Over the last few years, we’ve been more grateful to the Lord than ever for our Constitution that stands between us and Tyranny. But our Constitution is only as strong as the People who enforce it and honor it. This Thanksgiving, I’d like to stop and thank God for the gift of those who stood and still do stand strong… YOU.
From my friend American citizen Hal Shurtleff fighting to maintain the freedom to fly the Christian flag over Boston, and WINNING 9-0 in the United States Supreme Court (2) to Wauwatosa Wisconsin employees speaking out and engaging Liberty Counsel to fight for their freedom to display religious decor and even decorate with red and green (3) and WINNING (the city quickly backed down in a memo that employees are “free to decorate in the manner they have historically decorated…”), we must be ever vigilant.
Founding Father & author of The Declaration of Independence, President Thomas Jefferson instructed We the People,
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”
The attacks on our freedom are varied and vast, even against our right to live. Where would we be today if not for you:
For every prayer warrior, sometimes with fasting, who battled on their knees in the spiritual realm for the ensuing victories God wrought through others in the physical realm;
For every person who recognized the stronghold of CMS hospital protocols and suspected that the windfall of the financial payoffs of salivating hospital board rooms were not in the best interests of the patient;
For every doctor and nurse that rose and continues to rise against the dictates of bureaucracy choosing to risk loss and license in order to save our countrymen’s lives;
For every pharmacist who filled life saving prescriptions that were banned by health authorities at the cost of their job;
For every chiropractor or naturopath who kept us out of the hospital killing fields with immune boosting supplements and warnings, and every patient who heard their truth and pulled Remdesivir IV’s out of their arms and walked out of the hospitals alive, kidneys intact;
For every soldier who took their oath seriously to defend America from all enemies both foreign and domestic, recognizing the enemy within, and sacrificed pensions and vocations, risked being court martialed or dishonorably discharged to protect us;
For every sheriff who stood against mandates in his jurisdiction and directed the police to stand down and not jail those who walked free, breathed free, and continued to live their God-given, Constitutionally protected lives;
For every attorney or judge who stood strong and even won against the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, and the NIAID, against threats, bribes, and media bashing;
For every governor or legislator who wasn’t on a power trip and who remembered he answers, not to his handlers, but to We the People, and stepped up to safeguard constitutional laws that protect our rights, not to trample them by writing or approving new socialist legislation that benefits unelected bureaucrats;
For every voter across the political spectrum who fights for an honest vote, knowing that a representative Republic cannot long endure without the integrity of the ballot box;
For every constitutional candidate who faces the lion’s den of modern opinion, rabid media, and financial loss to risk his reputation and sometimes even his safety in order to obtain a chance to serve the people and defend and uphold our Constitutional Republic;
For every pastor that has risen to once again be the black-robed regiment of yesteryear, preaching from the pulpits that our rights come from our Creator and to stand strong in the evil day, calling hearts to revival. Some pastors who were even jailed/fined for refusing to shut their church’s doors, others who reopened quickly, in contrast to the yellow bellied who rolled over, shuttering their churches for nearly a year, enforced every mandate, and even became the arm of the government in hosting covid injection facilities;
For every official or ‘citizen’ news reporter who chose instead to communicate facts not propaganda, science not psychosis, and let the consequences come in exchange for the saving of even one life;
For every teacher who refused to indoctrinate our youth with corruption;
For every parent who fought for their kids at school board meetings, earning them the label of ‘domestic terrorist’ from the FBI, and still others who made whatever sacrifices they had to in order to pull their kids out of the government schools;
For every person who said NO in the face of the most pressurized worldwide, nationwide, statewide, company wide campaign for masks, “vaccines” and “vaccine” passports, refusing to comply to the animal training of standing on circles; sterilized socialization, and most of all, the personal invasion of experimentation on our very bodies;
We salute you, we thank you.
We are only as strong as each other. For we must fight for freedom together in numbers, for We the People are many more than those who seek to enslave us. They haven’t given up; neither can we.
How long has it been since you heard what President George Washington said about establishing Thanksgiving?
“Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor—and whereas both Houses of Congress have by their joint Committee requested me ‘to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness.’” Read the rest here (3)
Have a Happy Thanksgiving!
Feel free to forward if you have someone in your life you’d like to thank
Honestly, I’m surprised that it would be just another variant of Covid that they would attempt to lock Americans down for, haven’t they already beaten that cow to death?!? How much more mileage can covid “crisis” give them? I know it’s been in the works for decades according to the patents, so I guess they’re going to milk it – but only as far as Americans will allow them to.
John Zingsheim walked into a Wisconsin hospital in the Aurora Health Care system. He was not life-flighted or on a stretcher, but walked in, and tested positive for Covid. Within 10 minutes, the doctor told him, “Mr. Zingsheim, you’re going to die,” and placed him into the CMS (Medicare/Medicaid) hospital Covid protocol (aka “NIH protocol”). Without John’s knowledge or permission, they gave him remdesivir for two days before he called his family, “I think I’m in trouble, can you help me?”
This protocol for John included unproven Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) drugs baricitinib (causes blood clots and Sepsis, and says not to give it for upper respiratory infections) and remdesivir (which is toxic to the liver and kidneys).
John’s Power of Attorney (POA), his nephew Allen Gahl, demanded he be taken off the injurious drugs. Nevertheless, another effort at giving remdesivir to him was attempted, but according to my interview with the Gahls, they caught it on his charts and were able to stop it in time. John and his POA requested life-saving treatments ivermectin and high dose IV Vitamin C, but the hospital refused. The Gahls informed me, “On the Statutory HCPOA [Healthcare Power of Attorney] Form used by hospitals, which comes from Statute 155, it also requires the hospital to give ‘necessary treatments’ requested by the POA, but these were denied John.”
Under the the hospital’s protocol treatment, John’s kidneys failed, he was on dialysis, he had had Sepsis multiple times, and he was dying on the ventilator.
The hospital sent a hospice team to each family member trying to convince them to “pull the plug” on John, stating there was nothing more they could do at that point since they were claiming he had Multiple Organ System Failure, including his kidneys, and his lungs were scarred. They told them he would never be able to return to a livable quality of life. The family sought help from the legal system, and refused to end John’s life. And the hospital refused to give him ivermectin, even though he was dying.
Aurora argued that when a medical treatment falls beneath their standard of care for patient safety, then the court has no right to intervene for the patient.
The Waukesha Circuit Court was of a different opinion and granted the request of the family to have their Power of Attorney Statute upheld, and approved an outside doctor going into the hospital to administer the ivermectin to him.
The family rejoiced and they signed away any liability to the hospital for him receiving ivermectin, and the outside doctor was made ready. While the willing doctor was getting in the car to go to John to administer the ivermectin, the Appeals Court paused the order and took the case. So in effect, the outside doctor was barred admittance to administer the POA-requested Ivermectin.
Eventually the Appeals Court ruled that the Waukesha Circuit Court erred in their decision (to honor the POA and give this dying man the ivermectin in an attempt to save his life).
Beginning in October of 2021, people across Wisconsin protested for John’s life in front of the Aurora hospital in Oconomowoc. Christians across America prayed. Through a series of miraculous events, John Zingsheim shared, he was secretly given ivermectin, and with all the prayers going up on his behalf, beat the odds and survived the CMS protocol and the hospital’s “treatment” for over 10 months, more than 100 of those days on the ventilator.
Since many people have sadly died on the ventilator within 10 days, it is beyond astounding that John survived over 100 days on it. Today John is breathing on his own with a little help from supplemental oxygen, and his kidneys have both healed and come back to full function.
Having protested for him, prayed for him, cried for him, wrote about him, asked others to pray for him, it was such an honor to recently meet him, and surreal to talk with him, to converse with someone God fought for.
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin
On Tuesday, January 17, 2023, John Zingsheim’s court case, Allen Gahl v Aurora Health Care Inc., came before the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Attorney Karen L. Mueller, founder of the Amos Center for Justice and Liberty, presented oral arguments on his behalf.
The courtroom was very full, including people in attendance whose loved ones had tragically died within Wisconsin hospitals, and who firmly believe their loved ones’ deaths were the result of the CMS protocol they were placed on.
These were Attorney Karen Mueller’s opening remarks:
This Court need not decide which form of treatment for Covid is best. Rather it is simply called upon to ensure that the Wisconsin Healthcare Power of Attorney Statute is properly interpreted so that the rights it proclaims are not merely suggestions that hospitals can ignore at their pleasure.
We ask this Court to reverse the Appeals Court Decision that changed the intention of the Legislature and effectively gutted the rights of patients protected by the WI Healthcare Power of Attorney, Wisconsin Statute 155. This statute declares that patients have the right to refuse treatments preferred by their hospital and receive medical treatments withheld by the hospital, even though they are necessary. These rights can be transferred to the Principal’s Healthcare agent, if the Principal becomes unable to make the medical decisions himself.
The plain meaning analysis of this statute under this Court’s settled precedents, is that these rights are not mere suggestions, but convey and protect actual rights….
Even though Mueller had correctly stated at the beginning that this case was not a discussion on the proper treatment for Covid, nevertheless, a discussion on ivermectin commenced. Justice Jill J. Karofsky engaged in a line of questioning that coincides with the mainstream narrative that ivermectin is unsafe per the CDC and FDA for the treatment of Covid, that anecdotal stories to the contrary cannot be trusted, and that it is a drug for parasites. Justice Rebecca Bradley said, “Perhaps to expedite this line of questioning, there is in fact a study, Appendix B of the Amicus File by the Veterans of Liberty Law Firm ‘Review of Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Covid-19.’”
(It’s also worth noting that the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons [AAPS] and the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance [FLCCC] both submitted an Amicus Brief on behalf of Allen Gahl and the Standard of Care and included the efficacy and safety of ivermectin. In October of 2021, on the second day of the Waukesha trail court case Allen Gahl v Aurora, FLCCC co-founder Dr. Pierre Kory was there, prepared to testify.)
On January 17 of this year, in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Justice Patience Roggensack weighed in on the ongoing ivermectin discussion, stating that she has read that Africa has had a very low Covid rate, and most of their people are on ivermectin prophylactically for parasites, and the article “suggested that was another reason we should look more carefully at using ivermectin.”
Attorney Mueller noted and read from the NIH (National Institute of Health) chart 2E, pages 333-334, which lists remdesivir as the first treatment for Covid-19 and states that its safety concerns are renal [kidney] and liver toxicity; and lists ivermectin as the second treatment for Covid-19 and describes its safety concerns as “generally well-tolerated.”
A day later, Vicki McKenna of WISN Radio interviewed Attorney Karen Mueller. Vicki McKenna asks (starting at the 43-minute mark),
Does that make sense to anybody? To deny access to a completely safe drug — we’re talking end of life risk here – completely safe, and instead you want to toxify his kidneys so that he has a harder time surviving ventilation?… Ivermectin is very safe, The National Institute of Health says it’s very safe….
Why don’t you explain to us, like we’re 5, why it’s better to give the guy the thing that’s going to shoot his kidneys rather than give him a drug that at worst, won’t help him?
Attorney Karen Mueller answered,
It makes no sense. The whole thing is nonsensical, unless you understand there is something going on here… That there are Covid-19 protocols that are coming out of the Federal government, and they’re coming out through Medicare and Medicaid, and so these are policies that are being set in the federal government, and basically the hospital makes deals with them … that if you’re going to get your Medicare reimbursement, then you will follow these Covid policies. And I have a number of witnesses, not necessarily in that hospital, but other hospitals, that have said the doctors have told the family on the sly that they will lose their job if they give the ivermectin.
Back in courtroom, Justice Rebecca F. Dallet questioned how can a court be expected to get between the doctor and the patient? And Attorney Mueller pointed out that in reality the federal government has stepped between the doctor and the patient with this CMS protocol.
Although she was not able to continue due to being asked another question in another vein, paramount to this case is the Inherent power of the court to intervene for the life of a patient, which is a fundamental right protected under our Wisconsin Constitution.
Power of Attorney
Attorney Mueller stood firmly on the fact that the Healthcare POA is central to this case, because Mr. Gahl is the POA, and the one who brought the lawsuit.
Justice Ann Walsh Bradley asked Mueller questions about 155.30 first paragraph, on the second page of the POA. She pointed out that the section didn’t say “request” or “demand” another treatment but only words that would stop a treatment, to which Mueller answered that we should not skip the first page of the POA, because it is crucial in requesting “necessary” treatment. In fact, Attorney Mueller clearly explained that even if she customized a personalized POA for a client, she would still be required by WI Stat. 155.30 (2) to give the first page of statutory rights or sign off that she told the client all of his or her rights (from the first page). Only the first page.
The first page of the Statutory Form on POA 155.30(1) states:
Notice to Person making this Document
You have the right to make decisions about your health care.
No health care may be given to you over your objection,
and necessary health care may not be stopped or withheld if you object.
Right to Try
During his allotted time, Aurora’s Attorney, Jason J. Franckowiak, talked about Right to Try, even though the case wasn’t based on it. He stated that Right to Try “would have no bearing on this case,” that it has very narrow restrictions, and that ivermectin would not fall under its parameters. The clear message he conveyed was that even if the court wanted to use it, it wouldn’t apply in this case.
Although no Justice brought this up, my thoughts ran along this vein while Franckowiak was speaking:
Of course, Ivermectin would not be placed in the experimental drug category of a Right to Try, as it has been FDA approved for 36 years, used safely in babies, pregnant women, handicapped, immunocompromised, the elderly, and those in between. Because of ivermectin’s widespread success, the two scientists who discovered it were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2015. “Forty percent of drugs used in hospitals are used off-label. Dr. [Peter] McCullough uses off-label drugs every single day in his career. That’s fine if you’re treating heart disease, but suddenly, if it’s Coronavirus? The FDA, the CDC, the NIH do not want you to use an off-label drug because it would compete with Big Pharma,” according to FLCCC co-founder Dr. Paul Marik.
Justice Brian Hagedorn asked Attorney Mueller if she is relying on the Right to Try. She replied that they were related to the extent that it reveals the Legislature’s Intent to prolong and protect life, but it does not directly apply here. (It does not apply to an approved, albeit off-label drug).
Personal Note From Attorney Mueller
One of the points of the case that the Aurora Attorney and some of the justices drilled down on was the credibility of the outside doctor (who was to administer the ivermectin) asking a plethora of quick questions in succession that appeared to be the weak point of the case. As soon as Mueller was done answering the exact questions, she said, “Your Honor —,” so she could highlight and literally show the court the physical order that proved the doctor she was just questioned about was no longer the prescription-writing doctor, but she immediately was asked another question in a different vein that she needed to answer.
So in my interview with Attorney Karen Mueller on January 18th, she said she would like our readers to know the following.
The consent order for the ivermectin from the hospital took away all of the arguments that two of the Justices were making about the original doctor, because he was no longer involved. The [Waukesha] Circuit Court modified the Ivermectin order and then both parties agreed to it. Aurora had already started credentialing the new doctor. There was a new doctor agreed to, in order to examine the patient, have access to his medical records, and determine and adjust the Ivermectin dosage that was needed. It [would have] changed everything they had said [in the Supreme Court] about the original doctor [who was changed during the original trial court timeframe], who was out of the picture when the Appeals Court came in.
The proposed order that we were waiting for the judge to sign is in evidence. So they did have it, even though it was never signed because the Appellate Court stayed it.
Towards the end of Mueller’s five-minute rebuttal, the following exchange took place.
Justice Hagedorn: “You did not argue the Right to Try Statute before us at all, it wasn’t one of the three grounds that you raised, you’re not relying on that, correct?”
Mueller: “The Right to Try matters regarding the spirit, and that comes down to Legislative Intent, primarily of 155.30 (2), because we’re talking about the Legislature wanting to make sure that patients had the ability to ask for and to receive treatment, that may not be preferred by the hospitals, if it was necessary —”
Justice Karofsky: “How do we know that from the language in the Statute?…We’re supposed to read the Statute, then we’re supposed to read the words in the Statute, and interpret the Statute based on the words in the Statute, and you’re asking us take a leap from what the words in the Statute say to what you are telling us the Intent of the Legislature was.”
Mueller: “The Appeals Court did make that leap and they made a determination that those words were only informative and instructive, when in fact they were directly part of the Legislative Intent. That first page of the Statutory form is required, when any hospital or any other healthcare agency hands them out to people, so that The People, the people of Wisconsin know what they can expect if they are ever in a situation where they need a healthcare agent to make the decisions for them, and this Statute informs them they have those rights. And —”
Justice Dallet: “Has this argument been successful in any Appellate Court in the Country?”
Mueller: “It has not been. And what I would say to that, Your Honor, respectfully, is that we don’t live in Texas. Or Pennsylvania. Or any other state. This is a Statute that was formed by the Legislature in Wisconsin, and the people of Wisconsin would ask that you clarify what the meaning is here so that they understand if they have any ability to ask for care when they go to the Hospital.”
The People of Wisconsin say Amen!
Aurora’s Attorney Franckowiak and some of the Justices were more concerned that the statute wasn’t specifically cited by the original circuit (trial) court, rather than discussing the weightier matter of whether the rights in the WI Healthcare Statute of POA were being upheld. Because Allen Gahl was Power of Attorney, it gave him standing to knock on the door of the court, and the judge had recognized that in the first trial, the circuit court.
Basis in the Law
Exchanges between the Hospital’s Attorney Franckowiak and Justice Rebecca Bradley several minutes before the end of the court case are extraordinary.
Justice Rebecca Bradley asked Attorney Franckowiak:
Counsel, is there anything in the law that requires the Trial Court Judge to identify the particular law, because in the transcript, and I’m going to quote from it, the Circuit Court says, ‘This Court has a significant respect for an individual’s right to choose, and choose their treatment.’ And of course this is expressed [in] Martins v Richards, which was cited by the Dissent…that case identified the right for them to make their own healthcare decisions for patients, the right to informed consent, which means that physicians must disclose what a reasonable person in the patient’s position would want to know, and finally, the right to request and receive medically viable alternative treatments and have that choice respected by her or his doctor. Of course, there was a great debate among the experts presented to the Circuit Court in this case about whether the proposed treatment was medically viable, but there was testimony to the effect that the treatment was medically viable.
So is it enough that the Circuit Court said “This Court has a significant respect for an individual’s right to choose, and choose their treatment, which has a basis in the Law?”
Franckowiak responded by saying:
Your Honor, I would note that my time is up.
He seemed relieved he wouldn’t have to answer and then flustered when he was asked to answer the question. He said:
In this particular case, it would be the contention of the hospital that the Trial Court erroneously exercised its discretion to the extent that it did consider any of the affidavits submitted by Mr. ____ [microphone fails here]. Not properly submitted, they did not have any patient-specific documentation in them, therefore reliance upon those affidavits to establish that this [ivermectin] was a potentially medically viable treatment, to which there was a reasonable choice [note: the “reasonable choice” offered by the hospital was the ventilator or hospice], would not be an appropriate exercise of discretion by the Trial Court in the first instance.
Justice Rebecca Bradley asked Aurora’s Attorney Franckowiak:
Since you’re talking about the status quo, it’s important to define what is the status quo? I’m seeing two different perspectives from the parties…the doctors at the hospital basically said, “There’s nothing more we can do, we’ll keep him on a ventilator and provide palliative care to keep him comfortable.” There was nothing offered to him, the other side is saying, “Look he has a right to try,” that’s a law that was invoked by the Appellate Court Dissent. So what is the status quo from your perspective?
We would take the position that the status quo at the time of the petition was that Mr. Zingsheim was being treated by a team of four different specialties including critical care, including pulmonary medicine, 24 hrs per day, supported by the nursing staff, under a protocol that the treatment team had decided, based upon the evidence, and based upon the medical condition and his current clinical condition. They were treating under that treatment plan, and that treatment plan did not include ivermectin. That was the status quo at the time, so when the judge actually made his decision in this case and initially granted the injunction, he was actually not preserving the status quo, he was actually, actively upsetting the status quo…. The treatment team was now being required to administer ivermectin, and a change in the treatment plan —
Justice Rebecca Bradley interjected:
That’s disrupting the status quo for Aurora, but it’s not disrupting the status quo for Mr. Zingsheim, who is trying to live, right? The status quo for him was he was alive, and they were trying to keep him alive.
Sweet Nectar from the Throne Room of Heaven. Other things recede into the background, including whether the trial court cited everything that led to its decisions, or whether the efficacy of ivermectin is even an issue here. It all fades, as the essence of the spirit of our Founding Fathers’ Declaration whispers through the centuries and permeates the courtroom that Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness must be defended. All of these God-given, constitutionally protected rights are on the line in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, not just for John Zingsheim, but for every Wisconsinite. I would ask you to join me in prayer that the Wisconsin Supreme Court justices decide to uphold our liberties, because if we can’t make our own healthcare decisions, and if we can’t fight for those we love, then individual liberty is swallowed alive into the tomb of the collective.
Dominique Uhl is a wife and mother who is passionate her children not only grow up free, but that her future descendants are born free. She is dedicated to preserving our Constitution & rights as the Founders intended. In a culture teeming with lies and danger, she writes to share truth, preserve freedom, and save lives.
The above article originated in The New American https://thenewamerican.com/rights-of-the-patient-under-fire-in-wisconsins-supreme-court/
People across WI, including my family, protested for John’s life in front of the Aurora hospital in Oconomowoc. Christians across America prayed. Thank you to everyone on my email list who joined in our prayers for John. Through a series of miraculous events, John Zingsheim shared he was secretly given Ivermectin and with all the prayers going up on his behalf, beat the odds and survived the NIH protocol and the hospital’s treatment for over ten months, more than a 100 of those days on the Ventilator, captive within their walls.
John’s case, Allen Gahl v Aurora Health Care Inc, has now come before the WI Supreme Court and Attorney Karen Mueller will present oral arguments this Tuesday, January 17th. You can watch it for free on livestream at https://wiseye.org/. There are 3 cases being heard that morning, ours is the 2nd case, estimated to start around 11am, but in case they’re running early, I’d aim to be watching by 10:30 am central time.
“That story about Jesus Christ being the Son of God and rising from the dead? That’s fake news.”
“Covid is critical, because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize TOTAL BIOMETRIC SURVEILLANCE. We want to stop this epidemic? We need not just to monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin. Humans are now hackable animals…” — Yuval Noah Harari
“That story about Jesus Christ being the Son of God and rising from the dead? That’s fake news.”
“Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. NOT the intelligent design of some God above the clouds, but OUR intelligent design, and the intelligent design of our clouds, the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud, THESE are the new driving forces of evolution.”
“Data might enable human Elites to do something even more radical than just build digital dictatorships. By hacking organisms, Elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself. Because once you can hack something, you can usually also engineer it. And if indeed we succeed in hacking and engineering life, this will be, not just the greatest revolution in the history of humanity, this will be the greatest revolution in biology since the beginning of life 4 billion years ago.“Now humans are developing even bigger powers than ever before – we are really acquiring divine powers of creation and destruction. We are really upgrading humans into gods, we are acquiring, for instance, the power to reengineer life.
“The big political and economic question of the 21st Century will be, ‘What do we need humans for?’ or at least, ‘What do we need so many humans for?’ At present, the best guess we have is, ‘keep them happy with drugs and computer games.'”
“Freedom has absolutely NO meaning…it’s just another myth, another empty term, that humans have invented. Humans have invented God, and humans have invented Heaven and Hell, and humans have even invented free will.
“Humans are now hackable animals, you know the whole idea that humans have this soul or spirit and they have free will, and nobody knows what is happening inside me, whatever I choose, whether in the election, or whether in the supermarket, is my free will? That’s OVER.”
*Yuval Noah Harari –“Covid is critical, because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize TOTAL BIOMETRIC SURVEILLANCE. We want to stop this epidemic? We need not just to monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin.
“We now see mass surveillance systems established even in democratic countries, which previously rejected this, and we also see a change in the nature of surveillance. Previously, surveillance was mainly above the skin, now it’s going under the skin. Governments want to know, not just where we go, or who we meet – ABOVE ALL, they want to know what is happening under our skin. What’s our body temperature? What’s our blood pressure? What is our medical condition?”
“People could look back in a hundred years and identify the coronavirus epidemic as the MOMENT when a new regime of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin, which I think is maybe the most important development of the 21st Century is this ability to hack human beings, to go under the skin, collect biometric data, analyse it, and understand people better than they understand themselves. This, I believe is maybe the most important event of the 21st Century.
*Journalist Alex Newman weighs in on Yuval Noah Harari and their transhumanist agenda“Using this mRNA technology – in fact, the very same technology that they use in the injections that they’ve deployed under the guise of keeping us safe from Covid-19 (they very misleadingly call them “vaccinations” quote-un-quote), but this is the same technology..“The Chief Scientist there [Moderna] says this really represents the hacking of life because we’re now able to hijack biological systems and give them new instructions. So instead of these systems responding to the genetic instructions that GOD wrote when He wrote our DNA, when He wrote our genetic code, these are now PEOPLE who are writing these instructions and are able to then hijack our biological systems, whether that be the protein factories in our cells or even Macrosystem, and get them to do what they want, so this is the terminology that they’re using..“For a time, if you went to the Moderna’s website, they talked about this new injection they had developed as implanting a new operation system into your body. So we need to understand these people are not messing around. When they say these things, we need to listen.”
*Klaus Schwab, Chairman of the World Economic Forum, smiles as he says,“It changes YOU, if you take a genetic editing, just as an example.It’s YOU who are changed, and of course this has a big impact on your identity.”[interviewer] “When you began to do that kind of gene editing, some people worried that you were changing what it means to be human.”“Of course. The new industrial revolution offers many opportunities, but it raises manifold questions on the ethical but even legal implications. And we have to be prepared for it, that’s what we want to do in Davos next year.”
*Dr Zev Zelenko –“Their strategy [covid genetic injections] does a lot of things except treat Covid-19. It basically propagates reduction of the population, it leads to really surveillance 24/7 kind of enslavement, and there’s this transhumanist gene editing component to this which converts from being made in the image of God to being made in the image of Bill Gates.”
“Totalitarian tyrannical governments try to suppress houses of worship and belief in God, because if I believe in God and bow down to Him, I’m not going to bow down to them. And so they use fear as a tactic to sway human consciousness to be co-dependent in a cultish way on the workings of man, and on sociopathic oligarchs, and corrupt governments.”.“This is the biggest risk of genocide in the history of humanity. The true answer is they knew exactly what they were doing…that’s their objective here. It’s called the New World Order, but it’s really nothing more than a rebranding of the Oldest World Order of idolatry, paganism, and child sacrifice. What we’re seeing here is not a new war, but a replay of a Biblical narrative that started in the Garden of Eden.”
*Yuval Noah Harari –“I know that in recent years, we saw populist politicians undermining DELIBERATELY the trust that people have in important institutions like universities, like respectable media outlets, these populist politicians told people that scientists are this small ELITE, disconnected from the real people, you shouldn’t believe them. And you had all these conspiracy theories, that climate change is just a hoax, it’s not real, and that the earth, it’s actually flat, and that vaccinations are bad for you. But I don’t think it’s too late, especially in an emergency, people can change their views very fast and they can find hidden reservoirs of trust..“You look in this crisis, who do people trust? They trust scientists above EVERYTHING else, in ALL countries. In Israel, they closed down the synagogues, in Iran, they closed the mosques, churches all over the world are telling people, don’t come to church, the pope is doing all his sermons on zoom, or youtube. And why do they do all this? Because the scientists recommended it. Even the religious leaders have trust in the scientists..“And the easiest people to manipulate are the people who believe in free will, because you manipulate them, and they don’t even suspect, because ‘Hey, I chose it because it’s my free will.'”
His article link also includes a segment from Oct 2019 Event 201, the global pandemic exercise.
They don’t want the same people in, aren’t happy with them, but somehow they keep getting in.”
I loved that Elayna hit the ball out of the park in answering Knodl. And what did he respond–that she dodged the question and would make a good politician someday? I couldn’t figure out if he didn’t understand that she answered the question, or he didn’t want to admit it.”
To understand the time-frame of the day:
The prudent man forseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” Prov 22:3
“You will never know how much it has cost my generation
to preserve your freedom.
I hope you will make good use of it.”
The world still believes in the American experiment in self-governance. The Davos oligarchs [World Economic Forum] have demonstrated their gross incompetence to all the world over the last 2 years. They have neither right nor ability to govern America and Americans. We are a free people. And we have governed ourselves for almost 250 years now based on a Constitution developed by self-reliant farmers, tradesmen, shop owners, and landholders. These forefathers rejected a foreign monarchy and oligarchy and instead created and fought for a political structure which remains an inspiration for the world… a shining city on the hill…This is OUR country. We own this amazing gift. But we must defend it if we wish to keep it.– Dr. Robert Malone speech at the DC Rally on Jan 23, 2022, 10 days ago
Prov 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
Dear Representative,Representative Theisfeldt asked me at the public hearing on AJR 77,“How is it a violation of our Oath of Office to use a legitimate provision within the Constitution?”
Here is the rest of my answer:While technically, your application to Congress is a Constitutional procedure, you are misinterpreting – and misusing it. You believe that YOU, the State Legislature, will rein in the federal government through the Convention process and YOU will be in charge of every aspect of Convention AND the ratification process.That. Is. Not. Article V.You’ve constructed something in your mind that is not true, doubtless placed there by the lies and flattery of the lobbyists. It seems you have erected, so to speak, an Article V in your own image, your own likeness, to suit your own ideas of the states being in charge, under the pretense of invoking the Founding Fathers’ Constitutional provision.Let me tell you what the REAL Article V state application says it is – the trigger to put Congress. In. Charge.——————Again, an Article V state application is the trigger to put Congress in charge of calling a Convention, who will doubtless form a new Constitution and a new government. That IS what it’s there for, the Founders recognized it is our right to alter or abolish and establish new government. None of us want THIS Congress or their handlers doing that.If you go ahead and STILL vote in favor of AJR 77 or other Convention applications, which is the trigger to put Congress in charge, I’m not sure what your motives could possibly be, but by process of elimination, it can’t be to protect the Constitution, can it? Also interesting to note, every Wisconsinite from across our state registered AGAINST and spoke AGAINST AJR 77, you had not one in favor of AJR 77.So yes, you are putting our Constitution in great peril. That is NOT protecting our Constitution, and I firmly believe that IS violating your oath of office, and that is why I CANNOT withdraw my statement.My brother put it well when he talked about those of you voting in favor of convention resolutions,“They are directly ignoring the indirect destruction of the Constitution.”– Brian Bakash, WI
Chair Wichgers brought up another point that I think needs to be addressed. Establishing “Intent”.The State legislature is forever assuring us the Convention will be safe, limited, controlled, accountable because they are establishing INTENT with attorneys.So what?What good is establishing INTENT for the states to be in charge, when the rock of the Constitution clearly states Congress IS in charge?At the Assembly hearing, legislative counsel admitted:“There is legal uncertainty about whether those expressionsof the legislature’s intent from the statewould carry the day over, you know,competing with a call by Congress stating something else.”There’s nothing uncertain about it. Congress will carry the day.Article 1, Section 1All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.Article 1, Section 8The Congress shall have power…To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the forgoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.Article 5,“The CONGRESS… shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which…shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by…legislatures of three-fourths of the several states OR by conventions in three-fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the CONGRESS”And Congress has been writing & holding hearings about how they would run a Constitutional Convention for 60 years in the Congressional Research Report. 1378 pages.https://camppictures.s3.amazonaws.com/CampArchive/Downloads/1979+96-77+Constitutional+Convention+Procedures.pdfThey know they will be in charge. Make no mistake.Please work to rescind the Convention applications Congress already has from WI and kill any future convention applications in committee.”My name and address
I think it’s downright creepy how these Covid vaccines are being shoved down our throats – but it is also downright creepy how ANY and EVERY angle is being tried to get this Convention called.” Theresa Henderson, WI
As one of my fellow defenders of the Constitution says,“Storm the gates of Heaven with your prayers that the out-of-state bad actors don’t recruit all 34 States!”
Let us face reality.The Framers have simply been too shrewd for us.They have outwitted us.They designed separate institutions thatcannot be unified by mechanical linkages and frail bridge tinkering.If we are to turn the Founders upside down
we must directly confront
the Constitutional structure they erected.“
[Council on Foreign Relations] Robert P. George, a Member of [Mark Meckler’s] Convention of States Legal Advisory Board, has co-authored a new “conservative” Constitutionwhich grants massive powers to a new federal government and imposes gun control!” – Publius Huldah https://www.thestandardsc.org/joanna-r-martin/cos-board-member-drafted-new-constitution-that-imposes-gun-control/
“And since any new Constitution will have its own new mode of ratification (such as a national referendum), it’s sure to be approved.” – Publius Huldah
Prov 22:28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
Show me the data! Show me what’s in the shot, the lot numbers, I don’t care what you SAY, SHOW ME THE DATA – If we can get some data, we can start to heal these people – as long as there’s breath, there’s life.” BRILLIANT scientist Dr. Judy Mikovits
I’ve been through outbreak after outbreak – I’ve never seen anything like this: integration, harmonization, and enforcement. It is overtly authoritarian and it’s coming down from above, and its coordinated, and they’ve developed a bunch of different vehicles to reinforce this dominant narrative and make it so no other information is available to people so that people behave the way that the Health and Human Services and World Health Organization want them to behave. This is behavior control. It’s really psyops, is what’s happening, it’s applied psychological operations to control people and their behavior so they will accept these products, which are still experimental, based on technology that has never been deployed at this level, and as the data are coming out, it becomes more and more clear that these products are NOT completely safe…“The entire HHS system has been corrupted. The system is deeply corrupted and can no longer be counted on to perform its intended function. Then we go to a higher level, the media is corrupted and coordinated, the government is corrupted and coordinated…with the pharmaceutical industry basically buying access to the Hill and the regulatory capture we’ve seen across multiple agencies.“With the decisions that the pharmaceutical industry advocated for… that the FDA would be funded largely, directly, by fees from the Pharmaceutical industry – has created a situation in which they’re dependent on that Pharmaceutical money.In the case of CDC, it has a dual function, it’s there to promote the industry and to regulate the industry. It promotes vaccines, it’s a specific part of its mandate, and yet it also has the mission to regulate and oversee the safety of vaccines. Those two are in conflict. (And the mission that is more highly funded at the CDC is ‘promoting vaccination’).”
I got a lot of whistleblowers…these are heros. This is the only hope that we have because the government is so corrupt and lying so badly, we would never have it [proof].” Attorney Tom Renz
Do not be afraid of the truth. Face it head on with power, love, and a sound mind. Too much is at stake to ignore the evidence presented in this series of the lies, lies, dances of deceit.
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation,
continuing instant in prayer”“God hath not given us the spirit of fear,
but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.”“The truth shall make you free.”“Jesus Christ is the same
yesterday, today, and forever.”“Jesus saith unto him,I am the way, the truth, and the life.
No man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”