and most ethnically diverse religion in Canada, has deeply influenced the principles of compassion, justice, and service that define our nation; and
Whereas Christians, representing diverse backgrounds from all continents, have contributed significantly to Canada’s spiritual and cultural heritage; and
Whereas December is dedicated to celebrating Christmas, a holiday that embodies love, unity, and generosity;
Now, therefore, let December be proclaimed as Christian Heritage Month, honoring the enduring legacy of Christianity and its impact on the growth and values of Canada.“

Samples of Christian Heritage Month proclamations.

And, their flag or banner:

We encourage readers to forward this far and wide especially to members of the media, and then pray that we in the United States will be able to organize a concerted effort like Molly and Jay have.

Pearl Harbor Attacked “DECEMBER 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy!

LISTEN (text to speech)
Facebook  Twitter  Linkedin  
American Minute with Bill Federer
Pearl Harbor Attacked “DECEMBER 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy!”
Read American Minute

“I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars,”

-promised Franklin D. Roosevelt as he campaigned as the Democrat candidate for a third term as President, October 30, 1940 … continue reading …

Download as PDF …

FDR addressed Congress on Appropriations for National Defense, July 10, 1940:

“I said … keep this nation from being drawn into the war … We will not send our men to take part in European wars.”

FDR gave a campaign promise to the Young Democratic Clubs of America, April 20, 1940:

“We are keeping out of the wars that are going on in Europe and in Asia …

Our opponents are seeking to frighten the country by telling people that the present Administration is deliberately … drifting into war. You know better than that.”

FDR told the New York Herald Tribune Forum, October 26, 1939:

“The United States of America, as I have said before, is neutral and does not intend to get involved in war.”

FDR stated in a Fireside Chat, September 3, 1939:

“We seek to keep war from our own firesides by keeping war from coming to the Americas …

This nation will remain a neutral nation … I have said … many times … that I hate war …

I hope the United States will keep out of this war … I give you … reassurance that every effort of your Government will be directed toward that end.”

FDR addressed a Press Conference in Hyde Park, New York, July 22, 1939:

“On the neutrality thing, I have here forty-five newspaper editorials … showing how widespread is the general approval … to make the United States neutral and to help to avert war.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt stated in a radio address to the Third Annual Women’s Conference, October 13, 1933:

“It is the policy of this Government to avoid being drawn into wars between other Nations.”

On August 31, 1935, FDR gave a statement on Neutrality Legislation:

“As a Nation, we are overwhelmingly against engaging in war … The policy of the Government is … avoidance of any entanglements which would lead us into conflict.”

FDR stated on February 29, 1936:

“A definite step was taken toward enabling this country to maintain its neutrality and avoid being drawn into wars involving other Nations.”

FDR was quoted in the New York Herald Tribune Forum, October 26, 1939:

“We have heard orators … beating their breasts … against sending the boys of American mothers to fight on the battlefields of Europe.

That I do not hesitate to label as one of the worst fakes in current history. It is a deliberate setting up of an imaginary bogey man.

The simple truth is that no person … in the national administration … has ever suggested … the remotest possibility of sending the boys of American mothers to fight on the battlefields of Europe.

That is why I label that argument a shameless and dishonest fake.”

FDR remarked to Representatives of National Civic Organizations. Washington, D.C., August 2, 1940:

“I made a statement which was promptly twisted out of all semblance to what I said …

They promptly tried to misquote … that we would promptly send two or three million American boys to the line, which was, of course, merely a political effort on their part to misrepresent.”

FDR gave his campaign promise at an event in Philadelphia, October 23, 1940:

“I give … to the people of this country this most solemn assurance:

There is no secret treaty, no secret obligation, no secret commitment, no secret understanding in any shape or form, direct or indirect, with any other Government, or any other nation in any part of the world, to involve this nation in any war.”

FDR stated in Buffalo, New York, November 2, 1940:

“A few days ago … a person very high in Republican circles … I am telling you this story to illustrate these vicious misrepresentations …

This leader said: ‘I want to tell you something off the record … The President of the United States has … orders … that the day after Election the whole of the United States Fleet, will proceed further westward … And that, you know, would be an act of war against Japan.’

Well, the fact is that … that it is a falsehood …

I can cite to you many, many other examples of rumors … all of them untrue, but every one of them tending to make people believe that this country is going to war. Your President says this country is not going to war.”

FDR addressed naive college students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, December 5, 1938:

“You undergraduates who see me for the first time have read your newspapers and heard on the air that I am, at the very least, an ogre — a consorter with Communists, a destroyer of the rich, a breaker of our ancient traditions …

You have heard for six years that I was about to plunge the Nation into war; that you and your little brothers would be sent to the bloody fields of battle in Europe (Laughter).”

While FDR was making campaign promises, most of the world was pulled into war.

There were either part of the Allied Powers in support of freedom, or part of the Axis Power in support of dictatorships in Germany’s National Socialist Workers Party, Japan’s Imperial Empire, and Italy’s Fascist Party.

Nations entered World War Two in rapid succession:

  • Germany (1933)

 

  • Italy (1936)
  • Ethiopia (1936)
  • Japan (1937)
  • Manchukuo (1937)
  • Korea (1937)
  • China (1937)
  • Austria (1938)
  • Czechoslovakia (1938)
  • Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1939)
  • United Kingdom (1939)
  • Poland (1939)
  • Albania (1939)
  • South Africa (1939)
  • Saudi Arabia (1939)
  • Samoa (1939)
  • Australia (1939)
  • New Zealand (1939)
  • Lithuania (1939)
  • Malta (1940)
  • France (1940)
  • Denmark (1940)
  • Belgium (1940)
  • Hungary (1940)
  • Greece (1940)
  • Norway (1940)
  • Romania (1940)
  • Slovakia (1940)
  • Netherlands (1940)
  • Luxembourg (1940)
  • Latvia (1940)
  • Morocco (1940)
  • Croatia (1941)
  • Bulgaria (1941)
  • Finland (1941)
  • Belarus (1941)
  • Estonia (1941)
  • Yugoslavia (1941)
  • Turkey (1941)
  • Iraq (1941)
  • Iraq (1941)
  • Hong Kong (1941)
  • Thailand (1941)
  • Philippines (1941)
  • Libya (1941)
  • Egypt (1941)

A few countries officially remained neutral, though they were nevertheless affected by the war:

  • Sweden
  • Ireland
  • Portugal
  • Spain
  • Andorra
  • Liechtenstein
  • Vatican City
  • San Marino
  • Switzerland.

Franklin D. Roosevelt told the Teamsters Union Convention, September 11, 1940:

“I stand, with my party … on the platform … adopted in Chicago …

It said: ‘We will not participate in foreign wars, and we will not send our Army, naval or air forces to fight in foreign lands outside of the Americas, EXCEPT IN CASE OF ATTACK.'”

On DECEMBER 7, 1941, America was attacked.

Upon Pearl Harbor descended 350 Japanese aircraft, which sank 5 American battleships and 3 destroyers.

400 U.S. aircraft were destroyed.

Over 4,000 were killed or wounded.

Investigations afterwards revealed that warnings may have been disregarded.

Four-Star Admiral H.E. Kimmel stated in a 1958 radio interview hosted by Notre Dame Law School Dean Clarence Manion:

“General Short and I were not given the information available in Washington and were not informed of the impending attack because it was feared that action in Hawaii might deter the Japanese from making the attack.

Our president had repeatedly assured the American people that the United States would not enter the war unless we were attacked. The Japanese attack on the fleet would put the United States in the war with the full support of the American public.”

Similar accusations were made, and also denied, of the November 14, 1940, attack in England, where, supposedly, Winston Churchill did not warn the city of Coventry of an impending air raid because by doing so the Nazis would have been tipped off that their top-secret messages encrypted by the Enigma cipher machine could be decoded by British Ultra Secret cryptanalysts.

British Statesman Lord Acton wrote:

 

“Official truth is not actual truth.”

At the beginning of World War Two, on January 25, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt wrote the prologue of a special Gideons’ edition of the New Testament & Book of Psalms distributed to millions of soldiers and sailors:

“As Commander-in-Chief, I take pleasure in commending the reading of the Bible to all who serve in the armed forces of the United States … -(signed) Franklin D. Roosevelt.”

President Roosevelt proclaimed National Bible Week, December 8-14, 1941.

The National Bible Association website states:

“On Sunday December 7th, 1941 the National Broadcasting Company (NBC) which was a leading national radio station at the time, invited the founders of the National Bible Association to open programming for the day which was Sunday.

As they began their reading, bulletins came in from Hawaii announcing the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

Instead of just opening the day with one Bible reading NBC then asked the National Bible Association to continue reading the Bible all day between the bulletins about Pearl Harbor.”

Eleanor Roosevelt wrote:

“The words I heard over the telephone were quite sufficient to tell me that, finally, the blow had fallen, and we had been attacked.

Attacked in the Philippines, in Hawaii, and on the ocean between San Francisco and Hawaii.

Our people had been killed not suspecting there was an enemy, who attacked in the usual ruthless way which Hitler has prepared us to suspect …”

She continued:

“I think, perhaps, it is significant that we should be beginning Bible Week today.

This is the first annual Bible Week, so designated by the Laymen’s National Committee under the honorary chairmanship of Dr. Frank Kingdon.

This committee believes that religious faith and knowledge of the Bible are essential to the preservation of our freedoms.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt addressed a Joint Session of Congress:

“DECEMBER 7, 1941 — a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.”

President Roosevelt added:

“No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory …

We will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us …”

FDR continued:

“Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger.

With confidence in our armed forces — with the unbounding determination of our people — we will gain the inevitable triumph — so help us God.”

Many historians reasoned that if America had postponed entering the war, all the other Allies would have been defeated and America would be left alone fighting the Axis enemies.

After four years, and an estimated 15 million battle deaths and 45 million civilian deaths, the Axis Powers were defeated.

The World War Two Memorial in Washington, DC, was dedicated in 2004 to honor those Americans who gave their lives defending the nation.

Of the over 500 words inscribed on it, the designers chose not to include FDR’s phrase “So help us God” or any other mention of faith.

Chris Long of the Ohio Christian Alliance initiated the effort to add Franklin D. Roosevelt’s D-Day Prayer to the Memorial.

The D-Day Landing Prayer Acts (S 1044) was introduced in the House by Ohio Congressman Bill Johnson and in the Senate by Ohio Senator Rob Portman.

It gained bipartisan support and was signed into law in 2014.

(www.ddayprayerproject.org)

With a $2 million grant from the Lilly Endowment, Inc., Friends of the World War Two Memorial Board member and New York Times bestselling author Alex Kershaw wrote of FDR’s D-Day Prayer:

“Of all FDR’s radio broadcasts I believe it was the most powerful – it united every American in their will to win, to support the war effort, to sacrifice.”

On November 11, 2022, the ceremony celebrating the addition of the D-Day Prayer Circle of Remembrance to the World War Two Memorial in Washington, DC., had honored veteran Charlie Reinhart, who had fought in the D-Day Landing and in the Battle of the Bulge.

Congressman Bill Johnson address the audience:

“One of the veterans … much like Charlie … survived the landing at the beaches of Normandy …

He said … something happened that morning on board those ships, with 160,000 sailors, warriors, marines, waiting to come on shore to face off against the Germans …

It was like you could hear a pin drop when they crawled out of their bunks, nobody was saying very much, it was quiet, every man was into his own thoughts, and then their superiors came in and gave them their orders for the day … Their superiors told them ‘take out two targets before you’re killed.’ Not if you’re killed, but before you’re killed.

You see they knew there was a good chance that the bulk of the first wave of the beach landers would be killed by the machine gun fire that would rain down like terror from the cliffs above.

He said, but you know something … nobody refused to get in the boats and head for the beach … knowing that it could be the last significant act of their life, to sacrifice their own blood for their country.

Folks, that is the heart of the American warrior. and that was the heart of the President that was praying that prayer on June 6, 1944.”

Also speaking at the ceremony were Chris Long, radio host Bob Franz, Miss Ohio singer Melanie Miller, Mayor of Ashland, Ohio, Matt Miller, and William J. Federer, who stated:

“Though World War Two resulted in 85 million deaths worldwide, the Earth was saved from the Imperialism of Japan and the totalitarianism of the National Socialism Workers Party.

Today again our nation is facing unprecedented challenges – with instability world-wide, and powerful forces pushing for globalism.

Internally there is an orchestrated attack on patriotism with some attempting to malign it as “nationalism” – but the nation we want to preserve is the same as those we are remembering today – a nation which cherishes freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, government from the consent of the governed, and a nation which believes we have inalienable rights from a Creator.”

Many of FDR’s statements acknowledging faith are in the book:

The Faith of FDR – from President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Public Papers 1933-1945

  • “THE WHOLE WORLD is divided between … pagan brutality and the Christian ideal. We choose human freedom which is the Christian ideal.” -FDR, May 27, 1941, Address Announcing Unlimited National Emergency.
  • “PRESERVATION OF THESE rights is vitally important now, not only to us who enjoy them — but to the whole future of Christian civilization.” -FDR, Sept. 1, 1941, Labor Day.
  • “THE WORLD IS too small … for both Hitler and God … Nazis have now announced their plan for enforcing their … pagan religion all over the world … by which the Holy Bible and the Cross of Mercy would be displaced by Mein Kampf and the swastika.” -FDR, January 6, 1942, State of Union.
  • “THOSE FORCES HATE democracy and Christianity … They oppose democracy because it is Christian. They oppose Christianity because it preaches democracy.” -FDR, Nov. 1, 1940, Brooklyn, New York.
  • “I SAW SEVASTOPOL and Yalta! And I know that there is not room enough on earth for both German militarism and Christian decency.” -FDR, March 1, 1945, on Yalta Conference.
  • “THIS GREAT WAR effort … shall not be imperiled by the handful of noisy traitors — betrayers of America, betrayers of Christianity itself.” -FDR, April 28, 1942, Fireside Chat.
  • “WE GUARD AGAINST the forces of anti-Christian aggression, which may attack us from without, and the forces of ignorance and fear which may corrupt us from within.” -FDR, October 28, 1940, Madison Square Garden, New York.
  • “I KNEW THAT someday Russia would return to religion for the simple reason that four or five thousand years of recorded history have proven that mankind has always believed in God in spite of the many abortive attempts to exile God.” -FDR, February 10, 1940, American Youth Congress.
  • “THE AMERICAN PEOPLE … have watched with sympathetic interest the effort of the Jews to renew in Palestine the ties of their ancient homeland and to reestablish Jewish culture in the place where for centuries it flourished … It gives me great pleasure to send my warmest personal greetings.” -FDR, February 6, 1937, to Rabbi Stephen Wise of the United Palestine Appeal.
  • “AN ORDERING OF society which relegates religion … to the background can find no place within it for the ideals of the Prince of Peace. The United States rejects such an ordering, and retains its ancient faith.” -FDR, January 4, 1939.
  • “I DOUBT IF there is any problem in the world … that would not find happy solution if approached in the spirit of the Sermon on the Mount … in conformity with the teaching of Him Who is the Way, the Light and the Truth.” -FDR, October 1, 1938, New Orleans Eucharistic Congress.
  • “WE WILL CELEBRATE this Christmas Day in our traditional American way … because the teachings of Christ are fundamental in our lives; and because we want our youngest generation … knowing … the story of the coming of the immortal Prince of Peace.” -FDR, December 24, 1944.
Download as PDF …

Read as American Minute post

William J. Federer video & audio
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & captivating PowerPoint presentations: 314-502-8924 wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate, with acknowledgment.
Facebook  Twitter  Linkedin

(Reposted with permission)

The Pilgrims Were Not Socialists-The American Minute

LISTEN (text to speech)
Facebook  Twitter  Linkedin
American Minute with Bill Federer
Pilgrims tried Communism — and rejected it — replacing it with Individual’s having Property with which they could be Charitable!
Read American Minute

High winds and treacherous tides along North America’s coast blew the Pilgrims 500 miles off course, preventing them from joining Virginia’s settlement at Jamestown, founded 14 years earlier … continue reading …

Download as PDF …

Having to disembark in Massachusetts, there was no government to submit to, so the Pilgrims created their own – the Mayflower Compact.

It was the first “constitution” written in America.

The Mayflower Compact began:

“In ye name of God, Amen.

We whose names are underwritten, the loyall subjects of our dread soveraigne Lord, King James …

having undertaken, for ye glorie of God, and advancemente of ye Christian faith, and honour of our king & countrie, a voyage to plant ye first colonie in ye Northerne parts of Virginia …

in ye presence of God, and one of another, covenant & combine our selves togeather into a civill body politick …

to enacte … just & equall lawes … as shall be thought most meete & convenient for ye generall good of ye Colonie,

unto which we promise all due submission and obedience …”

The Mayflower Compact ended:

“In witnes wherof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cap-Codd ye 11 of NOVEMBER, Ano:Dom. 1620.”

There were three types of colonies:

  • Company Charter Colonies;
  • Royal Crown Colonies;
  • Proprietary Colonies.

1) A Company Charter Colony – where the king gave monopoly permission to investors who risked their own capital in attempting to found a colony.

It did not “cost” the king anything and he got a percentage of what came in, according to king-approved by laws.

The background of “joint-stock companies” is interesting.

Medieval Europe had a sin called usury – the paying or receiving of interest.

This prevented the formation of for-profit companies.

Though there existed merchant guilds, craft guilds, and religious guilds, these did not have large supplies of capital required for major undertakings.

Any significant endeavors, such as fitting out ships to sail the world, had to be financed by a king or wealthy noblemen.

After the Reformation, what is considered the first modern joint-stock company was England’s Company of Merchant Adventurers to New Lands, chartered in 1553.
Outfitted with investments from 250 shareholders, they sent three ships to find a way to China.

Unfortunately, they attempted to sail north of Russia where most of the crew froze to death.

The company was rechartered in 1555 as the Muscovy Company to trade with Moscow’s Ivan the Terrible.

The most financially successful joint-stock company was the Dutch East India Company, founded in 1602.

Anyone, be it a baker, blacksmith, farmer, etc., could invest in a ship going to Indonesia, and they would get paid a profit when the ship returned filled with valuable spices, such as nutmeg, cloves, and mace, together with tea, coffee, silk, sugarcane, grain, rice, soybean, porcelain, silk, and textiles.

The Dutch added the feature that allowed individuals to trade their shares of stock.

It was the Amsterdam Stock Exchange – the first of its kind in the world.

Shareholders had limited-liability, meaning that if the ship sank or was captured by pirates, investors only lost the amount they invested, and were not responsible for any additional liability or damages.

Losses were covered by the Dutch creating the first modern insurance companies.

By 1612, the Dutch East India Company had become the first intercontinental trade corporation with limited liability.

In the next two centuries, its profits grew to eclipse all other companies combined, being considered the most valuable company ever in world history.

The British East India Company was charted by Queen Elizabeth I on December 31, 1600.

It transported tea, spices, salt, cotton, saltpetre, indigo blue dye, and opium, and grew to eventually account for half of the world’s trade.

The Virginia Company of London was chartered in 1606.

The Virginia Colony suffered tremendous financial loss due to diseases, famine and Indian massacres. The colony was surrendered to the King who made it a Royal Crown Colony in 1624.

2) A Royal Crown Colony was ruled directly by the King through his appointed governor.

In Virginia’s case, the King appointed a governor but did not provide financial support.

The Governor demanded landowners provide his funding, but left it up to them to determine how, leading to a degree of autonomy in the Virginia House of Burgesses – the first legislative assembly in the New World.

3) A Proprietary Colony was land given by the king to a private individual, notably:

  • Maryland was originally given by King Charles I as private property to Lord Baltimore in 1632;
  • The Carolinas were originally given by King Charles II as private property to seven lord proprietors in 1663;
  • New York was originally given by King Charles II as private property to his younger brother, the Duke of York, in 1664;
  • Pennsylvania was given by King Charles II as private property to William Penn in 1681.

The Pilgrims’ “Plymouth Plantation” was originally a “company” colony, having obtained a land patent from the Virginia Company of London.

Company bylaws were drawn up by the investors, called “adventurers”- who loaned the money for the Pilgrims’ trip. They expected to be paid back with a profit.

The bylaws set up a communal system for the first seven years, in which all capital and profits remained “in ye common stock”:

“The adventurers & planters do agree that every person that goeth being aged 16 years & upward … be accounted a single share …

The persons transported & ye adventurers shall continue their joint stock & partnership together, ye space of 7 years …

during which time, all profits & benefits that are got by trade, traffic, trucking, working, fishing, or any other means of any person or persons, remain still in ye common stock …

… That all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provision out of ye common stock & goods …

That at ye end of ye 7 years, ye capital & profits, viz. the houses, lands, goods and chattels, be equally divided betwixt ye adventurers, and planters.”

Pilgrim Governor William Bradford described in Of Plymouth Plantation that the sharing of “all profits and benefits … in ye common stock,” regardless of how hard each individual worked, was a failure:

“The failure of that experiment of communal service, which was tried for several years, and by good and honest men,

proves the emptiness of the theory of Plato and other ancients, applauded by some of later times, — that the taking away of private property, and the possession of it in community, by a commonwealth, would make a state happy and flourishing; as it they were wiser than God …

… For in this instance, community of property was found to breed much confusion and discontent;

and retard much employment which would have been to the general benefit …

For the young men who were most able and fit for service objected to being forced to spend their time and strength in working for other men’s wives and children, without any recompense …”

William Bradford continued:

“The strong man or the resourceful man had no more share of food, clothes, etc., than the weak man who was not able to do a quarter the other could. This was thought injustice.

The aged and graver men, who were ranked and equalized in labor, food, clothes, etc., with the humbler and younger ones, thought it some indignity and disrespect to them.

As for men’s wives who were obliged to do service for other men, such as cooking, washing their clothes, etc., they considered it a kind of slavery, and many husbands would not brook it …”

Bradford explained that the “communistic plan” of redistributing wealth failed:

“it did … abolish those very relations which God himself has set among men … (and) greatly diminish the mutual respect that is so important should be preserved amongst them.

Let none argue that this is due to human failing, rather than to this communistic plan of life in itself.”

Bradford described how the Pilgrims switched to allow individuals to have their own property, after which they could be charitable to each other:

“I answer, seeing that all men have this failing in them, that God in His wisdom saw that another plan of life was fitter for them …

So they began to consider how to raise more corn, and obtain a better crop than they had done, so that they might not continue to endure the misery of want …

At length after much debate, the Governor, with the advice of the chief among them, allowed each man to plant corn for his own household …

So every family was assigned a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number …

… This was very successful.

It made all hands very industrious, so that much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could devise, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better satisfaction.

… The women now went willing into the field, and took their little ones with them to plant corn, while before they would allege weakness and inability, and to have compelled them would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.”

The Pilgrims tried the “communistic plan of life” and almost starved to death.

They switched to everyone owning their own land, producing their own food, after which they could be charitable with each other.

People may say, wasn’t the early church communistic?

No — the early church was the early church!

Socialism and communism are counterfeit early church. And the difference is between the words voluntary and involuntary.

Early believers voluntarily sold their property and laid the money at the feet of the Apostles for the church to distribute.

They did not have their land taken away from them and then be forced to involuntarily lay the money at the feet of Pilate for the Roman Government to redistribute.

In Bible, each family was given PROPERTY in Promised “Land.”

If you own property, you can accumulate possessions. The Bible calls this being BLESSED.

You can then be moved in your heart to voluntarily give away some of your possessions. The Bible calls this CHARITY.

If you do not own property and possessions, how can you be charitable? You cannot give away what you do not have.

 

Are you going to steal from others to give it away? If you steal, you are a thief. It would be a sin as you broke the Law. This is not what the Bible teaches.

Instead, God blesses you with possessions and then gives you the opportunity to express in this material world the love for others that exists in your heart by voluntarily giving some of your possessions away in charity.

Pilgrim Pastor John Robinson wrote December 15, 1617, that the Pilgrims were:

“Knit together as a body in most strict and sacred bond and covenant of the Lord, of the violation whereof we make great conscience,

and by virtue whereof we so hold ourselves straitly tied to all care of each other’s good, and of the whole by everyone and so mutually.”

Massachusetts Governor John Winthrop wrote similarly in A Model of Christian Charity, June 11, 1630:

“We are a company, professing ourselves fellow members of Christ … knit together by this bond of love …

It is by a mutual consent through a special overruling Providence … between God and us: we are entered into covenant with Him for this work.

We must be knit together … make one another’s condition our own, rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together … as members of the same body.

So shall we keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace …

We shall find that the God of Israel is among us … We shall be as a City upon a Hill, the eyes of all people are upon us.”

British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher stated in 1996:

“Your Founding Fathers … looked after one another, not only as a matter of necessity, but as a matter of duty to their God.”

Download as PDF …

 

Read as American Minute post

William J. Federer video & audio
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & captivating PowerPoint presentations: 314-502-8924 wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate, with acknowledgment.

The above article was reposted with permission from the American Minute.

Appeals Court Allows Louisiana To Post Ten Commandments

NEW ORLEANS, LA – The U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order Friday allowing Louisiana to post the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms in accordance with the state’s new law, except in the five school districts where parents have challenged the law. The Appeals Court’s order limits the scope of a lower court ruling that initially blocked Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law statewide as unconstitutional. The state is now free to post the Ten Commandments in its remaining 67 school districts beginning January 1, 2025 as litigation continues.
Louisiana state attorneys had filed an emergency motion with the Fifth Circuit arguing that lower court Judge John deGravelles had overstepped his authority when he ordered all 72 school districts in the state be notified that he had struck down the law instead of just the five districts involved in the lawsuit. The Appeals Court decided 2-1 in a one-sentence order to grant the state’s motion for an “administrative stay” which pauses the judge’s notification requirement and only allows his judgment to affect the five school districts with parents officially challenging the law. The Louisiana school districts currently blocked from posting the Ten Commandments are East Baton Rouge Parish, Livingston Parish, St. Tammany Parish, Orleans Parish, and Vernon Parish. The state is appealing to overturn Judge deGravelles full judgment arguing the law is constitutional.

In June 2024, Louisiana enacted House Bill 71 which requires all K-12 public schools and state-funded universities to display at least an 11-inch by 14-inch poster of the Ten Commandments. The displays must have a four-paragraph “context statement” describing the history of the Ten Commandments and how they “were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries.”

However, a multifaith group of nine families, consisting of Jewish, Christian, Unitarian Universalist, and nonreligious parents represented by the ACLU, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, have challenged the law alleging the state is endorsing a specific religion.

Louisiana officials defended the Ten Commandments law as constitutionally valid by arguing that it has a historical and educational purpose. They cite the Decalogue’s “historical role” in developing American law and education, which displayed alongside other historical documents, would be permissible under the First Amendment. Since HB 71 also required public school classrooms to display the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance, the state’s legal team argued that the law’s intent is not to endorse a religion but to teach where America’s longstanding moral values in civic life originate.

Louisiana has considerable grounds for its appeal. Recent Supreme Court precedents show that displaying the Ten Commandments is not necessarily a religious endorsement.  In American Legion v. American Humanists Association, the High Court wrote that the Ten Commandments “have historical significance as one of the foundations of our legal system” and represents a “common cultural heritage.” Then, in 2022, the cases of Shurtleff v. City of Boston and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District rejected and overruled the 1971 case of Lemon v. Kurtzman. The High Court replaced the “Lemon Test” by returning to a traditional First Amendment standard where courts must interpret the Establishment Clause by “reference to historical practices and understandings.”

Liberty Counsel’s Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “The Ten Commandments is a universally recognized symbol of law and has indelibly shaped the Western Legal Tradition and American government. There are more than 50 displays of the Ten Commandments inside and outside the United States Supreme Court. The Ten Commandments are ubiquitous and their central role in law and government pre-date the U.S. Constitution. With this injunction narrowed to only five school districts, the Ten Commandments will be displayed in nearly all Louisiana public schools.”

Liberty Counsel provides broadcast quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost.

(The above is a news release from Liberty Counsel  http://www.lc.org

 

TAKE ACTION

Democrats lost by overly orchestrating anti-Trump efforts

Democrats lost by overly orchestrating anti-Trump efforts

Nancy Pelosi got blamed for top-down “orchestration,” but the Cabal was broader than that

Ken Reid

The primary reasons voters elected Donald Trump over Kamala Harris and chose a Republican Congress were Joe Biden and the Democrats’ miserable handling of the economy, immigration and foreign policy – and their embrace of far-left “woke” polices, like sex-change operations for prisoners and other “transgender rights.”

However, the Democrat “strategy” of hitting Trump with multiple indictments, tagging him and his supporters as “existential threats to democracy,” and scaring women over abortion rights after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision may also have backfired, because these efforts were really designed to deflect attention from the harmful impacts of Biden’s bad policies and actions.

Topping it off, when he was pushed off the ticket for Vice President Kamala Harris in July, many voters may have smelled a rat. In essence, all of this was masterminded by a few political chieftains, notably former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and probably the Obamas, Clintons and their “strategists.”

Indeed, on MSNBC November 9, former Harris spokesperson and one-time Bernie Sanders operative Symone Sanders-Townsend (no relation to the senator), mouthed off against Pelosi, saying she    “orchestrated the very public demise of the president. And thank God for Joe Biden, that he came out and, yes, endorsed his VP. Pelosi is known for being “calculated,” she went on to say, but “where is her calculator now?”

The key words here are “orchestration” and “calculating.” One could say “None dare call it conspiracy,” or resurrect then-First Lady Hillary Clinton’s 1998 phrase “vast right-wing conspiracy” that “has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”

Ms. Clinton was denounced for calling it a “conspiracy.” In reality, a group of conservative activists and publications did continue an “opposition research” campaign against President Bill Clinton from the day he was elected in 1992, to persuade Congress and courts to investigate him, impeach him and undermine his presidency.

It didn’t really work. Like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton was impeached, but he resurrected himself, while Hillary went on to become a US Senator from New York and Secretary of State – and came close to defeating Trump for president in 2016.

The vast-left wing orchestration against Trump, however, was much more intricate, extensive and orchestrated than what conservatives used to tarnish Clinton. For example:

* Advancing the phony “Russiagate” scandal, at the highest levels of government

* Supporting and glorifying the “mostly peaceful” “Resistance” against the Trump presidency

* Instigating the 2019 House impeachment

* Demanding school and business lockdowns during the Covid pandemic, to hurt the economy and President Trump

* Supporting and capitalizing on the George Floyd riots

* Perpetuating “January 6” investigations, hearings, indictments and media coverage

* Promoting fear and hysteria following the Dobbs decision and various state limitations on abortion

* Pushing challengers out of the 2020 primaries to anoint Joe Biden (South Carolina Congressman James Clyburn’s “masterstroke”)

* Preventing a competitive 2024 primary against Biden

* Holding a Biden-Trump debate after primaries had ended, to see how President Biden would perform – and then forcing him off the ticket because he bombed

* Coronating Kamala Harris after Biden was ousted

Many are convinced that all these schemes were orchestrated by the Cabal of Pelosi, Schumer, the Obamas, the Clintons, and their strategists. Perhaps they wanted Biden to be the 2020 nominee, instead of independent-minded people like Senators Amy Klobuchar or Elizabeth Warren, or outsiders like Pete Buttigieg or Michael Bloomberg, because they knew they could manipulate Biden more easily.

However, Joe Biden was never a leader in the US Senate; he was a follower. He does little thinking for himself, but makes decisions based on the advice of bureaucrats, political aides and special interests. He largely approved all the big-spending legislation and regulatory initiatives the Democrats and his Obama-holdover aides wanted when they regained control of Congress after 2020. And he opened the nation’s borders to salve the bleeding hearts of his policy wonks.

“Joe Biden is nothing more than a Trojan horse for the radical socialists,” former Vice President Mike Pence warned in 2020. In the end, that radicalism doomed the Democrats in 2024.

In anointing Biden “The Nominee” during the 2020 primaries, octogenarians Clyburn and Pelosi looked over Biden’s eroding cognitive abilities. When he inevitably became a liability to the Democratic cause, they orchestrated his departure from the ticket for the younger Harris. They also engaged in incessant “lawfare,” Trump indictments and January-6 investigations.

Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested the Democrats should have focused “on one or two” charges against Trump, not four, and the indictments “will backfire on the Left.”  But The Cabal apparently wanted to extend the Trump-tarnishing so that there would be no trial before the GOP nominating process, thereby giving Republicans little opportunity to nominate someone else.

Prolonging the 1/6 congressional investigation into the 2022 elections was an effort to tarnish not just Trump, but his supporters. Biden’s unforgivable September 2022 speech in Philadelphia, when he attacked “MAGA Republicans” for being disloyal to America, was part and parcel of this effort

The media covered up the Cabal’s intrigues. Anyone who watches CNN or MSNBC has seen how Adam Schiff, Jamie Raskin, Pelosi, Clyburn and other leading Democrats are treated with kid gloves. The media hated Trump for calling them “fake news” and colluded with the Democrats nearly every step of the way.

It’s unlikely that Symone Sanders-Townsend will come clean on all of this, though our nation would benefit greatly from the disinfecting sunshine she could provide. Regardless, it seems highly unlikely that the Democrats can change their stripes, because their base and big donors have gone Loony-Left.

The Cabal probably thought throwing all those indictments and civil penalties at Trump would make him crack and cop a plea with the prosecutors. But Trump had the money and backbone to slug it out. He also had excellent lawyers, who mucked up the lawfare wheels. Essentially, he ran the clock out on the Democrats.

There’s a lesson here about being “overzealous” in politics. Jerome Lawrence coauthored the 1955 play (and 1960 film) “Inherit the Wind,” which examined extremism in “the Scopes monkey trial,” as a metaphor for the McCarthy investigations. Lawrence wrote: “Is it possible to be overzealous, to destroy that which you hope to save – so that nothing is left but emptiness?”

With Trump wining a near landslide despite the criminal cases – and taking the Congress – it seems all the Democrat orchestrations left them nothing but emptiness.

Ken Reid has been a journalist covering Congress and the federal health agencies since 1986. He served in local elected office in Loudoun County, VA (2006 to 2017), has been involved in Trump campaigns in Virginia since 2016, and has written for the Federalist and American Thinker.

The Weekly Sam: HOME SCHOOLING AND THE EDUCATIONAL CRISIS by Samuel L. Blumenfeld

(This article was originally published in the late 1980s.  Today, the homeschool movement is flourishing-Ed)

 

Home schooling is now the fastest growing educational phenomenon in the United States. For example, in April of this year, Massachusetts had its first home-school convention and more than 600 registries showed up, many with babes in arms preparing for the future. These are young Christian families who have decided that their children will never see the inside of a public school. No one knows exactly how many children are being educated at home. Estimates vary from 200,000 to a million. What we do know is that there are now home-school associations in every state and more home-school conventions, conferences, seminars, workshops and book fairs than anyone family can attend. Why is the home-education movement attracting so many new young families? Much of it has to do with the renewal of the Christian family and the desire to adhere to Biblical principles in child rearing.

The growing knowledge among Christians that the public schools are aggressively proselytizing Christian children into humanism via such programs as values clarification, sensitivity training, globalism, multiculturalism, evolution, sex education and death education is perhaps the most compelling reason why parents are turning to home schooling as the preferred alternative ~. Also, many families are disappointed in the lukewarm religious content of many Christian schools that seem to adopt too much from  the public schools in curriculum and general ‘practice. What the parents want is a strong, radical shift in orientation toward the Bible. They seek its moral and spiritual security in a world inundated by pornography, drugs, violence, abortion. political corruption and pagan depravity. The home school is being recognized as perhaps the only sure safe haven for children growing up in an increasingly dangerous society.

Meanwhile, the education establishment has become quite concerned with the growth of the home-education movement, which is contributing to the exodus from the public school. In fact, at its 1988 convention, the National Education Association virtually declared war on home education with its Resolution C-34:

“The National Education Association believes that home-school programs cannot provide the child with a comprehensive education experience. The Association believes that, if parental preference home-school study occurs, students enrolled must meet all state requirements. Instruction should be by persons who are licensed by the appropriate state education licensure agency, and a curriculum approved by the state department of education should be used. The Association further believes that such home-school programs should be limited to the children of the immediate family, with all expenses being borne by the parents.”

While the NEA deprecates the home school as an educational institution, the home schoolers are proving that their children are indeed getting a “comprehensive education experience” far  superior to the academic junk-food that public schoolers are fed for twelve years and result in declining test scores and increased functional illiteracy.

All of this has led to an education reform movement which is costing the taxpayers additional billions without any visible improvement to date. In addition, wherever home schoolers have been tested,  they’ve done better than their public-school counterparts. For example, in Tennessee, where about 900 home schoolers were registered with the state in 1989 — even though it is estimated that about 4,000 Tennessee children are being taught at home — home schoolers did quite \well. The Chattanooga News-Free Press of Dec. 11, 1989, reported:

“State tests show that second graders are about equal to their classroom-educated counterparts. But by the fifth grade, home schoolers have passed their classroom peers in reading, and by the seventh grade home schoolers excel in both math and language, scores show.”

In 1987, the performance of homeschoolers in Tennessee was equally impressive. Of the 561 homeschoolers tested, 213 outscored 245,000 of their public-school counterparts. Fifty-nine homeschool second graders were among the nation’s top 16 percent in reading ability and in the top 10 percentile in math. In the eighth grade, 30 home-schoolers scored 89 percent in reading and 79 percent in math. The 61,518 public school students scored 82 percent in reading and 72 percent in math. (Chattanooga Times, 8/13/87)

The reason why home schoolers do so well is because one-on-one tutoring is far superior to the classroom situation where children who need help get lost in the crowd. In tutoring you get immediate feedback, immediate correction, and thus the child is less likely to develop bad academic habits. Also, home-schooling parents are more apt to teach their children to read by intensive phonics than by the discredited, inefficient look-say or whole-word method. This makes an enormous difference when the goal is academic excellence. Another reason why home schoolers excel is because home educators are highly motivated, dedicated parents, committed to providing their children with the best education possible.

They want their children to become the best that America has to offer. The home-educated youngster represents the finest expression of the American Christian character; moral in behavior, peer independent, self-confident, respectful of elders, self-disciplined, inventive, freedom loving, patriotic, enterprising, God fearing. These are the youngsters who will become the leaders of tomorrow. It is symptomatic of our corrupt, paganized society that it is the finest Christian families, who have accepted their responsibility to educate and rear their children in a Godly manner, who are being , harassed and prosecuted by educational bureaucrats and state attorneys in Iowa, Michigan and elsewhere, determined to impose an atheistic sovereignty over God’s children. There will be many trials and tribulations in the days ahead, but in Christ, victory is ultimately assured.

The Weekly Sam: Educational Freedom in Early America By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

Many Americans falsely believe that there have always been government schools in our
country. Some believe that compulsory public education was written into our
Constitution. But nothing could be less true. The American colonies had total educational
freedom. Dames’ Schools provided primary education, and private academies provided
moral, literary, and commercial education. There were also, in New England,
town-supported Common Schools. These schools were run by local authorities, paid for
by local citizens, and provided the kind of basic education that parents approved of.
Church elders made sure that these schools provided a good moral education.

The idea of a centralized education system, owned and operated by the state and paid for
by all taxpayers, came from Prussia. In 1843 the “Father of Public-School Education”
Horace Mann visited Prussia, a state within what is now Germany run according to
militarist and centralist principles. Mann was impressed by the Prussians’ central control
of curriculum and teacher training. He was also impressed with the idea of compulsory
school attendance and the role of the truant officer.

Americans were quite satisfied with educational freedom and did not agitate for a
government system supported by taxes. They did not clamor for compulsory education
run by centralized government. But, as usual, the liberals and progressives were able to
use persuasive propaganda in favor of public schools and rally educators to their cause.
In the 1820s, the free market in education was clearly phasing out the community-run
common schools. The private academies were more efficiently organized, provided better
instruction, pupil supervision, and social atmosphere. They were less crowded and
offered a more practical curriculum. But by the 1850s, thanks to political propaganda,
liberal pressure on state legislators, tax-supported public schools were beginning to
phase out the private academies.

Let’s take a look at one of these academies. In 1846 a school entrepreneur by the name of
James Arlington Bennet was able to create the Arlington Academy for boys at New
Utrecht on Long Island, seven miles from New York City. It was housed in an elegant
and spacious building on 100 acres of land. According to the academy’s circular, its
English curriculum included “All the usual elementary branches, with Rhetoric,
Elocution, and English Composition. To this Department are added a splendid pair of
Globes, with Compasses, and Maps of the world, designed for the illustration of
Geographical, Historical, and Astronomical subjects.”
The Academy also taught Latin, Greek, French, Spanish, and Italian. Its Mathematical
Department taught Geometry, Algebra, Trigonometry, Differential Calculus, Land
Surveying, Navigation, and Lunar Observations. It had a Commercial Department, a
Civil Architecture Department, a Chemical and Philosophical Department, a Military
Department, and courses in Ethics and Moral Philosophy, Oratory, Agriculture and
Horticulture. The academy also provided instruction in Morals and Religion.

(Dummer Academy)

Many small towns had their own private academies. Dummer Academy was founded at
Byfield, Massachusetts, in 1763. Phillips, at Andover, Massachusetts, in 1778. Phillips at
Exeter, New Hampshire, in 1781. Leicester, at Leicester, Massachusetts, in 1783. Derby,
at Hingham, Massachusetts, in 1784. Each of these schools was founded by the
generosity of some wealthy person.

However, even in poorer towns, the local citizens were able to create excellent private
academies. Such was the case in Atkinson, New Hampshire, where in 1787 Atkinson
Academy was founded by prominent citizens of the town. It educated both boys and girls.
Students from other towns were boarded among local families. A history of the academy
describes what a typical day at school was like:

As the pupils entered the schoolroom each morning, the boys bowed and the girls
curtsied to the master. Awkward country youths found this an ordeal; some of the boys
and girls lost their balance and fell to the floor, greatly to the amusement of their
schoolmates… There followed Bible reading and prayer… Then came the classes. Slates
were probably in use for most of the written work and the problems in arithmetic…
Classes in English grammar parsed, perhaps from the complicated sentences in “Paradise
Lost.”

Virtually every academy had a debating society. At Atkinson Academy, the subjects
debated were of the abstract character so loved by schools of early days: honor versus
shame, courage versus fortitude, genius versus application, city life versus country life. In
1815 the question of the justice of Negro slavery was debated for the first time.
Obviously, the private academies suited the American temperament and desire for
freedom far more than the government schools, which went on to subvert that love of
freedom. Hopefully, the homeschool movement will revive that love of educational
freedom in more and more Americans.

Armenian Genocide History – American Minute with Bill Federer

 

Armenia’s last Arsacid king was deposed in 428 AD, ending an independent Armenia until the rise of Bagratid Armenia in the 9th century.

 

Armenia’s thousands of years of history included independence, interspersed with occupations by:

 

Assyrians, Medes, Achaemenid Persians, Greeks, Parthians, Romans, Sasanian Persians, Byzantines, Arabs, Seljuk Turks, Mongols, Ottoman Turks, Russians, Safavid Persians, Afsharid Persians, Qajar Persians, and again Russians.

 

Armenia’s medieval capitol of Ani was called “the city of a 1,001 churches,” with a population of 200,000, rivaling the populations of the cities of the largest cities of the era, such as: Constantinople, Baghdad, Damascus, Florence, Rome, Paris, London, and Milan.

Islam emerged in the 7th century and quickly conquered throughout north Africa, Egypt and the Middle East.

 

In 704 A.D., Caliph Walid tricked Armenian nobles to meet in St. Gregory’s Church in Naxcawan and Church of Xram on the Araxis River.

 

Once they were all inside, he broke his promise, a practice called “taqiya.” He had his soldiers surround the church, set it on fire, and burn everyone inside to death.

 

In 1064, Muslim Sultan Alp Arslan and his Seljuk Turkish army invaded Armenia and after a 25 day siege, destroyed the city of Ani.

 

Arab historian Sibt ibn al-Jawzi recorded:

 

“The city became filled from one end to the other with bodies of the slain … The army entered the city, massacred its inhabitants, pillaged and burned it, leaving it in ruins … Dead bodies were so many that they blocked the streets; one could not go anywhere without stepping over them. And the number of prisoners was not less than 50,000 souls … I was determined to enter city and see the destruction with my own eyes. I tried to find a street in which I would not have to walk over the corpses; but that was impossible.”

 

Ottoman Turks reduced conquered Christians, Jewish, and non-Muslim populations to a second-class status called “dhimmi,” and required them to annually ransom their lives by paying an exorbitant tax called “jizyah.”

 

Sultan Murat I, 1359-1389, began the practice of “devshirme” — taking away boys from the conquered Armenian and Greek families.

 

These innocent boys were systematically traumatized and indoctrinated into becoming ferocious Muslim warriors called “Janissaries,” similar to Egypt’s “Mamluk” slave soldiers.

 

Janissaries were required to call the Sultan their “father” and were forbidden to marry, giving rise to depraved practices and abhorrent pederasty — “the sodomy of the Turks.”

 

For centuries Ottoman Turks conquered throughout the Mediterranean, Middle East, Eastern Europe, Spain and North Africa, carrying tens of thousands into slavery.

 

Beginning in the early 1800s, the Ottoman Empire began to decline. Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Romania won their independence.

 

When Armenia’s sentiments leaned toward independence, Sultan Abdul Hamid II put an end to it by massacring 100,000 from 1894-1896.

 

President Grover Cleveland reported to Congress, December 2, 1895:

 

“Occurrences in Turkey have continued to excite concern … Massacres of Christians in Armenia and the development … of a spirit of fanatic hostility to Christian influences … have lately shocked civilization.”

 

The next year, President Cleveland addressed Congress, December 7, 1896:

 

“Disturbed condition in Asiatic Turkey … rage of mad bigotry and cruel fanaticism … wanton destruction of homes and the bloody butchery of men, women, and children, made martyrs to their profession of Christian faith …

 

Outbreaks of blind fury which lead to murder and pillage in Turkey occur suddenly and without notice … It seems hardly possible that the earnest demand of good people throughout the Christian world for its corrective treatment will remain unanswered.”

 

President William McKinley told Congress, December 5, 1898:

 

“The … envoy of the United States to … Turkey … is … charged to press for a just settlement of our claims … of the destruction of the property of American missionaries’ resident in that country during the Armenian troubles of 1895.”

 

On December 6, 1904, President Theodore Roosevelt reported to Congress of:

 

“… systematic and long-extended cruelty and oppression … of which the Armenians have been the victims, and which have won for them the indignant pity of the civilized world.”

 

Sultan Abdul Hamid the Second made a league with Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, trading guns for access to oil.

 

When Sultan Hamid was deposed in 1908, there was a brief euphoria among the citizens of Turkey, as they naively hoped the country would adopt a constitutional government guaranteeing individual rights and freedoms.

 

Instead, the government was taken over by the “Young Turks” — three leaders or “pashas”: Mehmed Talaat Pasha, Ismail Enver Pasha, and Ahmed Djemal Pasha.

 

They acted as if they were planning democratic reforms while they clandestinely planned a genocidal scheme called “Ottomanization,” ridding the country of all who were not Muslims Turks.

 

The first step involved recruiting unsuspecting Armenian young men into the military.

 

Next they made them “non-combatant” soldiers and took away their weapons.

 

Finally, they marched them into the woods and deserts where they were ambushed and massacred.

 

With the Armenian young men gone, Armenian cities and villages were defenseless.

 

Nearly 2 million old men, women and children were marched into the desert, thrown off cliffs or burned alive. Armenian cities of Kharpert, Van, and Ani were leveled.

 

Entire Armenian populations were deported to the deserts of Syria and Mesopotamia where hundreds of thousands were killed or starved to death.

 

During World War One, Armenia briefly received aid from Russia until that country’s military was decimated by German artillery, followed by Tsar Nicholas the Second being killed during Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik revolution.

 

Theodore Roosevelt recorded the fate of Armenians in his 1916 book Fear God and Take Your Own Part:

 

“Armenians, who for some centuries have sedulously avoided militarism and war … are so suffering precisely and exactly because they have been pacifists whereas their neighbors, the Turks, have … been … militarists …

 

During the last year and a half … Armenians have been subjected to wrongs far greater than any that have been committed since the close of the Napoleonic Wars …

 

Fearful atrocities … Serbia is at this moment passing under the harrow of torture and mortal anguish …”

 

Roosevelt continued:

 

“Armenians have been butchered under circumstances of murder and torture and rape that would have appealed to an old-time Apache Indian …

 

The wholesale slaughter of the Armenians … must be shared by the neutral powers headed by the United States for their failure to protest when this initial wrong was committed …

 

The crowning outrage has been committed by the Turks on the Armenians. They have suffered atrocities so hideous that it is difficult to name them, atrocities such as those inflicted upon conquered nations by the followers of Attila and of Genghis Khan …

 

It is dreadful to think that these things can be done and that this nation nevertheless remarks ‘neutral not only in deed but in thought,’ between right and the most hideous wrong, neutral between despairing and hunted people — people whose little children are murdered and their women raped — and the victorious and evil wrong-doers …

 

I trust that all Americans worthy of the name feel their deepest indignation and keenest sympathy aroused by the dreadful Armenian atrocities. I trust that they feel … that a peace obtained without … righting the wrongs of the Armenians would be worse than any war.”

 

Historian Arnold Toynbee wrote:

 

“The Turks draft the criminals from their prisons into the Gendarmeri – military police – to exterminate the Armenian race …

 

In 1913 the Turkish Army was engaged in exterminating the Albanians … Greeks and Slavs left in the territory … The same campaign of extermination has been waged against the Nestorian Christians on the Persian frontier … In Syria there is a reign of terror …”

 

Toynbee continued:

 

“Turkish rule … is … slaughtering or driving from their homes, the Christian population … Only a third of the two million Armenians in Turkey have survived, and that at the price of apostatizing to Islam or else of leaving all they had and fleeing across the frontier.”

 

Armenia’s pleas at the Paris Peace Conference led Democrat President Wilson in a failed effort to make Armenia a U.S. protectorate.

 

The Sharif of Mecca, Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi, issued a decree in 1918 that the Syrian lands should:

 

“Protect and to take good care of everyone from the Jacobite Armenian community living in your territories and … defend them as you would defend yourselves … they are the Protected People of the Muslims.” (Ahl Dimmat al-Muslimin).

 

Woodrow Wilson, who was born December 28, 1856, addressed Congress, May 24, 1920:

 

“The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has established the truth of the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the Armenian people have suffered … deplorable conditions of insecurity, starvation, and misery now prevalent in Armenia …

 

Sympathy for Armenia among our people has sprung from untainted consciences, pure Christian faith and an earnest desire to see Christian people everywhere succored – helped – in their time of suffering.”

 

In 2006, Director Andrew Goldberg produced a documentary film The Armenian Genocide.

 

In 2016, actors Christian Bale, Oscar Isaac and Charlotte Le Bon starred in the film The Promise, depicting the Armenian genocide in the last days of the Ottoman Empire. In some areas, entire Armenian populations were decimated.

 

Some heroic and caring Turks refused to carry out orders kill Armenians and were themselves punished, as represented in a scene in The Promise, where the character Emre Ogan, played by Marwan Kenzari, risked his life to rescue American journalist Chris Myers, played by Christian Bale.

 

On August 29, 2014, the California Senate unanimously passed the Armenian Genocide Education Act mandating that among the human rights subjects covered in public schools, instruction shall be made of the genocide committed in Armenia at the beginning of the 20th century:

 

“The Legislature encourages the incorporation of survivor, rescuer, liberator, and witness oral testimony into the teaching of … the Armenian, Cambodian, Darfur, and Rwandan genocides … teaching about civil rights, human rights violations, genocide, slavery … the Holocaust … and … the Great Irish Famine of 1845–50 …

 

For purposes of this article, ‘Armenian Genocide’ means the torture, starvation, and murder of 1,500,000 Armenians, which included death marches into the Syrian desert, by the rulers of the Ottoman Turkish Empire and the exile of more than 500,000 innocent people during the period from 1915 to 1923, inclusive.”

 

Hitler allegedly gave orders August 22, 1939, to brutally invade Poland, adding: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”

 

Secular leaders, such as Turkey’s Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Egypt’s Gemal Nasser, Iran’s Reza Pahlavi, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, Syria’s Hafez al-Asad, had ushered in an era of moderation and tolerance in the Middle East, but their legacy has been rejected by fundamentalists.

 

Attaturk was the founding father of the Republic of Turkey and served as President from 1924 to 1938, ushering in era of moderation.

 

He abolished sharia courts, and made Friday a workday, instituting the “weekend” of Saturday and Sunday. He outlawed polygamy and elevated the status of women, appointing the first female judges, and insisting on education of girls.
 

He abolished women wearing of scarves, veils, chadors or burqas – the full-length body dress worn by Muslim women, and requiring women to wear skirts.
 

Ataturk stated:
“If henceforward the women do not share in the social life of the nation, we shall never attain to our full development. We shall remain irremediably backward, incapable of treating on equal terms with the civilizations of the West.”
 

Ataturk wrote in his book on citizenship (quoted in Ataturk, Yurttaslik Bilgileri, Yenigun Haber Ajansi, June 1997, p. 18):
 

“Mohammedanism was based on Arab nationalism above all nationalities … The purpose of the religion founded by Muhammad, over all nations, was to drag them into Arab national politics … It might have suited tribes in the desert. It is no good for a modern, progressive state …
 

Even before accepting the religion of the Arabs, the Turks were a great nation … He is a weak ruler who needs religion to uphold his government.”
 

Ataturk abolished the position of the Sultan and set up a secular government He ended the religious Caliphate, thus preventing Muslim religious leaders from controlling government affairs.
 

In an effort to cut ties with the fundamentalist past, he introduced the western use of last names, replaced Arabic Islamic names with Turkish names, and encouraged the next generation not take Arabic names but instead ethnic Turkish names. He abolished the use of Arabic and Persian script, and replaced it with the Latin alphabet.

 

Attaturk abolished turbans and fezes – the red cap with a black tassel, and required men to wear western pants and suits. He even required Muslim prayer leaders be beardless, and replaced Arabic muezzin’s call to prayer and made praying a private affair.

 

In some Islamist countries, minorities in have continued to suffer persecution and even genocide:

 

Iraqi Chaldean Christians, Assyrian Christians, Syriac Christians, Lebanese Maronite Christians, Egyptian Coptic Christians, Aramaic Christians, Melkite Christians, and Kurds.

 

Judge Learned Hand reportedly wrote:

 

“The use of history is to tell us … past themes, else we should have to repeat, each in his own experience, the successes and the failures of our forebears.”

 

Will and Ariel Durant wrote in The Lessons of History, 1968, New York: Simon & Schuster:

 

“Civilization is not inherited; it has to be learned and earned by each generation anew, if the transmission should be interrupted … civilization would die, and we should be savages again.”

 

Harvard Professor George Santayana wrote in Reason in Common Sense, 1905, Volume One of The Life of Reason:

 

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

 

American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate.
Image Credits: Public Domain; Description: The coat of arms of Armenia (the escutcheon only); Date: June 17, 2012; Source: Coat of arms of Armenia.svg http://yeraguyn.com/2010/04/zinanshan/ ; Licensing: Creative Commons CC-Zero, This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arms_of_Armenia.svg
(Reposted with permission from American Minute.)

The Weekly Sam: On the Delights of Reading Old Magazines By Samuel Blumenfeld

I recently had the pleasure of perusing a number of old magazines from the
mid-nineteenth century to about 1918. They included such great monthly periodicals as
Scribner’s, Harper’s, McClure’s, and others. All of them had well-written articles on a
wide variety of subjects, reflecting the eclectic tastes of their readers. American readers
wanted more than just entertainment. There was a voracious hunger for knowledge, and
these magazines provided it, along with wonderful illustrations.

In these old magazines you’ll find articles and stories by Mark Twain, Edith Wharton,
Henry James, Jules Verne, A. Conan Doyle, Bret Harte, Frederic Remington, Stephen
Crane, and many others whose names today don’t ring a bell. It’s amazing how few of
the writers of those days have survived the ravages of time. In those days, Americans
were readers, and of course there was no television, or movies, or radio to provide other
diversions. So the literary world was where all the entertainment and enlightenment was.
But what I have found of particular fascination in these old magazines are the ads. Some
of these magazines had over one hundred pages of ads, selling everything that American
capitalism could provide.

You can easily follow the development of America’s great
free-market economy by simply looking at the ads for automobiles. The earliest ads for
cars can be seen in magazines published as early as 1898. And if you follow the ads that
appear in the succeeding years, you get a fascinating picture of the development of the
great American automobile industry. In these magazines you’ll find ads for Locomobile,
Pierce-Arrow, King, Peerless, Marmon, Franklin, Mora, Columbia, Northern, Knox and
other car companies that no longer exist. Most of them went belly-up during the Great
Depression. The Fed made it impossible for them to get financing.
Some of the products advertised in those days are still being sold today: National Biscuit,
now Nabisco, Ivory Soap, Pabst Beer, Kodak cameras, Whitman’s Chocolates, Prudential
Insurance, Mennen’s Talcum Powder, Quaker Oats. Cream of Wheat, Campbell Soup,
and many more. These companies continued to grow and prosper probably because of
great management and great products that Americans enjoyed. And they relied on
advertising to keep them in the public’s mind.

But many other companies now rest in the graveyard of extinguished businesses, such as
The Buckeye Camera, Larkin Soaps, Olympia Self-Playing Music Box, Fairy Soap, Blue
Label Ketchup, Waltham Watches, and many more enterprises that no longer exist.
What we see in the ads is the dynamism of our capitalist system which keeps producing
new and improved products for the fussy American consumer. Competition gives good
management and good products the edge needed for survival.

Indeed, advertising is such an important part of our economy that today it can drive one
crazy by the sheer number of ads we see on television, or hear on the radio, or are
accosted by on the Internet. But magazines are still with us, and with a vengeance. Just
look at the magazine rack at Barnes & Noble, and like Vogue and Glamour, they are
glossy, with more pictures than text. In the old magazines, illustrations were used to
supplement the text. Today, pictures are what you look at page after page with great ads
selling luxury products to a materialistic public.

Of course, there are a few magazines that are still literate, such as The New Yorker, The
Atlantic, Commentary, Vanity Fair, and our own The New American. But most of the
new magazines, like People and US, are geared to the illiterate tastes of the young and are
simply picture books with lots of ads trying to sell their young readers on how to be sexy
and popular.

Great magazines like Life, Colliers, and the old Saturday Evening Post are gone. But the
women’s magazines like the Ladies Home Journal, Good Housekeeping, Cosmopolitan,
and Redbook have survived by adapting themselves to women’s new interests. People
still read Time and Newsweek, but their readership is declining.. Most magazines now
cater to every nuanced interest of the public, such as cooking (Italian, Southern, Chinese,
Vegetarian, Dietetic), decorating, running, skiing, body building, football, golf, travel,
finance, antiques, cars, computers, parenting, etc. The great renaissance mind no longer
exists in America. You must fit into a niche. Otherwise you won’t be recognized.
It is only by reading these old magazines that you can begin to understand how our
civilization has changed in a short hundred years. But human nature has not changed.
There are still people who want to “kill the Jews.” You can find some of them on
YouTube. So, as the French say, plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose, the more
things change, the more they remain the same.

(The above article came from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives:  http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm

The Blumenfeld Archives

How has the Sun’s energy changed over the last 45 years?

This article is from our friend and Camp Constitution instructor Professor Willie Soon:
For centuries, it has been known that the Sun goes through subtle and not-so-subtle changes over time. For instance, when Galileo Galilei pointed his telescope at the Sun, he discovered that the Sun is imperfect and often blotched by dark areas known as sunspots. We now know that sunspots are very large features – often many times larger than the Earth. However, it was only in 1978, when the first satellite missions to continuously monitor the Sun were launched, that it became possible to directly measure the changes in the Sun’s energy, without the Earth’s atmosphere getting in the way.
Sun-monitoring instruments on satellites describe the energy reaching the Earth from the Sun in terms of the Total Solar Irradiance (TSI). These satellite measurements show that the average TSI reaching the Earth is around 1360-1365 Watts per meter squared (W/m2). They also show the TSI rises and falls slightly over the course of a sunspot cycle (roughly 8-13 years). However, most of the satellite missions only last for around 1 to 2 sunspot cycles. Therefore, in order to study the changes in TSI for longer than 10-15 years, scientists need to composite, or “stitch together”, the TSI measurements from multiple satellite missions.
For more than 20 years, there has been ongoing scientific controversy between rival scientific teams on how to best composite the TSI missions into a continuous record for the entire satellite era, i.e., from 1978 to the present.
For example, the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitoring (ACRIM) team in charge of the NASA ACRIM satellite project took the approach of using the data as provided by the satellite mission science teams. In contrast, the Physical Meteorological Observatory in Davos (PMOD) team applied various data adjustments to each of the satellite missions before constructing their composite.
The ACRIM composite suggested that as well as the changes in TSI over the course of a sunspot cycle, there are also long-term changes in TSI between sunspot cycles. It suggested the possibility that these long-term changes in TSI could be contributing to global warming.
However, the PMOD composite suggested that TSI does not change much between sunspot cycles. It ruled out the possibility of TSI changes being a major factor in global warming.
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s latest reports explicitly favored composites like PMOD’s over ACRIM’s.
A major study, led by the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (www.CERES-Science.com), has just been published that revisits this long-standing scientific controversy and provides important new insights that could change our understanding of the long-term changes in TSI over timescales longer than 10-15 years.
This new peer-reviewed paper was published in the prestigious journal, The Astrophysical Journal, founded in 1895, it remains one of the top journals in astronomy and astrophysics.
The scientists in the team reanalyzed all the available satellite data from the first Nimbus 7 mission to the currently active missions on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft and Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor 1 (TSIS-1) on the International Space Station (ISS). They updated several of the older composites, as well as developing a wide range of new composites. In total, they found 21 different composites for the satellite era – including the 4 existing composites currently used by the scientific community.
Using common statistical techniques, these 21 composites were sorted into 6 main composite groups – labelled “A” to “F”, as seen in the chart below:
One group (“A”) matches very well to the PMOD composite and to the various solar activity datasets used in the IPCC’s most recent report. This group implies that there has been little or no contribution of the Sun to any of the global warming during the satellite era, i.e., since 1978.
Two groups (“B” and “C”) agree with the original ACRIM composite that had implied that solar activity might have contributed to global warming in the 1980s and 1990s, but that solar activity had since declined.
However, two other groups (“D” and “E”) suggest a new history of TSI variability in the satellite era. They agree with ACRIM that solar activity might have contributed to global warming in the 1980s and 1990s and that solar activity slightly decreased since the early 2000s. But, unlike ACRIM, they suggest that solar activity is still higher than in the 1980s and therefore might still be contributing to global warming.
The sixth group (“F”) – that is the only group that does not include any of the satellite data associated with the original PMOD team – suggests that solar activity has continued to increase throughout all four of the solar minima during the satellite era so far. It also confirms that the current ongoing solar maximum is already higher than the last cycle. If this composite group is correct, it would completely change our current understanding of how solar activity has changed over the last 45 years.
The team behind this new paper were shocked at how many completely different plausible composites could be generated from the available satellite data as provided by the satellite mission science teams.
The lead author of the study, Dr. Ronan Connolly, said, “As we explain in the paper, Group A – the one closest to that used by IPCC and many of the current climate modelling groups – is probably the most unreliable of the six. This is because of the heavy data adjustments and subjective data truncations that were applied to the original satellite mission team’s data.”
However, they have not yet established conclusively which of the six composite groups are most accurate. For this reason, the team have provided all these new, updated and existing composites to the scientific community so that other researchers can work on resolving these new challenges.
The new dataset is freely available through the Supporting Data at the journal website, as well as at the CERES-Science website and the Zenodo dataset repository website.
Citation details for the study:
  • Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, Michael Connolly, Rodolfo Gustavo Cionco, Ana G. Elias, Gregory W. Henry, Nicola Scafetta, and Víctor M. Velasco Herrera (2024). “Multiple new or updated satellite Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) composites (1978-2023)”. The Astrophysical Journal, 975 (1), 102. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad7794