Listen (text to speech)![]()

![]()
Download as PDF …
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
(This is from Liberty Counsel http://www.lc.org
Under Gov. Janet Mills, Maine has become one of the most anti-Christian states in the nation. In fact, Liberty Counsel has sued this particular governor more than any other governor in the Union! And the only state we have sued more often in our 36-year history is California.
But even CA Gov. Gavin Newsom learned the hard way, during the COVID shutdowns, that Liberty Counsel will not allow anti-God governments to discriminate against Christians. But the State of Maine has somehow missed the message.
The anti-God political machine running the Pine Tree State seems bent on eradicating Christianity from the state.
ONE church appears to be “ground zero” for Maine’s anti-Christian attacks — Calvary Chapel.
Liberty Counsel is fighting back.
Maine has a rich religious history. Catholic missionaries arrived in the state in 1604. The first Christian mass in all of New England was held on Maine’s Swan Island in 1611.
During the colonial years, the Puritans, followed by the Congregationalists, dominated Maine. The colony even required towns to fund a Congregational church and minister. Methodists, Baptists, and Freewill Baptists arrived in the 18th century, and Jews soon followed at the end of the 19th century.
But fast-forward to the 21st century and Maine is tied with Vermont for being “the least religious state” in the nation.
Since being targeted by Gov. Mills’ unconstitutional COVID lockdowns on churches, Calvary Chapel of Bangor has birthed six churches spanning the sparsely populated state. Pastor Ken Graves and Calvary Chapel are working to change Maine’s spiritual landscape by sharing the gospel and transforming broken people. But an anti-God governor and a league of similarly minded bureaucrats is doing their darndest to try to stop the revival happening in Maine.
During the COVID shutdowns, ME Gov. Janet Mills threatened to throw the participants in Calvary Chapel Bangor’s drug rehabilitation program in prison if they read the Bible and prayed together during Mills’ unlawful church shutdowns. Mills ordered that the group could meet, so long as they DID NOT read the Bible or pray.
Liberty Counsel took Mills and Maine to court, and Mills and her crew had to end her outrageous restrictions on churches and places of worship.
In 2022, Maine lost again, this time at the U.S. Supreme Court when the state allowed vouchers for any schools — except Christian schools. The High Court ruled Maine’s law unconstitutional.
Then, a Maine state family court judge banned a member of Calvary Chapel from taking her own daughter to church. The judge cited the opinion of a Marxist California professor in declaring that churches are “cults.”
Liberty Counsel has taken up this case on appeal, and continues to fight for this born-again Christian mother and her daughter’s right to attend the church of their choice.
Now, the University of Maine System is refusing to sell an excess university property to the highest bidder solely because the winning bidder is a Christian church. That church is Calvary Chapel Belfast.
Liberty Counsel is taking Maine back to court again…and we intend to win.
Don’t let anti-God governors and bureaucrats silence the gospel! Support our legal fund today!
I don’t know what Gov. Mills and the anti-God political machine running Maine have against Calvary Chapel’s network of churches, which extend from the cold shores of Portland through the Highlands and right to the St. Crois Valley, which borders Canada. Maybe it’s because Calvary Chapel is saving so many souls, bringing lost people back into Christ’s flock.
What I do know is that discrimination against Christians and churches is against the law.
Liberty Counsel will not stop fighting until the State of Maine stops attacking Christians and their churches.
For over 35 years, Liberty Counsel has been defending life, religious freedom, and the natural family. We’ve won 37 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and thousands of others before state courts and the U.S. Courts of Appeal.
We NEVER charge for our work because most people — and churches — could not afford to defend themselves against anti-Christian governors and governments. Our clients rely on YOU, the faithful Liberty Counsel supporter, to ensure liberty remains free.
A generous supporter has established a special Challenge Grant to support our work. But that grant only kicks in when you do. Every donation made to our legal fund today will be DOUBLED in impact. Even recurring monthly donations will be doubled for the duration of the grant! Please, help us defend the faith with your generous gift today.
Mat Staver
Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel
TAKE ACTION
Even a small recurring monthly donation would be incredibly helpful in defending life, religious liberty, and the natural family, AND that recurring donation will be DOUBLED in impact for the duration of the Challenge Grant!
Sources:
“Catholic Sites in Maine.” Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland. Accessed March 3, 2025. Portlanddiocese.org/catholic-sites-maine.
Hatlen, Burton, Joshua M. Smith, Peter Lodge, and Michael Hermann. “A Sampler from the New Historical Atlas of Maine: Religion in Maine.” Maine Policy Review 11.1 (2002): 48 -57, Digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mpr/vol11/iss1/11.
“Least Religious States 2023.” Wisevoter. Accessed March 3, 2025. Wisevoter.com/state-rankings/least-religious-states.
Judd, Richard. “Religion on Maine’s Frontier.” Maine History Online. Accessed March 3, 2025. Mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/825/page/1235/display.
“The History of Our Presbyterate.” Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland. Accessed March 3, 2025. Portlanddiocese.org/vocations/history-our-presbyterate.
1944? FDR “A Struggle to Preserve our Republic June 6 our Religion & our Civilization” What led up to D-Day
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In socialist countries, a person’s life is only of worth if it benefits the state:
![]()
![]()

![]()
The following is from a description of Sam’s book on Amazon:
When Sam Blumenfeld was finishing his 1984 book on the NEA his manuscript was refused by all publishers. Reason: They all believed he and they would be dragged into court frivolously by the NEA Union to prevent him form getting his extensive research in the book out into the public. In other words, publishers were being intimidated by the powerful Teacher’s Union. Finally, he found a brave small group who formed a new publishing company and risked everything to get his blockbuster revelations into print. Fortunately, the NEA was more busy at that time dealing with newly elected Ronald Reagan and his administration to bother squashing Sam’s publisher. The rest is history: the book sold tens of thousands of copies and was in print for many years. It was, and still is, the seminal book on the professional group which ultimately dropped all pretenses of being devoted only to the kids and their education. As recently as 2009 the NEA’s top attorney, Bob Channin [July 9, 2009, NEA Representative Assembly, San Diego] in a speech to his members, stated in effect that the interests of the members came ahead of the interest of the kids.
“Although this book was first published in 1984, everything in it is as relevant today as when it was first published. If anything, the NEA has simply moved even further to the left than it was back them. It has simply adopted all of the politically correct trends of the far left. The history behind all of this has not changed. Thus, the NEA’s influence in American education as a force of the left is still a fact that parents of children in the public schools must deal with.” — Samuel L. Blumenfeld – Preface to 2011 Edition
Here is a link to a free PDF version of the book:
http://blumenfeld.campconstitution.net/Books/NEA-Trojan%20Horse%20In%20American%20Education.pdf

![]()

“Mad Anthony” Wayne fought at Brandywine in 1777, then harassed British General Howe as his troops marched towards Pennsylvania.

In 1778, Wayne attacked at the Battle of Monmouth.
![]()

In July of 1779, when General George Washington asked if he could capture Stony Point, New York, Wayne replied:
![]()

Wayne then led a well-planned and executed stealth, bayonet-only night attack and captured Stony Point.
![]()

When the Pennsylvania Line of the Continental Army threatened mutiny for being paid with worthless “continental currency,” Wayne was able to keep the army together.
Wayne led Lafayette’s forces in the 1781 Green Springs action and led a bayonet charge against British Lord Cornwallis’ troops in Virginia.
![]()

After the Revolution, Wayne was recalled by Washington to fight a British and Indian confederacy in the Battle of Fallen Timbers, 1794.
![]()

![]()

![]()

![]()

![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()

He played football for University of Southern California. and worked behind-the-scenes at Fox Studios.
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()



![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

On May 26, 1979, the U.S. Congress awarded him the Congressional Gold Medal.

![]()
A Harris Poll, January 2011, ranked John Wayne third among America’s favorite film stars.

![]()
![]()

Ronald Reagan said November 5, 1984:
![]()

John Wayne stated in a 1971 interview:
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
In 1868, General John A. Logan, commander of the Civil War veterans’ organization “The Grand Army of the Republic,” called for a Decoration Day to be observed annually on May 30.

![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

One soldier was Orval William Epperson.
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

On June 6, 1944 President Franklin Roosevelt offered a D-Day Prayer, which is now part of the World War II Memorial in Washington, D.C., thanks to the effort led by Chris Long of the Ohio Christian Alliance, as documented in his book For Their Honor:
“My fellow Americans: … I ask you to join with me in prayer:
Almighty God, Our sons, pride of our Nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion, and our civilization …
Give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith. They will need Thy blessings. Their road will be long and hard. For the enemy is strong. He may hurl back our forces …
We know that by Thy grace, and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph … Some will never return. Embrace these, Father, and receive them, Thy heroic servants, into Thy kingdom.”
In 1958, President Eisenhower placed soldiers in the tomb from World War II and the Korean War.
![]()

In 1998, Michael Blassie’s remains were reburied at Jefferson Memorial Cemetery, St. Louis, Missouri.
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()

![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
This is a classic. We are not sure of its origination, but it clearly points out the how wasteful government programs have been over the years.
Honorable Secretary of Agriculture
Washington, D.C.
Dear Sir;
My friend, Ed Peterson, over at Wells Iowa,
received a check for $1,000 from the government for not
raising hogs. So, I want to go into the “not raising
hogs” business next year.
What I want to know is, in your opinion, what is the
best kind of farm not to raise hogs on, and what is the
best breed of hogs not to raise? I want to be sure that
I approach this endeavor in keeping with all
governmental policies. I would prefer not to raise
razorbacks, but if that is not a good breed not to
raise, then I will just as gladly not raise Yorkshires
or Poland Chinas.
As I see it, the hardest part of this program will be in
keeping an accurate inventory of how many hogs I haven’t
raised.
My friend, Peterson, is very joyful about the future of
the business. He has been raising hogs for twenty years
or so, and the best he ever made on them was $422 in
1968, until this year when he got your check for $1000
for not raising hogs.
If I get $1000 for not raising 50 hogs, will I get $2000
for not raising 100 hogs? I plan to operate on a small
scale at first, holding myself down to about 4000 hogs
not raised, which will mean about $80,000 the first
year. Then I can afford an airplane.
Now another thing, these hogs I will not raise will not
eat 100,000 bushels of corn. I understand that you also
pay farmers for not raising corn and wheat. Will I
qualify for payments for not raising wheat and corn not
to feed the 4000 hogs I am not going to raise?
Also, I am considering the “not milking cows” business,
so send me any information you have on that too.
In view of these circumstances, you understand that I
will be totally unemployed and plan to file for
unemployment and food stamps.
Be assured you will have my vote in the coming election.
And a video of this letter read by Peter Grace:
This is a news release from Camp Constitution instructor Professor Willie Soon:
A groundbreaking study published in Science of Climate Change challenges the validity and reliability of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) climate models, the projections from which underpin the Paris Climate Agreement and the adoption of “Net Zero” policies.
The research by Dr. Kesten C. Green—a forecasting expert at the University of South Australia and co-author of The Scientific Method: A Guide to Finding Useful Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, 2022)—and astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon of the Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, Hungary, found models that included the IPCC’s anthropogenic (human causation) variable failed badly in temperature forecasting comparisons with models that included independent measures of variation in the Sun’s radiation, and even with forecasts that the temperature would be the same as the historical average.
The study, titled “Are Climate Model Forecasts Useful for Policy Making? Effect of Variable Choice on Reliability and Predictive Validity,” tested alternative hypotheses on causes of temperature change in the form of models that included the IPCC anthropogenic variable—mainly carbon dioxide emissions—with and without the IPCC preferred solar variable, and two models with independent solar variables. The models were used to forecast annual Northern Hemisphere land temperature averages with and without urban temperatures—the latter to avoid heat island effects—for various subsets of temperature data from 1850 to 2018.
The results were striking: Models using the IPCC anthropogenic and solar variables produced forecast errors as large as 4°C in forecasting Northern Hemisphere land temperatures that had not been used in estimating the models, and as large as 20°C in forecasting rural temperatures. The independent solar variable models’ errors were mostly much less than 1°C in forecasting the all-land temperatures, and almost always much less than 1°C in forecasting the rural temperatures.
The authors found that while the independent solar variables individually exhibited relationships consistent with physical causality—temperatures tending to increase as solar irradiance increases—that was not the case with the IPCC variables. The IPCC solar variable hardly changed over the 1850 to 2018 period, and higher temperatures were associated with lower irradiance from 1970, a time when fears of a new ice age were replaced by fears of global warming. In a challenge to physics, the IPCC anthropogenic variable similarly failed to exhibit a relationship with temperature prior to 1970 but displayed a strong positive relationship thereafter.
Dr. Green emphasized the policy implications: “Our findings suggest that IPCC modelling fails to support the hypothesis that human carbon dioxide emissions have a meaningful impact on global temperatures. Uncomfortable as it may be for policy makers, unpredictable and uncontrollable variations in radiation from the Sun and volcanic eruptions will continue to determine changes in the Earth’s climate. Policies that deny that reality cannot avoid imposing great costs on the many, to the benefit of very few”.
|
For More Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

