Hal Shurtleff

Director and Co-Founder of Camp Constitution.

‘You missed the point’: Inspired governor smacks down anti-God folks demanding Christ-less Christmas

The following article is reposted with permission from World Net Daily.  Note that the Freedom From Religion Foundation filed an “amicus brief” against Camp Constitution’s “Shurtleff v Boston” case back in 2021.

“Though you may enter this season with bitterness, know that Christ is with you, that He loves you, and that He died for your sins just the same as He did for mine and everyone else’s’

Christmas lights are illuminated beneath a full moon at Peddler's Village in Lahaska, Pennsylvania, Friday, Nov. 15, 2024. (Photo by Joe Kovacs)
Christmas lights are illuminated beneath a full moon at Peddler’s Village in Lahaska, Pennsylvania, Friday, Nov. 15, 2024. (Photo by Joe Kovacs)

The governor of Arkansas, former Trump Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, has publicly rebuked a group of “foundation” folks who wrote to her after she announced state offices would be closed for Christmas to demand she make the holiday Christ-less.

It was the leftist Freedom from Religion Foundation, whose leaders routinely object loudly to any acknowledgement of Christianity, the Bible or even faith in a multitude of venues, that told Sanders to promote what they called an “end-of-the-year holiday” that has “broadly observed secular cultural aspects.”

Baloney, she responded, only more politely than that.

“I issued a proclamation closing state offices on Friday, December, 26, to celebrate Christmas and offer state employees more time with their families. I am in receipt of a letter from your organization calling on me to rescind that proclamation because it ‘gives a detailed theological narrative presenting core Christian doctrines, including the divinity of Jesus Christ, his crucifixion for the sins of mankind, his resurrection, and his anticipated return ‘in glory,'” she wrote.

Not happening, she confirmed.

“You say that my communications as governor must be neutral on matters of religion. I say that, even if I wanted to do that, it would be impossible. Christmas is not simply an ‘end-of-the-year holiday’ with ‘broadly observed secular cultural aspects,’ as your letter states. It’s not gifts, trees, and stockings that make this holiday special. Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ, and if we are to honor Him properly, we should tell His miraculous, world-changing story property, too.”

President Donald Trump and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders at a town-hall event in Flint, Michigan, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2024 (Video screenshot)
President Donald Trump and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders at a town-hall event in Flint, Michigan, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2024

She continued, “Ironically, I received your letter claiming I was alienating my non-Christian constituents as I was leaving a Menorah lighting celebration with people from all across Arkansas. I doubt they would say that my administration alienates non-Christians. In fact, many would say the opposite: that only by voicing our own faith and celebrating other faiths can we make our state’s diverse religious communities feel seen and heard.

“I will end by saying that you missed the point of my proclamation. It was not to browbeat readers with Christian doctrine, but rather to point to the humility of Christ’s birth and to the amazing fact that the King of Kings was born not in a palace or temple, but in a humble manger attended only by poor shepherds. It is in that spirit of humility that I am reminded that Christ did not dine with wise Pharisees or rich men but rather with fishermen and outcasts.

“Though you may enter this season with bitterness, know that Christ is with you, that He loves you, and that He died for your sins just the same as He did for mine and everyone else’s.”

 

 

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh’s articles here.

First Circuit: Nashua Violated First Amendment by Censoring Citizens’ Flag Requests

Camp Constitution wishes to congratulate our friends Beth and Steve Scaer for their victory against the anti-Christian bigot Mayor of Nashau.

Federal appeals court finds city unconstitutionally censored citizens’ requests for use of “Citizen Flag Pole” under guise of “government speech”

December 22, 2025   •  By IFS Staff   •  

Stephen and Beth Scaer / Photo by: Visuals by Mugsy

Boston, MA — Can a city invite residents to fly flags on a “Citizen Flag Pole,” then censor the messages it doesn’t like by claiming those flags represent government speech?

The First Circuit has answered that question with a clear “no.”

In a major victory for free speech, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously reversed a lower court decision earlier today, holding that the City of Nashua, New Hampshire violated the First Amendment when it engaged in viewpoint discrimination by denying Bethany and Stephen Scaer’s requests to fly flags on the city’s Citizen Flag Pole. Attorneys from the Institute for Free Speech and local counsel Roy S. McCandless represent the Scaers in the litigation.

In a decision authored by Judge Sandra Lynch, the First Circuit panel rejected Nashua’s attempt to characterize its censorship as “government speech.” The court found that, between 2017 and 2024, Nashua’s Citizen Flag Pole operated as a forum for private speech, not government expression—making the city’s viewpoint-based denials unconstitutional.

“As the First Circuit recognized, governments cannot get away with censorship by labeling that censorship ‘government speech,’” said Institute for Free Speech Attorney Nathan Ristuccia, who argued the case before the First Circuit. “We are delighted that the First Circuit intervened to prevent Nashua from doing exactly that.”

“After years of being told our flags weren’t ‘in harmony’ with the city’s views, it’s vindicating to have the First Circuit confirm that was unconstitutional,” said Beth Scaer. “No one should have to face government censorship for expressing their beliefs. We’re thrilled with this victory for free speech rights throughout New England.”

The Scaers had multiple flag requests denied by Nashua, most recently a request to fly the historic Pine Tree Flag that commemorates the Battle of Bunker Hill. The city provided no explanation beyond stating that the Scaers’ flags were “not in harmony” with the city’s message.

The court’s analysis revealed the fundamental flaw in Nashua’s position: From 2017 to 2020, the city approved every single flag application without exercising meaningful control over content. Private citizens supplied their own flags, raised them themselves using a borrowed tool, organized ceremonies typically without any city officials present, and retained ownership of their flags throughout. The city even required applicants to indemnify it for damages—hardly the hallmark of government speech.

Only after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Shurtleff v. City of Boston protected speech in such forums did Nashua hastily adopt a new policy claiming the flagpole constituted “government speech”—while continuing to invite and accept citizen applications.

The First Circuit correctly assessed the purpose of this maneuver. As the court noted, Nashua initially approved Bethany Scaer’s “Save Women’s Sports” flag in 2020, then revoked permission just one day later—not because of any change in government policy or perspective, but, rather, after receiving complaints. The court observed that this sequence resembled “a classic heckler’s veto”—the government silencing speech because others found it offensive.

The lawsuit challenged the constitutionality of Nashua’s policy, arguing that the city imposed viewpoint-based restrictions on speech, created an unconstitutional prior restraint, and enforced impermissibly vague standards.

“Nashua’s flag policy gives city officials unbridled discretion to censor speech they dislike,” Ristuccia explained when the Institute for Free Speech originally filed the suit. “The First Amendment doesn’t permit the government to turn a longstanding public forum into a personal billboard for city officials’ preferred views.”

The court’s decision sends an important message about free speech to municipalities throughout the First Circuit, which includes Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico.

While Nashua has since closed the Citizen Flag Pole to all private expression—a choice the city remains free to make—today’s ruling prevents cities from creating forums that invite citizen participation, only to discriminate based on viewpoint under a pretense of “government speech.”

The court remanded the case with instructions for the district court to enter declaratory relief in the Scaers’ favor, formally declaring that Nashua’s actions violated the First Amendment. This declaratory judgment should prevent Nashua and cities throughout the First Circuit from adopting or reinstating similar citizen flag poles that discriminate on the basis of viewpoint and violate citizens’ free speech rights.

To read the First Circuit’s decision in Scaer, et al. v. City of Nashua, et al., click here. To visit our case page, which includes all filings and other case resources, including client photos, click here.

About the Institute for Free Speech

The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment.

The Pilgrim Story: A Presentation by Leo and Nancy Martin

Last Saturday (December 13), Camp Constitution held its annual “Reason for the Season” Potluck in Lexington, MA.  Our guest speakers were Leo and Nancy Martin of the Jenney Museum   https://thejenney.org/   The Martins are experts on the Pilgrims.  Mr. Martin conducts tours of the Forefathers Monument, and was a consultant for the documentary “Monumental”

 

 

America250 Spotlight: Dr. Soon Dr. Willie Soon, Climate Realist

 

America250 Spotlight: Dr. Soon Dr. Willie Soon, an esteemed astrophysicist and aerospace engineer, offered a fast-moving and engaging journey through science, history, and American innovation at the America250 FieldWerx Summit. He began with Galileo’s pioneering use of observation and experimentation, then traced humanity’s growing understanding of the sun—from its immense scale to early sunspot records by figures like John Winthrop and Humphrey Marshall. These discoveries, he explained, revealed how careful observation and persistence have shaped scientific progress and helped connect solar activity to historical climate shifts such as the Little Ice Age.

Dr. Soon then turned to today’s challenges, arguing that solar variability plays a central role in climate change and urged continued debate grounded in data rather than consensus. He closed by looking ahead, highlighting artificial intelligence as a powerful new tool for discovery if guided by a commitment to truth-seeking. Framed by the America250 vision, his message is ultimately optimistic: America’s strength has always come from scientific freedom and bold thinkers, and those same qualities will drive innovation for the next 250 years!

Hsu Educational Foundation  https://hsu-foundation.org/     kicked off America250 with a FieldWerx Summit on September 3, 2025 gathering leaders, visionaries and budding innovators to convene ideas for strengthening America’s future. Join us as we share a series with inspiring remarks from moving presentations of military, industry, local and state government, academia and the non-profit sector. Special appreciation to Florida Power & Light and HSU Educational Foundation.

Camp Constitution is a New Hampshire based charitable trust. We run a week-long family camp, man information tables at various venues, have a book publishing arm, and post videos from our camp and others that we think are of importance. Please visit our website www.campconstitution.net

December 16, 2025, Marks Anniversary of the Boston Tea Party

December 16, 2025 marks the anniversary of The Boston Tea Party where on this date in 1773 members of the Sons of Liberty-some dressed up as Mohawk Indians- boarded three ships docked at Griffins Wharf in Boston and dumped 46 tons of tea into the harbor.

Background to the Tea Party:

The British Parliament passed the Townshend Act in 1767 which levied direct taxes against the Colonists.  Prior to this, colonial governments elected by the people were the only entities that levied taxes.  There was much opposition to the Townshend Act on both sides of the Atlantic.  In 1770, Parliament repealed the Townshend Act with the exception the tax on tea. On May 10, 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act giving, for the first time, the East India Company a monopoly on the export of tea. The East India Company would appoint certain colonial merchants-consigners- the sole right to sell the tea to the detriment of other merchants who lost their livelihoods. While “Taxation without Representation” was one of the rallying cries of the Revolutionary War-along with “No King But King Jesus, the biggest objection Boston colonists had was that the tax was used to pay the salaries of the governor, and other colonial leaders, making these officials beholding and dependent to the Crown instead of the colonists.

In the fall of 1773, seven ships loaded with tea and other cargo sailed to America-four to Boston, one to Philadelphia, one to Charlestown, SC., one to New York City.  Local Patriots in Philadelphia and New York convinced the consigners to resign, and the tea went back to England. In Charleston, S.C, the tea was never claimed and ended up rotting in storage. The Dartmouth was the first ship to arrive at Boston’s Griffin Wharf.   By law, it had 20 days to land the tea, or it would be confiscated. Two other ships, the Beaver and Eleanor arrived a few weeks later.  A fourth ship ran aground on Cape Cod.  Colonists petitioned Governor Thomas Hutchinson to let the ships return the tea to England.  His sons Thomas and Elisha just happened to be the consignees.  Indeed, if the ships did not unload the tea, the owners were told that their ships would be fired upon as they sailed past Castle Island.

  The Tea Party

The 16th of December fell on a rainy and chilly Thursday. It was the last day that the Dartmouth had to unload its cargo.  The meeting at the Old South Meeting House was held in the morning where attendees were read letters of support from surrounding towns. The meeting ended and reconvened in the afternoon.   The meeting lasted a few hours and instructed that the ship owners are to have an interview with Governor Hutchinson to get permission to sail without unloading the tea.  At 6PM, close to forty percent of the 16,000 Bostonians arranged themselves in and out of the Old South Meeting House. No word as of yet from Hutchinson and the ship owners.   Josiah Quincy (member of the Committee of Correspondence) spoke of the peoples’ resolve and popular acclamations of willing to gives their lives. Others spoke in similar tones to the attendees.  Finally, around 7PM, they receive word that the ships must unload the tea.

Samuel Adams stands and says the words “This meeting can do nothing more to save the country,” In the back of the room and outside in the street, the Sons of Liberty- reacted to that remark by moving swiftly to Griffin’s Wharf and board the three tea ships Dartmouth, Eleanor, and Beaver. The men, some dressed as Mohawk Indians, extracted the tea from the cargo holds and disperse the leaves into the waters of the harbor. They were given strict orders not to do any damage or hurt any of the crew members of the three ships.  Men were posted in small boats preventing anyone from taking the tea.   The Caption of the Beaver, Hezekiah Coffin, turned over the keys to the storage holds and encouraged his men to participate in “Tea Party.” Forty-sic tons of tea worth approximately $2 million in today’s money ended up in the Harbor.

The British government’s response to the “Tea Party” was the passing of what became known as The Intolerable Acts which included the closing of Boston Harbor. This helped further unify the colonies and led our nation’s independence.

I highly recommend a visit to the Tea Party Museum located on Congress St and close to the location of the Tea Party.  The museum has two replicas of the ships-the Beaver and Eleanor, reenactors with attendee involvement and a multi-media presentation that brings history alive.  Among the museum’s collection is an original tea chest recovered from the event.  Their website:  https://www.bostonteapartyship.com/

 

In 2018, I had the opportunity to attend the Tea Party Reenactment with media credentials.  A link to the video of the event:

In 1874, Oliver Wendall Holmes wrote a poem entitled “A Ballad of the Boston Tea Party” A portion of that poem is found at an historic plaque at the site of the original location of the Tea Party on Boston’s Atlantic Ave.

 

 

The Bill of Rights Vs. the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

 

Today, December 15 marks the 234th anniversary of the Bill of Rights-the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution.

During the Constitutional Convention, there were some delegates who refused to support the proposed Constitution unless it contained a Bill of Rights; George Mason and Elbridge Gerry led the way.  Delegates James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, was initially against a Bill of Rights believing that since the U.S. Constitution granted specific powers to the federal government, there was no need for a Bill of Rights. Mason and Gerry proposed a Bill of Rights on September 12, 1787, a few days before the Constitution was approved by the delegates. Roger Sherman of Connecticut rightfully contented that the proposed federal Constitution had no authority to repeal Bills of Rights enshrined in state constitutions.  It was unanimously rejected by states each having one vote. James Wilson of Pennsylvania warned that by expressly listing rights, those that weren’t listed did not exist. This legitimate concerned was addressed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

James Madison changed his position, and he made the issue of proposing a Bill of Rights a key part of his Congressional campaign. One of the first things Madison did as a member of Congress was to propose a Bill of Rights. On September 25, 1789, Congress agreed to 12 Amendments and submitted them to the states for ratification needing 3/4ths for approval.  On December 15, 1791, Virginia ratified amendments three to twelve making them part of the Constitution.  The second proposed amendment concerning Congressional pay raises was eventually ratified in 1992. 

On December 15 of each year,  it is my habit to ask people in my travels what we celebrate today.  Very few people have answered correctly.  What is even more troubling is that most people who take our ten question quiz on the U.S. Constitution think that  “From each according to his ability–to each according to his needs” is part of the Bill of Rights.  One of those persons was a New Hampshire Republican running for a federal office.  And who can blame them?  Both major political parties accept the welfare state. The voting records of our Congressional delegation are to the left of Lenin, and the majority of voters are okay with it.

Karl Marx, and the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

 After the results of elections in New York City, New Jersey, and Virginia, socialism, and communism, two evil political and economic systems, are alive and well in our nation.  This should come as no surprise,  According to my friend Dr. Duke Pesta of Freedom Project Academy and a tenured professor at a state college in Wisconsin, the Communist Manifesto is the most read book in state universities.

Karl Marx was one of the more loathsome figures in History. He was born in 1818  to an upper middle class family in Prussia.  According to Pastor Richard Wumbrand in his book Marx and Satan, Marx embraced Christianity as a young man but rejected the faith and became a satanist.  Marx would refer to his writings as “devilish muddle.”  Although he came from a Jewish background, Marx was both an anti-Semite and a racist.  He authored the book A World Without Jews and would refer to those he disliked, which was almost everyone, as “Jews with Negro blood.  He died in 1883 but his evil and deadly legacy lives on.

Back in the early 1990s, a was a guest speaker at a conservative Baptist college.  Over lunch, one of the students said that “communism is good in theory, but it hasn’t been run by the right people.”  I replied:  ‘That is like saying Hell is a good place.”  It just needs to be run by the right demons.  A reading of Marx’s Manifesto can easily prove my point.

In his manifesto, Marx wrote “But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality…”  He called for the destruction of the family and labeled  motherhood and fatherhood “bourgeois claptrap.”  He promoted for free education for all children run by communist teachers.  Here are the ten planks he outlined in his manifesto:

 

  1. Abolition of Property in Land and Application of all Rents of   Land   to Public Purpose
  2. A Heavy Progressive or Graduated Income Tax.
  3. Abolition of All Rights of Inheritance
  4. Confiscation of the Property of All Emigrants and Rebels.
  5. Centralization of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of a National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.
  6. Centralization of the Means of Communication and Transport in the Hands of the State.
  7. Extension of Factories and Instruments of Production Owned by the State, the Bringing Into Cultivation of Waste Lands, and the Improvement of the Soil Generally in Accordance with a Common Plan.
  8. Equal Liability of All to Labor. Establishment of Industrial Armies, Especially for Agriculture.
  9. Combination of Agriculture with Manufacturing Industries; Gradual Abolition of the Distinction Between Town and Country by a More Equable Distribution of the Population over the Country.
  10. Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Abolition of Children’s Factory Labor in its Present Form. Combination of Education with Industrial Production.

Most of these plans  are either partially or fully implemented in our nation.  Plank two became the 16th Amendment to the Constitution.

Contrast Marx to our Bill of Rights

I, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

II, A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

III, No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

IV, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

  1. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
  2. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

VII. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

VIII. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

  1. The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
  2. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

 

The Bill of Rights did not give us rights.  We already had them. Rights come from God, and the main purpose of government is to protect these God given rights.  Today, most elected officials would laugh in derision at this and declare those who proclaim it as  “Christian Nationalists.” The Bill of Rights was a list of restrictions against Congress.  On the other hand, the ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto is a list of rights taken away from people. Our founding fathers left us a legacy of freedom.  Marx and his minions left us a legacy of genocide, and tyranny.

At the end of the 1787 Constitution Convention, Mrs. Elizabeth Powel asked  Benjamin Franklin what kind of government was created at the Convention.   He replied, “A republic if you can keep it.”  As we go into our 250th birthday, let’s hope that we not only “keep it” but banish communist and its twin socialism into the dust bins of history where they so rightly deserve to be.    Readers who would like a pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution may request one from me campconstitution1@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will the United States Become a Muslim Nation? An Interview with Beber Diamond of the Mordecai Mission

 

Hal Shurtleff. host of the Camp Constitution Report, interviews Bebe Diamond of the Mordecai Mission https://mordecaimission.net/ and daughter of the late Barbara from Harlem.  Hal and Bebe discuss the political influence of Muslims in the United States.

Please subscribe to our YouTube channel.

 

Pearl Harbor Day of Remembrance from President Trump

 

 

BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A PROCLAMATION


On December 7, 1941, a peaceful Sunday morning on the Hawaiian island of Oahu was shattered by an unprovoked attack by the naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan on the United States Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor and the aircraft and hangars at Kaneohe, Ford Island, Barbers Point, and Hickam Field.  The surprise offensive claimed the lives of 2,403 American service members and civilians and propelled our Nation into the Second World War.

The Japanese mission was designed to cripple our military assets and obliterate the American spirit, but instead, the fatal attacks rallied our shattered citizenry and fueled our resolve.  Young men from every corner of our country put their lives and futures on hold and were thrust into bloody and brutal battles of historic consequence that would forever change the world.  Although untested in battle, these patriots, still reeling from horror and disbelief, united in a singular mission:  to defeat tyranny.  The exceptional courage and immeasurable sacrifices of the Greatest Generation secured our way of life and the blessings of freedom for future generations.

In the decades since the “date which will live in infamy,” the aggressor has become our loyal ally and trusted friend.  Japan is one of our closest security partnerships, and our military forces work together every day to defend our common interests.  We are united by commerce, history, culture, and mutual respect.  Our strong alliance is a testament to the transformational power of peace, diplomacy, and democracy.

The lessons learned 84 years ago on that fateful day still resound with America’s exceptional fighting force.  We must remain ever vigilant and prepared to annihilate any foe who dares to threaten our liberty.  This annual day of remembrance must be held in the highest esteem and reverence as we honor the Americans who laid down their lives to defend our homeland on the island of Oahu and in the battles of World War II.

The Congress, by Public Law 103-308, as amended, has designated December 7 of each year as “National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2025, as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.  I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn day and to honor our military, past and present, with appropriate ceremonies and activities.  I urge all Federal agencies and interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United States at half-staff in honor of those American patriots who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fiftieth.

DONALD J. TRUMP

The Weekly Sam: Christianity Versus Islam

Because we live in such a highly secularized society, we cannot believe that America could ever become
involved in a religious war in this day and age. Yet ferocious religious wars have been going on all over the
place: in Northern Ireland, in Israel, in the Balkans, in Sudan, in India, in Kashmir, and in Russia. But
history is a very harsh taskmaster and refuses to let us Americans escape into our secular fantasies and
liberal hot houses for long. Thus, it is vitally important for us to reconnect with the human race’s never
ending history of religious struggle. That a group of Islamic terrorists, trained in a remote war-torn, famine
ridden, hell-hole in Asia, could organize the kind of mind-boggling attack against America that took place on
September 11, 2001, means that America is not only not exempt from history, but has been dragged
kicking and screaming back into the middle of it.

Back in 1588, Christopher Marlowe, master of historical drama, wrote his famous Tamburlaine 2. In it there
is a fascinating scene in which the Christian King Sigismund of Hungary and Orcanes, the Muslim King of
Natolia, both former enemies, decide to establish peace between them in order to join forces to defeat
Tamberlaine the Great, the cruel, pagan conqueror of Asia.
Both men confirm their commitment with an oath. King Sigismund vows:

By Him that made the world and sav’d my soul,
The Son of God and issue of a maid,
Sweet Jesus Christ, I solemnly protest
And vow to keep this peace inviolable!

King Orcanes vows:
By sacred Mohamet, the friend of God,
Whose holy Alcoran remains with us,
Whose Glorious body, when he left the world,
Clos’d in a coffin mounted up the air,
And hung on stately Mecca’s temple-roof,
I swear to keep this truce inviolable!

But as the story goes, it was King Sigismund who later broke the truce and was defeated and killed by the
Muslims.

While the history of the struggle between Christians and Muslims for control of Europe was for a time
settled after the Muslims were expelled from Spain in 1492, and driven back from the gates of Vienna to
Asia and Africa, the Islamic enclaves that remained in the Balkans led to the recent wars in Bosnia and
Kosovo. The Serbs had considered themselves as the Christian bulwark against further Islamic incursions
in Europe, and therefore could not understand why they were being bombed by fellow Europeans and
Americans.

You had to know history to understand what Bosnia and Kosovo were all about and what bin Laden’s men
were doing in the Balkans. That conflict proved that the war between Christianity and Islam has never
ended. Over the ages, it simply took on different forms. The rise of European power put a lid on Islamic
ambitions and the Muslim world became the backwater of history until the discovery of oil in the twentieth
century. But in the nineteenth century, the Islamic Barbary states of North Africa could still make trouble for
the Infidel. They took possession of American and European commercial vessels, held their crews for
ransom, and enslaved other Christians. Our first war after independence was fought during the Jefferson
administration against the Muslim pirates and kidnappers of Tripolitania. It is known in the history books as
the Barbary War, in which U.S. Marines staged their first invasion of foreign soil. Hence, the Marine
anthem: “From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli.”

In order to finally put an end to the piracy and barbarism coming out of North Africa, France decided to take
over Algeria. During the 1830s and 1840s, the French imposed their rule over the territory, encouraging
Europeans to settle there. The result was a flourishing French colony and an end to Barbary piracy. France
maintained order in North Africa until the end of World War II, when the anti-colonialist movement got
underway. Both liberals and communists joined in forcing the European powers to give up their colonies.

In Algeria, however, over a million Europeans had settled in the territory and the coastal departments
were considered an integral part of France. However, when Charles de Gaulle gained power at the height
of the Algerian uprising, he decided that France should quit Algeria because the Moslems could never
become true Frenchmen. And so France abandoned Algeria, and a million Europeans took to the boats.
Today, the invasion has been reversed. Five million Muslims, mostly Algerians, live in France. They make
up ten percent of the population and are part of the resurgent Islamic power in Europe. Christianity is now
so weak in France that one wonders if it is capable of resisting the assumption of Islamic power.

We have been told by our leaders and the media that we are not at war against the Islamic religion. We
are at war against terrorism. But what they all prefer not to recognize is that the spiritual power behind that
terrorism, the power that drives otherwise intelligent human beings to undertake suicidal missions against
the infidel is the religion of Islam. Of course, there are millions of Muslims who just want to lead normal
lives. Unfortunately, after September 11, 2001, nothing is “normal” anymore.
In an alarming article in the November issue of Commentary magazine, Daniel Pipes contends that
Islamist militants are serious about their plan to conquer America. He writes:

The first missionaries for militant Islam, or Islamism, who arrived here from abroad in the
1920’s, unblushingly declared, “Our plan is, we are going to conquer America.” The
audacity of such statements hardly went unnoticed at the time, including by Christians who
cherished their own missionizing hopes.

As a 1922 newspaper commentary put it:
To the millions of American Christians who have so long looked eagerly
forward to the time the cross shall be supreme in every land and the people
of the whole world shall have become the followers of Christ, the plan to win
the continent to the path of the “infidel Turk” will seem a thing unbelievable.
But there is no doubt about its being pressed with all the fanatical zeal for
which the Mohammedans are noted.

Pipes writes further:

As a teacher at an Islamic school in Jersey City, near New York, explains, the “short-term
goal is to introduce Islam. In the long term, we must save American society.” Step by step,
writes a Pakistan-born professor of economics, by offering “an alternative model” to
Americans, Muslims can transform what Ismail Al-Faruqi referred to as “the unfortunate
realities of North America” into something acceptable in God’s eyes.

The irony in all of this is stunning. For years the Christian right has been trying to get Americans to live
godly lives, but with very limited success. The fact that 85% of American parents put their children in pagan
public schools is an indication of how strong our liberal secular culture is. It controls the curriculum in our
schools and universities. It controls most of the print media, the electronic media, and most of what comes
out of Hollywood. And American schools are now teaching American children all about Islam. While the
Bible has been eliminated from the classroom, apparently the Koran hasn’t. How else can you teach about
Islam?

Recently, the Reverend Franklin Graham, president of Samaritan’s Purse, a Christian relief agency, called
Islam “wicked and violent.” He said, “I don’t believe this is a wonderful, peaceful religion. When you read
the Koran and you read the verses from the Koran, it instructs the killing of the infidel, for those that are
non-Muslim.”

As the son of Billy Graham, Franklin is the designated successor to his father’s longtime evangelical
ministry. He delivered the benediction at Bush’s inauguration. But now he’s in trouble with the White
House, which sponsored a Ramadan dinner for 50 ambassadors from Islamic countries with a traditional
meal and prayer. Also, the Muslim chaplain of Georgetown University recently officiated at the opening
prayers of the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill.

The moral seems to be that if Islamist terrorists bomb the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and kill
5,000 Americans, other Islamists get invited to the White House for a special dinner prepared to their
specifications: no pork. Now that Americans are being invited to be kind to Muslims, where will all of this
lead?

Graham said, “It wasn’t Methodists flying into those buildings, it wasn’t Lutherans. It was an attack on this
country by people of the Islamic faith.” And that’s why the latter are now favored guests at the White
House! Of course, the President is doing this to keep the Islamic states in line while we war against the
terrorists which these states harbor.

But if we are being encouraged by our born-again President to be kind to our Muslim neighbors, shouldn’t
Christians see this as a missionary opportunity? Why not introduce Muslims to the loving grace of Jesus
Christ? One of the reasons why Americans find it difficult to become friendly with Muslims is because
sooner or later their rabid hatred of Israel will surface. Americans in general don’t like to hate anybody, and
they are uncomfortable with people who are haters.

Christianity preaches love. Islam preaches hate. That is why hatred of Israel fills the psyche of so many
Muslims. Abnormal, pathological hatred is not healthy. It requires constant energy to be sustained at the
level it exists among Muslims. And that is why life is so miserable in many Islamic countries. And that is
why Palestinian refugees have preferred to remain in refugee camps for 50 years rather than do something
constructive with their lives. They prefer to live with festering, enduring hatred, and teach it to their
children, rather than accept forgiveness and peace. No true Christian could ever waste his life that way.

Yet, the United Nations aid agency accepts these refugee camps as perfectly normal for the Arab Muslims.
After World War II, millions of displaced persons found new constructive lives in countries all over the
world. But in the Middle East, Palestinian hatred is used to torment the world about Israel.
It is to be hoped that one of the first things the new government of Afghanistan might do is recognize Israel
and establish diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. It would signal a dramatic change in the attitude of
Muslims toward Israel.

Indeed, let us be loving and concerned with the well-being of our Muslim citizens, and let us convey to
them that Jesus will save them from their sickening hatred and grant them life renewed.

The Blumenfeld Archives  

The above article came from the Sam Blumenfeld Archives:  http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/main.htm

The U.S. Constitution vs. Sharia Law

This presentation was conducted back in 2017 but the information Father Michael Carl presents is timeless.   Father Carl used Islamic writings and teaching to demonstrate that Sharia Law and the U.S. Constitution are diametrically opposite to each other, and any elected official who promotes Sharia Law cannot uphold his or her oath of office.  Indeed, they are deliberately lying when they promise to uphold the U.S. Constitution.