campconstitution

The Weekly Sam: Look-Say Causes Dyslexia by Sam Blumenfeld

Sam Blumenfeld discovered that there was a concerted effort to dumb the American people down as far back as the early 1960s, and by the mid 1970s, Sam concluded that the look-say method of reading used in government schools was responsible for dyslexia.  The government’s solution to dyslexia was to drug children.  Sam’s solution was to teach the victims of the look-say method, intensive phonics.  Here is a link to a speech Sam gave on the subject:

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/shurtleffhal/episodes/2023-03-23T15_24_07-07_00

Sam was more than a critic of government education; he was a man of action who helped create private schools and then he became a pioneer in the modern homeschool movement.  He also gave us, perhaps,  his most important work, Alpha-Phonics:

This book has been used by hundreds of thousands of people around the world. Camp Constitution makes it available in an on-line and PDF format:

https://campconstitution.net/blumenfelds-alphaphonics/

We also have a print version available from our on-line store:  https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-by-sam-blumenfeld/

The Weekly Sam: GOD AND MAN AT HARVARD:

The following is one of many of Sam Blumenfeld’s book proposals that never turned into a book.  However, Sam did write extensively about the Unitarian and eventual Marxist takeover of Harvard.  Many contemporary conservatives don’t realize that Harvard was taken over by the Left 200 years ago.

GOD AND MAN AT HARVARD:

  Chapter Outline

Chapter One – THE CALVINIST BEGINNING. Educating a learned clergy for the Biblical Commonwealth in the wilderness. Calvinism as a world view. The meaning of the Calvinist doctrines of innate depravity, election, reprobation, and predestination. God as the supreme ruler of the universe; man as the disobedient, sinful descendant of Adam and Eve. Harvard as a Calvinist institution. (1636-1700)

 

Chapter Two – THE EMERGENCE OF A LIBERAL HERESY.

The election of John Leverett as president of Harvard in 1707 signals the beginning of a century-long protracted struggle between Calvinists and liberals for control of Harvard. The liberals reject the omnipotent “tyrannical” God of Calvin far a benevolent rational God of limited powers. Man is elevated from the status of depraved sinner to that of a benevolent, rational and perfectible being.  (l700-180~)

Chapter Three – HARVARD BECOMES THE UNITARIAN VATICAN.

The takeover of Harvard in 1805 by the Unitarians and the removal of the Calvinists to Andover (1) marks the crucial turning point in American intellectual history. Harvard becomes the citadel of religious liberalism and academic anti-Calvinism. Everett, Ticknor, Bancroft and Cogswell are sent to Germany to sop up German liberal influences. A liberal cultural elite emerges and  with it, the Anthology Society, the Boston Athenaeum., and the North American Review. Andrews Norton, as head of the Harvard Divinity School is dubbed the Unitarian Pope.  Unitarianism becomes the world-view of a privileged educated elite. (1805-1830)

Chapter Four – THE TRANSCENDENTAL PERIOD.

Emerson’s Divinity School Address in 1838 ushers in a further liberalization of Unitarianism which becomes known as Transcendentalism because of its Hegelian origin. God is transformed into pantheistic emanations throughout nature and Man is transformed into an expression or God., Human pride becomes the principle ingredient behind the new faith in modern statism. The Bible as religious authority is subverted; natural scientists, German scholars, and the influence of Carlyle, Coleridge, Cousin, Kant, and Hegel, leading to’ the secularization of learning. Interest shifts from the knowledge of God (theology) to knowledge of man (psychology). (1830-1850)

Chapter Five – HARVARD AND PRE-MARXIAN  SOCIALISM.

The Transcendentalist experiment in communal living. Brook Farm. The influences of Robert Owen, Fournier, Saint-Simon, Auguste Comte, etc. The issues of Darwinism and natural selection divide the academicians. The liberals win. The schizoid mind of the Brahmin elite: political conservatism and religious liberalism; anti-abolitionism; the public school movement. Protestant theology in a state of anarchy. Harvard weathers the Civil War with little inconvenience. (1850-1869)

Chapter Six – THE  BREAK WITH THE PAST.

President Eliot gradually breaks ties with the classical and Biblical past. Greek and Latin are no longer required for admission to Harvard.  Compulsory chapel is abolished. The elective system is inaugurated. The scientific spirit takes over as material progress advance~ at a spectacular rate. The Hegelian progressive world-view becomes the world-view of the Harvard elite. Man is intoxicated with his new technological and ~scientific achievements. Eliot writes of the “religion of the future.” Secularism becomes the wave of the future, and statism is its political ~expression. (1869-1880)

Chapter Seven – THE GREAT LIBERAL PROFESSORS.

Josiah Royce, William James, Hugo Munsterberg, George Santayana. The modern curriculum is developed, psychology, sociology, history, the sciences, etc. Christianity is reduced to a system of “social ethics.” Harvard leads the transition to the modern secular world.  Int influence reigns supreme.  Santayana “defects” and embraces Catholicism.

Chapter Eight – SOCIALISM AT  HARVARD

The Intercollegiate Socialist Society if founded at Harvard.  Members include Walter Lippmann, Heywood Broun, Osmond Frankel. Harvard becomes known as “the mother of radicals,” John Reed becomes a Bolshevik, dies in Russia and his buried in the Kremlin. Fabian Socialist Graham Wallas lecture at Harvard. Man marvels at his own powers.  (1900-1920)

 

 Chapter Nine – HARVARD SETS THE LIBERAL STANDARD

The academic world, for the most part, follows Harvard’s lead to the left. Through its graduate schools, the great foundations, its professors, Harvard liberalism becomes the world-view of America’s academic elite. Harvard alumni like Corliss Lamont and Robert Morse Lovett lend prestige to pro-Communist causes.  The New Deal (1920-1945)

Chapter Ten:  Harvard AND THE MCCARTHY ERA

Sen. McCarthy accuses the academic establishment, the Protestant clergy, the great foundations of aiding the Communist cause. Harvard men implicated in high treason:  Lee Pressman, John Abt, Nathan Witt, Alger Hiss.  This chapter will sow how Harvard’s prestige not only served as a cover-up for subversion but was also instrumental in stopping Congressional investigations into Leftist activities.  Academic freedom for the Left (1945-1958)

Chapter Eleven – HARVARD AND VIETNAM

Harvard’s influence during the Kennedy years reaches its high-point. McGeorge Bundy, Arthur Schlesinger, Kissinger, and others flock to Washington. The Cambridge-Washington axis. Meanwhile, back at the campus, the SDS takes over. Harvard strategists lead America to its worst military defeat. (1958-1975)

Chapter Twelve – SOCIAL ENGINEERING FOR THE FUTURE

Harvard scientific las and institutes all operate on the premise that man’s power is unlimited, and that he is the center and measure of all things. Secular humanism is the philosophy guiding the behavioral sciences.  The myth of moral progress permits any action in the name of mankind’s “improvement, Abortion, birth control, behavior modification by drugs, genetic transmutations are the natural products of this philosophy, Benevolent, rational perfectible man is now capable of causing hos fellow man more misery that event in history.  Power is now man’s rampant passion. Skinner, Eriksin, Galbraith, Reisman, Lipset, etc.

Chapter Thirteen – GOD AT HARVARD

Atheist Harvey Cox is head of the Divinity School, Cox pushes secular, “religion less” religion. He is pro-Marxist, pro-Castro,,  Christianity is dead at Harvard.  The logical end of the liberal heresy is not merely the death of God but the murder of God. Religious liberalism has reached the end of the road. It now openly espouses dialectical materialism.  The paradox of our time:  a theological school at war with the idea of God; a theology unable and unwilling to resist Communist.  Social and revolutionary action as the liberal form of piety.

Note by the editor

  • The Andover Theological Seminary

 

Please visit and subscribe to the Sam Blumenfeld Archives:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/

Death of “Lemon Test” Returns Religious Expression to America by Liberty Counsel

Mar 17, 2023

WASHINGTON, D.C. – After years of judicial activists eradicating religious monuments and expressions of faith on public property because of the “Lemon Test,” major victories at the U.S. Supreme Court last year that led to the overturning of the legal test have changed the landscape in America.
The “Lemon Test” was binding authority for 51 years with 7,073 references in court opinions, administrative law decisions or other legal writings as cited on Thomas Reuters Westlaw. The legal test came out of the ruling in Lemon v. Kurtzman that has been used to determine if a law violates the First Amendment Establishment Clause. The High Court ruled in that case that a Rhode Island law that supplemented salaries of some parochial schoolteachers was unconstitutional.

As a result, Lemon has been used by courts to remove religious symbols and displays from the public square since 1971. In fact, Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, wrote in Lamb’s Chapel v. Ctr. Moriches Union Free School District regarding that the High Court’s invocation of the “Lemon Test” was “like some ghoul in a late night horror movie that repeatedly sits up in its grave and shuffles abroad, after being repeatedly killed and buried.”

However, all that changed last year as a result of two major victories at the U.S. Supreme Court.

On May 2, 2022, Liberty Counsel’s 9-0 victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in Shurtleff v. City of Boston involved censorship of Christian viewpoints regarding flag raisings.  The High Court unanimously ruled that the city of Boston violated the Constitution by censoring a private flag in a public forum open to “all applicants” merely because the application referred to it as a “Christian flag.” The High Court unanimously rejected Boston’s use of the “Lemon Test” to censor Christian viewpoints.

In Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, Liberty Counsel argued in its amicus brief that since the Establishment Clause provides no justification for suppressing Coach Joe Kennedy’s private, religious speech to silently pray on the football field after games, the “Lemon Test” should be overruled. Then on June 27, 2022, the High Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the high school football coach and also finally buried the court-made “Lemon” test, citing Liberty Counsel’s 9-0 decision handed down in Shurtleff v. City of Boston involving the Christian flag.

The Kennedy ruling stated, “This Court long ago abandoned Lemon and its endorsement test offshoot… In place of Lemon and the endorsement test, this Court has instructed that the Establishment Clause must be interpreted by ‘reference to historical practices and understandings.’”

As a result, the Ten Commandments, for example, can be displayed on government property, including in public school classrooms. That means that the 1980 Stone v. Graham Supreme Court decision is no longer valid. In this case, the High Court ruled that a Kentucky law requiring the posting of a copy of the Ten Commandments, purchased with private contributions, on the wall of each public school classroom was unconstitutional and violated the first part of the Lemon and the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.

The activist 5-4 per curium opinion in Stone v. Graham was issued without any briefing or oral argument. Incredibly, the Court wrote:

“If the posted copies of the Ten Commandments are to have any effect at all, it will be to induce the schoolchildren to read, meditate upon, perhaps to venerate and obey, the Commandments. However desirable this might be as a matter of private devotion, it is not a permissible state objective under the Establishment Clause.”

However, since Lemon has been finally buried, students across the nation can read, memorize and hopefully obey, the Ten Commandments. Now it would be nice to return to the time prior to the removal of the Ten Commandments from schools when the worst infractions were chewing gum and spitballs.

In addition, other religious symbols such as crosses can permanently remain on government property.

On June 20, 2019, even though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Bladensburg Peace Cross, a 40-foot cross honoring those who died during World War I, could remain standing, the High Court sidestepped the opportunity to overturn the “Lemon Test.” Liberty Counsel filed an amicus brief to the High Court in support of the 93-year-old war memorial in Bladensburg, Maryland that the American Humanist Association challenged as violating the Establishment Clause and “discriminating against patriotic soldiers who are not Christian.”

Since the “Lemon Test” is now dead and the Establishment Clause must be interpreted according to its historical intent, all the cases that relied on Lemon are no longer valid, including cases that struck down Ten Commandment displays, Nativity scenes or other religious symbols. In fact, Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissenting in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, wrote: “The Court overrules Lemon v. Kurtzman and calls into question decades of subsequent precedents that it deems ‘offshoot[s]’ of that decision.”

Liberty Counsel’s Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “The decisions from the Supreme Court involving the Christian flag and Coach Kennedy send a clear message that the ‘Lemon Test’ has finally been buried and government must not discriminate based on religious viewpoint. The Ten Commandments, Nativity scenes, crosses, religious symbols, displays, expression, meetings, and performances can no longer be brushed aside. No longer can courts divorce America from religious freedom or the First Amendment from its original and historical purpose.”

Liberty Counsel provides broadcast quality TV interviews via Hi-Def Skype and LTN at no cost.

(The above was a news release from Liberty Counsel http://www.lc.org

 

 

TAKE ACTION

Climate Hustlers Deceiving on Temperature Records Says Professor Willie Soon. one the world’s leading astrophyscists

(Professor Soon asked us to repost this important interview with Alex Newman.)

Government agencies with a vested interest in the man-made global-warming agenda along with the United Nations are deceiving mankind about global temperature records using a number of flagrant errors, explained one of the world’s leading astrophyscists, Dr. Willie Soon, in this interview with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman. Dr. Soon, one of the speakers at the Heartland Institute’s annual climate convention, exposes these tricks, including relying on contaminated temperature data from urban areas that show more heat only due to human development rather than CO2 or global warming, he said. This has been known for over a century, and yet the climate profiteers keep peddling the fraud. Dr. Soon’s published studies on this have been cited even by top UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientists in their own work, so they can’t claim to be ignorant. It is time for truth, Dr. Soon warns.

 

 

 

 

 

The Weekly Sam: The Great American Math Disaster By Samuel Blumenfeld

One of the reasons why Americans are so confused about the large numbers being tossed
around by our leaders in Washington these days, is because of how poorly they’ve been
taught mathematics in the public schools they attended. Numbers in the millions,
billions, and trillions are almost impossible to visualize as anything more than just strings
of numbers. Most Americans can barely deal with thousands, let alone trillions.

The basic problem is that American children are no longer being taught arithmetic. They
are taught math, which includes more than our simple counting system. Arithmetic deals
with quantity. Math deals with relationships and uses complex symbols. When you
submerge arithmetic in mathematics, without making sure that the children have mastered
their counting skills, you get math failure. And this is nothing new. Back in 1991
Newsweek magazine reported (6/17/91):

How bad are eighth graders’ math skills? So bad that half are scoring just above
the proficiency level expected of fifth-grade students. Even the best students did
miserably; at the top-scoring schools, the average was well below grade level.
Hardly any students have the background to go beyond simple computation, most
of those kids can add but they have serious trouble thinking through simple
problems….

What’s really frightening about these results is that the alarm has been ringing
since the 1983 publication of “A Nation at Risk,” the federally sponsored study
that highlighted vast problems in the public schools. Yet despite years of talk
about reform–and genuine efforts of change in a few places–American students
are still not making the grade and remain behind their counterparts in other
industrialized nations.

All of those kids who did miserably in math in 1983 and 1991 are today’s voting adults in
their thirties and forties. And let us not forget the disaster called the “New Math” which
swept through America’s elementary schools like a hurricane during the 1960s and ’70s,
creating today’s math illiterates among Boomers in their fifties and sixties.
The educators blame the problem on traditional arithmetic, which hasn’t been taught in
years, but is a perfect scapegoat. They complain that too much time is wasted practicing
adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. The solution? More calculators and
computers. The real problem is that our educators really don’t know the difference between
arithmetic and mathematics, and if you don’t know the difference, you will not know how
to teach either.

Our arithmetic system is an ingenious method of counting, keeping track of quantity. It
uses 10 symbols and place value for all of its notations and operations. As such it is one
of the greatest achievements of the human intellect, an invention that permits human
beings to perform any counting feat with mere pencil and paper.

But the key to its proficient use is memorization of the basic arithmetic facts. If you
don’t memorize the facts, then you are stuck with unit counting and you might as well
learn to use an abacus. Memorization requires rote drill, which is forbidden in today’s
schools, even though it is the easiest way for a child to learn anything. When educators
think that children can learn to compute without memorizing the arithmetic facts, they are
deluding themselves and cheating the children.

Why is it important for children to memorize the arithmetic facts? Because
memorization will give them mastery of the system. And once the arithmetic facts are
memorized through drill and practice with pencil and paper, they will later be able to use
calculators and computers with accuracy, spotting errors when they make them, always
able to do the calculations on paper if necessary.

Why did eighth graders do so poorly even in wealthy suburban schools? Because of bad
teaching. Obviously, when even the richest and brightest fail, one cannot blame it on
rote memorization when we are told that memorization is what makes the Japanese
student so much better than the American. If teachers do not even know how to teach
simple arithmetic effectively, how can we assume that they know how to teach algebra,
geometry, trigonometry, or calculus effectively?

Besides, very few of us will need to use algebra, geometry, trigonometry or calculus, but
all of us will need to use arithmetic–in doing tax returns, figuring out mortgages,
balancing our checking accounts, using credit cards, making change, planning our
retirement. So if everyone must use arithmetic in order to survive economically, why
don’t the educators emphasize the need to develop good arithmetic skills?

Back in 1983, John Saxon, the celebrated author of superb mathematics textbooks used
by home-schoolers and private schools, wrote:
“For the last twenty years, these [mathematics] experts have worked unwittingly to bring
matters to a point where only the brilliant can learn mathematics. They have tried to
teach advanced concepts and a general overview before the student has learned the
basics….In an important sense, these authors are experts neither in mathematics nor in
education. They do not know which mathematics topics must be mastered at which level
and have no understanding of the capabilities of the average student. Their books are
visible proof that they do not know how children learn and assimilate abstractions.”
(National Review, 8/19/83)

Until rote learning is restored in our primary schools in the teaching of arithmetic, we can
expect math failure to plague American public education for the foreseeable future.

(Sam Blumenfeld created a basic arithmetic course and it is available on his archive:  https://campconstitution.net/blumenfelds-math-tutor/

Boston’s Harbor Blockaded, Virginia’s Day of Fasting, & the “shot heard round the world” – American Minute with Bill Federer

Britain was almost bankrupt after the Seven Years War, 1756-1763, which was called in America the French and Indian War.
This led Parliament to tax the colonies.
Resistance to taxes prompted a long list of Acts intended to bring colonists into submission, culminating in the Boston Massacre.

At the same time, the British East India Company, which had taken control of Bengal and large areas of India, was facing bankruptcy.
The Bengal Famine of 1770 killed an estimated 10 million people – a third of Bengal’s population.
It was the first of several major Bengal famines during the era of British rule.
Administrative costs skyrocketed while Bengal’s labor productivity plummeted.
This was all occurring as an economic downturn in Europe caused a depression in trade.
To avoid bankruptcy, the British East India Company directors appealed to Parliament, which passed the Tea Act in 1773.
The Tea Act gave the Company an exemption from paying duties on Tea imported to the American colonies, but kept duties on tea from competitors, thereby undercutting local merchants and putting thousands out of work.
It was viewed as the camel’s nose under the tent, for if colonists acquiesced, they would implicitly be accepting Parliament’s right to directly tax the colonies anytime it wished.
Colonists objected because they had no representation in Parliament — “No taxation without representation.”
The Boston Tea Party took place on December 16, 1773.
Samuel Adams led a band of patriots, the Sons of Liberty, disguised as Mohawk Indians, from the South Meeting House toward Griffin’s Wharf.
There they threw 342 chests of British East India Company tea into Boston’s harbor.
Furious at the Boston Tea Party, the King decided to punished Boston.
Britain imposed the Boston Port Act, MARCH 7, 1774, effectively closing Boston’s harbor till the cost of the tea was repaid.
It was the first of five Punitive Acts, also called Coercive Acts or Intolerable Acts, which were designed to punish colonists by stopping all commerce from coming in and out of Boston.
These Acts ruined Boston’s economy, causing stores to close and putting thousands out of work.
This was similar to modern-day Big Tech censorship, Internet deplatforming, shadow-banning, and canceling.
The situation soon became a test of wills between the King and his colonists.

James Otis wrote in “The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved,” 1764:

“The grant of GOD Almighty,
who has given to
all men a natural right to be free … The colonists are by the law of nature freeborn, as indeed all men are, white or black.”
In enforcing the Boston Port Act, the British Commander-in-Chief in America, General Thomas Gage, effectively ruled through martial law.
He prevented citizens of Massachusetts from electing their own leaders.
Gage dissolved Massachusetts’ Provincial Congress.
He forbade town hall meetings without his permission:
“Calling such meetings … the inhabitants … pass many dangerous and unwarrantable resolves: for remedy whereof, be it enacted … no meeting shall be called … without the leave (permission) of the governor.”
Britain’s Prime Minister, Lord North, told Parliament these Acts were necessary “to take the executive power from the hands of the democratic part of government.”
It was the memory of Gage’s actions that later led the writers of the Bill of Rights to insist on “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Massachusetts’ citizens refused to stop their town hall meetings and passed more resolves against the King.
Surrounding colonists rallied by sending food to Boston.
William Prescott, who later commanded at Bunker Hill, wrote:
“If we submit to these regulations, all is gone …
Our forefathers passed the vast Atlantic, spent their blood and treasure, that they might enjoy their liberties, both civil and religious, and transmit them to their posterity …
Now if we should give them up, can our children rise up and call us blessed?”
Upon hearing of the Boston Port Act, Thomas Jefferson drafted a Day of Fasting & Prayer resolution, to be observed in Virginia the same day the blockade was to commence in Boston.
It was introduced in the Virginia House of Burgesses by Robert Carter Nicholas, May 24, 1774.
It passed unanimously, being supported by Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee and George Mason:
“This House, being deeply impressed with apprehension … from the hostile invasion of the city of Boston in our Sister Colony of Massachusetts Bay, whose commerce and harbor are, on the first day of June next, to be stopped by an armed force,
deem it highly necessary that the said first day of June be set apart, by the members of this House, as a Day of Fasting, Humiliation and Prayer, devoutly to implore the Divine interposition, for averting the heavy calamity which threatens destruction to our civil rights …
… Ordered, therefore that the Members of this House do attend … with the Speaker, and the mace, to the Church in this City, for the purposes aforesaid;
and that the Reverend Mr. Price be appointed to read prayers, and the Reverend Mr. Gwatkin, to preach a sermon.”
On the appointed Day of Fasting, June 1, 1774, George Washington wrote in his diary:
“Went to church, fasted all day.”
Virginia’s Royal Crown-appointed Governor was Lord Dunmore.
He was finishing up fighting Dunmore’s War against the Shawnee and Mingo tribes in the Ohio River Valley of western Virginia, as they had tortured and massacred settlers, including Daniel Boone’s son, James.
Dunmore was so upset by Jefferson’s Day of Fasting and Prayer resolution that he dissolved Virginia’s House of Burgesses.
Virginia’s legislators, instead of going home, went down the street and gathered in Raleigh Tavern.
There, in a back room, they decided to form a Continental Congress, to meet in Philadelphia three months later.
Meanwhile in Massachusetts, General Thomas Gage continued to tighten his grip by removing gunpowder from the storage magazine near the town of Somerville in September of 1774.
Thousands of American militiamen rapidly confronted them in what was referred to as the Powder Alarm.
Shocked by the colonists’ quick and firm response, Gage wrote:
“If force is to be used at length, it must be a considerable one, and foreign troops must be hired, for to begin with small numbers will encourage resistance, and not terrify; and will in the end cost more blood and treasure.”
The next Spring, April of 1775, General Gage sent troops to confiscate the arms and gunpowder at Lexington and Concord.
They were also going to arrest Sam Adams and John Hancock, who was President of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress and President of the Continental Congress.
Gage had received an order from Lord Dartmouth “to arrest the principal actors and abettors in the Provincial Congress whose proceedings appear in every light to be acts of treason and rebellion.”
Hancock was staying in Lexington at the home where he grew up, which was now the home of his cousin, Lucy Bowes Clark, and her husband, Pastor Jonas Clark.
Warned ahead of time by the midnight ride of Paul Revere and William Dawes, American militiamen were armed and waiting for the British at the Lexington Green, led by Pastor Jonas Clark, who stated:
“I have trained them for this very hour; they would fight, and, if need be, die, too, under the shadow of the house of God!”
That day, April 19, 1775, British Major Pitcairn shouted, “Disperse, ye villains! Ye rebels, disperse! Lay down your arms! Why don’t you lay down your arms and disperse?”
Then was fired the “shot heard round the world,” and the war of Independence officially began.
Driven back, colonists regrouped at the Concord Bridge. This time they did not retreat.
The colonists fought back, joined by more militiamen, and chased the British all the way back to Boston.
The British suffered 273 casualties.
Pastor Jonas Clarke declared:
“From this day will be dated the liberty of the world!”
General Gage offered a pardon to anyone who would abandon the patriot cause, with the specific exception of John Hancock and Samuel Adams.
On May 3, 1775, Patrick Henry led the Hanover militia to seize the gunpowder in Williamsburg, Virginia.
British Governor Lord Dunmore, fled Williamsburg and issued a proclamation against “a certain Patrick Henry … and a Number of deluded Followers” who organized “an Independent Company… and put themselves in a Posture of War.”
Dunmore sent raiding parties to plunder plantations along the James River, York River and Potomac River, which only served to make colonists resent him more.
George Washington wrote:
“I do not think that forcing his lordship (Dunmore) on shipboard is sufficient. Nothing less than depriving him of life or liberty will secure peace to Virginia, as motives of resentment actuate his conduct to a degree equal to the total destruction of that colony.”
Lord Dunmore eventually sailed back to Britain and Patrick Henry became Virginia’s first post-colonial governor.
The situation in Boston escalated with the British bringing thousands of additional troops, led by Admiral Samuel Graves and Generals William Howe, John Burgoyne and Henry Clinton.
General Thomas Gage, who had been Commander-in-Chief in America since Pontiac’s War, was recalled to Britain after the Battle of Bunker Hill and replaced with General William Howe.
On May 31, 1775, citizens of Charlotte Town, North Carolina, passed the Mecklenburg Resolves, officially rejecting allegiance to Britain’s King and Parliament:
“Whereas by an Address presented to his Majesty by both Houses of Parliament in February last, the American Colonies are declared to be in a State of actual Rebellion, we conceive that all Laws … derived from the Authority of the King or Parliament, are annulled and vacated …
All Commissions, civil and military, heretofore granted by the Crown, to be exercised in these Colonies, are null and void,
That whatever Person shall hereafter receive a Commission from the Crown, or attempt to exercise any such Commission heretofore received, shall be deemed an Enemy to his Country …
That these Resolves be in full Force and Virtue, until Instructions from the General Congress of this Province … shall provide otherwise, or the legislative Body of Great-Britain resign its unjust and arbitrary Pretentions with Respect to America …
… That the several Militia Companies in this county do provide themselves with proper Arms and Accoutrements and hold themselves in Readiness to execute the commands and Directions of the Provincial Congress.”
Reposted with permission of American Minute  http://www.AmericanMinute.com

Are You Familiar with the Shurtleff Case? Senator Josh Hawley to Colleen Shogan, Nominated to be National Archivist

Last week, the US. Senate Judiciary Committee held a confirmation hearing for Colleen Shogan nominated by Joe Biden to be National Archivist.  Senator Hawley exposed her as a far-left anti-Christian bigot which is the norm for a Biden nominee for any position in his administration.  She refused to acknowledge her ranting on social media.  In this short clip of the hearing, Hawley asks Shogun if she has heard of the “Shurtleff case?”  Hawley takes her to task for offering legal advice to a friend who complained of religious flags on federal property.

 

Since the 9-0 U.S. Supreme Court decision “Shurtleff v Boston”, Camp Constitution’s lawsuit against the City of Boston, dozens of towns and cities across the United States have banned third party flags which include the Rainbow flag.  USA Today recently ran a story on the subject:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/02/24/pride-flag-ban-lgbtq-symbol-vanishes-more-cities-schools/11325450002/

 

Global Warming Mostly Human Caused or Mostly Natural:Camp Constitution Instructor Dr. Willie Soon’s February 2023 presentation at ICCC15, Florida (USA)

On February 24th, 2023, CERES co-team leader, Dr. Willie Soon presented a talk at the Heartland Institute’s 15th International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC15). His talk was entitled, “Global warming: Mostly human-caused or mostly natural?”

In this talk, he summarized some of the key findings of two of CERES’ recent scientific publications:

  1. P. O’Neill, R. Connolly, M. Connolly, W. Soon, B. Chimani, M. Crok, R. de Vos, H. Harde, P. Kajaba, P. Nojarov, R. Przybylak, D. Rasol, Oleg Skrynyk, Olesya Skrynyk, P. Štěpánek, A. Wypych and P. Zahradníček (2022). Evaluation of the homogenization adjustments applied to European temperature records in the Global Historical Climatology Network dataset. Atmosphere 13(2), 285; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020285. (🗄️)

  2. R. Connolly, W. Soon, M. Connolly, S. Baliunas, J. Berglund, C. J. Butler, R. G. Cionco, A. G. Elias, V. M. Fedorov, H. Harde, G. W. Henry, D. V. Hoyt, O. Humlum, D. R. Legates, S. Lüning, N. Scafetta, J.-E. Solheim, L. Szarka, H. van Loon, V. M. Velasco Herrera, R. C. Willson, H. Yan and W. Zhang (2021). How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/6/131. (🗄️) Supplementary Materials available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7088728.

He also discussed the implications these studies have for the findings of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s recent 6th Assessment Report (AR6, 2021).

The slides for his presentation can be downloaded here in either Powerpoint or PDF format:

Soon23-Feb24-Heartland ICCC15 Talk
.pptx
Download PPTX • 25.29MB
Soon23-Feb24-Heartland ICCC15 Talk
.pdf
Download PDF • 9.95MB

For details on the latest ICCC conference, see https://climateconference.heartland.org/. For access to an archive of all the ICCC conferences since 2008, see https://climateconferences.heartland.org/.

Dr. Soon’s talk can be viewed at the following YouTube link:

(The above article originated on the CERES Science blog https://www.ceres-science.com/post/iccc15
Professor Soon will be  an at Camp Constitution’s 15th Annual Family Camp July 16-21:  https://campconstitution.net/camp-registration/
 

Evolution’s Racism defended by Clarence Darrow: The Monkey Trial & William Jennings Bryan – American Minute with Bill Federer

The Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925 pitted EVOLUTION against CREATION.

Clarence Darrow was the attorney who defended EVOLUTION.
Darrow had previously defended Leopold and Loeb, the teenage homosexual thrill killers who murdered 14-year-old Robert “Bobby” Franks in 1924 just for the excitement.
Darrow obtained a pardon for antifa-type anarchists in 1886 who blew up a pipe bomb in Chicago’s Haymarket, Square, killing 7 policemen and injured 60 others.
A Haymarket Statue was dedicated to the fallen policemen.
The policemen’s Haymarket Statue was blown up by the socialist anarchist group Weather Underground on October 6, 1969, prior to the “Days of Rage” protests.
The statue was rebuilt, but the Weather Underground blew it up again on October 6, 1970.
The Weather Underground’s leaders had a lasting effect, as two of them, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, hosted a meeting in 1995 to launch Barack Obama’s Illinois State Senate Campaign; and another, Eric Mann, trained Patrisse Cullors, a founder of Black Lives Matter.
Clarence Darrow defended the “mentally deranged drifter” Patrick Eugene Prendergast in 1894 who confessed to murdering Chicago mayor Carter H. Harrison, Sr.
Darrow defended socialist organizer Eugene V. Debs, who was prosecuted for instigating the Pullman Railroad Strike which caused 30 deaths, 57 wounded, and $80 million in property damages in 27 states.
Debs founded the Socialist Party of America, which branched off the Communist Party USA in 1919.
Clarence Darrow represented the Western Federation of Miners leaders charged with the 1905 murder of former Idaho Gov. Frank Steunenberg.
In 1911, the American Federation of Labor arranged for Darrow to defend the McNamara brothers.
The McNamara brothers were charged with dynamiting the Los Angeles Times building which killed 21 employees.
Implicated in bribing jurors, Darrow was banned from practicing law in California.
In 1925, Darrow unsuccessfully defended John Scopes, a Tennessee high school biology teacher who taught the theory of origins called “evolution.”
The attorney defending CREATION was the Democrat Party’s three time candidate for President, William Jennings Bryan.
Bryan objected to a tooth being presented as proof of humans evolving from apes.
Later the tooth was found to be that of an extinct peccary (pig).
William Jennings Bryan won the Scopes case on JULY 21, 1925.
Though Darrow lost the trial, a pro-evolution propaganda film was produced in 1960 titled Inherit the Wind.
Professor Alan M. Dershowitz wrote on “The Scopes Trial” in his book America on Trial: Inside the Legal Battles that Transformed Our Nation (eBook Edition: May 2004):
“The popular perception of what transpired in the courtroom comes not from the transcript of the court proceeding itself, but rather from the motion picture … Inherit the Wind.
The William Jennings Bryan character, Scopes’s prosecutor, was a burlesque of know-nothing religious literalism …
… The actual William Jennings Bryan was no simple-minded literalist, and he certainly was no bigot.
He was a great populist who cared deeply about equality and about the downtrodden.
Indeed, one of his reasons for becoming so deeply involved in the campaign against evolution was that Darwin’s theories were being used – misused, it turns out – by racists, militarists, and nationalists to further some pretty horrible programs …”
Dershowitz continued:
“The eugenics movement, which advocated sterilization of ‘unfit’ and ‘inferior’ stock, was at its zenith, and it took its impetus from Darwin’s theory of natural selection.
German militarism, which had just led to the disastrous world war, drew inspiration from Darwin’s ideas on survival of the fittest.
The anti-immigration movement, which had succeeded in closing American ports of entry to ‘inferior racial stock,’ was grounded in a mistaken belief that certain ethnic groups had evolved more fully than others …
… The Jim Crow laws, which maintained racial segregation, were rationalized on grounds of the racial inferiority of blacks.
… Indeed, the very book – Hunter’s Civic Biology – from which John T. Scopes taught Darwin’s theory of evolution to high school students in Dayton, Tennessee, contained dangerous misapplications of that theory …”
Dershowitz added:
“Indeed, its very title, Civic Biology, made it clear that biology had direct political implications for civic society.
In discussing the ‘five races’ of man, the text assured the all-white, legally segregated high school students taught by Scopes that ‘the highest type of all, the Caucasians, (are) represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America.’
The book, the avowed goal of which was the improvement of the future human race, then proposed certain eugenic remedies.”
Eugenic laws, based on evolution, were passed in many states.
Virginia’s eugenic law, in 1924, allowed for the state to sterilize its first victim, Carrie Buck, who was a patient in the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-minded.
A case was brought which went to the Supreme Court.
There, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., gave his infamous Buck v. Bell decision (1927), which continued to allow the sterilization of people without their knowledge or consent, stating: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Because of Holmes’ decision, Virginia continued to sterilize more than 8,000 people until the practice was stopped in 1974.
Holmes also applied evolution to his decision-making philosophy, calling it “legal realism,” letting judges alter laws to adapt to changing social and economic conditions.

Professor Alan Dershowitz continued his critique of the high school textbook used by John Scopes, Hunter’s Civic Biology:
After a discussion of the inheritability of crime and immorality, the author proposed an analogy: …
‘Just as certain animals or plants become parasitic on other plants or animals, these families have become parasitic on society.
They not only do harm to others by corrupting, stealing, or spreading disease, but they are actually protected and cared for by the state out of public money …
They take from society, but they give nothing in return. They are true parasites …'”
Dershowitz added:
“From the analogy flowed ‘the remedy’:
‘If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading.
Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.
Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully in Europe and are now meeting with success in this country.’
… These ‘remedies’ included involuntary sterilizations, and eventually laid the foundation for involuntary ‘euthanasia’ of the kind practiced in Nazi Germany …”
Dershowitz continued:
“Nor were these misapplications of Darwinian theory limited to high school textbooks. Eugenic views held sway at institutions of higher learning such as Harvard University, under racist president Abbot Lawrence Lowell.
Even so distinguished a Supreme Curt justice as Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld a mandatory sterilization law on the basis of a pseudo-scientific assumption about heritability and genetics.
His widely quoted rationale – that ‘three generations of imbeciles are enough’ – was later cited by Nazi apologists for mass sterilization …
… It should not be surprising, therefore, that William Jennings Bryan … would be outraged – both morally and religiously …
The textbook Scopes wanted to teach was … a bad science text, filled with misapplied Darwinism and racist rubbish.”
After the trial, William Jennings Bryan wrote in his summary of the Scopes trial of how science tells us what we can do, religion tells us what we should do:
“Science is a magnificent force, but it is not a teacher of morals. It can perfect machinery, but it adds no moral restraints to protect society from the misuse of the machine.
It can also build gigantic intellectual ships, but it constructs no moral rudders for the control of storm-tossed human vessel.
It not only fails to supply the spiritual element needed but some of its unproven hypotheses rob the ship of its compass and thus endanger its cargo …”
Bryan continued:
“In war, science has proven itself an evil genius; it has made war more terrible than it ever was before.
Man used to be content to slaughter his fellowmen on a single plane, the earth’s surface.
Science has taught him to go down into the water and shoot up from below and to go up into the clouds and shoot down from above, thus making the battlefield three times as bloody as it was before;
but science does not teach brotherly love.
… Science has made war so hellish that civilization was about to commit suicide;
and now we are told that newly discovered instruments of destruction will make the cruelties of the late war seem trivial in comparison with the cruelties of wars that may come in the future …”
Bryan concluded:
“If civilization is to be saved from the wreckage threatened by intelligence not consecrated by love, it must be saved by the moral code of the meek and lowly Nazarene.
His teachings, and His teachings alone, can solve the problems that vex the heart and perplex the world.”
Bryan’s 1925 statement was echoed by Winston Churchill, who stated in 1941:
“But if we fail, then the whole world, including the United States … will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.”

William Jennings Bryan had been a Colonel in the Spanish-American War, a U.S. Representative from Nebraska and U.S. Secretary of State under Democrat President Woodrow Wilson.
Bryan edited the Omaha World Herald and founded The Commoner Newspaper.
Dying five days after the Scopes Trial, William Jennings Bryan was so popular that his statue was placed in the U.S. Capitol’s Statuary Hall by the State of Nebraska and the Post Office issued a $2.00 stamp in his honor.
Bryan gave over 600 public speeches during his Presidential campaigns, with his most famous being “The Prince of Peace,” printed in the New York Times, September 7, 1913, in which he stated:
“I am interested in the science of government but I am more interested in religion …
I enjoy making a political speech … but I would rather speak on religion than on politics.
I commenced speaking on the stump when I was only twenty, but I commenced speaking in the church six years earlier-and I shall be in the church even after I am out of politics …”
Bryan reasoned:
“Tolstoy … declares that the religious sentiment rests not upon a superstitious fear … but upon man’s consciousness of his finiteness amid an infinite universe …
Man feels the weight of his sins and looks for One who is sinless.
Religion has been defined by Tolstoy as the relation which man fixes between himself and his God …
Religion is the foundation of morality in the individual and in the group of individuals …”
Bryan added:
“A religion which teaches personal responsibility to God gives strength to morality.
There is a powerful restraining influence in the belief that an all-seeing eye scrutinizes every thought and word and act of the individual …
One needs the inner strength which comes with the conscious presence of a personal God …”
Bryan stated further:
“I passed through a period of skepticism when I was in college …
The college days cover the dangerous period in the young man’s life; he is just coming into possession of his powers, and feels stronger than he ever feels afterward-and he thinks he knows more than he ever does know.
It was at this period that I became confused by the different theories of creation.
… But I examined these theories and found that they all assumed something to begin with …
A Designer back of the design – a Creator back of the creation;
and no matter how long you draw out the process of creation, so long as God stands back of it you cannot shake my faith in Jehovah …
We must begin with something – we must start somewhere – and the Christian begins with God …”
Bryan continued:
“While you may trace your ancestry back to the monkey … you shall not connect me with your family tree …
The ape, according to this theory, is older than man and yet the ape is still an ape while man is the author of the marvelous civilization which we see about us …
This theory … does not explain the origin of life.
When the follower of Darwin has traced the germ of life back to the lowest form … to follow him one must exercise more faith than religion calls for …”
Bryan explained:
“Those who reject the idea of creation are divided into two schools, some believing that the first germ of life came from another planet and others holding that it was the result of spontaneous generation …
Go back as far as we may, we cannot escape from the creative act, and it is just as easy for me to believe that God created man as he is as to believe that, millions of years ago, He created a germ of life and endowed it with power to develop …”
He added:
“But there is another objection.
The Darwinian theory represents man as reaching his present perfection by the operation of the law of hate – the merciless law by which the strong crowd out and kill off the weak …
I prefer to believe that love rather than hatred is the law of development …”
William Jennings Bryan concluded:
“Science has disclosed some of the machinery of the universe, but science has not yet revealed to us the great secret — the secret of life.
It is to be found in every blade of grass, in every insect, in every bird and in every animal, as well as in man.
Six thousand years of recorded history and yet we know no more about the secret of life than they knew in the beginning …
If the Father deigns to touch with divine power the cold and pulseless heart of the buried acorn and to make it burst forth from its prison walls, will he leave neglected in the earth the soul of man, made in the image of his Creator? …
The Gospel of the Prince of Peace gives us the only hope that the world has.”

Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt stated in an address at the Memorial to William Jennings Bryan, May 3, 1934:
“No selfish motive touched his public life; he held important office only as a sacred trust of honor from his country …
To Secretary Bryan political courage was not a virtue to be sought or attained, for it was an inherent part of the man.
He chose his path not to win acclaim but rather because that path appeared clear to him from his inmost beliefs.
He did not have to dare to do what to him seemed right; he could not do otherwise …”
Franklin Roosevelt continued:
“It was my privilege to know William Jennings Bryan when I was a very young man.
Years later both of us came to the Nation’s capital to serve under the leadership of Woodrow Wilson …
It was Mr. Bryan who said: ‘I respect the aristocracy of learning, I deplore the plutocracy of wealth but I thank God for the democracy of the heart.’
Many years ago he also said: ‘You may dispute over whether I have fought a good fight; you may dispute over whether I have finished my course; but you cannot deny that I have kept the faith.’
We who are assembled here today to accept this memorial in the capital of the Republic can well agree that he fought a good fight; that he finished his course; and that he kept the faith.”

—

American Minute is a registered trademark of William J. Federer. Permission granted to forward, reprint, or duplicate.
(Camp Constitution reposted this with permission from American Minute)

The Weekly Sam: The Miracle of Alpha-Phonics A Teacher’s Testimonial by Paul Lukawski

(Mr. Lukawski wrote this testimonial of Sam Blumenfeld’s Alpha-Phonics in May of 2008)

 

I have been a high school English teacher for 14 years. I remember in college wanting to know how to teach children to read. I went to a teacher college established in 1910. The school had one of the oldest teachers colleges in the country. Its College of Education enjoyed an excellent reputation. I asked three different professors how do you teach reading I received three different vague responses. After I completed my second year of teaching. I realized that my students could not read. I taught grades nine through twelve. The second year, I had three classes of ninth graders. I assigned the novel To Kill a Mockingbird for them to read. I rea1ized that most of my students could not read the novel’s literate narrative.

It was during this time that I heard Samuel Blumenfeld interviewed on shortwave radio. At this time the Rodney King verdict had come in and there was rioting in the streets of LA. He said that the reason the people were rioting was that they did not have jobs. They did not have jobs because they were illiterate. He said you could tell they were illiterate by listening to lyrics of the songs they listened to and by the way they talked. I was intrigued by what he said because it verified my experience as a high school teacher. He then said the schools were at fault because of the way they taught reading. I was again intrigued because of my experience in college trying to determine how to teach children to read. I was never taught it in college. Mr. Blumenfeld had made two provocative statements on the radio, but I knew them to be true because of my personal experience. I then decided to buy a couple of his books, including Alpha-Phonics.

My third year of teaching, I had a class of ninth graders that consisted of the worst performing students in the school These students were in the dropout prevention program.  They were waiting until they turned sixteen to drop out of school.  I teach in our state’s poorest county and our district at that time had a high dropout rate. Also in the class were several students from Mexico and one from Haiti. These students were speakers of other languages (ESOL). Their only problem was that they had a limited understanding of English. Every day in the class was a struggle with disruptive behavior; and if I could finish class without one being sent to the office for discipline problems, I considered it a success. The students had chronic discipline problems; they had trouble with the law, and every problem you could imagine.

After two months of getting absolutely nowhere with the students, I decided that I would try an experiment. I was going to use Alpha-Phonics beginning with lesson one to teach those that wanted to learn how to read.  I told the class that those that wanted to learn would sit on this side of the and those that did not were to sit on the opposite side of the room. The only rule was a student could not interfere with the Alpha-Phonics lessons.  Until this time, everyone sat scattered around the back of the room, as I did not have a seating chart.

Any student, when given the option, would not sit in the front of the room with the teacher. The stage being set, I began the first day by reading the directions from the “Teachers Manual” to Alpha-Phonics and beginning with lesson one. I wondered what response I would get. I was shocked by the response of the students. Nothing could have prepared me for what happened. If someone had told me what would happen, I would not have believed them. With the exception of a few students who sat on the other side of the room because they did not want to participate, all of the students followed along as I wrote the lessons on the board. I would write the lesson on the board,   read it out loud, and then have them read. The students leaned forward in their desks and followed along. The next day the students all sat in the front of the room. Everyone would raise their band and want to read. Indeed, after the first few days, the students would fuss among themselves to read out aloud. They fought over who could write the lessons on the board. Everyone wanted to read aloud. Everyone sat in front of the room. There were no discipline problems. The entire class had been transformed. I had discovered a disturbing truth.

We worked through the book; and about halfway through the book, we began reading Sounder and The Old Man and the Sea.  One youth in the class who could not read, and who had been a behavior problem told me that every night he would sit with his dad as his dad read the sports section of the papers.  He said he always wanted to read the paper with his dad, but he could not because he did not know how to read. A few weeks after starting Alpha-Phonics, he entered the class one day and told me that as he was driving down the road be began to sound out the words on the signs. He was excited because he was never able to do that before.

We had started Alpha-Phonics in October and the semester ended in December. I would not be seeing the students anymore. We had completed about three-fourths of the book and read the two novels. I would begin each class by doing about 15 minutes of Alpha Phonics and then read from the novels. The students were eager and well behaved.  The youth who began reading the signs told me that in evening he could now sit with his dad and read the sports section along with him. They would talk. about what they had read. Three Spanish-speaking students learned English this way.

The following year, I tried another experiment. I had one student who was identified as having ADD/ADHD. He was notorious. He was a ninth grader. This was his first year at our school. I had another student who was in trouble with the dean’s office constantly. I gave both of them Sam’s Blumenfeld Oral Reading Test (BORAT), and they scored between the Ist and second grade levels. I made an arrangement with other teachers to have both students come to my class fifteen minutes while I did an Alpha-Phonics lesson with them. Because I began in August, I was able to finish the whole book with them by Christmas.

I gave both students the BORAT test. One boy had doubled his reading score, and the other was close behind him. The boy with ADO/ ADHD was never antsy or hyperactive when he was working on the lesson.  He was a completely different child when he was with me. Indeed, his teacher would often allow him to stay the whole hour with me because he had many behavior problems in her class. He never bad a behavior problem when working on Alpha-Phonics, neither did the other child who was constantly getting into fights and being When these two youngsters worked on Alpha-Phonics with me they were different children.

The following year, I worked with some other children. I had developed a system where I would set aside ten minutes each class period and do a few lessons while the rest of the class would work: quietly on their own at their desks. I would use the BORAT to Identify the illiterates in my class. I would then ask them if they bad ever had an A in English. Invariably they would say, “‘No.” I would ask them if they would want one. They would say, “Yes.” I then would say that all they had to do was work with me for ten minutes a day on Alpha-Phonics until we were done with the book. When we were done with the book, I would choose several pages at random for them to read from. If they could read the pages to me., they would receive an A.  I told them that that was all they had to worry about in the class as I was not interested in what they did regarding the usual course work.

That was the incentive I offered them. It was up to them. One youth had failed the ninth grade and was taking his ninth-grade English class over again with me. He was also taking his tenth-grade English class. His tenth-grade class met next door to mine first period. He would then come to my class second period. His tenth-grade teacher was the same one he took the year before, the class, which he had failed. He was working ten minutes a day on Alpha-Phonics for several weeks, when one day the door that communicated between my room and the neighboring room opened. It was his tenth-grade teacher. She called me over to her and asked what it was I was doing with him. I told her Alpha-Phonics. She said, “Look!” The whole class was watching Channel One and chatting. It was during homeroom. The whole class, except this youth, who was busy reading a book I had given him. The teacher was flabbergasted. She knew he was illiterate and could not believe that he was able to read.

One day I was working with this boy at my desk when we had a new student enter the class. He had just been released from a juvenile detention. He knew the youth I was working with and sat by him as we worked together. He was curious about what we were doing,  and I explained it to him. He said that he could not read either. He explained that he started having trouble reading in the third grade. He said that when the time came to read aloud be would intentionally get into trouble so he would be sent to the office so that he would not have to read. He could not take the embarrassment. He did not want anyone to know that he could not read.  The boy I was working with chimed in and said that he was the same way. They both recounted events when they would get into trouble on purpose so they could avoid reading. They would even start fistfights. The boy who had been in juvenile detention was sent there because be had set fire to the junior high school.

The following year, I had finally established my regular ten-minute routine in my class, and every year after that I would have students who would participate. One year, I was in a staffing meeting for a boy who was labeled as a special education student with learning disabilities. The special education staffer, whom I had never met before asked me what I was doing with the boy. The reason she asked is that she was with the boy’s science teacher when the science teacher had reported that the boy began volunteering to read aloud. The science teacher was astonished. We Iive in a small community and the teacher had known the boy ever since kindergarten, and had known that he could not read, thus the placement in the special education program: Here he was volunteering to read aloud in her class.  I told them what it was I was doing.

There is one case that haunts me. I had a big strapping youth who was seventeen years old. He had failed ninth and tenth grade English because he could not read.  He was in my ninth-grade English class. I had given him the BORAT test, and he was at about the 1-2 grade level: A typical case. We began working ten minutes a day. After a month I gave him the book Sounder, and he told me he was reading it at home. We were about halfway through the book when he no longer showed up in my class. I learned that he had moved away. I do not know if he ever completely learned how to read. He was a decent well-mannered youth who would show up ever day, was polite and carried a big stack of books with him. He was waiting for someone to teach him to read.

My daughter was born in 1996. I remember seeing the little girl read in the Hooked-on Phonics commercials and wished my daughter could read like her. When she was two, I began to teach her how to read during my summer vacation. She would take naps then, and I followed the advice in the teacher’s manual. I set up a routine. Every day, before she took be- nap, we would sit together. Following Sam’s advice, I appealed to be- intellect. I said, “”It is time for our lessons.” I began by following the alphabet pre-reading exercise in the back of the book. Again, following Mr. Blumenfeld’s advice, I did not pressure her or scold her, regardless of her behavior. Some days, she would kick at the book and giggle. I would say, “You did a good job today!” And I put the book away. We would continue tomorrow. It went on like this for several months. When school started again, she would do the lessons with me before we went to bed. She enjoyed the routine and the lessons.

One evening, while my wife was in the room, she took out the book on her own and began reading from lesson two: “”Am, Sam, Hear the S sound,” she said Then, – “Sam Sal” – etc. My wife could not believe it. “Did she memorize those words?” She asked. “No,” l replied, and then explained the method. When she was three, we were driving down the road when she said, “Look Momma,” pointing to a sign, “‘Marshal’s, there is your store.’ My wife could not believe it. When she was three, there was one occasion when our daughter was at Sunday school. Her teachers were arguing over whether or not she was reading the colors on the crayons. ‘”She’s memorized them,” said one. “‘No, she is reading them,” said the other. The colors she was reading were purple~ fuchsia and magenta; Magenta was her favorite. The spring before my daughter began kindergarten, she could read fluently any word in front of her.

We were at a spring festival when my daughter and her friend bought soft drinks. My daughter” read the inside of the cap, which told whether or not you had won a prize advertised on the side of the can. My daughter read the label effortlessly, which included the words vacation and discovery. “‘She is a genius!” exclaimed the father. My daughter’s friend asked her dad to read the soft drink label to her. I told the girl’s father that his daughter could read if he used Alpha-Phonics with her. I said, “‘Follow the lesson manual and be patient, do not pressure your child, as Mr. Blumenfeld says, and in a year or so she will be like my daughter.” That fall I saw the girl’s parents and asked how she was doing. He said his daughter had not really taken to the book yet. (His daughter” had just started kindergarten, as mine had.). “Be patient and keep going. ”

Meanwhile, my daughter” was reading at 2nd grade level; and during kindergarten reading time, she would go to a second-grade class for reading instruction. The following year I saw the girl’s dad again and asked him how she was doing in first grade. He said that his daughter was reading at a second-grade level and was being tested for gifted and talented. Meanwhile my daughter entered the first grade and soon afterwards was referred to the gifted and talented program. She won the spelling bee and Math bash just as she did in kindergarten. I used Samuel Blumenfeld’s “How-to-Tutor” to instruct her in math. In second grade, she read at the seventh-grade level~ won all of the reading, spelling and math prizes and was elected to the school’s hall of fame.  She has had straight A’s in every class. She learned to read with Alpha-phonics and learned math with How-to-Tutor.

While my daughter was in first grade, I was asked to sit on a parent teacher committee. While on the committee, the mayor of our town complained to the principal that be bad been on the committee for three years and that the committee was always talking about doing something outside of the box when it came to improving the school’s reading scores. Regardless of what the committee did to improve reading scores., they were always the same. The principal said that he was open for suggestions outside of the box. No one had any suggestions, so I said that I was familiar with the method of reading instruction in the public schools and that was what was at fault.  I said that I had a method that worked better. Indeed, I said that I drop my daughter- off at school at 7:30, I could walk into any class, give a ten-minute lesson and still arrive at the high school where I teach in time to sign in a 8:00 am. I said that if anyone doubted me, I get a paycheck every two weeks with a comma in it.  Let us put it on the table and keep the tourists out. I wanted to let them know my intentions were serious.

They took me up on the offer, and a first-year teacher volunteered her class. I began the first Monday after spring break. I only had six weeks to work with the children. I made transparencies of the Alpha-Phonics lessons and followed the teacher’s manual I only did a ten-minute lesson. The teacher combined her bottom ~ students with the reading teacher’s bottom students. After two weeks, the mother of one of the children approached me. She said, “‘I am glad you are working with my daughter. A while bad the school called me up to their office and told me there was something wrong with my daughter. She had a learning disability.”  I cried for two days,” she said I told her not to listen to anything the schools told her, to be patient and to watch what happens. A week after school was over, I saw the mother again and I asked her how her daughter was doing. She said that the school had called her up again and told her that they had given her daughter an end of the year reading test showing that she had a 40% improvement in her reading: they and were going to put her into an advanced class.

The following year, I was asked to do the project again with a first-grade class. I worked ten minutes each morning. I was only able to complete three-fourths of the book. The school’s diagnostic test revealed that of the children who were able to complete the project successfully, not one had a reading disability. The makers of the diagnostic test said that you could expect 20% of the children to have reading disabilities.

I once was explaining to a student why children have reading problems. When I finished, a girl from the other side of the class, who I thought was not listening, said, “This is what happened to my brother. He is in the fourth grade, hates to read and gets stomach aches and headaches.” I told her that his troubles were over and gave her a copy of Alpha Phonics.  Four months later, I asked how her brother was doing. She said be completed the book and reads just fine. I had the same success with students in special education, who were labeled as learning disabled or educatable mentally retarded. I have 100% per cent success with every student.

The only variable is the speed at which students progress. You must follow Dr. Blumenfeld’s advice and be patient. Do not pressure the child. I have many other- heartbreaking stories about children who have quit school because they did not know how to read, and no one will teach them. I have had children take a copy of Alpha-Phonics and keep it to teach friends they know, how to read. I encourage everyone to try Alpha-Phonics. The results you see in the child are truly miraculous. It must be seen to be believed.

(Copies of Sam’s Alpha-Phonics are available from our on-line shop:  http://mpconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-by-sam-blumenfeld/   And, afree-donations accepted-PDF version is available here: https://campconstitution.net/product/alpha-phonics-workbook/

To sign up for Sam’s archive:  https://campconstitution.net/sam-blumenfeld-archive/