American Minute with Bill Federer LABOR DAY: Railroad Strikes, Grover Cleveland, Eugene Debs, Socialist Party of America, Outsourcing

Read American Minute

Labor Day. The history is a little more interesting than just picnics and hot dogs.

To appreciate it, some background is necessary.

At the time the United States was founded, most people were self-employed, working as either farmers or in trades, such as:

  • baker,
  • butcher,
  • carpenter,
  • cabinetmaker,
  • upholsterer,
  • tailor,
  • milliner (clothes merchant),
  • cobbler (shoe maker),
  • chandler (candle maker),
  • cooper (barrel maker),
  • wheelwright (wheel craftsman).
  • blacksmith,
  • gunsmith,
  • printer, and
  • apothecary … continue reading …

Download as PDF …

Then, the Industrial Revolution began in Britain in the late 18th century.

Where Ireland burned peat from bogs, Britain burned coal from mines.

The problem was that mines kept filling up with water.

Scottish inventor James Watt came up with an invention to pump water out of mines — a steam pump.
Steam was soon harnessed in the early 19th century to not just power pumps, but railroad steam engines, steam boats, and textile manufacturing machines.

This led to the creation of factories which could mass produce items inexpensively.

Workers moved from farms to factories. The products they manufactured were imported into America.

During the colonial era, Britain prevented factories from being built in America.

After the Revolution, Samuel Slater built the first factory in America in 1790, a cotton spinning mill in Pawtucket, Rhode Island.

The first union in America was a shoe makers union in Philadelphia in 1794.

President Washington signed a bill putting a tariff tax on European-manufactured products making them more expensive in order to encourage people to purchase American-manufactured products.

Tariffs were the main source of income for the Federal government, as there was no income tax till Lincoln’s temporary one during the Civil War.

Most of America’s factories were located in Northern states.

Tariff taxes that helped the Northern states hurt the Southern states, as the South was agricultural with few factories.

At one point, nearly 90 percent of the Federal budget came from tariff taxes collected at Southern ports.

This fueled animosity between the North and South prior to the Civil War.

After the Civil War, more tariff taxes were passed allowing Northern factories to grow enormous.

Factories produced items like clothes, glass, dishes, and farm tools for a fraction of the previous costs.

Women were freed up from tedious daily tasks, such as hand-weaving thread, hand-sewing cloth, and hand-washing clothes.

Instead of carrying water from a well, pumps and pipes brought water directly into homes.

New ways of making stronger iron and steel helped build bridges, skyscrapers, steamboats, and mining machinery.

Railroads began taking people safely and inexpensively across the entire nation, opening up unprecedented mobility and opportunity.

Inventions and advances in manufacturing made more goods available at cheaper prices.

Americans experienced the fastest rise in the standard of living of any people in world history.

Factories and railroads hired workers from the millions of immigrants, who, while working, learned the language and trade skills.

President Grover Cleveland dedicated the Statue of Liberty in 1886 to welcome immigrants, who were mostly English, Irish, Scandinavian, Italians, Greeks, Poles, Russian, Jews, and Germans.

Immigrants were anxious to the learn English language and assimilate, swearing allegiance to their new country.

Most immigrants were hard workers, as noted by German sociologist Max Weber in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, 1904-1905.

It was a foundational textbook in economic sociology, listed as the 4th most important sociological book of the 20th century by the International Sociological Association.

Weber documented how modern capitalism evolved out of the Protestant Calvinism in Northern Europe, which emphasized self-discipline, hard work, frugality, thrift, and avoidance of all forms of indulgence for religious reasons.

Weber described Calvinists, Baptists, Methodists, Quakers, traditional Lutherans, pietist Lutherans, and Moravians from Count Ludwig von Zinzendorf’s Herrnhut community.

Religious adherents established private secular enterprises, engaged in trade, and accumulated wealth to support charitable missionary activity.

A literary genre that developed at this time were “rags-to-riches” stories, highlighting individuals who were honest, worked hard, and gained strength through adversity to achieve success.

In 1867, Horatio Alger began publishing a best-selling novels, such as:

Ragged Dick;

Strong and Steady, Or, Paddle Your Own Canoe; and

Shifting for Himself: Or Gilbert Greyson’s Fortune.

These were stories were about immigrants, impoverished orphans, or homeless street boys, who sold newspapers, polished shoes or sold apples, demonstrating the Protestant work ethic, and rose from humble beginnings to achieving success.

In 1894, Orison Swett Marden wrote “Pushing to the Front”, and in 1897, he founded SUCCESS magazine, publishing inspirational stories of success in life through common-sense principles and well-rounded virtues.

Immigrants were not a financial burden on the government, as there were no government welfare programs.

Extended family, churches, and generous individuals who gave to charity were the welfare net.

Some German immigrants brought with them Karl Marx’s ideas of “critical theory,” which divided citizens into groups, pit them against each other in a “class-struggle,” to forcibly redistribute wealth.

These ideas only found limited acceptance in America, as wealth could be achieved in one lifetime if one was innovative and worked hard. This era was referred to as The Gilded Age.

The situation was different in Europe, where wealthy elites owned most of the property, passing it from generation to generation for centuries, leaving little for commoners.

Socialist ideas created labor tensions, with some workers even embracing the anarchist goal of tearing down the capitalist system, naively hoping a utopian socialist economy would take its place.

Factory working conditions were often unsafe, as noted in Charles Dicken’s Hard Times, 1854, and Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, 1905.

Though immigrants were not forced to work in factories, many joined in organizing unions push for better working conditions, an 8-hour work day, and income taxes on the rich.

Union organizing flyers were printed in English and German languages.

Cyrus McCormick, inventor of the mechanical reaper, built a factory in Chicago. A Presbyterian, McCormick felt his reaper would help to fulfill a religious mission to feed the world.

In 1869, McCormick donated $10,000 to Dwight L. Moody to build the Chicago Young Men’s Christian Assoication.

Beginning in 1882, there was an economic downturn in America.

In German immigrants holding socialist ideas organized a protest on May 4, 1886, near the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company plant in Chicago.

The “peaceful” protest turned into the Haymarket Riot. A protestor threw a dynamite bomb at the police.

The blast, and the violence that followed, killed seven police officers, four civilians, and wounded dozens more.

To commemorate the incident, socialist workers made May 1st “International Workers Day.”

Then came a railroad strike.

George Pullman founded the Pullman Railroad Sleeping Car Company.

Pullman saw that workers needed a place to live, so he built them houses in a safe little village around the factory, with rent deducted from paychecks.

To save them the trouble of traveling to the markets, he located stores on site.

Workers were paid company “scrip,” similar to food stamps, which were redeemable at the company-owned grocery stores.

It was considered a utopian workers’ paradise community, in the vein of Sir Thomas More’s Island of Utopia, published in 1516; and Sir Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis, published in 1626.

The Pullman community worked for over a decade until there was a nationwide economic depression in 1893, resulting in orders for railroad sleeping cars dropping off.

To keep the company afloat, George Pullman had to make cuts in wages and lay off hundreds of employees, though, for the time being, rents and groceries stayed the same price.

Employees were distraught, as they had grown dependent on the company.

Some employees walked off their jobs, demanding higher pay and lower rents, being unaware that the reason for the cuts was that the company needed to stay in business during the economic crash.

A high school drop out named Eugene Debs got a job cleaning grease from freight engines.

He was promoted to locomotive fireman and joined the Brotherhood of Locomotive Fireman.

He briefly served as a Terre Haute city clerk and one-term Indiana state representative.

When the 1893 economic downturn occurred, Debs organized a railroad workers strike in 1894.

Union workers across the nation joined in boycotting trains carrying Pullman cars.

Then rioters pillaged and burned railroad cars, destroying an estimated $80 million worth of property in 27 states.

A New York Times editorial, July 9, 1894, called Debs “a lawbreaker at large, an enemy of the human race.”

“Debs’ Rebellion” became a national issue because it interrupted delivery of mail.

President Grover Cleveland declared the strike a federal crime and deployed 12,000 U.S. Army troops to break up the strike.

More violence erupted, and two were killed.

After the riots, Americans blamed the Democrat Administration.

Democrat advisor Francis Lynde Stetson warned Cleveland regarding the upcoming mid-term elections of 1894:

“We are on the eve of very dark night, unless a return of commercial prosperity relieves popular discontent with what they believe is Democratic incompetence to make laws, and consequently with Democratic Administrations anywhere and everywhere.”

Cleveland thought it might improve his Party’s election chances if workers were given a day off, so support grew for a national “LABOR DAY.”

Workers wanted Labor Day to be on May 1st to coincide with the “International Workers Day” and the anniversary of the bloody Chicago’s Haymarket Riot.

Instead, Grover Cleveland chose the FIRST MONDAY in SEPTEMBER to celebrate LABOR DAY.

What happened to May 1st?

Patriotic Americans celebrated May 1st as “Loyalty Day,” officially recognized by Congress, April 27, 1955, and proclaimed an annual holiday by President Eisenhower with Public Law 85-529.

What happened in the 1894 elections?

It did not help the Democrat Party as it had the biggest mid-term loss in decades.

What happened to Eugene Debs?

He was arrested, because the railroad strike obstructed delivery of United States mail, and he was put in prison for six months.

In prison, Debs “ravenously” read Karl Marx’s Das Kapital.

Socialist progressives demanded the redistribution of wealth, resulting in the passage of:

* corporate income tax, 1894;

* personal income tax, 1914; and

* inheritance estate tax, 1916.

Debs and socialist rioters were defended by the attorney Clarence Darrow.

Darrow later defended evolution in the Scope’s Monkey Trial.

After six months in prison, Eugene Debs was released.

He then founded:

* the Social Democracy of America, 1897;

* the Social Democratic Party of America, 1898; and

* the Socialist Party of America, 1901.

Debs ran five time for United States President as a socialist, 1900 till 1920. He won zero electoral votes, so he wanted to get rid of America’s electoral process.

When World War One started, Debs urged resistance to the draft.

One draft-dodger was Roger Baldwin, who later founded the A.C.L.U. – American Civil Liberties Union – to help defend those who were accused of being socialist agitators.

Roger Baldwin wrote:

“I am for socialism … I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.”

Eugene Deb’s reputation spread around the world to Russia, where he influenced socialist leader Vladimir Lenin.

Lenin organized the Bolshevik Revolution overthrowing Tsar Nicholas II and killing an estimated 12 million.

Lenin cited Debs in “An Open Letter to Boris Souvarine,” published January 27, 1918, in La Vente, No. 48:

“Look at America—apart from everything else a neutral country. Haven’t we the beginnings of a split there, too: Eugene Debs, the ‘American Rebel’, declares in the socialist press that he recognizes only one type of war, civil war for the victory of socialism, and that he would sooner be shot than vote a single cent for American war expenditure ”

Eugene Deb’s Appeal to Reason, “When I Shall Fight,” Number 1032, September 11, 1915).

Lenin wrote “On the Appeal of the German Independents,” February 1919, Lenin Miscellany 24, 1933; Lenin Collected Works, 1971, Moscow.

“I quoted the statement of the ‘American Rebel,’ Eugene Debs, to the effect that he would rather be shot than agree to vote for imperialist war loans, and that he would agree to fight only in a war of the workers against the capitalists.”

Debs gave an anti-government speech in Canton, Ohio, June 16, 1918, resulting in his arrest.

He was charged with ten counts of sedition and sentenced to ten years in prison.

A May Day parade in was organized in Cleveland, Ohio, to support Debs, led by union members, socialists, and anarchists.

Their peaceful parade broke out into Antifa-style violence — the May Day Riots of 1919.

Debs’ attorney asked for a Presidential pardon, but Woodrow Wilson wrote “denied” across the paperwork, stating that during World War One:

“While the flower of American youth was pouring out its blood to vindicate the cause of civilization, this man, Debs, stood behind the lines sniping, attacking, and denouncing them …

This man was a traitor to his country and he will never be pardoned during my administration.”

The next President, Warren Harding, also did not pardon Debs, and the White House released the statement:

“There is no question of his guilt … He is … a dangerous man calculated to mislead the unthinking and affording excuse for those with criminal intent.”

Theodore Roosevelt had criticized Debs for fomenting “bloodshed, anarchy, and riot,” calling him one of the nation’s most “undesirable citizens.”

In 1979, Bernie Sanders produced a documentary praising Eugene Debs. He hung a portrait of Debs in the City Hall of Burlington, Vermont, and dedicated a plaque to him in his Congressional office.

After the Bolshevik Revolution, Lenin decided to take his revolution global, forming the Communist International in 1919.

Members of Debs’ Socialist Party of America followed suit and formed the Communist Party USA on September 1, 1919.

The Communist Party USA ran candidates for United States President every year from 1924 till 1940.

That is when they decided to support Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt for his New Deal welfare programs during the Great Depression and for his treaty with the Soviet leader Josef Stalin during World War Two.

Reagan commented on communist infiltration of the Democrat Party:

“I didn’t leave the Democratic Party; the Democratic Party left me.”

Party infiltration was listed as one of the communist goals for America, read into the Congressional Record by Representative Albert S. Herlong, January 10, 1963:

“Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.”

Former Democrat United States Senator Zell Miller stated in an interview for his book Deficit of Decency, 2005:

“Unfortunately, the national Democratic Party has lost its way … and they’ve been taken over by the very liberal, left-wing leaning special interest groups that you have in Washington.”

In Chicago, a statue was erected to honor the police officers killed in the 1886 Haymarket Riot.

That statue was blown up on October 6, 1969, by the anarchist “Weatherman Underground” during their Days of Rage.

Chicago rebuilt the Haymarket statue, only see it blown up again by the Weatherman Underground, October 6, 1970.

Weatherman Underground member Bill Ayers later helped launch the political career of a young Illinois State Senator Barack Obama.

Bill Ayers stated:

“I am a radical, leftist, small ‘c’ communist … Maybe I’m the last communist who is willing to admit it … The ethics of communism still appeal to me. I don’t like Lenin as much as the early Marx.”

Weatherman Underground member Eric Mann helped train Patrisse Cullors, one of the founders of Black Lives Matters.

Cullors stated in 2015:

“Myself and Alicia in particular are trained organizers … We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on, sort of, ideological theories.”

In America, laborers work hard for wages with which they can buy things, trucks, houses, cars, boats, guns, and other personal possessions.

They also can give away some of their possessions to those in need in charity.

In socialist countries, laborers work hard, but own no possessions.

People with no possessions have nothing with which to be charitable.

Marx and Engles wrote in the Communist Manifesto, 1848:

“The theory of the communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”

Lenin stated:

“The goal of socialism is communism.”

Marx described socialism as a transition phase from capitalism to communism, in The Critique of the Gotha Programme, Part Four:

“Between capitalist and communist society there lies the period of the revolutionary transformation.”

Author Ayn Rand wrote:

“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force; socialism – by vote.

It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.”

Socialists believe that when governments finally succeed in taking away all the private possessions from everyone in the entire world, then the world will magically become a wonderful utopia called communism.

The term “communism” comes from the Latin word “communis,”meaning everything held in common.

Communist goals are not just to end private property, but to end privacy. People will not even have control over their own children.

The government will control everything, on both the production side and the consumption side.

In 1971, John Lennon and his second wife, Yoko Ono, co-wrote the song “Imagine,” with socialist-themed lyrics: “Imagine no possessions … And no religion too.”

Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum stated that by 2030: “You will own nothing but be happy.”

The term “socialism” was coined by French political philosopher Henry de Saint-Simon, 1760–1825, to mean the opposite of the “individual.”

Use of the term socialism was popularized by mid-to-late 1800s European theorists, such as Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Leon Trotsky, and Antonio Gramsci.

In contrast to the socialism is Judeo-Christian Western Civilization, which promotes the concept of the individual — that each person has worth and an identity apart from belonging to any group, simply by virtue of being made in the image of God, who is not a respecter of persons.

John F. Kennedy stated in his Inaugural Address, 1961:

“The Rights of man Come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.”

Harry Truman stated in his Inaugural Address, 1949:

“We believe that all men are created equal, because they are created in the image of God.”

“Capitalism” is where individuals have their own money, or capital, and can invest it in a business to provide goods or services – the production side.

Individuals can also earn money with which they can buy things – the consumption side.

Socialist Antonio Gramsci explained that the Judeo-Christian idea of “individual” must be replaced by group identity, as he wrote in “Audacia e Fede,” printed in the Avanti! newspaper, May 1916:

“Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity.”

James Wardner summarized Gramsci’s views in Unholy Alliances, 1996:

“In the new order, socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches, and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.”

The most opportune time to transition from “individual” to “group” is in crises.

Marx and Friedrich Engels explained in Marx and Engels Collected Works, Volume 10, page 318:

“Conspirators by no means confine themselves to organizing the revolutionary proletariat – working class. Their business consists in … spurring it in to artificial crises …

For them the only condition required for the revolution is a sufficient organization of their own conspiracy. They are the alchemists of the revolution.”

It should be acknowledged that Unions did help to bring about:

an end of child labor;

an 8-hour work day;

a 40-hour work week;

minimum wages;

safer working conditions; and

more benefits for workers.

These benefits, as good as they are, came with a cost.

Companies began to look for ways to cut expenses and limit the power of unions.

Henry Ford’s Motor Company was one of the first companies required to implement union benefits.

A story circulated that Henry Ford wanted to break union control by recruiting Muslims to work in his factories.

Ford was said to have met a Yemeni sailor at port.

Witnessing his hard work, Ford told him if he showed up at his auto factory he would give him a job that paid five dollars a day.

The sailor spread the word, leading to chain migration from Yemen and other Middle Eastern countries to Detroit.

ArabAmerica.com reported, September 5, 2020:

“The origin story of how the Yemeni community in Michigan is an interesting one.

Way back in the early 1900s, Henry Ford started recruiting Yemeni workers to work at Ford’s factories.

After a few years, Ford sent for more workers and the Yemeni American community began to grow.

People who gained citizenship during their time working for Ford brought family over and started lives in Michigan while remaining close to their family back in Yemen.”

Henry Ford may have thus initiated the mass immigration of Middle Easterners to Dearborn and Hamtramck in order to counter unions.

Unions were anti-immigrant, as cheaper immigrant labor undercut union wages.

Another unanticipated consequence of the cost of workers’ benefits was automation and out-sourcing as ways companies could stay competitive in the global marketplace.

After World War Two, America helped rebuild Germany and Japan with new factories.

These overseas factories, with their cheaper labor costs and newer machinery, produced items less expensively and took a larger part of the global market.

They hired lobbyists to push for United States politicians to lower tariffs so they could bring their less expensive products in, gaining a competitive advantage over American factories.

Higher costs of doing business in the United States included:

Higher wages;

Increased taxes;

Expensive lawsuits;

Burdensome regulations;

Environmental restrictions;

Crony capitalism, globalist capitalism, vulture capitalism, and big tech monopolies, where career politicians provide subsidies, contracts, and relax regulations for companies supporting their political agendas and reelection campaigns ;but deny those benefits and even weaponizing government against companies not supporting them.

As American-made products became more expensive in comparison to foreign-made products, consumers bought fewer of them, resulting in American factories needing fewer workers.

“Squeeze the sponge and the water goes out” – as manufacturing costs in America rose, manufacturers moved with their jobs to other countries.

Many companies were sadly put in the position of going out of country or going out of business.

To personalize this, if you needed gas for your car, and the gas station on your side of the street sold it at $4.50 a gallon, but the station on the other side of the street sold it for just $1.99 a gallon, would you cross the street?

Just as water seeks its own level, individuals and businesses are motivated to save money.

President Donald Trump’s tariffs are an attempt to bring factories and jobs back to America, making it more profitable for factories to be located here than there.

Another by-product of companies moving overseas was their loss of patriotism, creating “globalists.”

Globalists are international big businesses whose patriotism is to their profits.

Globalists are happy to work with socialist and communist governments as a means secure monopolies and guarantee profits.

Capitalism is effectively split in two:

“individual” capitalism being patriotic, supporting the countrythat gives equal opportunities for advancement;

and

“globalist” capitalism which squelches competition by supporting one world government socialist politicians who return the favor with profitable government contracts, exception of regulations, and insider trade deals.

Politicians receiving money from globalists are pressured to enact regulations which put smaller competitors out of business.

As unions grew, another situation developed. Union leadership often held values different than rank-and-file workers.

Many workers supported the Second Amendment, traditional marriage, biological male and female definitions of sex, and protection of the unborn, yet union leadership often funneled union dues to support candidates who voted for opposing views.

Ironicaly, socialist strategy includes raising unemployment rates so unemployed workers will sign up for welfare benefits.

Once they become dependent on welfare benefits, they are inclined to vote for politicians who promise to continue them.

More unemployment means more people on welfare, means an increased Democart voter base.

If welfare entitlements are threatened, recipients are primed to be organized into revolutionaries.

Socialist thinker Friedrich Engels wrote in 1844, Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy, 1844; London: W.O. Henderson, The Life of Friedrich Engels, 1976:

“Every fresh slump must ruin more small capitalists and increase the workers who live only by their labor.

This will increase the number of the unemployed and this is the main problem that worries economists.

In the end commercial crises will lead to a social revolution far beyond the comprehension of the economists with their scholastic wisdom.”

Soviet leader Nikita Khrushschev reportedly told Ezra Taft Benson, Eisenhower’s Secretary of Agriculture, in 1959:

“We won’t have to fight you; We’ll so weaken your economy, until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.”

Union membership has declined in America from a high of 35 percent of the workforce in 1954 to currently less than 9.9 percent.

Instead of attracting manufacturers back to America, many unions have focused on increasing membership by recruiting from other occupations, such as government, education, medical professionals, sports, service industry, and retail.

Warning American workers of the hidden danger of the “social justice” movement, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who had spent 11 years in labor camps in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, stated, June 30, 1975:

“I … call upon America to be more careful with its trust …

Prevent those … who are attempting to establish even finer … legal shades of equality — because of their … falsely using the struggle for peace and for social justice to lead you down a false road …

They are trying to weaken you; they are trying to disarm your strong and magnificent country in the face of this fearful threat …

I call upon you: ordinary working men of America … do not let yourselves become weak.”

America’s entrepreneurial spirit was articulated by Booker T. Washington, who founded the National Negro Business League in 1900.

He stated:

“Anyone can seek a job, but it requires a person of rare ability to create a job … What we should do in our schools is to turn out fewer job seekers and more job creators.”

Reagan stated in 1988:

“I believe we really can say that God did give mankind virtually unlimited gifts to invent, produce, and create. And for that reason alone, it would be wrong for governments to devise a tax structure or economic system that suppresses and denies those gifts.”

A spiritual insight is found in First Corinthians 15:58:

“Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.”

Download as PDF …

Read as American Minute post

William J. Federer video & audio
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & captivating PowerPoint presentations: 314-502-8924 wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate, with acknowledgment.

The Weekly Sam: How to Increase Your Vocabulary By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

Evolutionists love to remind us how close our DNA is to that of the chimpanzee or
gorilla. But there is one very sharp distinction between human beings and every other
species, including the various kinds of monkeys. God gave us the faculty of language,
the faculty of speech.

Why did God so endow the human being with this remarkable ability? If you read the
Bible you will find the answer. We read in Genesis 1:27: “And God created man in his
own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.”
We were created to be like God, to have certain attributes of God, but not be God. The
next passage makes that clear: “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, be
fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the
fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and of every living thing that moveth upon
the earth.”

And in order to do all of that God gave man a brain properly endowed with extraordinary
intelligence in order to carry out these huge tasks. The Bible further states in Genesis
2:19: “And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every
fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and
whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.”
In other words, God made Adam into a lexicographer–an inventor of names, a creator of
vocabulary. Indeed, God gave man the power of language in order to serve four
different functions: The first, to know God and be able to communicate with Him. We
do that every day through prayer. We’ve done that by writing the Bible, the history of
man’s relations with God. Second, we use language to know one’s mate with the ability
to communicate at the deepest intimate level. Third, we use language to be able to know
other human beings and thereby create society. And Fourth, we use language to know
oneself. We are constantly speaking inwardly to ourselves in order to understand who
and what we are, and in order to transform our dreams and ideas into reality.

So why should we want to expand our vocabularies? Because knowledge is power, and
every new word represents new knowledge. And how does one increase one’s
vocabulary? A good place to start is by reading Shakespeare’s plays, all 36 of them
which were published in the First Folio in 1623. It is said that Shakespeare invented
more new words than any other writer in English literature. New words are needed
when it is necessary to convey the meaning of something for which no word exists.

Another good way to expand one’s vocabulary is to read 19th century literature, including
Dickens, Carlyle, James Fenimore Cooper, Thackerary, Washington Irving, and other
great masters of the written word, who had extensive, rich vocabularies. Also read the
most literate writers you can find who are not afraid to show off their use of vocabulary.
However, whenever reading such works, keep a blank notebook at your side in which you
can jot down all of the new words you’ve encountered. Then read their definitions in your
dictionary and write your own sentences using these new words. Remember, the more
words you know, the more knowledge you have, for each new word represents new
knowledge.

As we said, new words are needed to express new ideas or actions for which no words
exist. This is particularly true in our hi-tech culture where advances in computer and
internet technology require us to invent new words. Words like “geek” and “nerd” were
invented by students to describe those with a passion for computers and technological
inventions. Such new words are being invented every day.
The fact that God commanded Adam to name every living creature meant that an
important part of being a human was the need to make good use of greatest gift God gave
us, the faculty of language.
.
In other words, man was exalted in a way that no other species was by his Creator.
Thus, increasing and expanding one’s vocabulary is not only necessary for the
advancement of man’s purpose on earth, but also needed to carry out God’s
commandments. Besides having been given the faculty of speech we were also endowed
with a voice-box that could express thoughts and ideas by sounds. An extraordinary
physical phenomenon.

Language, in fact, is the link to the spiritual dimension in our lives. Man is a spiritual as
well as a physical being. We are made of matter by God who is not matter. Indeed, if
you become a physicist, you will find that the deeper you explore the nature of matter,
you will reach virtually no matter at all.

Remember, language is sounds made by the voice box. It has no substance but what it
signals in our heads. But written language has permitted us to make a permanent record
of what is said. That is why we have science, history, and life stories to tell.
It is the exploration of that microcosmic realm that has made it possible for man to
develop computer science in which a million transistors can be put on a microscopic
silicon chip.

So scientists increase our vocabulary every day by making discoveries that have to be
named. Whenever we invent something new, we have to invent words to describe it.
By the way, God put our language faculty in the left hemisphere of our brains. It is our
most valuable piece of brain matter. Without it we would not be human beings. The
right hemisphere deals with space, dimension, art, and perspective. In American schools
teachers force students to use the right brain to perform the functions of the left brain.
The result is dyslexia.

Learning to read must be taught phonetically through intensive phonics so that it
conforms with the functions of the language faculty and expands its power. In fact our
alphabetic reading and writing system is the most successful reading system ever
invented because it conforms with the left brain’s faculty, thus making it easy for anyone
to learn to read.

And so, increase your vocabulary in order to increase the power of your brain and the
power of your mind. Our brains emit dreams, images, and ideas that are not matter, but
are the basis of human power. The more words you know, the more power you will
have to create, grow, and prosper. Indeed, learning the vocabulary of the stock market
may lead you to become a millionaire.

American Minute with Bill Federer Evolution’s Inherent racism defended by Clarence Darrow: The Monkey Trial & William Jennings Bryan

 

Clarence Darrow was the attorney who defended
EVOLUTION.


Darrow had previously defended Leopold and
Loeb, the teenage homosexual thrill killers who
murdered 14-year-old Robert “Bobby” Franks in
1924 just for the excitement.
Darrow obtained a pardon for antifa-type anarchists
in 1886 who blew up a pipe bomb in Chicago’s
Haymarket, Square, killing 7 policemen and injured
60 others.
A Haymarket Statue was dedicated to the fallen
policemen.
The policemen’s Haymarket Statue was blown up
by the socialist anarchist group Weather
Underground on October 6, 1969, prior to the
“Days of Rage” protests.

The statue was rebuilt, but the Weather
Underground blew it up again on October 6, 1970.
The Weather Underground’s leaders had a lasting
effect, as two of them, Bill Ayers and Bernadine
Dohrn, hosted a meeting in 1995 to launch Barack
Obama’s Illinois State Senate Campaign; and
another, Eric Mann, trained Patrisse Cullors, a
founder of Black Lives Matter.

Clarence Darrow defended the “mentally deranged
drifter” Patrick Eugene Prendergast in 1894 who
confessed to murdering Chicago mayor Carter H.
Harrison, Sr.
Darrow defended socialist organizer Eugene V.
Debs, who was prosecuted for instigating the
Pullman Railroad Strike which caused 30 deaths,
57 wounded, and $80 million in property damages
in 27 states.
Debs founded the Socialist Party of America,
which branched off the Communist Party USA in
1919.
Clarence Darrow represented the Western
Federation of Miners leaders charged with the 1905
murder of former Idaho Gov. Frank
Steunenberg.

In 1911, the American Federation of Labor arranged
for Darrow to defend the McNamara brothers.
The McNamara brothers were charged with
dynamiting the Los Angeles Times building which
killed 21 employees.
Implicated in bribing jurors, Darrow was banned
from practicing law in California.
In 1925, Darrow unsuccessfully
defended John Scopes, a
Tennessee high school
biology teacher who taught the
theory of origins called
“evolution.”

The attorney defending CREATION was the
Democrat Party’s three time candidate for
President, William Jennings Bryan.
Bryan objected to a tooth being presented as proof
of humans evolving from apes.

Later the tooth was found to be that of an extinct
peccary (pig).
William Jennings Bryan won the Scopes case on
JULY 21, 1925.
Though Darrow lost the trial, a
pro-evolution propaganda film
was produced in 1960 titled
Inherit the Wind.
Professor Alan M. Dershowitz wrote on “The
Scopes Trial” in his book America on Trial: Inside
the Legal Battles that Transformed Our Nation
(eBook Edition: May 2004):

“The popular perception of what transpired in the
courtroom comes not from the transcript of the
court proceeding itself, but rather from the
motion picture … Inherit the Wind.
The William Jennings Bryan character, Scopes’s
prosecutor, was a burlesque of know-nothing
religious literalism …
… The actual William Jennings Bryan was no
simple-minded literalist, and he certainly was no
bigot.

He was a great populist who cared deeply about
equality and about the downtrodden.
Indeed, one of his reasons for becoming so deeply
involved in the campaign against evolution was
that Darwin’s theories were being used
misused, it turns out – by racists, militarists, and
nationalists to further some pretty horrible
programs …”
Dershowitz continued:
“The eugenics movement, which advocated
sterilization of ‘unfit’ and ‘inferior’ stock, was at
its zenith, and it took its impetus from Darwin’s
theory of natural selection.
German militarism, which had just led to the
disastrous world war, drew inspiration from
Darwin’s ideas on survival of the fittest.
The anti-immigration movement, which had
succeeded in closing American ports of entry to
‘inferior racial stock,’ was grounded in a mistaken
belief that certain ethnic groups had evolved
more fully than others …
… The Jim Crow laws, which maintained racial
segregation, were rationalized on grounds of the
racial inferiority of blacks.
… Indeed, the very book – Hunter’s Civic Biology
from which John T. Scopes taught Darwin’s
theory of evolution to high school students in
Dayton, Tennessee, contained dangerous
misapplications of that theory …”

Dershowitz added:
“Indeed, its very title, Civic Biology, made it clear
that biology had direct political implications for civic
society.
In discussing the ‘five races’ of man, the text
assured the all-white, legally segregated high
school students taught by Scopes that ‘the
highest type of all, the Caucasians, (are)
represented by the civilized white inhabitants of
Europe and America.’
The book, the avowed goal of which was the
improvement of the future human race, then
proposed certain eugenic remedies.”
Eugenic laws, based on evolution, were passed in
many states.
Virginia’s eugenic law, in 1924, allowed for the
state to sterilize its first victim, Carrie Buck, who
was a patient in the State Colony for Epileptics and
Feeble-minded.

A case was brought which went to the Supreme
Court.
There, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., gave
his infamous Buck v. Bell decision (1927), which
continued to allow the sterilization of people
without their knowledge or consent, stating:
“Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Because of Holmes’ decision, Virginia continued
to sterilize more than 8,000 people until the
practice was stopped in 1974.
Holmes also applied evolution to his decision
making philosophy, calling it “legal realism,” letting
judges alter laws to adapt to changing social and
economic conditions.
Professor Alan
Dershowitz
continued his
critique of the high
school textbook
used by John
Scopes, Hunter’s
Civic Biology:
After a discussion of the inheritability of crime and
immorality, the author proposed an analogy: …
‘Just as certain animals or plants become parasitic
on other plants or animals, these families have
become parasitic on society.
They not only do harm to others by corrupting,
stealing, or spreading disease, but they are actually
protected and cared for by the state out of public
money …
They take from society, but they give nothing in
return. They are true parasites …'”
Dershowitz added:
“From the analogy flowed ‘the remedy’:
‘If such people were lower animals, we would
probably kill them off to prevent them from
spreading.
Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the
remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other
places and in various ways preventing
intermarriage and the possibilities of
perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.
Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully
in Europe and are now meeting with success in this
country.’
… These ‘remedies’ included involuntary
sterilizations, and eventually laid the foundation for
involuntary ‘euthanasia’ of the kind practiced in
Nazi Germany …”

Dershowitz continued:
“Nor were these misapplications of Darwinian
theory limited to high school textbooks. Eugenic
views held sway at institutions of higher learning
such as Harvard University, under racist
president Abbot Lawrence Lowell.
Even so distinguished a Supreme Curt justice as
Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld a mandatory
sterilization law on the basis of a pseudo-scientific
assumption about heritability and genetics.
His widely quoted rationale – that ‘three
generations of imbeciles are enough’ – was later
cited by Nazi apologists for mass sterilization …
… It should not be surprising, therefore, that William
Jennings Bryan … would be outraged – both
morally and religiously …
The textbook Scopes wanted to teach was … a
bad science text, filled with misapplied Darwinism
and racist rubbish.”
After the trial, William Jennings
Bryan wrote in his summary of the
Scopes trial of how science tells us
what we can do, religion tells us
what we should do:

“Science is a magnificent force, but it is not a
teacher of morals. It can perfect machinery, but it
adds no moral restraints to protect society from
the misuse of the machine.

It can also build gigantic intellectual ships, but it
constructs no moral rudders for the control of storm
tossed human vessel.

It not only fails to supply the spiritual element
needed but some of its unproven hypotheses rob
the ship of its compass and thus endanger its cargo
…”
Bryan continued:
“In war, science has proven itself an evil genius; it
has made war more terrible than it ever was before.
Man used to be content to slaughter his fellowmen
on a single plane, the earth’s surface.
Science has taught him to go down into the water
and shoot up from below and to go up into the
clouds and shoot down from above, thus making
the battlefield three times as bloody as it was
before;

but science does not teach brotherly love.
… Science has made war so hellish that civilization
was about to commit suicide;
and now we are told that newly discovered
instruments of destruction will make the cruelties of
the late war seem trivial in comparison with the
cruelties of wars that may come in the future …”

Bryan concluded:
“If civilization is to be saved from the wreckage
threatened by intelligence not consecrated by love,
it must be saved by the moral code of the meek
and lowly Nazarene.
His teachings, and His teachings alone, can
solve the problems that vex the heart and perplex
the world.”

Bryan’s 1925 statement was echoed by Winston
Churchill, who stated in 1941:
“But if we fail, then the whole world, including the
United States … will sink into the abyss of a new
Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more
protracted, by the lights of perverted science.”
BELIEVE – A Captivating & Inspiring
Devotional of Scriptures, Thoughts &
Quotations
William Jennings Bryan had been a Colonel in the
Spanish-American War, a U.S. Representative from
Nebraska and U.S. Secretary of State under
Democrat President Woodrow Wilson.
Bryan edited the Omaha World Herald and founded
The Commoner Newspaper.
Dying five days after the Scopes Trial, William
Jennings Bryan was so popular that his statue was
placed in the U.S. Capitol’s Statuary Hall by the
State of Nebraska and the Post Office issued a
$2.00 stamp in his honor.
Bryan gave over 600 public speeches
during his Presidential campaigns, with
his most famous being “The Prince of
Peace,” printed in the New York
Times, September 7, 1913, in which he
stated:
“I am interested in the science of government but I
am more interested in religion …

I enjoy making a political speech … but I would
rather speak on religion than on politics.
I commenced speaking on the stump when I was
only twenty, but I commenced speaking in the
church six years earlier-and I shall be in the church
even after I am out of politics …”

Bryan reasoned:
“Tolstoy … declares that the religious sentiment
rests not upon a superstitious fear … but upon
man’s consciousness of his finiteness amid an
infinite universe …

Man feels the weight of his sins and looks for One
who is sinless.
Religion has been defined by Tolstoy as the
relation which man fixes between himself and his
God …
Religion is the foundation of morality in the
individual and in the group of individuals …”
Bryan added:
“A religion which teaches personal responsibility
to God gives strength to morality.
There is a powerful restraining influence in the
belief that an all-seeing eye scrutinizes every
thought and word and act of the individual …
One needs the inner strength which comes with the
conscious presence of a personal God …”
Bryan stated further:
“I passed through a period of skepticism when I
was in college …
The college days cover the dangerous period in the
young man’s life; he is just coming into possession
of his powers, and feels stronger than he ever
feels afterward-and he thinks he knows more than
he ever does know.
It was at this period that I became confused by the
different theories of creation.
… But I examined these theories and found that
they all assumed something to begin with …
A Designer back of the design – a Creator back of
the creation;
and no matter how long you draw out the process of
creation, so long as God stands back of it you
cannot shake my faith in Jehovah …
We must begin with something – we must start
somewhere – and the Christian begins with God …”
Bryan continued:
“While you may trace your ancestry back to the
monkey … you shall not connect me with your
family tree …
The ape, according to this theory, is older than man
and yet the ape is still an ape while man is the
author of the marvelous civilization which we see
about us …
This theory … does not explain the origin of life.
When the follower of Darwin has traced the germ
of life back to the lowest form … to follow him one
must exercise more faith than religion calls for
…”
Bryan explained:
“Those who reject the idea of creation are divided
into two schools, some believing that the first germ
of life came from another planet and others
holding that it was the result of spontaneous
generation …
Go back as far as we may, we cannot escape from
the creative act, and it is just as easy for me to
believe that God created man as he is as to
believe that, millions of years ago, He created a
germ of life and endowed it with power to develop
…”
He added:
“But there is another objection.
The Darwinian theory represents man as reaching
his present perfection by the operation of the law of
hate – the merciless law by which the strong
crowd out and kill off the weak …
I prefer to believe that love rather than hatred is
the law of development …”
William Jennings Bryan concluded:
“Science has disclosed some of the machinery of
the universe, but science has not yet revealed to us
the great secret — the secret of life.
It is to be found in every blade of grass, in every
insect, in every bird and in every animal, as well as
in man.
Six thousand years of recorded history and yet
we know no more about the secret of life than they
knew in the beginning …
If the Father deigns to touch with divine power the
cold and pulseless heart of the buried acorn and to
make it burst forth from its prison walls, will he
leave neglected in the earth the soul of man, made
in the image of his Creator? …
The Gospel of the Prince of Peace gives us the
only hope that the world has.”
Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated
in an address at the Memorial to William Jennings
Bryan, May 3, 1934:
“No selfish motive touched his public life; he held
important office only as a sacred trust of honor from
his country …
To Secretary Bryan political courage was not a
virtue to be sought or attained, for it was an inherent
part of the man.
He chose his path not to win acclaim but rather
because that path appeared clear to him from his
inmost beliefs.
He did not have to dare to do what to him seemed
right; he could not do otherwise …”
Franklin Roosevelt continued:
“It was my privilege to know William Jennings
Bryan when I was a very young man.
Years later both of us came to the Nation’s capital to
serve under the leadership of Woodrow Wilson …
It was Mr. Bryan who said: ‘I respect the aristocracy
of learning, I deplore the plutocracy of wealth but I
thank God for the democracy of the heart.’
Many years ago he also said: ‘You may dispute over
whether I have fought a good fight; you may dispute
over whether I have finished my course; but you
cannot deny that I have kept the faith.’
We who are assembled here today to accept this
memorial in the capital of the Republic can well
agree that he fought a good fight; that he
finished his course; and that he kept the faith.”–
Download as PDF …
Read as American Minute post
BELIEVE – A Captivating &
Inspiring Devotional of
Scriptures, Thoughts &
Quotations
Schedule Bill Federer for informative interviews & captivating
PowerPoint presentations: 314-502
8924 wjfederer@gmail.com
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J.
Federer. Permission is granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate,
with acknowledgment.
www.AmericanMinute.com
Amerisearch, Inc | PO BOX 60442 | Fort Myers, FL 33906 U

The Forefathers Monument

 

Tucked away in a residential neighborhood, a short distance from downtown Plymouth, affectionately known as “America’s Hometown,” can be found the largest granite statue in the United States.  The statue is called the “Forefather’s Monument.”  It was often overlooked and even unknown to locals and tourists alike. But thanks to the efforts of Leo and Nancy Martin who run the Jenny Museum, Pastor Paul Jehle of the Plymouth Rock Foundation,  the documentary “Monumental” narrated by actor Kirt Cameron, and Michelle Gallagher of Proclamation House to name a few,  this incredible monument to commemorate the Pilgrims and the faith that sustained them has enjoyed a rebirth of interest.

( Leo Martin of the Jenney Museum with actor Kirt Cameron at the base of the monument)

This granite monument was conceived by the Pilgrim Society, which was formed in 1820 to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Pilgrim landing.  In 1849,  the Pilgrim Society held a competition for a design and offered a $300. prize.  The society chose the architectural firm of Zucker and Asborth of New York.  However, the accomplished architect Hammatt Billings of Boston offered a design which the Pilgrim Society approved.  Billings’ initial design was over 150 feet, which included an observation tower and a museum at its base.  Billings’ other works include Wellesley College and the Boston Athenaeum.

Billings launched a national fund-raising campaign, with President Abraham Lincoln among the donors.  The cornerstone of the monument was laid on August 2, 1859. It was attended by thousands of people, where public prayers were offered and a letter from President James Buchanan was read.  The Civil War and the nation’s postwar economy led to a decrease in donations.   As a result, Billings designed a smaller model, 81 feet, without an observation tower and museum.  It still was a massive design.  Billings didn’t live to see his project completed.  He passed away in 1874.  On August 1, 1889, the monument was dedicated with a crowd of over 12,000 on hand.

The monument’s central figure is “Faith,” depicted as a woman who stands at the top of the monument with a Bible in one hand and her other hand pointing to Heaven.  Four statues underneath Faith are “Morality” holding the Ten Commandments, “Law,” “Education,” and “Liberty.”  The monument also contains the names of the Mayflower passengers, a marble bas relief of the signing of the Mayflower Compact, and bas reliefs of “Justice,” “Mercy,” “The Embarkation,” “Evangelist,” “Youth,” “Wisdom,” and “Tyranny.”

“Monumental: In Search of America’s Treasure”:

In 2012, the documentary “Monumental: In Search of America’s Treasure” was released, leading to a renewed interest in the monument.  From the documentary’s website,

Monumental is the story of America’s beginnings. Presented by Kirk Cameron, the 90-minute true story follows this father of six across Europe and the U.S. as he seeks to discover America’s true “national treasure” – the people, places, and principles that made America the freest, most prosperous, and generous nation the world has ever known. Long regarded as “the land of opportunity,” there’s no question the tiny band of religious outcasts who founded this country hit upon a formula for success that went way beyond what they could have imagined. What formula did they discover? What motivated them to come here in the first place? More importantly, how can we apply these same foundational truths today? Monumental is heralded as “inspiring,” “beautifully executed,” “powerful,” and “one meant to teach.”

  The Jenney Museum:

In 2001, Leo and Nancy Martin founded the Jenney Museum and began giving tours of the monument.  Tours are available from April 15 to November 29.

In 2021, Michelle Gallagher of Proclamation House wrote and published Forefathers Monument Guidebook. Michelle conducted a presentation at our annual family camp.

Teaching the next Generation in New Hampshire and beyond:

There is a recently created New Hampshire-based organization called The Matrix Coalition of New Hampshire, whose mission is to teach the state’s students about the Forefathers Monument.  Led by Deb Roux, the group’s goal is to introduce the Forefathers Monument Guidebook and posters of the monument to public and private schools, hosting tours of the monument and Freedom Walks, the next one being on September 13 at the New Hampshire State House.

Both Camp Constitution and The Matrix Coalition are hosting tours of the Forefathers Monument Saturday October 11—1:00 PM and Saturday October 18—10:  AM.  To register or for more information, please email me at campconstitutuion1@gmail.com

 

The Weekly Sam: America Started with Educational Freedom By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

One of the reasons why the United States of America got off to such a great start is
because we had total educational freedom. When the Constitution was written, there was
already by then a great variety of teaching institutions. The Dames Schools were colonial
preschools in which children were taught the three R’s in preparation for going on to an
academy. The academy was a private school run by an educational entrepreneur. It
prepared students for higher learning or a trade or profession. They were considered the
most appropriate educational institution for a free people. Their responsibility was to the
parents who put their children in the academy.

Home tutoring was also very common in those days. There was no such thing as
“compulsory school attendance.” Parents were free to provide their children with any
fonn of education which met their needs. Children were taught to read and write in the
Dames Schools, which were keenly aware that Biblical literacy was an absolute necessity
in a society based on the teachings of the Bible.

In New England, laws had been passed requiring parents to educate their children. This
spurred the creation of Common Schools throughout the region. Towns hired teachers to
run such schools. Their main function was to prepare the students for future studies in
the colleges. They were owned and operated by the local folks who usually paid the
schoolmasters with commodities rather than money.

The beauty of this high degree of freedom was that education was practical, its
foundation based on reality. Whatever was taught was intended to improve the
knowledge, skills, and aptitudes of the students. The community’s basic purpose in
education was to pass on to the future generation the knowledge, wisdom, religion and
morals of the previous generation. There was no such thing as religious neutrality. The
United States was a Christian nation and all agreed that children should be inculcated in
the tenets of Christianity. And anyone who went into the education profession knew its
spiritual purposes.

But then the question arises: why did Americans give up educational freedom so early in
their history when its benefits were so obvious? Believe it or not, it had nothing to do
with economics or poor teaching. Literacy was very high and education was available to
everyone. There were even excellent charity schools that provided education for the
children of the poor. There was no need for the government to get involved in education.
.
But in Boston, the government did get involved in establishing the Boston Latin School,
an elite school to prepare students for Harvard. It was funded by the city even though the
parents of the students could easily have paid its costs. But the liberals in Boston were
already looking to government to establish an elite institution separated from the church.
What happened to create this state of mind? It was the rise of the Unitarian heresy at
Harvard among the descendants of the Puritans. Intellectual pride became the spearhead
of religious Liberalism.

The Unitarians no longer believed in the Trinity or in the divinity of Christ. If Christ was
divine it was in the sense that we are all divine. But while Christ was considered a great
teacher, he was not considered to be the source of salvation. The Unitarians also rejected
Calvin’s view of man as being innately depraved who needed to be saved by Jesus Christ.
The Unitarians believed that man was basically good, and that all he needed was a good
secular education to achieve moral perfectibility.

And so the Boston Unitarians launched a strong campaign to create government primary
schools in which Calvinist teachings would be eliminated. They were successful because
they learned how to influence the press, control the legislature, and get what they wanted.
As the public school movement grew, the orthodox were in a dilenuna as to whether or
not to support it. In 1849, the orthodox General Association of Massachusetts decided in
favor of support with this very important stipulation. They wrote:

“If after a full and faithful experiment, it should at last be seen that fidelity to the
religious interests of our children forbids a further patronage of the system, we
can unite with the Evangelical Christians in the establishment of private schools,
in which more full doctrinal religious instruction may be possible.”

There is no question that the “full and faithful experiment” has been a colossal failure,
and that millions of Christian children have been spiritually harmed. While many parents
have taken their children out of the public schools, and hundreds if not thousands of
church schools have been founded, the vast majority of Christian parents still put their
children in these anti-Christian public schools. In other words, we have still to learn the
lessons of history.

The Blumenfeld Archives is a free on-line educational resource:  http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm

Liberty Counsel and Liberty University Launch Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic

A news release from Liberty Counsel:

Aug 12, 2025

LYNCHBURG, VA – In partnership with Liberty University School of Law, Liberty Counsel is launching a new Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic this Fall for third-year law students to work on real-world cases at the highest court levels. The two-semester clinic will be open to up to four third-year students.

In 2005, Liberty Counsel and Liberty University School of Law launched the Constitutional Litigation Clinic. The clinic has been in operation for 20 years and will continue to be open to up to five students per semester. Previous students in this clinic worked on Shurtleff v. City of Boston, a Liberty Counsel case that begin in 2017 and resulted in a 9-0 win at the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2022.

The Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic will be an advanced clinic focused on specific Supreme Court and Appellate cases. Under supervision and instruction from experienced Liberty Counsel’s Supreme Court practitioners, the students will have weekly class instruction, case rounds, and gain clinical experience with active cases. The clinic is designed to give students valuable practical experience in Supreme Court advocacy through researching and drafting certiorari petitions, merits and opposition briefs, reply briefs, and amicus briefs.

Liberty University School of Law Dean and Professor of Law Dr. Timothy M. Todd said, “We are thankful for the partnership with Liberty Counsel. This clinic will emphasize the development of practical skills while fostering a deep understanding of the substantive law and procedure relevant to practice before the United States Supreme Court and federal appellate courts.”

Liberty University School of Law is also home to a one-of-a-kind replica of the U.S. Supreme Court bench designed by Mat Staver during his tenure as Dean and Professor of Law.

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “We are excited to partner with Liberty University School of Law to educate and train students to practice at the highest levels of the U.S. Supreme Court and appellate courts. Law students in our previous clinics contributed to our 9-0 victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in Shurtleff v. City of Boston in 2022. The Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic will offer students the invaluable experience of working on high profile cases that will shape legal precedent for decades. Liberty Counsel is resolved to develop the next generation of constitutional law advocates.”

Liberty Counsel provides broadcast-quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost

Patriot Camp August 4-6, 2025 Rockland, Maine Report

 

Patriot Camp 2025 was a three-day summer camp designed to introduce young participants, ages 5–14,
to the principles of American government through engaging, age-appropriate activities centered around
the founding documents of the United States.

This year, we welcomed 15 enthusiastic campers. The 5–8-year-old group spent their days learning
about America’s Constitutional Republic, the three branches of government, and the First and Second
Amendments. The 9–14-year-olds focused on U.S. civics questions in preparation for the final contest
held on the last day of camp. The Civics Savvy Contest questions were read by Camp Constitution’s
Director, Hal Shurtleff. The contest featured two teams—the Eagles and the Werewolves—with the
Eagles taking the win.  An addition to this year’s camp had a portable air rifle range which gave camper’s the opportunity to learn marksmanship skills.

The camp ran from August 4th through August 6th and was a great success in fostering civic
knowledge and patriotism in a fun, interactive environment.
We owe this year’s success to the gracious host, Littlefield Memorial Baptist Church, and to all of the
dedicated volunteers.

The camp concluded with a well-attended family picnic, where campers had the opportunity to share
their experiences and successes with parents and siblings.

 

 

John Adams on Government: Christian Virtue Necessary for Liberty – American Minute with Bill Federer

 

  & the Need for Christian Virtue – American Minute with Bill Federer  The Wisdom of John Adams: on Liberty  Tyranny

Download as PDF …

John Adams was born October 30, 1735. A Harvard graduate, he was admitted to the bar and in 1764, married Abigail Smith, the daughter of a Congregational minister.

In 1765, Britain enacted the Stamp Act, which would be equivalent to a modern-day Internet tax, online censorship or government surveillance of emails.
John Adams wrote:
“It seems very manifest from the Stamp Act itself, that a design is formed to strip us in a great measure of the means of knowledge, by loading the press, the colleges, and even an almanac and a newspaper, with restraints and duties.”

In resisting the Stamp Act, Adams wrote instructions to representatives from town of Braintree being sent to the Massachusetts General Court:

“The late acts of Parliament … divest us of our most essential rights and liberties … The Stamp Act … a very burdensome, and… unconstitutional tax, is to be laid upon us …
We are subjected to … penalties, to be prosecuted, sued for, and recovered, at the option of an informer, in a court of admiralty, without a jury …
Business … would be totally impossible … That Act … would drain the country of its cash, strip multitudes of all their property, and reduce them to absolute beggary …
No freeman should be subject to any tax to which he has not given his own consent.”

John Adams explained in A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law, 1765, that it was Christian principles, brought to America by the Puritans, that resisted tyranny:

“The desire of dominion … when … restraints are taken off … becomes an encroaching, grasping, restless, and ungovernable power … contrived by the great for the gratification of this passion …
Originally formed … for the necessary defense … against … invasions … yet … tyranny, cruelty, and lust … was soon adopted by almost all the princes of Europe …
The people were held in ignorance … till God in his benign providence raised up the champions who began and conducted the Reformation.
From the time of the Reformation to the first settlement of America, knowledge gradually spread in Europe, but especially in England; and in proportion as that increased and spread among the people … tyranny … lost … strength.”
He continued:
“It was this great struggle that peopled America … by a sensible people … the Puritans …
This people had been so vexed and tortured by the powers of those days, for no other crime than their knowledge and their freedom of inquiry … they at last resolved to fly to the wilderness for refuge …
After their arrival here, they … formed their plan, both of ecclesiastical and civil government, in direct opposition to the canon and the feudal systems …
I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in Providence for the illumination of the ignorant, and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth …”

Adams added:

“Tyranny in every form, shape, and appearance was their disdain …
They saw clearly, that popular powers must be placed as … a control, a balance, to the powers of the monarch … or else it would soon become the man of sin, the whore of Babylon, the mystery of iniquity, a great and detestable system of fraud, violence, and usurpation.
Their greatest concern seems to have been to establish a government of the church more consistent with the Scriptures, and a government of the state more agreeable to the dignity of human nature, than any they had seen in Europe …
To render the popular power in their new government as great and wise … as human nature and the Christian religion require it should be, they … had an utter contempt … of hereditary, indefeasible right … of passive obedience and nonresistance …
They thought all such slavish subordinations were … inconsistent with … that religious liberty with which Jesus had made them free …”
Adams explained further:
“Original … government was … despotic … arbitrary, lawless power …
But knowledge diffused generally through the whole body of the people … their civil and religious principles …
For this purpose they laid very early the foundations of colleges, and … seminaries … They made it a crime for such a town to be destitute of a grammar schoolmaster …
Education of all ranks of people was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe has been unknown to any other people ancient or modern …
A native of America who cannot read and write is as rare … as a comet or an earthquake …
Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker …”

 Adams continued:

“Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right … to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know …
Rulers are no more than … trustees for the people; and if the … trust is insidiously betrayed, or wantonly trifled away, the people have a right to revoke the authority … and to constitute abler and better … trustees …
The jaws of power are always opened to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing …
Be not intimidated, therefore, by any terrors, from publishing with the utmost freedom, whatever can be warranted by the laws of your country …
I hope in God the time is near at hand when they will be fully convinced of your understanding, integrity and courage …
Let us not suppose that all are become luxurious, effeminate, and unreasonable, on the other side the water, as many designing persons would insinuate.
Let us presume, what is in fact true, that the spirit of liberty is as ardent as ever among the body of the nation …
Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.”

 Adams stated in A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law:

“Let us study … the great examples of Greece and Rome … the conduct of our own British ancestors, who have defended for us the inherent rights of mankind against foreign and domestic tyrants and usurpers, against arbitrary kings and cruel priests, in short, against the gates of earth and hell …
Let the pulpit resound with the doctrines and sentiments of religious liberty …
Let us hear the dignity of his nature, and the noble rank he holds among the works of God,
– that consenting to slavery is a sacrilegious breach of trust, as offensive in the sight of God as it is derogatory from our own honor or interest or happiness,
– and that God Almighty has promulgated from heaven, liberty, peace, and goodwill to man!”

When the Revolution started, John Adams recommended that George Washington be the Commander-in-Chief and that Thomas Jefferson pen the Declaration.

 In Novanglus: A History of the Dispute with America, from its Origin, in 1754, to the Present Time, published February 6, 1775, John Adams wrote:

“It is the duty of the clergy to accommodate their discourses to the times, to preach against such sins as are most prevalent, and recommend such virtues as are most wanted …
If exorbitant ambition and venality are predominant, ought they not to warn their hearers against those vices?
If public spirit is much wanted, should they not inculcate this great virtue?
If the rights and duties of Christian magistrates and subjects are disputed, should they not explain them, show their nature, ends, limitations, and restrictions, how much soever it may move the gall of Massachusetts.”

John Adams authored the Massachusetts Constitution, 1780, described as the world’s oldest functioning written constitution, a model for the United States Constitution. It stated:

“The happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government, essentially depend upon piety, religion and morality;
and as these cannot be generally diffused through a community, but by the institution of the Public worship of God …
the people of this commonwealth … authorize … the public worship of God, and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion and morality …
And every denomination of Christians, demeaning themselves peaceably, and as good subjects of the commonwealth, shall be equally under the protection of the law …
The Governor shall be chosen annually; and no person shall be eligible to this office, unless … he shall declare himself to be of the Christian religion …
Any person chosen governor, lieutenant governor, counselor, senator or representative, and accepting the trust, shall … make … the following declaration, viz.-
“I, A. B., do declare, that I believe the Christian religion, and have a firm persuasion of its truth.”

 John Adams was U.S. Minister to France, where, together with Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, and David Hartley, he signed the Treaty of Paris, September 3, 1783, officially ending the Revolutionary War:

“In the name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith …
and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences …
Done at Paris, this third day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three.”

While U.S. Minister to Britain, John Adams met with his former king, George the Third.

 Adams helped ratify the U.S. Constitution by writing Defense of the Constitution of the Government of the United States, 1787-1788.

Initially, Presidential elections designated the President as the one who received the most votes, and the Vice-President was the one who received the second most votes.

John Adams was so popular that he was elected Vice-President twice, serving under George Washington.

 When George Washington insisted on only serving two terms, John Adams was elected the 2nd U.S. President in 1796.

He established the Library of Congress and the Department of Navy.

His son, John Quincy Adams, became 6th President.

 After Abigail Adams died in 1818, Adams wrote to Jefferson:

“I do not know how to prove physically, that we shall meet and know each other in a future state; nor does Revelation, as I can find, give us any positive assurance of such a felicity.
My reasons for believing it, as I do most undoubtedly, are that I cannot conceive such a Being could make such a species as the human, merely to live and die on this earth.
If I did not believe in a future state, I should believe in no God.
This Universe, this all would appear, with all of its swelling pomp, a boyish firework.
And if there be a future state, why should the Almighty dissolve forever all the tender ties which unite us so delightfully in this world, and forbid us to see each other in the next?”

In 1819, John Adams wrote to Jefferson:

“Have you ever found in history, one single example of a nation thoroughly corrupted that was afterwards restored to virtue? …
And without virtue, there can be no political liberty …
Will you tell me how to prevent luxury from producing effeminacy, intoxication, extravagance, vice and folly? …
No effort in favor of virtue is lost.”

 In Paris, John Adams wrote in his diary, June 2, 1778:

“In vain are schools, academies, and universities instituted, if loose principles and licentious habits are impressed upon children in their earliest years …
The vices and examples of the parents cannot be concealed from the children.
How is it possible that children can have any just sense of the sacred obligations of Morality or Religion if, from their earliest infancy … their fathers (are) in as constant infidelity to their mothers?”

On June 21, 1776, John Adams wrote:
“Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone, which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand.
The only foundation of a free Constitution is pure virtue,
and if this cannot be inspired into our people in a greater measure, than they have it now, they may change their rulers and the forms of government, but they will not obtain a lasting liberty.”
American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate.

The Weekly Sam: Eugenics and the Making of a Black Underclass

The late Sam Blumenfeld wrote a monthly newsletter from 1986 to 1999 and all of them are available in PDF format on the Sam Blumenfeld Archives.  One of his most important and still timely was his June 1987 newsletter titled “Eugenics and the Making of a Black Underclass.”  In this newsletter, Sam gives us a history of the racist roots of the I,Q. test, and how the “progressive educators worked together to promote their agenda in government schools.  We put it back in print and make them available on our on-line store:  https://campconstitution.net/product/eugenics-in-american-education-and-the-making-of-a-black-underclass-by-sam-blumenfeld/

And a link to a PDF version:

http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/1987/BEL%2002-06%20198706.pdf

 

The Blumenfeld Archives

 

 

The Weekly Sam: Education and Food Back in the Old Days By Samuel L. Blumenfeld

 

I was born in 1926, which makes me probably older than anyone reading this magazine.
Which means that I have a sense of history, that is, an understanding of cause and effect,
that most young people lack these days. Is it important? As Sarah Palin would say,
“You betcha.” In other words, I know history intimately because I have lived through it:
the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the current
wars. That’s a lot of history to know first-hand.

Although I was born less than ten years after World War One, that war seemed as remote
to me as if it had never taken place. That’s the way the memory works, and that’s why I
can understand why so many people today cannot know what it was like to live through
World War II or the Korean War, or even the Vietnam War. And I have no idea how the
schools teach these wars these days.

I was born on Manhattan Island in the world’s greatest metropolis, the most expensive
and legendary piece of real estate on the planet. I was born in one of those tenements in
East Harlem which was filled with new immigrant families and their new American
children.

At age five I was sent to kindergarten at the neighborhood elementary school, P.S.
Number something or other. Of course, I walked to school. A very nice policeman at the
corner helped us cross the avenue. In those days kindergarten was play time. Formal
education started in the first grade. I remember the name of my first-grade teacher, Miss
Sullivan. Or was it Miss Murray? She taught us to read with phonics and to write in
cursive. So our little brains were totally activated to become lovers of books and
writing. There was no such thing as dyslexia in those days, and certainly no such thing
as Ritalin.

The classrooms were pretty clean and bare back then. Just a portrait of George
Washington hanging on the wall, and a cursive writing chart over the blackboard. We
sat in desks bolted to the floor. Today, kids sit around tables facing one another,
coughing into each others faces, pestering one another. Back then you faced the back of
a fellow pupil’s head and you did not chat. You were quiet and attentive. The teacher
was the focus of attention. She wasn’t a facilitator. She had your attention, so you
couldn’t possibly get attention deficit disorder.

Back in those days we went home for lunch. My mother usually prepared a fried egg
sandwich and a glass of milk. Then I walked back to school. On Sundays my mother
would make a herring and onion sandwich on a roll which I loved. She would buy a
salted herring out of a barrel at the appetizer or fish store and that would be our Sunday
breakfast and lunch. They were delicious. That was Eastern European fare.
Your taste in food is developed very early in life by what your parents feed you. So I’ve
always liked fried egg sandwiches. Today, schools serve breakfast and lunch, so parents
have less of an influence on what a child gets to eat. Once, during a school outing, we
were served tuna-fish sandwiches and tomato soup. I had never had that at home, and I
liked them. My sister, two years older than I, had friends who introduced her to foods
my mother was unfamiliar with, such as mayonnaise. Once we discovered mayonnaise,
it became a household favorite. My sister also introduced me to chow mein in the local
Chinese restaurant. I’ve loved Chinese food ever since.

For some reason tomatoes tasted better in those days. That’s probably because the taste
hadn’t been altered by so much special scientific breeding. But you can’t stop progress.
And so the advent of the supermarket with its myriad of packaged and frozen foods and
the rise of so many fast-food franchises has made it easier for Americans to feed
themselves with as little fuss and time as possible.

As for education, progress in the public schools has seemed to go in the opposite
direction. Despite all of the computers and new textbooks, reading skills have declined.
According to Reading at Risk, a report issued by the National Endowment of the Arts in
2007, American literacy is in serious decline. Dana Gioia, chairman of the Endowment
stated: “This is a massive social problem. We are losing the majority of the new
generation. They will not achieve anything close to their potential because of poor
reading.”

In short, instead of getting smarter, our kids are getting dumber. High tech executives
complain that young Americans lack the basic skills that are needed in today’s high tech
industries.

And that is why home-schooling is where you find real progress in education: high
literacy, enhanced academic skills, interest in technology, government, history,
geography, and most important of all, Biblical religion.
If you want to see what educational progress looks like in the 21st century, just attend one
of the many home-school conventions that now take place every spring across America.
You’ll see parent-educators in droves listening to lectures, examining books and
curricula, making sure that what they do at home will enable their kids to become the best
educated young adults in America.

The Blumenfeld Archives